Excluding basis in tensor notationConversion of mixed tensors into mixed tensors and into covariant (or contravariant) onessum representation by/ determinant of elementary tensorsWhat is contracting a tensor actually doing?How to identifiy $V wedge V$ with the space of all alternating bilinear formsCoordinate-free notation for tensor contraction?How to represent matrix multiplication in tensor algebra?Question about abstract notation of Maxwell Stress TensorHow to interpret stress tensor as a contravariant second order tensorEquivalence between dual vectors and dual covectorsAre all bivectors in three dimensions simple?In what sense is the cross-product not a tensor?

What favor did Moody owe Dumbledore?

Why is there so much iron?

Is honey really a supersaturated solution? Does heating to un-crystalize redissolve it or melt it?

What is the significance behind "40 days" that often appears in the Bible?

Recruiter wants very extensive technical details about all of my previous work

Pronounciation of the combination "st" in spanish accents

What does Deadpool mean by "left the house in that shirt"?

Generic TVP tradeoffs?

If "dar" means "to give", what does "daros" mean?

How to terminate ping <dest> &

Optimising a list searching algorithm

How might a highly intelligent aquatic species (mermaids) communicate underwater?

Synchronized implementation of a bank account in Java

Practical application of matrices and determinants

Unfrosted light bulb

Do native speakers use "ultima" and "proxima" frequently in spoken English?

Worshiping one God at a time?

Can a wizard cast a spell during their first turn of combat if they initiated combat by releasing a readied spell?

Calculate the frequency of characters in a string

Can a medieval gyroplane be built?

What are substitutions for coconut in curry?

What is the relationship between relativity and the Doppler effect?

A Ri-diddley-iley Riddle

In what cases must I use 了 and in what cases not?



Excluding basis in tensor notation


Conversion of mixed tensors into mixed tensors and into covariant (or contravariant) onessum representation by/ determinant of elementary tensorsWhat is contracting a tensor actually doing?How to identifiy $V wedge V$ with the space of all alternating bilinear formsCoordinate-free notation for tensor contraction?How to represent matrix multiplication in tensor algebra?Question about abstract notation of Maxwell Stress TensorHow to interpret stress tensor as a contravariant second order tensorEquivalence between dual vectors and dual covectorsAre all bivectors in three dimensions simple?In what sense is the cross-product not a tensor?













0












$begingroup$


My question is: is there anywhere in tensors that we lose something by dropping the basis, or where it makes something more difficult? Like by saying the a tensor $T^ije_iotimes e_j$ is represented entirely by the notation $T^ij$?



Another thing, because there is only one i and j in the previous expression, does the summation convention kick in?



I heard this on the YouTube channel XylyXylyX (that's actually the name). Correct me if this is wrong because I've just started learning this myself.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    You might find part of this answer helpful.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Albanese
    Mar 12 at 21:13











  • $begingroup$
    @Michael Albanese Thanks, which part exactly?
    $endgroup$
    – Benjamin Thoburn
    Mar 14 at 8:50










  • $begingroup$
    @Michael Albanese also it's confusing me that in one case $T^ij$ is a tensor valued quantity and in the other it's a scalar quantity being summed over.
    $endgroup$
    – Benjamin Thoburn
    Mar 14 at 9:24










  • $begingroup$
    Basically all of it. $T^ij$ is not a tensor-valued quantity. As is mentioned in the answer below, $T^ij$ are the coefficients of the tensor with respect to a fixed basis of the vector space. If the basis changes, the coefficients change in a certain way. Often in physics, people regard the collection of coefficients $T^ij$, together with the knowledge of how it transforms under a change of basis, as the tensor itself.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Albanese
    Mar 14 at 14:03















0












$begingroup$


My question is: is there anywhere in tensors that we lose something by dropping the basis, or where it makes something more difficult? Like by saying the a tensor $T^ije_iotimes e_j$ is represented entirely by the notation $T^ij$?



Another thing, because there is only one i and j in the previous expression, does the summation convention kick in?



I heard this on the YouTube channel XylyXylyX (that's actually the name). Correct me if this is wrong because I've just started learning this myself.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    You might find part of this answer helpful.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Albanese
    Mar 12 at 21:13











  • $begingroup$
    @Michael Albanese Thanks, which part exactly?
    $endgroup$
    – Benjamin Thoburn
    Mar 14 at 8:50










  • $begingroup$
    @Michael Albanese also it's confusing me that in one case $T^ij$ is a tensor valued quantity and in the other it's a scalar quantity being summed over.
    $endgroup$
    – Benjamin Thoburn
    Mar 14 at 9:24










  • $begingroup$
    Basically all of it. $T^ij$ is not a tensor-valued quantity. As is mentioned in the answer below, $T^ij$ are the coefficients of the tensor with respect to a fixed basis of the vector space. If the basis changes, the coefficients change in a certain way. Often in physics, people regard the collection of coefficients $T^ij$, together with the knowledge of how it transforms under a change of basis, as the tensor itself.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Albanese
    Mar 14 at 14:03













0












0








0


1



$begingroup$


My question is: is there anywhere in tensors that we lose something by dropping the basis, or where it makes something more difficult? Like by saying the a tensor $T^ije_iotimes e_j$ is represented entirely by the notation $T^ij$?



Another thing, because there is only one i and j in the previous expression, does the summation convention kick in?



I heard this on the YouTube channel XylyXylyX (that's actually the name). Correct me if this is wrong because I've just started learning this myself.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




My question is: is there anywhere in tensors that we lose something by dropping the basis, or where it makes something more difficult? Like by saying the a tensor $T^ije_iotimes e_j$ is represented entirely by the notation $T^ij$?



Another thing, because there is only one i and j in the previous expression, does the summation convention kick in?



I heard this on the YouTube channel XylyXylyX (that's actually the name). Correct me if this is wrong because I've just started learning this myself.







tensors






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 14 at 8:53







Benjamin Thoburn

















asked Mar 12 at 20:00









Benjamin ThoburnBenjamin Thoburn

356313




356313











  • $begingroup$
    You might find part of this answer helpful.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Albanese
    Mar 12 at 21:13











  • $begingroup$
    @Michael Albanese Thanks, which part exactly?
    $endgroup$
    – Benjamin Thoburn
    Mar 14 at 8:50










  • $begingroup$
    @Michael Albanese also it's confusing me that in one case $T^ij$ is a tensor valued quantity and in the other it's a scalar quantity being summed over.
    $endgroup$
    – Benjamin Thoburn
    Mar 14 at 9:24










  • $begingroup$
    Basically all of it. $T^ij$ is not a tensor-valued quantity. As is mentioned in the answer below, $T^ij$ are the coefficients of the tensor with respect to a fixed basis of the vector space. If the basis changes, the coefficients change in a certain way. Often in physics, people regard the collection of coefficients $T^ij$, together with the knowledge of how it transforms under a change of basis, as the tensor itself.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Albanese
    Mar 14 at 14:03
















  • $begingroup$
    You might find part of this answer helpful.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Albanese
    Mar 12 at 21:13











  • $begingroup$
    @Michael Albanese Thanks, which part exactly?
    $endgroup$
    – Benjamin Thoburn
    Mar 14 at 8:50










  • $begingroup$
    @Michael Albanese also it's confusing me that in one case $T^ij$ is a tensor valued quantity and in the other it's a scalar quantity being summed over.
    $endgroup$
    – Benjamin Thoburn
    Mar 14 at 9:24










  • $begingroup$
    Basically all of it. $T^ij$ is not a tensor-valued quantity. As is mentioned in the answer below, $T^ij$ are the coefficients of the tensor with respect to a fixed basis of the vector space. If the basis changes, the coefficients change in a certain way. Often in physics, people regard the collection of coefficients $T^ij$, together with the knowledge of how it transforms under a change of basis, as the tensor itself.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Albanese
    Mar 14 at 14:03















$begingroup$
You might find part of this answer helpful.
$endgroup$
– Michael Albanese
Mar 12 at 21:13





$begingroup$
You might find part of this answer helpful.
$endgroup$
– Michael Albanese
Mar 12 at 21:13













$begingroup$
@Michael Albanese Thanks, which part exactly?
$endgroup$
– Benjamin Thoburn
Mar 14 at 8:50




$begingroup$
@Michael Albanese Thanks, which part exactly?
$endgroup$
– Benjamin Thoburn
Mar 14 at 8:50












$begingroup$
@Michael Albanese also it's confusing me that in one case $T^ij$ is a tensor valued quantity and in the other it's a scalar quantity being summed over.
$endgroup$
– Benjamin Thoburn
Mar 14 at 9:24




$begingroup$
@Michael Albanese also it's confusing me that in one case $T^ij$ is a tensor valued quantity and in the other it's a scalar quantity being summed over.
$endgroup$
– Benjamin Thoburn
Mar 14 at 9:24












$begingroup$
Basically all of it. $T^ij$ is not a tensor-valued quantity. As is mentioned in the answer below, $T^ij$ are the coefficients of the tensor with respect to a fixed basis of the vector space. If the basis changes, the coefficients change in a certain way. Often in physics, people regard the collection of coefficients $T^ij$, together with the knowledge of how it transforms under a change of basis, as the tensor itself.
$endgroup$
– Michael Albanese
Mar 14 at 14:03




$begingroup$
Basically all of it. $T^ij$ is not a tensor-valued quantity. As is mentioned in the answer below, $T^ij$ are the coefficients of the tensor with respect to a fixed basis of the vector space. If the basis changes, the coefficients change in a certain way. Often in physics, people regard the collection of coefficients $T^ij$, together with the knowledge of how it transforms under a change of basis, as the tensor itself.
$endgroup$
– Michael Albanese
Mar 14 at 14:03










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Strictly speaking $mathbf T^ij$ represents the $(i,j)$th component of the $(2,0)$ tensor $mathbf T$ relative to a particular basis of $V times V$, and the whole tensor would be represented by



$mathbf T^ij mathbf e_i otimes mathbf e_j$



which is short for



$sum_i=1^nsum_j=1^nmathbf T^ij mathbf e_i otimes mathbf e_j$



But $mathbf T^ij$ is often used informally to represent all of the $n^2$ components of $mathbf T$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3145595%2fexcluding-basis-in-tensor-notation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Strictly speaking $mathbf T^ij$ represents the $(i,j)$th component of the $(2,0)$ tensor $mathbf T$ relative to a particular basis of $V times V$, and the whole tensor would be represented by



    $mathbf T^ij mathbf e_i otimes mathbf e_j$



    which is short for



    $sum_i=1^nsum_j=1^nmathbf T^ij mathbf e_i otimes mathbf e_j$



    But $mathbf T^ij$ is often used informally to represent all of the $n^2$ components of $mathbf T$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      1












      $begingroup$

      Strictly speaking $mathbf T^ij$ represents the $(i,j)$th component of the $(2,0)$ tensor $mathbf T$ relative to a particular basis of $V times V$, and the whole tensor would be represented by



      $mathbf T^ij mathbf e_i otimes mathbf e_j$



      which is short for



      $sum_i=1^nsum_j=1^nmathbf T^ij mathbf e_i otimes mathbf e_j$



      But $mathbf T^ij$ is often used informally to represent all of the $n^2$ components of $mathbf T$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Strictly speaking $mathbf T^ij$ represents the $(i,j)$th component of the $(2,0)$ tensor $mathbf T$ relative to a particular basis of $V times V$, and the whole tensor would be represented by



        $mathbf T^ij mathbf e_i otimes mathbf e_j$



        which is short for



        $sum_i=1^nsum_j=1^nmathbf T^ij mathbf e_i otimes mathbf e_j$



        But $mathbf T^ij$ is often used informally to represent all of the $n^2$ components of $mathbf T$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Strictly speaking $mathbf T^ij$ represents the $(i,j)$th component of the $(2,0)$ tensor $mathbf T$ relative to a particular basis of $V times V$, and the whole tensor would be represented by



        $mathbf T^ij mathbf e_i otimes mathbf e_j$



        which is short for



        $sum_i=1^nsum_j=1^nmathbf T^ij mathbf e_i otimes mathbf e_j$



        But $mathbf T^ij$ is often used informally to represent all of the $n^2$ components of $mathbf T$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Mar 14 at 10:06









        gandalf61gandalf61

        9,109825




        9,109825



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3145595%2fexcluding-basis-in-tensor-notation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Moe incest case Sentencing See also References Navigation menu"'Australian Josef Fritzl' fathered four children by daughter""Small town recoils in horror at 'Australian Fritzl' incest case""Victorian rape allegations echo Fritzl case - Just In (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)""Incest father jailed for 22 years""'Australian Fritzl' sentenced to 22 years in prison for abusing daughter for three decades""RSJ v The Queen"

            John Burke, 9th Earl of Clanricarde References Navigation menuA General and heraldic dictionary of the peerage and baronetage of the British EmpireLeigh Rayment's Peerage Pages

            Football at the 1986 Brunei Merdeka Games Contents Teams Group stage Knockout stage References Navigation menu"Brunei Merdeka Games 1986".