Research articles on Multi-Objective Non-Linear Programming (MONLP) The Next CEO of Stack OverflowFormulating linear programming treatment plan based on costs, periods, and conditionObjective function: linear programmingCalculus/Optimization - Implicit fuction theorem with equality constraints¿formulation of this problem in non linear programming?linear programming for bus ticketsFinding the Constraints of a Linear Programming problemCan Sequential Quadratic Programming be applied to functions that are non-differentiable on the edge?Formulating Linear Programming for Production Planning ProblemLinear Programming objective functionConstruction of a linear programming given a solution

How to implement Comparable so it is consistent with identity-equality

That's an odd coin - I wonder why

How to pronounce fünf in 45

Compensation for working overtime on Saturdays

How exploitable/balanced is this homebrew spell: Spell Permanency?

What steps are necessary to read a Modern SSD in Medieval Europe?

How can the PCs determine if an item is a phylactery?

How to compactly explain secondary and tertiary characters without resorting to stereotypes?

Find a path from s to t using as few red nodes as possible

pgfplots: How to draw a tangent graph below two others?

Prodigo = pro + ago?

Does Germany produce more waste than the US?

Early programmable calculators with RS-232

Mathematica command that allows it to read my intentions

Upgrading From a 9 Speed Sora Derailleur?

How dangerous is XSS

How should I connect my cat5 cable to connectors having an orange-green line?

How do I secure a TV wall mount?

Salesforce opportunity stages

Small nick on power cord from an electric alarm clock, and copper wiring exposed but intact

Could you use a laser beam as a modulated carrier wave for radio signal?

Is it a bad idea to plug the other end of ESD strap to wall ground?

Cannot restore registry to default in Windows 10?

How can I replace x-axis labels with pre-determined symbols?



Research articles on Multi-Objective Non-Linear Programming (MONLP)



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowFormulating linear programming treatment plan based on costs, periods, and conditionObjective function: linear programmingCalculus/Optimization - Implicit fuction theorem with equality constraints¿formulation of this problem in non linear programming?linear programming for bus ticketsFinding the Constraints of a Linear Programming problemCan Sequential Quadratic Programming be applied to functions that are non-differentiable on the edge?Formulating Linear Programming for Production Planning ProblemLinear Programming objective functionConstruction of a linear programming given a solution










0












$begingroup$


I'm looking for papers dealing with multi-objective non-linear programming which could help me implement an algorithm to solve my problem.



My problem is :



Maximize $f(x) = c cdot x$, while minimizing $g(x) = r cdot x$, where $cdot$ is the scalar product.



Constrained by $h_1(x) = fracv cdot xp cdot x geq 0.5$ and $h_2(x) = b cdot x = B$



Given that $b, c, p, r, v in (mathbbN^*)^n, B in mathbbR_+^*, x in [0, 1]^n$



For me, n will be in the order of 1000.



I know there is not a unique solution so I'm looking for the set of Pareto optimal solutions, therefore I am not interested by scalarizing. I could use interactive methods though.



Any help on the subject will be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    0












    $begingroup$


    I'm looking for papers dealing with multi-objective non-linear programming which could help me implement an algorithm to solve my problem.



    My problem is :



    Maximize $f(x) = c cdot x$, while minimizing $g(x) = r cdot x$, where $cdot$ is the scalar product.



    Constrained by $h_1(x) = fracv cdot xp cdot x geq 0.5$ and $h_2(x) = b cdot x = B$



    Given that $b, c, p, r, v in (mathbbN^*)^n, B in mathbbR_+^*, x in [0, 1]^n$



    For me, n will be in the order of 1000.



    I know there is not a unique solution so I'm looking for the set of Pareto optimal solutions, therefore I am not interested by scalarizing. I could use interactive methods though.



    Any help on the subject will be appreciated.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I'm looking for papers dealing with multi-objective non-linear programming which could help me implement an algorithm to solve my problem.



      My problem is :



      Maximize $f(x) = c cdot x$, while minimizing $g(x) = r cdot x$, where $cdot$ is the scalar product.



      Constrained by $h_1(x) = fracv cdot xp cdot x geq 0.5$ and $h_2(x) = b cdot x = B$



      Given that $b, c, p, r, v in (mathbbN^*)^n, B in mathbbR_+^*, x in [0, 1]^n$



      For me, n will be in the order of 1000.



      I know there is not a unique solution so I'm looking for the set of Pareto optimal solutions, therefore I am not interested by scalarizing. I could use interactive methods though.



      Any help on the subject will be appreciated.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I'm looking for papers dealing with multi-objective non-linear programming which could help me implement an algorithm to solve my problem.



      My problem is :



      Maximize $f(x) = c cdot x$, while minimizing $g(x) = r cdot x$, where $cdot$ is the scalar product.



      Constrained by $h_1(x) = fracv cdot xp cdot x geq 0.5$ and $h_2(x) = b cdot x = B$



      Given that $b, c, p, r, v in (mathbbN^*)^n, B in mathbbR_+^*, x in [0, 1]^n$



      For me, n will be in the order of 1000.



      I know there is not a unique solution so I'm looking for the set of Pareto optimal solutions, therefore I am not interested by scalarizing. I could use interactive methods though.



      Any help on the subject will be appreciated.







      reference-request nonlinear-optimization constraints operations-research






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Feb 20 at 14:46







      Arius

















      asked Feb 19 at 16:10









      AriusArius

      1014




      1014




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          I recently read a paper where someone was solving a nonlinear problem with binary variables and multiple objectives, looking for the Pareto optimal solutions. They used a genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) that seems appropriate, with the caveat that the solutions it gets are not guaranteed to be Pareto optimal, though they should at least be close. (I think the paper argues that the GA's population converges to the Pareto frontier.) It might be worth a look, if you're okay with using a metaheuristic. Here's the citation:



          Kalyanmoy Deb, Amrit Pratap, Sameer Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan (2002). "A Fast and Elitist Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II". IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 6, No. 2 (April), 182-197.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer. Nevertheless I'm not looking for binary variables (it's in the full [0, 1] range). I will take a look at NSGA-II but it might not converge as rapidly for me and will probably not yield the same results as continuous variables.
            $endgroup$
            – Arius
            Feb 19 at 21:58






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I'm not sure the examples in the NGSA-II paper used binary variables. It just happens that the paper in which I saw it being used had binary variables.
            $endgroup$
            – prubin
            Feb 20 at 19:10


















          0












          $begingroup$

          In Gandibleux, X. (Ed.). (2006). Multiple criteria optimization: state of the art annotated bibliographic surveys (Vol. 52). Springer Science & Business Media., I found in chapter 5 many interactive nonlinear multiobjective procedures explained. According to Kaisa Miettinen, none is better than another and they all have their pros and cons.



          We can cite :



          • Interactive Surrogate Worth Trade-Off Method [1]

          • Geoffrion-Dyer-Feinberg Method [2]

          • Tchebycheff Method [3]

          • Step Method [4]

          • Reference Point Method [5]

          • GUESS Method [6]

          • Satisficing Trade-Off Method [7]

          • Light Beam Search [8]

          • Reference Direction Approach [9]

          • Reference Direction Method [10]


          • NIMBUS Method [11]



            [1]: V. Chankong and Y. Y. Haimes. Multiobjective Decision Making Theory and Methodology. Elsevier Science Publishing Co., New York, 1983



            [2]: A. M. Geoffrion, J. S. Dyer, and A. Feinberg. An interactive
            approach for multi-criterion optimization, with an application to
            the operation of an academic department. Management Science,
            19:357–368, 1972



            [3]: R. E. Steuer. The Tchebycheff procedure of interactive multiple objective programming. In B. Karpak and S. Zionts, editors, Multiple Criteria Decision Making and Risk Analysis Using Microcomputers, pages 235–249. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg,
            1989.



            [4]: R. Benayoun, J. de Montgolfier, J. Tergny, and O. Laritchev. Lin-
            ear programming with multiple objective functions: Step method
            (STEM). Mathematical Programming, 1:366–375, 1971



            [5]: A. P. Wierzbicki. The use of reference objectives in multiobjec-
            tive optimization. In G. Fandel and T. Gal, editors, Multiple Cri-
            teria Decision Making Theory and Applications, pages 468–486.
            Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1980



            [6]: J. T. Buchanan. A naïve approach for solving MCDM problems:
            The GUESS method. Journal of the Operational Research Society,
            48:202–206, 1997.



            [7]: H. Nakayama. Aspiration level approach to interactive multi-
            objective programming and its applications. In P. M. Pardalos,
            Y. Siskos, and C. Zopounidis, editors, Advances in Multicriteria
            Analysis, pages 147–174. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht,
            1995



            [8]: A. Jaszkiewicz The light beam search – outrank-
            ing based interactive procedure for multiple-objective mathemati-
            cal programming. In P. M. Pardalos, Y. Siskos, and C. Zopounidis,
            editors, Advances in Multicriteria Analysis, pages 129–146. Kluwer
            Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1995.



            [9]: P. Korhonen. Reference direction approach to multiple objec-
            tive linear programming: Historical overview. In M. H. Karwan,
            J. Spronk, and J. Wallenius, editors, Essays in Decision Making:
            A Volume in Honour of Stanley Zionts, pages 74–92. Springer-
            Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1997



            [10]: S. C. Narula, L. Kirilov, and V. Vassilev. An interactive algorithm
            for solving multiple objective nonlinear programming problems. In
            G. H. Tzeng, H. F. Wand, U. P. Wen, and P. L. Yu, editors, Multi-
            ple Criteria Decision Making – Proceedings of the Tenth Interna-
            tional Conference: Expand and Enrich the Domains of Thinking
            and Application, pages 119–127. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994



            [11]: K. Miettinen. Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization. Kluwer Aca-
            demic Publishers, Boston, 1999







          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3119016%2fresearch-articles-on-multi-objective-non-linear-programming-monlp%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            I recently read a paper where someone was solving a nonlinear problem with binary variables and multiple objectives, looking for the Pareto optimal solutions. They used a genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) that seems appropriate, with the caveat that the solutions it gets are not guaranteed to be Pareto optimal, though they should at least be close. (I think the paper argues that the GA's population converges to the Pareto frontier.) It might be worth a look, if you're okay with using a metaheuristic. Here's the citation:



            Kalyanmoy Deb, Amrit Pratap, Sameer Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan (2002). "A Fast and Elitist Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II". IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 6, No. 2 (April), 182-197.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for your answer. Nevertheless I'm not looking for binary variables (it's in the full [0, 1] range). I will take a look at NSGA-II but it might not converge as rapidly for me and will probably not yield the same results as continuous variables.
              $endgroup$
              – Arius
              Feb 19 at 21:58






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I'm not sure the examples in the NGSA-II paper used binary variables. It just happens that the paper in which I saw it being used had binary variables.
              $endgroup$
              – prubin
              Feb 20 at 19:10















            1












            $begingroup$

            I recently read a paper where someone was solving a nonlinear problem with binary variables and multiple objectives, looking for the Pareto optimal solutions. They used a genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) that seems appropriate, with the caveat that the solutions it gets are not guaranteed to be Pareto optimal, though they should at least be close. (I think the paper argues that the GA's population converges to the Pareto frontier.) It might be worth a look, if you're okay with using a metaheuristic. Here's the citation:



            Kalyanmoy Deb, Amrit Pratap, Sameer Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan (2002). "A Fast and Elitist Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II". IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 6, No. 2 (April), 182-197.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for your answer. Nevertheless I'm not looking for binary variables (it's in the full [0, 1] range). I will take a look at NSGA-II but it might not converge as rapidly for me and will probably not yield the same results as continuous variables.
              $endgroup$
              – Arius
              Feb 19 at 21:58






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I'm not sure the examples in the NGSA-II paper used binary variables. It just happens that the paper in which I saw it being used had binary variables.
              $endgroup$
              – prubin
              Feb 20 at 19:10













            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            I recently read a paper where someone was solving a nonlinear problem with binary variables and multiple objectives, looking for the Pareto optimal solutions. They used a genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) that seems appropriate, with the caveat that the solutions it gets are not guaranteed to be Pareto optimal, though they should at least be close. (I think the paper argues that the GA's population converges to the Pareto frontier.) It might be worth a look, if you're okay with using a metaheuristic. Here's the citation:



            Kalyanmoy Deb, Amrit Pratap, Sameer Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan (2002). "A Fast and Elitist Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II". IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 6, No. 2 (April), 182-197.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            I recently read a paper where someone was solving a nonlinear problem with binary variables and multiple objectives, looking for the Pareto optimal solutions. They used a genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) that seems appropriate, with the caveat that the solutions it gets are not guaranteed to be Pareto optimal, though they should at least be close. (I think the paper argues that the GA's population converges to the Pareto frontier.) It might be worth a look, if you're okay with using a metaheuristic. Here's the citation:



            Kalyanmoy Deb, Amrit Pratap, Sameer Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan (2002). "A Fast and Elitist Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II". IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 6, No. 2 (April), 182-197.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Feb 19 at 21:46









            prubinprubin

            1,565125




            1,565125











            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for your answer. Nevertheless I'm not looking for binary variables (it's in the full [0, 1] range). I will take a look at NSGA-II but it might not converge as rapidly for me and will probably not yield the same results as continuous variables.
              $endgroup$
              – Arius
              Feb 19 at 21:58






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I'm not sure the examples in the NGSA-II paper used binary variables. It just happens that the paper in which I saw it being used had binary variables.
              $endgroup$
              – prubin
              Feb 20 at 19:10
















            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for your answer. Nevertheless I'm not looking for binary variables (it's in the full [0, 1] range). I will take a look at NSGA-II but it might not converge as rapidly for me and will probably not yield the same results as continuous variables.
              $endgroup$
              – Arius
              Feb 19 at 21:58






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I'm not sure the examples in the NGSA-II paper used binary variables. It just happens that the paper in which I saw it being used had binary variables.
              $endgroup$
              – prubin
              Feb 20 at 19:10















            $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer. Nevertheless I'm not looking for binary variables (it's in the full [0, 1] range). I will take a look at NSGA-II but it might not converge as rapidly for me and will probably not yield the same results as continuous variables.
            $endgroup$
            – Arius
            Feb 19 at 21:58




            $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer. Nevertheless I'm not looking for binary variables (it's in the full [0, 1] range). I will take a look at NSGA-II but it might not converge as rapidly for me and will probably not yield the same results as continuous variables.
            $endgroup$
            – Arius
            Feb 19 at 21:58




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            I'm not sure the examples in the NGSA-II paper used binary variables. It just happens that the paper in which I saw it being used had binary variables.
            $endgroup$
            – prubin
            Feb 20 at 19:10




            $begingroup$
            I'm not sure the examples in the NGSA-II paper used binary variables. It just happens that the paper in which I saw it being used had binary variables.
            $endgroup$
            – prubin
            Feb 20 at 19:10











            0












            $begingroup$

            In Gandibleux, X. (Ed.). (2006). Multiple criteria optimization: state of the art annotated bibliographic surveys (Vol. 52). Springer Science & Business Media., I found in chapter 5 many interactive nonlinear multiobjective procedures explained. According to Kaisa Miettinen, none is better than another and they all have their pros and cons.



            We can cite :



            • Interactive Surrogate Worth Trade-Off Method [1]

            • Geoffrion-Dyer-Feinberg Method [2]

            • Tchebycheff Method [3]

            • Step Method [4]

            • Reference Point Method [5]

            • GUESS Method [6]

            • Satisficing Trade-Off Method [7]

            • Light Beam Search [8]

            • Reference Direction Approach [9]

            • Reference Direction Method [10]


            • NIMBUS Method [11]



              [1]: V. Chankong and Y. Y. Haimes. Multiobjective Decision Making Theory and Methodology. Elsevier Science Publishing Co., New York, 1983



              [2]: A. M. Geoffrion, J. S. Dyer, and A. Feinberg. An interactive
              approach for multi-criterion optimization, with an application to
              the operation of an academic department. Management Science,
              19:357–368, 1972



              [3]: R. E. Steuer. The Tchebycheff procedure of interactive multiple objective programming. In B. Karpak and S. Zionts, editors, Multiple Criteria Decision Making and Risk Analysis Using Microcomputers, pages 235–249. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg,
              1989.



              [4]: R. Benayoun, J. de Montgolfier, J. Tergny, and O. Laritchev. Lin-
              ear programming with multiple objective functions: Step method
              (STEM). Mathematical Programming, 1:366–375, 1971



              [5]: A. P. Wierzbicki. The use of reference objectives in multiobjec-
              tive optimization. In G. Fandel and T. Gal, editors, Multiple Cri-
              teria Decision Making Theory and Applications, pages 468–486.
              Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1980



              [6]: J. T. Buchanan. A naïve approach for solving MCDM problems:
              The GUESS method. Journal of the Operational Research Society,
              48:202–206, 1997.



              [7]: H. Nakayama. Aspiration level approach to interactive multi-
              objective programming and its applications. In P. M. Pardalos,
              Y. Siskos, and C. Zopounidis, editors, Advances in Multicriteria
              Analysis, pages 147–174. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht,
              1995



              [8]: A. Jaszkiewicz The light beam search – outrank-
              ing based interactive procedure for multiple-objective mathemati-
              cal programming. In P. M. Pardalos, Y. Siskos, and C. Zopounidis,
              editors, Advances in Multicriteria Analysis, pages 129–146. Kluwer
              Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1995.



              [9]: P. Korhonen. Reference direction approach to multiple objec-
              tive linear programming: Historical overview. In M. H. Karwan,
              J. Spronk, and J. Wallenius, editors, Essays in Decision Making:
              A Volume in Honour of Stanley Zionts, pages 74–92. Springer-
              Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1997



              [10]: S. C. Narula, L. Kirilov, and V. Vassilev. An interactive algorithm
              for solving multiple objective nonlinear programming problems. In
              G. H. Tzeng, H. F. Wand, U. P. Wen, and P. L. Yu, editors, Multi-
              ple Criteria Decision Making – Proceedings of the Tenth Interna-
              tional Conference: Expand and Enrich the Domains of Thinking
              and Application, pages 119–127. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994



              [11]: K. Miettinen. Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization. Kluwer Aca-
              demic Publishers, Boston, 1999







            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              0












              $begingroup$

              In Gandibleux, X. (Ed.). (2006). Multiple criteria optimization: state of the art annotated bibliographic surveys (Vol. 52). Springer Science & Business Media., I found in chapter 5 many interactive nonlinear multiobjective procedures explained. According to Kaisa Miettinen, none is better than another and they all have their pros and cons.



              We can cite :



              • Interactive Surrogate Worth Trade-Off Method [1]

              • Geoffrion-Dyer-Feinberg Method [2]

              • Tchebycheff Method [3]

              • Step Method [4]

              • Reference Point Method [5]

              • GUESS Method [6]

              • Satisficing Trade-Off Method [7]

              • Light Beam Search [8]

              • Reference Direction Approach [9]

              • Reference Direction Method [10]


              • NIMBUS Method [11]



                [1]: V. Chankong and Y. Y. Haimes. Multiobjective Decision Making Theory and Methodology. Elsevier Science Publishing Co., New York, 1983



                [2]: A. M. Geoffrion, J. S. Dyer, and A. Feinberg. An interactive
                approach for multi-criterion optimization, with an application to
                the operation of an academic department. Management Science,
                19:357–368, 1972



                [3]: R. E. Steuer. The Tchebycheff procedure of interactive multiple objective programming. In B. Karpak and S. Zionts, editors, Multiple Criteria Decision Making and Risk Analysis Using Microcomputers, pages 235–249. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg,
                1989.



                [4]: R. Benayoun, J. de Montgolfier, J. Tergny, and O. Laritchev. Lin-
                ear programming with multiple objective functions: Step method
                (STEM). Mathematical Programming, 1:366–375, 1971



                [5]: A. P. Wierzbicki. The use of reference objectives in multiobjec-
                tive optimization. In G. Fandel and T. Gal, editors, Multiple Cri-
                teria Decision Making Theory and Applications, pages 468–486.
                Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1980



                [6]: J. T. Buchanan. A naïve approach for solving MCDM problems:
                The GUESS method. Journal of the Operational Research Society,
                48:202–206, 1997.



                [7]: H. Nakayama. Aspiration level approach to interactive multi-
                objective programming and its applications. In P. M. Pardalos,
                Y. Siskos, and C. Zopounidis, editors, Advances in Multicriteria
                Analysis, pages 147–174. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht,
                1995



                [8]: A. Jaszkiewicz The light beam search – outrank-
                ing based interactive procedure for multiple-objective mathemati-
                cal programming. In P. M. Pardalos, Y. Siskos, and C. Zopounidis,
                editors, Advances in Multicriteria Analysis, pages 129–146. Kluwer
                Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1995.



                [9]: P. Korhonen. Reference direction approach to multiple objec-
                tive linear programming: Historical overview. In M. H. Karwan,
                J. Spronk, and J. Wallenius, editors, Essays in Decision Making:
                A Volume in Honour of Stanley Zionts, pages 74–92. Springer-
                Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1997



                [10]: S. C. Narula, L. Kirilov, and V. Vassilev. An interactive algorithm
                for solving multiple objective nonlinear programming problems. In
                G. H. Tzeng, H. F. Wand, U. P. Wen, and P. L. Yu, editors, Multi-
                ple Criteria Decision Making – Proceedings of the Tenth Interna-
                tional Conference: Expand and Enrich the Domains of Thinking
                and Application, pages 119–127. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994



                [11]: K. Miettinen. Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization. Kluwer Aca-
                demic Publishers, Boston, 1999







              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                In Gandibleux, X. (Ed.). (2006). Multiple criteria optimization: state of the art annotated bibliographic surveys (Vol. 52). Springer Science & Business Media., I found in chapter 5 many interactive nonlinear multiobjective procedures explained. According to Kaisa Miettinen, none is better than another and they all have their pros and cons.



                We can cite :



                • Interactive Surrogate Worth Trade-Off Method [1]

                • Geoffrion-Dyer-Feinberg Method [2]

                • Tchebycheff Method [3]

                • Step Method [4]

                • Reference Point Method [5]

                • GUESS Method [6]

                • Satisficing Trade-Off Method [7]

                • Light Beam Search [8]

                • Reference Direction Approach [9]

                • Reference Direction Method [10]


                • NIMBUS Method [11]



                  [1]: V. Chankong and Y. Y. Haimes. Multiobjective Decision Making Theory and Methodology. Elsevier Science Publishing Co., New York, 1983



                  [2]: A. M. Geoffrion, J. S. Dyer, and A. Feinberg. An interactive
                  approach for multi-criterion optimization, with an application to
                  the operation of an academic department. Management Science,
                  19:357–368, 1972



                  [3]: R. E. Steuer. The Tchebycheff procedure of interactive multiple objective programming. In B. Karpak and S. Zionts, editors, Multiple Criteria Decision Making and Risk Analysis Using Microcomputers, pages 235–249. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg,
                  1989.



                  [4]: R. Benayoun, J. de Montgolfier, J. Tergny, and O. Laritchev. Lin-
                  ear programming with multiple objective functions: Step method
                  (STEM). Mathematical Programming, 1:366–375, 1971



                  [5]: A. P. Wierzbicki. The use of reference objectives in multiobjec-
                  tive optimization. In G. Fandel and T. Gal, editors, Multiple Cri-
                  teria Decision Making Theory and Applications, pages 468–486.
                  Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1980



                  [6]: J. T. Buchanan. A naïve approach for solving MCDM problems:
                  The GUESS method. Journal of the Operational Research Society,
                  48:202–206, 1997.



                  [7]: H. Nakayama. Aspiration level approach to interactive multi-
                  objective programming and its applications. In P. M. Pardalos,
                  Y. Siskos, and C. Zopounidis, editors, Advances in Multicriteria
                  Analysis, pages 147–174. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht,
                  1995



                  [8]: A. Jaszkiewicz The light beam search – outrank-
                  ing based interactive procedure for multiple-objective mathemati-
                  cal programming. In P. M. Pardalos, Y. Siskos, and C. Zopounidis,
                  editors, Advances in Multicriteria Analysis, pages 129–146. Kluwer
                  Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1995.



                  [9]: P. Korhonen. Reference direction approach to multiple objec-
                  tive linear programming: Historical overview. In M. H. Karwan,
                  J. Spronk, and J. Wallenius, editors, Essays in Decision Making:
                  A Volume in Honour of Stanley Zionts, pages 74–92. Springer-
                  Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1997



                  [10]: S. C. Narula, L. Kirilov, and V. Vassilev. An interactive algorithm
                  for solving multiple objective nonlinear programming problems. In
                  G. H. Tzeng, H. F. Wand, U. P. Wen, and P. L. Yu, editors, Multi-
                  ple Criteria Decision Making – Proceedings of the Tenth Interna-
                  tional Conference: Expand and Enrich the Domains of Thinking
                  and Application, pages 119–127. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994



                  [11]: K. Miettinen. Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization. Kluwer Aca-
                  demic Publishers, Boston, 1999







                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                In Gandibleux, X. (Ed.). (2006). Multiple criteria optimization: state of the art annotated bibliographic surveys (Vol. 52). Springer Science & Business Media., I found in chapter 5 many interactive nonlinear multiobjective procedures explained. According to Kaisa Miettinen, none is better than another and they all have their pros and cons.



                We can cite :



                • Interactive Surrogate Worth Trade-Off Method [1]

                • Geoffrion-Dyer-Feinberg Method [2]

                • Tchebycheff Method [3]

                • Step Method [4]

                • Reference Point Method [5]

                • GUESS Method [6]

                • Satisficing Trade-Off Method [7]

                • Light Beam Search [8]

                • Reference Direction Approach [9]

                • Reference Direction Method [10]


                • NIMBUS Method [11]



                  [1]: V. Chankong and Y. Y. Haimes. Multiobjective Decision Making Theory and Methodology. Elsevier Science Publishing Co., New York, 1983



                  [2]: A. M. Geoffrion, J. S. Dyer, and A. Feinberg. An interactive
                  approach for multi-criterion optimization, with an application to
                  the operation of an academic department. Management Science,
                  19:357–368, 1972



                  [3]: R. E. Steuer. The Tchebycheff procedure of interactive multiple objective programming. In B. Karpak and S. Zionts, editors, Multiple Criteria Decision Making and Risk Analysis Using Microcomputers, pages 235–249. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg,
                  1989.



                  [4]: R. Benayoun, J. de Montgolfier, J. Tergny, and O. Laritchev. Lin-
                  ear programming with multiple objective functions: Step method
                  (STEM). Mathematical Programming, 1:366–375, 1971



                  [5]: A. P. Wierzbicki. The use of reference objectives in multiobjec-
                  tive optimization. In G. Fandel and T. Gal, editors, Multiple Cri-
                  teria Decision Making Theory and Applications, pages 468–486.
                  Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1980



                  [6]: J. T. Buchanan. A naïve approach for solving MCDM problems:
                  The GUESS method. Journal of the Operational Research Society,
                  48:202–206, 1997.



                  [7]: H. Nakayama. Aspiration level approach to interactive multi-
                  objective programming and its applications. In P. M. Pardalos,
                  Y. Siskos, and C. Zopounidis, editors, Advances in Multicriteria
                  Analysis, pages 147–174. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht,
                  1995



                  [8]: A. Jaszkiewicz The light beam search – outrank-
                  ing based interactive procedure for multiple-objective mathemati-
                  cal programming. In P. M. Pardalos, Y. Siskos, and C. Zopounidis,
                  editors, Advances in Multicriteria Analysis, pages 129–146. Kluwer
                  Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1995.



                  [9]: P. Korhonen. Reference direction approach to multiple objec-
                  tive linear programming: Historical overview. In M. H. Karwan,
                  J. Spronk, and J. Wallenius, editors, Essays in Decision Making:
                  A Volume in Honour of Stanley Zionts, pages 74–92. Springer-
                  Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1997



                  [10]: S. C. Narula, L. Kirilov, and V. Vassilev. An interactive algorithm
                  for solving multiple objective nonlinear programming problems. In
                  G. H. Tzeng, H. F. Wand, U. P. Wen, and P. L. Yu, editors, Multi-
                  ple Criteria Decision Making – Proceedings of the Tenth Interna-
                  tional Conference: Expand and Enrich the Domains of Thinking
                  and Application, pages 119–127. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994



                  [11]: K. Miettinen. Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization. Kluwer Aca-
                  demic Publishers, Boston, 1999








                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Mar 20 at 9:54









                AriusArius

                1014




                1014



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3119016%2fresearch-articles-on-multi-objective-non-linear-programming-monlp%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

                    random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

                    Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye