Proving the product rule for polynomials without limits or derivative rulesApostol Calculus Vol.1 Exercise 9 , Chapter 1.5 (Prove property of polynomial function)If something holds for n+1 distinct values then it holds for all values.Proving a property of polynomialShow that $(1+a_1x+ldots+a_rx^r)^k=1+x+x^r+1q(x)$Generalization of the derivative to polynomial ringsinduction with remaindersProve that $R(n) =frac2nsum_k=0^n-1 (R(k))+c$ is $R(n) = n*c$Proving by induction that order of the product is equal to the product of the ordersExpressing Laurent polynomials using generators and relationsPolynomial Length upper boundProving the connection between the Binomial Theorem and the product rule for derivatives

Do US professors/group leaders only get a salary, but no group budget?

Do I need to be arrogant to get ahead?

Recruiter wants very extensive technical details about all of my previous work

Maths symbols and unicode-math input inside siunitx commands

Print last inputted byte

Would it be believable to defy demographics in a story?

What favor did Moody owe Dumbledore?

How is the partial sum of a geometric sequence calculated?

Why is there so much iron?

How can an organ that provides biological immortality be unable to regenerate?

Should I use acronyms in dialogues before telling the readers what it stands for in fiction?

Hausdorff dimension of the boundary of fibres of Lipschitz maps

If "dar" means "to give", what does "daros" mean?

Light propagating through a sound wave

Is it true that good novels will automatically sell themselves on Amazon (and so on) and there is no need for one to waste time promoting?

Should I be concerned about student access to a test bank?

What exactly term 'companion plants' means?

Deletion of copy-ctor & copy-assignment - public, private or protected?

Practical application of matrices and determinants

Brake pads destroying wheels

When did antialiasing start being available?

What can I do if I am asked to learn different programming languages very frequently?

What does "^L" mean in C?

HP P840 HDD RAID 5 many strange drive failures



Proving the product rule for polynomials without limits or derivative rules


Apostol Calculus Vol.1 Exercise 9 , Chapter 1.5 (Prove property of polynomial function)If something holds for n+1 distinct values then it holds for all values.Proving a property of polynomialShow that $(1+a_1x+ldots+a_rx^r)^k=1+x+x^r+1q(x)$Generalization of the derivative to polynomial ringsinduction with remaindersProve that $R(n) =frac2nsum_k=0^n-1 (R(k))+c$ is $R(n) = n*c$Proving by induction that order of the product is equal to the product of the ordersExpressing Laurent polynomials using generators and relationsPolynomial Length upper boundProving the connection between the Binomial Theorem and the product rule for derivatives













1












$begingroup$


As I said in the title, in the book where this exercise was proposed, derivatives or limits were not introduced yet. The exercise was to show that given the function $':mathbbC[x]rightarrow mathbbC[x]$ I should show that $(fg)'=f'g+fg'$



$f'(x)$ was defined as $sum_k=1^nka_kx^k-1$ where $f(x)=sum_k=0^na_kx^k$.



I have found out that an equivalent representation for $f'(x)$ is $sum_k=0^n-1(k+1)a_k+1x^k$



I have tried to prove the result myself step by step but there must be an error somewhere in the proof because in the end the result does not fit the bill.



$fg=sum_k=0^m+nc_kx^k$ with $c_k=sum_r+s=ka_rb_s$



$(fg)'=sum_j=0^m+n-1(j+1)c_j+1x^j$



$f=sum_r=0^na_rx^r$



$f'=sum_r=0^n-1(r+1)a_r+1x^r$



$g=sum_s=0^mb_sx^s$



$g'=sum_s=0^m-1(s+1)b_s+1x^s$



$f'g=sum_j=0^m+n-1c'_jx^j$, with $c'_j=sum_r+s=j(r+1)a_r+1b_s$



$fg'=sum_j=0^m+n-1c''_jx^j$, with $c''_j=sum_r+s=ja_r(s+1)b_s+1$



I have tried to prove by induction that for every $j$ we have



$c'_j+c''_j=(j+1)c_j+1$



but I failed to show that the coefficients of both polynomials are equal. Where is the mistake? Can somebody give me a hint please?



