Proof for upper bound of function using an approximation through Squeeze Theorem. The Next CEO of Stack OverflowFinding lower bound sequence for squeeze theoremHow to use Taylor's Theorem to obtain an upper bound for an error approximationProof verification for the Squeeze Theorem.squeeze theorem proof, using the same epsilonsqueeze theorem proof checkProof using squeeze theorem for convergence of infinite sequenceUsing a Taylor polynomial to calculate the error in using $x$ as an approximation for $sinx$Proof Verification: Squeeze theoremProve that $sqrt[k] frac1k+2 to 1$ by squeeze theorem2 has a square root in $mathbbR$ - proof explanation
Is it a good idea to use COLUMN AS (left([Another_Column],(4)) instead of LEFT in the select?
Horror movie/show or scene where a horse creature opens its mouth really wide and devours a man in a stables
% symbol leads to superlong (forever?) compilations
Customer Requests (Sometimes) Drive Me Bonkers!
How to be diplomatic in refusing to write code that breaches the privacy of our users
How to make a variable always equal to the result of some calculations?
Why Were Madagascar and New Zealand Discovered So Late?
Why didn't Theresa May consult with Parliament before negotiating a deal with the EU?
How to use tikz in fbox?
What happens if you roll doubles 3 times then land on "Go to jail?"
Inappropriate reference requests from Journal reviewers
What is meant by a M next to a roman numeral?
What is the purpose of the Evocation wizard's Potent Cantrip feature?
Is a stroke of luck acceptable after a series of unfavorable events?
Why doesn't a table tennis ball float on the surface? How do we calculate buoyancy here?
Implement the Thanos sorting algorithm
How do scammers retract money, while you can’t?
How long to clear the 'suck zone' of a turbofan after start is initiated?
Text adventure game code
Does it take more energy to get to Venus or to Mars?
Why does GHC infer a monomorphic type here, even with MonomorphismRestriction disabled?
forest, changing `s sep` such that it is at each second end node larger?
How do I go from 300 unfinished/half written blog posts, to published posts?
What is the difference between "behavior" and "behaviour"?
Proof for upper bound of function using an approximation through Squeeze Theorem.
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowFinding lower bound sequence for squeeze theoremHow to use Taylor's Theorem to obtain an upper bound for an error approximationProof verification for the Squeeze Theorem.squeeze theorem proof, using the same epsilonsqueeze theorem proof checkProof using squeeze theorem for convergence of infinite sequenceUsing a Taylor polynomial to calculate the error in using $x$ as an approximation for $sinx$Proof Verification: Squeeze theoremProve that $sqrt[k] frac1k+2 to 1$ by squeeze theorem2 has a square root in $mathbbR$ - proof explanation
$begingroup$
I am trying to turn
$n_0log_2(n_0)$ into an approximation of $nlog_2(n)$ using the following statement:
$$n geq n_0+1 $$
For a bit of context, $n$ is the number of nodes on a minimum spanning tree [MST] and $n_0$ the number of odd degree nodes on MST.
I am having trouble justifying the following. I wish to set an upper bound to the prior statement, and make an approximation of $n_0$ for large numbers of $nuparrowuparrow$ so I state:
$$ n_0 lessapprox n rightarrow n_0log_2(n_0) lessapprox nlog_2(n) $$
Is there any better mathematical way you can think of to prove my reasoning above?
I had thought of doing it through Squeeze Theorem. What do you think?
calculus proof-verification proof-explanation approximation alternative-proof
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am trying to turn
$n_0log_2(n_0)$ into an approximation of $nlog_2(n)$ using the following statement:
$$n geq n_0+1 $$
For a bit of context, $n$ is the number of nodes on a minimum spanning tree [MST] and $n_0$ the number of odd degree nodes on MST.
I am having trouble justifying the following. I wish to set an upper bound to the prior statement, and make an approximation of $n_0$ for large numbers of $nuparrowuparrow$ so I state:
$$ n_0 lessapprox n rightarrow n_0log_2(n_0) lessapprox nlog_2(n) $$
Is there any better mathematical way you can think of to prove my reasoning above?
I had thought of doing it through Squeeze Theorem. What do you think?
calculus proof-verification proof-explanation approximation alternative-proof
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am trying to turn
$n_0log_2(n_0)$ into an approximation of $nlog_2(n)$ using the following statement:
$$n geq n_0+1 $$
For a bit of context, $n$ is the number of nodes on a minimum spanning tree [MST] and $n_0$ the number of odd degree nodes on MST.
I am having trouble justifying the following. I wish to set an upper bound to the prior statement, and make an approximation of $n_0$ for large numbers of $nuparrowuparrow$ so I state:
$$ n_0 lessapprox n rightarrow n_0log_2(n_0) lessapprox nlog_2(n) $$
Is there any better mathematical way you can think of to prove my reasoning above?
I had thought of doing it through Squeeze Theorem. What do you think?
calculus proof-verification proof-explanation approximation alternative-proof
$endgroup$
I am trying to turn
$n_0log_2(n_0)$ into an approximation of $nlog_2(n)$ using the following statement:
$$n geq n_0+1 $$
For a bit of context, $n$ is the number of nodes on a minimum spanning tree [MST] and $n_0$ the number of odd degree nodes on MST.
I am having trouble justifying the following. I wish to set an upper bound to the prior statement, and make an approximation of $n_0$ for large numbers of $nuparrowuparrow$ so I state:
$$ n_0 lessapprox n rightarrow n_0log_2(n_0) lessapprox nlog_2(n) $$
Is there any better mathematical way you can think of to prove my reasoning above?
I had thought of doing it through Squeeze Theorem. What do you think?
calculus proof-verification proof-explanation approximation alternative-proof
calculus proof-verification proof-explanation approximation alternative-proof
asked Mar 18 at 10:34
Aidan DeavesAidan Deaves
36
36
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3152632%2fproof-for-upper-bound-of-function-using-an-approximation-through-squeeze-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3152632%2fproof-for-upper-bound-of-function-using-an-approximation-through-squeeze-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown