Method of Partial Fractions integrationIntegration of rational functions..Is it possible for a function with range $=R$ have a global max/min without specifying a region?Calculate $int fracdxxsqrtx^2-1$Differentiating a non-linear functional with respect to a vectorHow to take derivative of matrix inside integrate $frac A^TG(x)-B^TJ(x)partial A$Trigonometric integration question (tricky substitution)A functional recurrence relation with differentiation, closed formEvaluate $int fracx^2 + x + 1(x+1)^2(x+2)dx$ via partial fractionsIntegrate $int_0^1 fracx^2+1(x+1)^2(x+2)$Evaluate $int fracx+4x^2 + 2x + 5$
Help prove this basic trig identity please!
Using Past-Perfect interchangeably with the Past Continuous
A Ri-diddley-iley Riddle
gerund and noun applications
PTIJ What is the inyan of the Konami code in Uncle Moishy's song?
What are substitutions for coconut in curry?
Comment Box for Substitution Method of Integrals
Hausdorff dimension of the boundary of fibres of Lipschitz maps
What favor did Moody owe Dumbledore?
In Aliens, how many people were on LV-426 before the Marines arrived?
What is the term when voters “dishonestly” choose something that they do not want to choose?
Describing a chess game in a novel
How to define limit operations in general topological spaces? Are nets able to do this?
How can an organ that provides biological immortality be unable to regenerate?
What is the English word for a graduation award?
What is the significance behind "40 days" that often appears in the Bible?
Print last inputted byte
Knife as defense against stray dogs
Worshiping one God at a time?
Calculate the frequency of characters in a string
Why is indicated airspeed rather than ground speed used during the takeoff roll?
How to get the n-th line after a grepped one?
Am I eligible for the Eurail Youth pass? I am 27.5 years old
I got the following comment from a reputed math journal. What does it mean?
Method of Partial Fractions integration
Integration of rational functions..Is it possible for a function with range $=R$ have a global max/min without specifying a region?Calculate $int fracdxxsqrtx^2-1$Differentiating a non-linear functional with respect to a vectorHow to take derivative of matrix inside integrate $frac ^2 H(x),dxpartial A$Trigonometric integration question (tricky substitution)A functional recurrence relation with differentiation, closed formEvaluate $int fracx^2 + x + 1(x+1)^2(x+2)dx$ via partial fractionsIntegrate $int_0^1 fracx^2+1(x+1)^2(x+2)$Evaluate $int fracx+4x^2 + 2x + 5$
$begingroup$
$int fracdxx^4+3x^2 = int fracdxx^2(x^2+3) = A(x^2+3) + (Bx+C)x^2 = fracAx^2 + fracBx+Cx^2+3 = Ax^2 + 3A + Bx^2 + Cx^2$
I am having some trouble solving the system of equations that follows. I tried plugging into my calculator a 4x4 matrix
$beginbmatrix
0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \
1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
3 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
endbmatrix$ but the RREF form only gave me $A,B,C = 0$ which doesn't seem like the right answer and I am now stuck.
I would prefer hints rather than answers at this time!
Edit:
My initial partial fractions was incomplete. The correct one is posted below:
$$fracAx + fracBx^2 + fracCx+Dx^2+3
= A(x)(x^2+3) + B(x^2+3) + (Cx+D)x^2$$
$$ = Ax^3 + 3Ax + Bx^2 + 3B + Cx^3 + Dx^2 $$
This gives me the following matrix:
$
beginbmatrix
1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
3 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 3 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
endbmatrix$ but the RREF is still giving me $A,B,C,D = 0$!
Edit:
attempting to solve system of equations...
$1 = Ax(x^2+3) + B(x^2+3) + Cx^3 + Dx^2$
Let x = 1,
1 = A(4) + B(4) + C + D
???
calculus integration
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$int fracdxx^4+3x^2 = int fracdxx^2(x^2+3) = A(x^2+3) + (Bx+C)x^2 = fracAx^2 + fracBx+Cx^2+3 = Ax^2 + 3A + Bx^2 + Cx^2$
I am having some trouble solving the system of equations that follows. I tried plugging into my calculator a 4x4 matrix
$beginbmatrix
0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \
1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
3 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
endbmatrix$ but the RREF form only gave me $A,B,C = 0$ which doesn't seem like the right answer and I am now stuck.
I would prefer hints rather than answers at this time!
Edit:
My initial partial fractions was incomplete. The correct one is posted below:
$$fracAx + fracBx^2 + fracCx+Dx^2+3
= A(x)(x^2+3) + B(x^2+3) + (Cx+D)x^2$$
$$ = Ax^3 + 3Ax + Bx^2 + 3B + Cx^3 + Dx^2 $$
This gives me the following matrix:
$
beginbmatrix
1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
3 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 3 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
endbmatrix$ but the RREF is still giving me $A,B,C,D = 0$!
Edit:
attempting to solve system of equations...
$1 = Ax(x^2+3) + B(x^2+3) + Cx^3 + Dx^2$
Let x = 1,
1 = A(4) + B(4) + C + D
???
calculus integration
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You have a product of two quadratics in the denominator with no linear term. Make the substitution $x^2=y$ (only to find the partial fraction decomposition and not for integration). The integrand becomes $frac1y(y+3)$ which is a product of linear terms and can be easily decomposed into $frac13big[frac1y-frac1y+3big]=frac13big[frac1x^2-frac1x^2+3big]$
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Mar 12 at 21:13
1
$begingroup$
Wow, we've got the equal-isn't-equal-to-equal-unless-when-it-is-equal-to-equal kind of equal in the equation.
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
Mar 12 at 21:19
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$int fracdxx^4+3x^2 = int fracdxx^2(x^2+3) = A(x^2+3) + (Bx+C)x^2 = fracAx^2 + fracBx+Cx^2+3 = Ax^2 + 3A + Bx^2 + Cx^2$
I am having some trouble solving the system of equations that follows. I tried plugging into my calculator a 4x4 matrix
$beginbmatrix
0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \
1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
3 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
endbmatrix$ but the RREF form only gave me $A,B,C = 0$ which doesn't seem like the right answer and I am now stuck.
I would prefer hints rather than answers at this time!
Edit:
My initial partial fractions was incomplete. The correct one is posted below:
$$fracAx + fracBx^2 + fracCx+Dx^2+3
= A(x)(x^2+3) + B(x^2+3) + (Cx+D)x^2$$
$$ = Ax^3 + 3Ax + Bx^2 + 3B + Cx^3 + Dx^2 $$
This gives me the following matrix:
$
beginbmatrix
1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
3 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 3 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
endbmatrix$ but the RREF is still giving me $A,B,C,D = 0$!
Edit:
attempting to solve system of equations...
$1 = Ax(x^2+3) + B(x^2+3) + Cx^3 + Dx^2$
Let x = 1,
1 = A(4) + B(4) + C + D
???
calculus integration
$endgroup$
$int fracdxx^4+3x^2 = int fracdxx^2(x^2+3) = A(x^2+3) + (Bx+C)x^2 = fracAx^2 + fracBx+Cx^2+3 = Ax^2 + 3A + Bx^2 + Cx^2$
I am having some trouble solving the system of equations that follows. I tried plugging into my calculator a 4x4 matrix
$beginbmatrix
0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \
1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
3 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
endbmatrix$ but the RREF form only gave me $A,B,C = 0$ which doesn't seem like the right answer and I am now stuck.
I would prefer hints rather than answers at this time!
Edit:
My initial partial fractions was incomplete. The correct one is posted below:
$$fracAx + fracBx^2 + fracCx+Dx^2+3
= A(x)(x^2+3) + B(x^2+3) + (Cx+D)x^2$$
$$ = Ax^3 + 3Ax + Bx^2 + 3B + Cx^3 + Dx^2 $$
This gives me the following matrix:
$
beginbmatrix
1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
3 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 3 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
endbmatrix$ but the RREF is still giving me $A,B,C,D = 0$!
Edit:
attempting to solve system of equations...
$1 = Ax(x^2+3) + B(x^2+3) + Cx^3 + Dx^2$
Let x = 1,
1 = A(4) + B(4) + C + D
???
calculus integration
calculus integration
edited Mar 12 at 23:25
Evan Kim
asked Mar 12 at 21:04
Evan KimEvan Kim
6039
6039
1
$begingroup$
You have a product of two quadratics in the denominator with no linear term. Make the substitution $x^2=y$ (only to find the partial fraction decomposition and not for integration). The integrand becomes $frac1y(y+3)$ which is a product of linear terms and can be easily decomposed into $frac13big[frac1y-frac1y+3big]=frac13big[frac1x^2-frac1x^2+3big]$
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Mar 12 at 21:13
1
$begingroup$
Wow, we've got the equal-isn't-equal-to-equal-unless-when-it-is-equal-to-equal kind of equal in the equation.
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
Mar 12 at 21:19
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
You have a product of two quadratics in the denominator with no linear term. Make the substitution $x^2=y$ (only to find the partial fraction decomposition and not for integration). The integrand becomes $frac1y(y+3)$ which is a product of linear terms and can be easily decomposed into $frac13big[frac1y-frac1y+3big]=frac13big[frac1x^2-frac1x^2+3big]$
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Mar 12 at 21:13
1
$begingroup$
Wow, we've got the equal-isn't-equal-to-equal-unless-when-it-is-equal-to-equal kind of equal in the equation.
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
Mar 12 at 21:19
1
1
$begingroup$
You have a product of two quadratics in the denominator with no linear term. Make the substitution $x^2=y$ (only to find the partial fraction decomposition and not for integration). The integrand becomes $frac1y(y+3)$ which is a product of linear terms and can be easily decomposed into $frac13big[frac1y-frac1y+3big]=frac13big[frac1x^2-frac1x^2+3big]$
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Mar 12 at 21:13
$begingroup$
You have a product of two quadratics in the denominator with no linear term. Make the substitution $x^2=y$ (only to find the partial fraction decomposition and not for integration). The integrand becomes $frac1y(y+3)$ which is a product of linear terms and can be easily decomposed into $frac13big[frac1y-frac1y+3big]=frac13big[frac1x^2-frac1x^2+3big]$
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Mar 12 at 21:13
1
1
$begingroup$
Wow, we've got the equal-isn't-equal-to-equal-unless-when-it-is-equal-to-equal kind of equal in the equation.
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
Mar 12 at 21:19
$begingroup$
Wow, we've got the equal-isn't-equal-to-equal-unless-when-it-is-equal-to-equal kind of equal in the equation.
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
Mar 12 at 21:19
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
For partial fractions involving denominators of perfect powers, you need to split it up in a slightly different way:
$$fracAx + fracBx^2 + fracCx+Dx^2+3$$
Edit: in this specific case, we can get the equality $$1 = Ax(x^2+3) + B(x^2+3) + Cx^3 + Dx^2$$
From this we can obtain a set of simultaneous equations by substituting $x = 0,1,-1,2$ to get:
$$ 1 = 3B $$
$$ 1 = 4A+4B+C+D $$
$$ 1 = -4A+4B-C+D $$
$$ 1 = 14A+7B+8C+4D $$
You can solve this with any method you like (e.g. RREF).
Double edit: I've just worked out the way you were taught to do it, by comparing coefficients rather than making substitutions. This works too. The issue is simply in your matrix: you have that you want $Ax^3 + 3Ax + Bx^2 + 3B + Cx^3 + Dx^2$ to be equal to $1$ (the numerator of the original fraction). This is why it's important to take care of where you use equality signs: your string of equalities in the original post are not correct. Your matrix should be
$$ beginbmatrix
1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
3 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 3 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
endbmatrix $$
Note the $1$ in the bottom right corresponding to the $1$ in the numerator of the initial fraction. Solving this will give you $A=C=0$, $B=1/3$, $D=-1/3$, which is correct. And then you can integrate.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Oh, yes you are totally right. However that didn't seem to change my system of equations outcome still. Please see my edits above
$endgroup$
– Evan Kim
Mar 12 at 21:35
$begingroup$
I'm not familiar with the matrix way of doing this. Here's how I learned it: we know $frac1x^2(x^2+3) = fracAx + fracBx^2 + fracCx+Dx^2+3$ so multiply upwards by $x^2(x^2+3)$ and you get that $1 = Ax(x^2+3) + B(x^2+3) + Cx^3 + Dx^2$. Then by putting $x=0,1,-1,2$ or any other convenient values, you get simultaneous equations which should yield $A=C=0$, $B=1/3$, $D=-1/3$.
$endgroup$
– Adam
Mar 12 at 21:56
$begingroup$
How are you isolating A,B, and C to solve for them? Is there a more details you can provide or some additional resources?
$endgroup$
– Evan Kim
Mar 12 at 22:02
$begingroup$
please see my new edit, I don't think I understand how to solve the system of equations after letting $x=1$ and how to "get the simultaneous equations" (not sure why you call it simultaneous equations)
$endgroup$
– Evan Kim
Mar 12 at 23:26
1
$begingroup$
See my edit. Do what you did but not just for $x=1$; also for $x=0$, $x=-1$ and $x=2$. The values of $x$ chosen are arbitrary - the point is that with each substitution you get a new equation, and for four unknowns you need four equations.
$endgroup$
– Adam
Mar 12 at 23:46
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Even in the revised decomposition equation in the question, there is an error: The denominator is missing on the right-hand side: We should have
$$frac1x^2 (x^2 + 3) = fracAx + fracBx^2 + fracCx+Dx^2+3 .$$
Hint Before proceeding with cross-multiplication or substitution, we can simplify the resulting linear algebra by observing that the rational function that we are decomposing (on the left-hand side) is even, hence the right-hand side must be too. This immediately forces
$$A = C = 0 .$$
(To see this, recall that since an even function is unchanged by the replacement $x mapsto -x$, applying that substitution to the right-hand side and comparing with the original equation gives those values.)
With this in hand, the decomposition equation simplifies to
$$frac1x^2 (x^2 + 3) = fracBx^2 + fracDx^2+3. $$
Cross-multiplying gives $$1 = B(x^2 + 3) + D(x^2) = (B + D)x^2 + 3 B,$$ comparing the constant coefficients gives $3B = 1$, so $B = frac13$, and then comparing the remaining coefficients gives $B + D = 0$, so $D = -B = -frac13$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3145677%2fmethod-of-partial-fractions-integration%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
For partial fractions involving denominators of perfect powers, you need to split it up in a slightly different way:
$$fracAx + fracBx^2 + fracCx+Dx^2+3$$
Edit: in this specific case, we can get the equality $$1 = Ax(x^2+3) + B(x^2+3) + Cx^3 + Dx^2$$
From this we can obtain a set of simultaneous equations by substituting $x = 0,1,-1,2$ to get:
$$ 1 = 3B $$
$$ 1 = 4A+4B+C+D $$
$$ 1 = -4A+4B-C+D $$
$$ 1 = 14A+7B+8C+4D $$
You can solve this with any method you like (e.g. RREF).
Double edit: I've just worked out the way you were taught to do it, by comparing coefficients rather than making substitutions. This works too. The issue is simply in your matrix: you have that you want $Ax^3 + 3Ax + Bx^2 + 3B + Cx^3 + Dx^2$ to be equal to $1$ (the numerator of the original fraction). This is why it's important to take care of where you use equality signs: your string of equalities in the original post are not correct. Your matrix should be
$$ beginbmatrix
1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
3 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 3 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
endbmatrix $$
Note the $1$ in the bottom right corresponding to the $1$ in the numerator of the initial fraction. Solving this will give you $A=C=0$, $B=1/3$, $D=-1/3$, which is correct. And then you can integrate.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Oh, yes you are totally right. However that didn't seem to change my system of equations outcome still. Please see my edits above
$endgroup$
– Evan Kim
Mar 12 at 21:35
$begingroup$
I'm not familiar with the matrix way of doing this. Here's how I learned it: we know $frac1x^2(x^2+3) = fracAx + fracBx^2 + fracCx+Dx^2+3$ so multiply upwards by $x^2(x^2+3)$ and you get that $1 = Ax(x^2+3) + B(x^2+3) + Cx^3 + Dx^2$. Then by putting $x=0,1,-1,2$ or any other convenient values, you get simultaneous equations which should yield $A=C=0$, $B=1/3$, $D=-1/3$.
$endgroup$
– Adam
Mar 12 at 21:56
$begingroup$
How are you isolating A,B, and C to solve for them? Is there a more details you can provide or some additional resources?
$endgroup$
– Evan Kim
Mar 12 at 22:02
$begingroup$
please see my new edit, I don't think I understand how to solve the system of equations after letting $x=1$ and how to "get the simultaneous equations" (not sure why you call it simultaneous equations)
$endgroup$
– Evan Kim
Mar 12 at 23:26
1
$begingroup$
See my edit. Do what you did but not just for $x=1$; also for $x=0$, $x=-1$ and $x=2$. The values of $x$ chosen are arbitrary - the point is that with each substitution you get a new equation, and for four unknowns you need four equations.
$endgroup$
– Adam
Mar 12 at 23:46
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
For partial fractions involving denominators of perfect powers, you need to split it up in a slightly different way:
$$fracAx + fracBx^2 + fracCx+Dx^2+3$$
Edit: in this specific case, we can get the equality $$1 = Ax(x^2+3) + B(x^2+3) + Cx^3 + Dx^2$$
From this we can obtain a set of simultaneous equations by substituting $x = 0,1,-1,2$ to get:
$$ 1 = 3B $$
$$ 1 = 4A+4B+C+D $$
$$ 1 = -4A+4B-C+D $$
$$ 1 = 14A+7B+8C+4D $$
You can solve this with any method you like (e.g. RREF).
Double edit: I've just worked out the way you were taught to do it, by comparing coefficients rather than making substitutions. This works too. The issue is simply in your matrix: you have that you want $Ax^3 + 3Ax + Bx^2 + 3B + Cx^3 + Dx^2$ to be equal to $1$ (the numerator of the original fraction). This is why it's important to take care of where you use equality signs: your string of equalities in the original post are not correct. Your matrix should be
$$ beginbmatrix
1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
3 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 3 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
endbmatrix $$
Note the $1$ in the bottom right corresponding to the $1$ in the numerator of the initial fraction. Solving this will give you $A=C=0$, $B=1/3$, $D=-1/3$, which is correct. And then you can integrate.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Oh, yes you are totally right. However that didn't seem to change my system of equations outcome still. Please see my edits above
$endgroup$
– Evan Kim
Mar 12 at 21:35
$begingroup$
I'm not familiar with the matrix way of doing this. Here's how I learned it: we know $frac1x^2(x^2+3) = fracAx + fracBx^2 + fracCx+Dx^2+3$ so multiply upwards by $x^2(x^2+3)$ and you get that $1 = Ax(x^2+3) + B(x^2+3) + Cx^3 + Dx^2$. Then by putting $x=0,1,-1,2$ or any other convenient values, you get simultaneous equations which should yield $A=C=0$, $B=1/3$, $D=-1/3$.
$endgroup$
– Adam
Mar 12 at 21:56
$begingroup$
How are you isolating A,B, and C to solve for them? Is there a more details you can provide or some additional resources?
$endgroup$
– Evan Kim
Mar 12 at 22:02
$begingroup$
please see my new edit, I don't think I understand how to solve the system of equations after letting $x=1$ and how to "get the simultaneous equations" (not sure why you call it simultaneous equations)
$endgroup$
– Evan Kim
Mar 12 at 23:26
1
$begingroup$
See my edit. Do what you did but not just for $x=1$; also for $x=0$, $x=-1$ and $x=2$. The values of $x$ chosen are arbitrary - the point is that with each substitution you get a new equation, and for four unknowns you need four equations.
$endgroup$
– Adam
Mar 12 at 23:46
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
For partial fractions involving denominators of perfect powers, you need to split it up in a slightly different way:
$$fracAx + fracBx^2 + fracCx+Dx^2+3$$
Edit: in this specific case, we can get the equality $$1 = Ax(x^2+3) + B(x^2+3) + Cx^3 + Dx^2$$
From this we can obtain a set of simultaneous equations by substituting $x = 0,1,-1,2$ to get:
$$ 1 = 3B $$
$$ 1 = 4A+4B+C+D $$
$$ 1 = -4A+4B-C+D $$
$$ 1 = 14A+7B+8C+4D $$
You can solve this with any method you like (e.g. RREF).
Double edit: I've just worked out the way you were taught to do it, by comparing coefficients rather than making substitutions. This works too. The issue is simply in your matrix: you have that you want $Ax^3 + 3Ax + Bx^2 + 3B + Cx^3 + Dx^2$ to be equal to $1$ (the numerator of the original fraction). This is why it's important to take care of where you use equality signs: your string of equalities in the original post are not correct. Your matrix should be
$$ beginbmatrix
1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
3 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 3 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
endbmatrix $$
Note the $1$ in the bottom right corresponding to the $1$ in the numerator of the initial fraction. Solving this will give you $A=C=0$, $B=1/3$, $D=-1/3$, which is correct. And then you can integrate.
$endgroup$
For partial fractions involving denominators of perfect powers, you need to split it up in a slightly different way:
$$fracAx + fracBx^2 + fracCx+Dx^2+3$$
Edit: in this specific case, we can get the equality $$1 = Ax(x^2+3) + B(x^2+3) + Cx^3 + Dx^2$$
From this we can obtain a set of simultaneous equations by substituting $x = 0,1,-1,2$ to get:
$$ 1 = 3B $$
$$ 1 = 4A+4B+C+D $$
$$ 1 = -4A+4B-C+D $$
$$ 1 = 14A+7B+8C+4D $$
You can solve this with any method you like (e.g. RREF).
Double edit: I've just worked out the way you were taught to do it, by comparing coefficients rather than making substitutions. This works too. The issue is simply in your matrix: you have that you want $Ax^3 + 3Ax + Bx^2 + 3B + Cx^3 + Dx^2$ to be equal to $1$ (the numerator of the original fraction). This is why it's important to take care of where you use equality signs: your string of equalities in the original post are not correct. Your matrix should be
$$ beginbmatrix
1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
3 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 3 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
endbmatrix $$
Note the $1$ in the bottom right corresponding to the $1$ in the numerator of the initial fraction. Solving this will give you $A=C=0$, $B=1/3$, $D=-1/3$, which is correct. And then you can integrate.
edited Mar 12 at 23:55
answered Mar 12 at 21:05
AdamAdam
748113
748113
$begingroup$
Oh, yes you are totally right. However that didn't seem to change my system of equations outcome still. Please see my edits above
$endgroup$
– Evan Kim
Mar 12 at 21:35
$begingroup$
I'm not familiar with the matrix way of doing this. Here's how I learned it: we know $frac1x^2(x^2+3) = fracAx + fracBx^2 + fracCx+Dx^2+3$ so multiply upwards by $x^2(x^2+3)$ and you get that $1 = Ax(x^2+3) + B(x^2+3) + Cx^3 + Dx^2$. Then by putting $x=0,1,-1,2$ or any other convenient values, you get simultaneous equations which should yield $A=C=0$, $B=1/3$, $D=-1/3$.
$endgroup$
– Adam
Mar 12 at 21:56
$begingroup$
How are you isolating A,B, and C to solve for them? Is there a more details you can provide or some additional resources?
$endgroup$
– Evan Kim
Mar 12 at 22:02
$begingroup$
please see my new edit, I don't think I understand how to solve the system of equations after letting $x=1$ and how to "get the simultaneous equations" (not sure why you call it simultaneous equations)
$endgroup$
– Evan Kim
Mar 12 at 23:26
1
$begingroup$
See my edit. Do what you did but not just for $x=1$; also for $x=0$, $x=-1$ and $x=2$. The values of $x$ chosen are arbitrary - the point is that with each substitution you get a new equation, and for four unknowns you need four equations.
$endgroup$
– Adam
Mar 12 at 23:46
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Oh, yes you are totally right. However that didn't seem to change my system of equations outcome still. Please see my edits above
$endgroup$
– Evan Kim
Mar 12 at 21:35
$begingroup$
I'm not familiar with the matrix way of doing this. Here's how I learned it: we know $frac1x^2(x^2+3) = fracAx + fracBx^2 + fracCx+Dx^2+3$ so multiply upwards by $x^2(x^2+3)$ and you get that $1 = Ax(x^2+3) + B(x^2+3) + Cx^3 + Dx^2$. Then by putting $x=0,1,-1,2$ or any other convenient values, you get simultaneous equations which should yield $A=C=0$, $B=1/3$, $D=-1/3$.
$endgroup$
– Adam
Mar 12 at 21:56
$begingroup$
How are you isolating A,B, and C to solve for them? Is there a more details you can provide or some additional resources?
$endgroup$
– Evan Kim
Mar 12 at 22:02
$begingroup$
please see my new edit, I don't think I understand how to solve the system of equations after letting $x=1$ and how to "get the simultaneous equations" (not sure why you call it simultaneous equations)
$endgroup$
– Evan Kim
Mar 12 at 23:26
1
$begingroup$
See my edit. Do what you did but not just for $x=1$; also for $x=0$, $x=-1$ and $x=2$. The values of $x$ chosen are arbitrary - the point is that with each substitution you get a new equation, and for four unknowns you need four equations.
$endgroup$
– Adam
Mar 12 at 23:46
$begingroup$
Oh, yes you are totally right. However that didn't seem to change my system of equations outcome still. Please see my edits above
$endgroup$
– Evan Kim
Mar 12 at 21:35
$begingroup$
Oh, yes you are totally right. However that didn't seem to change my system of equations outcome still. Please see my edits above
$endgroup$
– Evan Kim
Mar 12 at 21:35
$begingroup$
I'm not familiar with the matrix way of doing this. Here's how I learned it: we know $frac1x^2(x^2+3) = fracAx + fracBx^2 + fracCx+Dx^2+3$ so multiply upwards by $x^2(x^2+3)$ and you get that $1 = Ax(x^2+3) + B(x^2+3) + Cx^3 + Dx^2$. Then by putting $x=0,1,-1,2$ or any other convenient values, you get simultaneous equations which should yield $A=C=0$, $B=1/3$, $D=-1/3$.
$endgroup$
– Adam
Mar 12 at 21:56
$begingroup$
I'm not familiar with the matrix way of doing this. Here's how I learned it: we know $frac1x^2(x^2+3) = fracAx + fracBx^2 + fracCx+Dx^2+3$ so multiply upwards by $x^2(x^2+3)$ and you get that $1 = Ax(x^2+3) + B(x^2+3) + Cx^3 + Dx^2$. Then by putting $x=0,1,-1,2$ or any other convenient values, you get simultaneous equations which should yield $A=C=0$, $B=1/3$, $D=-1/3$.
$endgroup$
– Adam
Mar 12 at 21:56
$begingroup$
How are you isolating A,B, and C to solve for them? Is there a more details you can provide or some additional resources?
$endgroup$
– Evan Kim
Mar 12 at 22:02
$begingroup$
How are you isolating A,B, and C to solve for them? Is there a more details you can provide or some additional resources?
$endgroup$
– Evan Kim
Mar 12 at 22:02
$begingroup$
please see my new edit, I don't think I understand how to solve the system of equations after letting $x=1$ and how to "get the simultaneous equations" (not sure why you call it simultaneous equations)
$endgroup$
– Evan Kim
Mar 12 at 23:26
$begingroup$
please see my new edit, I don't think I understand how to solve the system of equations after letting $x=1$ and how to "get the simultaneous equations" (not sure why you call it simultaneous equations)
$endgroup$
– Evan Kim
Mar 12 at 23:26
1
1
$begingroup$
See my edit. Do what you did but not just for $x=1$; also for $x=0$, $x=-1$ and $x=2$. The values of $x$ chosen are arbitrary - the point is that with each substitution you get a new equation, and for four unknowns you need four equations.
$endgroup$
– Adam
Mar 12 at 23:46
$begingroup$
See my edit. Do what you did but not just for $x=1$; also for $x=0$, $x=-1$ and $x=2$. The values of $x$ chosen are arbitrary - the point is that with each substitution you get a new equation, and for four unknowns you need four equations.
$endgroup$
– Adam
Mar 12 at 23:46
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Even in the revised decomposition equation in the question, there is an error: The denominator is missing on the right-hand side: We should have
$$frac1x^2 (x^2 + 3) = fracAx + fracBx^2 + fracCx+Dx^2+3 .$$
Hint Before proceeding with cross-multiplication or substitution, we can simplify the resulting linear algebra by observing that the rational function that we are decomposing (on the left-hand side) is even, hence the right-hand side must be too. This immediately forces
$$A = C = 0 .$$
(To see this, recall that since an even function is unchanged by the replacement $x mapsto -x$, applying that substitution to the right-hand side and comparing with the original equation gives those values.)
With this in hand, the decomposition equation simplifies to
$$frac1x^2 (x^2 + 3) = fracBx^2 + fracDx^2+3. $$
Cross-multiplying gives $$1 = B(x^2 + 3) + D(x^2) = (B + D)x^2 + 3 B,$$ comparing the constant coefficients gives $3B = 1$, so $B = frac13$, and then comparing the remaining coefficients gives $B + D = 0$, so $D = -B = -frac13$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Even in the revised decomposition equation in the question, there is an error: The denominator is missing on the right-hand side: We should have
$$frac1x^2 (x^2 + 3) = fracAx + fracBx^2 + fracCx+Dx^2+3 .$$
Hint Before proceeding with cross-multiplication or substitution, we can simplify the resulting linear algebra by observing that the rational function that we are decomposing (on the left-hand side) is even, hence the right-hand side must be too. This immediately forces
$$A = C = 0 .$$
(To see this, recall that since an even function is unchanged by the replacement $x mapsto -x$, applying that substitution to the right-hand side and comparing with the original equation gives those values.)
With this in hand, the decomposition equation simplifies to
$$frac1x^2 (x^2 + 3) = fracBx^2 + fracDx^2+3. $$
Cross-multiplying gives $$1 = B(x^2 + 3) + D(x^2) = (B + D)x^2 + 3 B,$$ comparing the constant coefficients gives $3B = 1$, so $B = frac13$, and then comparing the remaining coefficients gives $B + D = 0$, so $D = -B = -frac13$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Even in the revised decomposition equation in the question, there is an error: The denominator is missing on the right-hand side: We should have
$$frac1x^2 (x^2 + 3) = fracAx + fracBx^2 + fracCx+Dx^2+3 .$$
Hint Before proceeding with cross-multiplication or substitution, we can simplify the resulting linear algebra by observing that the rational function that we are decomposing (on the left-hand side) is even, hence the right-hand side must be too. This immediately forces
$$A = C = 0 .$$
(To see this, recall that since an even function is unchanged by the replacement $x mapsto -x$, applying that substitution to the right-hand side and comparing with the original equation gives those values.)
With this in hand, the decomposition equation simplifies to
$$frac1x^2 (x^2 + 3) = fracBx^2 + fracDx^2+3. $$
Cross-multiplying gives $$1 = B(x^2 + 3) + D(x^2) = (B + D)x^2 + 3 B,$$ comparing the constant coefficients gives $3B = 1$, so $B = frac13$, and then comparing the remaining coefficients gives $B + D = 0$, so $D = -B = -frac13$.
$endgroup$
Even in the revised decomposition equation in the question, there is an error: The denominator is missing on the right-hand side: We should have
$$frac1x^2 (x^2 + 3) = fracAx + fracBx^2 + fracCx+Dx^2+3 .$$
Hint Before proceeding with cross-multiplication or substitution, we can simplify the resulting linear algebra by observing that the rational function that we are decomposing (on the left-hand side) is even, hence the right-hand side must be too. This immediately forces
$$A = C = 0 .$$
(To see this, recall that since an even function is unchanged by the replacement $x mapsto -x$, applying that substitution to the right-hand side and comparing with the original equation gives those values.)
With this in hand, the decomposition equation simplifies to
$$frac1x^2 (x^2 + 3) = fracBx^2 + fracDx^2+3. $$
Cross-multiplying gives $$1 = B(x^2 + 3) + D(x^2) = (B + D)x^2 + 3 B,$$ comparing the constant coefficients gives $3B = 1$, so $B = frac13$, and then comparing the remaining coefficients gives $B + D = 0$, so $D = -B = -frac13$.
answered Mar 13 at 0:21
TravisTravis
63.3k768150
63.3k768150
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3145677%2fmethod-of-partial-fractions-integration%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
You have a product of two quadratics in the denominator with no linear term. Make the substitution $x^2=y$ (only to find the partial fraction decomposition and not for integration). The integrand becomes $frac1y(y+3)$ which is a product of linear terms and can be easily decomposed into $frac13big[frac1y-frac1y+3big]=frac13big[frac1x^2-frac1x^2+3big]$
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Mar 12 at 21:13
1
$begingroup$
Wow, we've got the equal-isn't-equal-to-equal-unless-when-it-is-equal-to-equal kind of equal in the equation.
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
Mar 12 at 21:19