The Problem is the induction step; I don't know how I can use the induction hypothesis to my advantage; I have made the induction over $j$ and I could Show it for $j=0$ and $j=1$ (just to be sure):



The claim is



$$(j+1)sum_r+s=j+1a_rb_s=sum_r+s=j(r+1)a_r+1b_s+sum_r+s=ja_r(s+1)b_s+1$$



I also know that $(j+1)sum_r+s=j+1a_rb_s=(j+1)sum_r=0^j+1a_rb_j+1-r$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Try proving it first for monomials (the case $f(x) = x^r$, $g(x) = x^s$) and then use linearity to prove the general case.
    $endgroup$
    – Jair Taylor
    Mar 12 at 21:08















1












$begingroup$


As I said in the title, in the book where this exercise was proposed, derivatives or limits were not introduced yet. The exercise was to show that given the function $':mathbbC[x]rightarrow mathbbC[x]$ I should show that $(fg)'=f'g+fg'$



$f'(x)$ was defined as $sum_k=1^nka_kx^k-1$ where $f(x)=sum_k=0^na_kx^k$.



I have found out that an equivalent representation for $f'(x)$ is $sum_k=0^n-1(k+1)a_k+1x^k$



I have tried to prove the result myself step by step but there must be an error somewhere in the proof because in the end the result does not fit the bill.



$fg=sum_k=0^m+nc_kx^k$ with $c_k=sum_r+s=ka_rb_s$



$(fg)'=sum_j=0^m+n-1(j+1)c_j+1x^j$



$f=sum_r=0^na_rx^r$



$f'=sum_r=0^n-1(r+1)a_r+1x^r$



$g=sum_s=0^mb_sx^s$



$g'=sum_s=0^m-1(s+1)b_s+1x^s$



$f'g=sum_j=0^m+n-1c'_jx^j$, with $c'_j=sum_r+s=j(r+1)a_r+1b_s$



$fg'=sum_j=0^m+n-1c''_jx^j$, with $c''_j=sum_r+s=ja_r(s+1)b_s+1$



I have tried to prove by induction that for every $j$ we have



$c'_j+c''_j=(j+1)c_j+1$



but I failed to show that the coefficients of both polynomials are equal. Where is the mistake? Can somebody give me a hint please?



The Problem is the induction step; I don't know how I can use the induction hypothesis to my advantage; I have made the induction over $j$ and I could Show it for $j=0$ and $j=1$ (just to be sure):



The claim is



$$(j+1)sum_r+s=j+1a_rb_s=sum_r+s=j(r+1)a_r+1b_s+sum_r+s=ja_r(s+1)b_s+1$$



I also know that $(j+1)sum_r+s=j+1a_rb_s=(j+1)sum_r=0^j+1a_rb_j+1-r$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Try proving it first for monomials (the case $f(x) = x^r$, $g(x) = x^s$) and then use linearity to prove the general case.
    $endgroup$
    – Jair Taylor
    Mar 12 at 21:08













1












1








1


1



$begingroup$


As I said in the title, in the book where this exercise was proposed, derivatives or limits were not introduced yet. The exercise was to show that given the function $':mathbbC[x]rightarrow mathbbC[x]$ I should show that $(fg)'=f'g+fg'$



$f'(x)$ was defined as $sum_k=1^nka_kx^k-1$ where $f(x)=sum_k=0^na_kx^k$.



I have found out that an equivalent representation for $f'(x)$ is $sum_k=0^n-1(k+1)a_k+1x^k$



I have tried to prove the result myself step by step but there must be an error somewhere in the proof because in the end the result does not fit the bill.



$fg=sum_k=0^m+nc_kx^k$ with $c_k=sum_r+s=ka_rb_s$



$(fg)'=sum_j=0^m+n-1(j+1)c_j+1x^j$



$f=sum_r=0^na_rx^r$



$f'=sum_r=0^n-1(r+1)a_r+1x^r$



$g=sum_s=0^mb_sx^s$



$g'=sum_s=0^m-1(s+1)b_s+1x^s$



$f'g=sum_j=0^m+n-1c'_jx^j$, with $c'_j=sum_r+s=j(r+1)a_r+1b_s$



$fg'=sum_j=0^m+n-1c''_jx^j$, with $c''_j=sum_r+s=ja_r(s+1)b_s+1$



I have tried to prove by induction that for every $j$ we have



$c'_j+c''_j=(j+1)c_j+1$



but I failed to show that the coefficients of both polynomials are equal. Where is the mistake? Can somebody give me a hint please?



The Problem is the induction step; I don't know how I can use the induction hypothesis to my advantage; I have made the induction over $j$ and I could Show it for $j=0$ and $j=1$ (just to be sure):



The claim is



$$(j+1)sum_r+s=j+1a_rb_s=sum_r+s=j(r+1)a_r+1b_s+sum_r+s=ja_r(s+1)b_s+1$$



I also know that $(j+1)sum_r+s=j+1a_rb_s=(j+1)sum_r=0^j+1a_rb_j+1-r$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




As I said in the title, in the book where this exercise was proposed, derivatives or limits were not introduced yet. The exercise was to show that given the function $':mathbbC[x]rightarrow mathbbC[x]$ I should show that $(fg)'=f'g+fg'$



$f'(x)$ was defined as $sum_k=1^nka_kx^k-1$ where $f(x)=sum_k=0^na_kx^k$.



I have found out that an equivalent representation for $f'(x)$ is $sum_k=0^n-1(k+1)a_k+1x^k$



I have tried to prove the result myself step by step but there must be an error somewhere in the proof because in the end the result does not fit the bill.



$fg=sum_k=0^m+nc_kx^k$ with $c_k=sum_r+s=ka_rb_s$



$(fg)'=sum_j=0^m+n-1(j+1)c_j+1x^j$



$f=sum_r=0^na_rx^r$



$f'=sum_r=0^n-1(r+1)a_r+1x^r$



$g=sum_s=0^mb_sx^s$



$g'=sum_s=0^m-1(s+1)b_s+1x^s$



$f'g=sum_j=0^m+n-1c'_jx^j$, with $c'_j=sum_r+s=j(r+1)a_r+1b_s$



$fg'=sum_j=0^m+n-1c''_jx^j$, with $c''_j=sum_r+s=ja_r(s+1)b_s+1$



I have tried to prove by induction that for every $j$ we have



$c'_j+c''_j=(j+1)c_j+1$



but I failed to show that the coefficients of both polynomials are equal. Where is the mistake? Can somebody give me a hint please?



The Problem is the induction step; I don't know how I can use the induction hypothesis to my advantage; I have made the induction over $j$ and I could Show it for $j=0$ and $j=1$ (just to be sure):



The claim is



$$(j+1)sum_r+s=j+1a_rb_s=sum_r+s=j(r+1)a_r+1b_s+sum_r+s=ja_r(s+1)b_s+1$$



I also know that $(j+1)sum_r+s=j+1a_rb_s=(j+1)sum_r=0^j+1a_rb_j+1-r$







polynomials complex-numbers induction






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 12 at 21:09









J. W. Tanner

3,3351320




3,3351320










asked Mar 12 at 20:12









New2MathNew2Math

12312




12312











  • $begingroup$
    Try proving it first for monomials (the case $f(x) = x^r$, $g(x) = x^s$) and then use linearity to prove the general case.
    $endgroup$
    – Jair Taylor
    Mar 12 at 21:08
















  • $begingroup$
    Try proving it first for monomials (the case $f(x) = x^r$, $g(x) = x^s$) and then use linearity to prove the general case.
    $endgroup$
    – Jair Taylor
    Mar 12 at 21:08















$begingroup$
Try proving it first for monomials (the case $f(x) = x^r$, $g(x) = x^s$) and then use linearity to prove the general case.
$endgroup$
– Jair Taylor
Mar 12 at 21:08




$begingroup$
Try proving it first for monomials (the case $f(x) = x^r$, $g(x) = x^s$) and then use linearity to prove the general case.
$endgroup$
– Jair Taylor
Mar 12 at 21:08










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

It is easier to not use coefficients at all - except that we initially check by straightforward computation
$$tag1 (f+g)'=f'+g',$$ $$tag2 (cf)'=cf',$$ $$tag3 (xf)'=f+f'.$$
$$tag 4c'=0$$
Let $Asubseteq Bbb C[x]$ be the set of polynomials $f$ with the property that $(fg)'=f'g+fg'$ for all polynomials $g$.



If $f_1,f_2in A$, then for every polynomial $g$,
$$beginalign((f_1+f_2)g)'&=(f_1g+f_2g)'\&=(f_1g)'+(f_2g)'&textby (1)\&=f_1g'+f_1'g+f_2g'+f_2'g\&=(f_1+f_2)g'+(f_1'+f_2')g\
&=(f_1+f_2)g'+(f_1+f_2)'g&textby (1)endalign $$

Thus,




$A$ is closed under addition.




Assume $f_1,f_2in A$. Then for any polynomial $g$,
$$beginalign
((f_1f_2)g)'&=(f_1(f_2g))'\
&=f_1'f_2g+f_1(f_2g)'\
&=f_1'f_2g+f_1(f_2'g+f_2g')\
&=(f_1'f_2+f_1f_2')g+f_1f_2g'.
endalign$$

We conclude that




$A$ is closed under multiplication.




From $(2)$ and $(4)$, we see that




$A$ contains all constants




and from $(3)$ (after verifying that in particular $x'=1$)




$xin A$.




Now observe that the four highlighted statements imply that $A=Bbb C[x]$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3145611%2fproving-the-product-rule-for-polynomials-without-limits-or-derivative-rules%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    It is easier to not use coefficients at all - except that we initially check by straightforward computation
    $$tag1 (f+g)'=f'+g',$$ $$tag2 (cf)'=cf',$$ $$tag3 (xf)'=f+f'.$$
    $$tag 4c'=0$$
    Let $Asubseteq Bbb C[x]$ be the set of polynomials $f$ with the property that $(fg)'=f'g+fg'$ for all polynomials $g$.



    If $f_1,f_2in A$, then for every polynomial $g$,
    $$beginalign((f_1+f_2)g)'&=(f_1g+f_2g)'\&=(f_1g)'+(f_2g)'&textby (1)\&=f_1g'+f_1'g+f_2g'+f_2'g\&=(f_1+f_2)g'+(f_1'+f_2')g\
    &=(f_1+f_2)g'+(f_1+f_2)'g&textby (1)endalign $$

    Thus,




    $A$ is closed under addition.




    Assume $f_1,f_2in A$. Then for any polynomial $g$,
    $$beginalign
    ((f_1f_2)g)'&=(f_1(f_2g))'\
    &=f_1'f_2g+f_1(f_2g)'\
    &=f_1'f_2g+f_1(f_2'g+f_2g')\
    &=(f_1'f_2+f_1f_2')g+f_1f_2g'.
    endalign$$

    We conclude that




    $A$ is closed under multiplication.




    From $(2)$ and $(4)$, we see that




    $A$ contains all constants




    and from $(3)$ (after verifying that in particular $x'=1$)




    $xin A$.




    Now observe that the four highlighted statements imply that $A=Bbb C[x]$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      3












      $begingroup$

      It is easier to not use coefficients at all - except that we initially check by straightforward computation
      $$tag1 (f+g)'=f'+g',$$ $$tag2 (cf)'=cf',$$ $$tag3 (xf)'=f+f'.$$
      $$tag 4c'=0$$
      Let $Asubseteq Bbb C[x]$ be the set of polynomials $f$ with the property that $(fg)'=f'g+fg'$ for all polynomials $g$.



      If $f_1,f_2in A$, then for every polynomial $g$,
      $$beginalign((f_1+f_2)g)'&=(f_1g+f_2g)'\&=(f_1g)'+(f_2g)'&textby (1)\&=f_1g'+f_1'g+f_2g'+f_2'g\&=(f_1+f_2)g'+(f_1'+f_2')g\
      &=(f_1+f_2)g'+(f_1+f_2)'g&textby (1)endalign $$

      Thus,




      $A$ is closed under addition.




      Assume $f_1,f_2in A$. Then for any polynomial $g$,
      $$beginalign
      ((f_1f_2)g)'&=(f_1(f_2g))'\
      &=f_1'f_2g+f_1(f_2g)'\
      &=f_1'f_2g+f_1(f_2'g+f_2g')\
      &=(f_1'f_2+f_1f_2')g+f_1f_2g'.
      endalign$$

      We conclude that




      $A$ is closed under multiplication.




      From $(2)$ and $(4)$, we see that




      $A$ contains all constants




      and from $(3)$ (after verifying that in particular $x'=1$)




      $xin A$.




      Now observe that the four highlighted statements imply that $A=Bbb C[x]$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        It is easier to not use coefficients at all - except that we initially check by straightforward computation
        $$tag1 (f+g)'=f'+g',$$ $$tag2 (cf)'=cf',$$ $$tag3 (xf)'=f+f'.$$
        $$tag 4c'=0$$
        Let $Asubseteq Bbb C[x]$ be the set of polynomials $f$ with the property that $(fg)'=f'g+fg'$ for all polynomials $g$.



        If $f_1,f_2in A$, then for every polynomial $g$,
        $$beginalign((f_1+f_2)g)'&=(f_1g+f_2g)'\&=(f_1g)'+(f_2g)'&textby (1)\&=f_1g'+f_1'g+f_2g'+f_2'g\&=(f_1+f_2)g'+(f_1'+f_2')g\
        &=(f_1+f_2)g'+(f_1+f_2)'g&textby (1)endalign $$

        Thus,




        $A$ is closed under addition.




        Assume $f_1,f_2in A$. Then for any polynomial $g$,
        $$beginalign
        ((f_1f_2)g)'&=(f_1(f_2g))'\
        &=f_1'f_2g+f_1(f_2g)'\
        &=f_1'f_2g+f_1(f_2'g+f_2g')\
        &=(f_1'f_2+f_1f_2')g+f_1f_2g'.
        endalign$$

        We conclude that




        $A$ is closed under multiplication.




        From $(2)$ and $(4)$, we see that




        $A$ contains all constants




        and from $(3)$ (after verifying that in particular $x'=1$)




        $xin A$.




        Now observe that the four highlighted statements imply that $A=Bbb C[x]$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        It is easier to not use coefficients at all - except that we initially check by straightforward computation
        $$tag1 (f+g)'=f'+g',$$ $$tag2 (cf)'=cf',$$ $$tag3 (xf)'=f+f'.$$
        $$tag 4c'=0$$
        Let $Asubseteq Bbb C[x]$ be the set of polynomials $f$ with the property that $(fg)'=f'g+fg'$ for all polynomials $g$.



        If $f_1,f_2in A$, then for every polynomial $g$,
        $$beginalign((f_1+f_2)g)'&=(f_1g+f_2g)'\&=(f_1g)'+(f_2g)'&textby (1)\&=f_1g'+f_1'g+f_2g'+f_2'g\&=(f_1+f_2)g'+(f_1'+f_2')g\
        &=(f_1+f_2)g'+(f_1+f_2)'g&textby (1)endalign $$

        Thus,




        $A$ is closed under addition.




        Assume $f_1,f_2in A$. Then for any polynomial $g$,
        $$beginalign
        ((f_1f_2)g)'&=(f_1(f_2g))'\
        &=f_1'f_2g+f_1(f_2g)'\
        &=f_1'f_2g+f_1(f_2'g+f_2g')\
        &=(f_1'f_2+f_1f_2')g+f_1f_2g'.
        endalign$$

        We conclude that




        $A$ is closed under multiplication.




        From $(2)$ and $(4)$, we see that




        $A$ contains all constants




        and from $(3)$ (after verifying that in particular $x'=1$)




        $xin A$.




        Now observe that the four highlighted statements imply that $A=Bbb C[x]$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Mar 12 at 22:02









        Hagen von EitzenHagen von Eitzen

        283k23272507




        283k23272507



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3145611%2fproving-the-product-rule-for-polynomials-without-limits-or-derivative-rules%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

            Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee

            Method to test if a number is a perfect power? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Detecting perfect squares faster than by extracting square rooteffective way to get the integer sequence A181392 from oeisA rarely mentioned fact about perfect powersHow many numbers such $n$ are there that $n<100,lfloorsqrtn rfloor mid n$Check perfect squareness by modulo division against multiple basesFor what pair of integers $(a,b)$ is $3^a + 7^b$ a perfect square.Do there exist any positive integers $n$ such that $lfloore^nrfloor$ is a perfect power? What is the probability that one exists?finding perfect power factors of an integerProve that the sequence contains a perfect square for any natural number $m $ in the domain of $f$ .Counting Perfect Powers