Isometry and compactness. The Next CEO of Stack OverflowTotally bounded, complete $implies$ compactConditional compactness iff totally boundedCompactness and closed ballsCompactness under different metric?Equivalence between properties of compactness for metric spacesA question about local compactness and $sigma$-compactnessRelative Compactness and equivalent conditionsA concern on the definition of compactness in a metric spaceShow that if two metrics induce the same topology, one metric space is compact iff the other one is.Is this proof that a continuous image of a compact metric space is compact correct?
Create custom note boxes
Prodigo = pro + ago?
How can I separate the number from the unit in argument?
Could a dragon use its wings to swim?
How can a day be of 24 hours?
MT "will strike" & LXX "will watch carefully" (Gen 3:15)?
What happens if you break a law in another country outside of that country?
Car headlights in a world without electricity
Is it possible to create a QR code using text?
Does Germany produce more waste than the US?
How to find if SQL server backup is encrypted with TDE without restoring the backup
Is it okay to majorly distort historical facts while writing a fiction story?
Why does freezing point matter when picking cooler ice packs?
Could you use a laser beam as a modulated carrier wave for radio signal?
How to pronounce fünf in 45
Can you teleport closer to a creature you are Frightened of?
Free fall ellipse or parabola?
Is it reasonable to ask other researchers to send me their previous grant applications?
Can this transistor (2n2222) take 6V on emitter-base? Am I reading datasheet incorrectly?
Planeswalker Ability and Death Timing
Is this a new Fibonacci Identity?
How to unfasten electrical subpanel attached with ramset
A hang glider, sudden unexpected lift to 25,000 feet altitude, what could do this?
How to coordinate airplane tickets?
Isometry and compactness.
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowTotally bounded, complete $implies$ compactConditional compactness iff totally boundedCompactness and closed ballsCompactness under different metric?Equivalence between properties of compactness for metric spacesA question about local compactness and $sigma$-compactnessRelative Compactness and equivalent conditionsA concern on the definition of compactness in a metric spaceShow that if two metrics induce the same topology, one metric space is compact iff the other one is.Is this proof that a continuous image of a compact metric space is compact correct?
$begingroup$
Let $Ksubset mathbbR^n$ be a compact non-empty set and $f: K to K$ such that $|f(x) - f(y)| geq |x-y|$, for all $x,y in K$. Consider the sequnce $f_n$ given by $f_n = f^n = fcirc cdots circ f$. For $a,b in K$, let $a_n = f_n(a)$ and $b_n = f_n(b)$.
(a) Show that for any $epsilon > 0$, there is $k in mathbbN$ such that
$$|a-a_k| < epsilon, |b-b_k|<epsilon.$$
(b) Show that $f(K)$ is dense in $K$.
(c) Show that $f$ is an isometry
My attempt
(a) I dont have any idea
(b) Given $x in K$, take $x_n = f_n(x)$. By (a), for any $epsilon > 0$, there is $k in mathbbN$ such that $|x - x_k| < epsilon$. The sequence $x_k$ satisfying (a) has a convergent subsequence, since $K$ is compact. But this sequence converges to $x$.
(c) My idea was suppose that $|a - b| > |f(a) - f(b)|$ for some $a,b$ using (b), but I cannot conclude anything.
Can someone help me? Also, I'm not sure about (b). This not seems a hard problem, but I'm stuck on it.
real-analysis metric-spaces compactness
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $Ksubset mathbbR^n$ be a compact non-empty set and $f: K to K$ such that $|f(x) - f(y)| geq |x-y|$, for all $x,y in K$. Consider the sequnce $f_n$ given by $f_n = f^n = fcirc cdots circ f$. For $a,b in K$, let $a_n = f_n(a)$ and $b_n = f_n(b)$.
(a) Show that for any $epsilon > 0$, there is $k in mathbbN$ such that
$$|a-a_k| < epsilon, |b-b_k|<epsilon.$$
(b) Show that $f(K)$ is dense in $K$.
(c) Show that $f$ is an isometry
My attempt
(a) I dont have any idea
(b) Given $x in K$, take $x_n = f_n(x)$. By (a), for any $epsilon > 0$, there is $k in mathbbN$ such that $|x - x_k| < epsilon$. The sequence $x_k$ satisfying (a) has a convergent subsequence, since $K$ is compact. But this sequence converges to $x$.
(c) My idea was suppose that $|a - b| > |f(a) - f(b)|$ for some $a,b$ using (b), but I cannot conclude anything.
Can someone help me? Also, I'm not sure about (b). This not seems a hard problem, but I'm stuck on it.
real-analysis metric-spaces compactness
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $Ksubset mathbbR^n$ be a compact non-empty set and $f: K to K$ such that $|f(x) - f(y)| geq |x-y|$, for all $x,y in K$. Consider the sequnce $f_n$ given by $f_n = f^n = fcirc cdots circ f$. For $a,b in K$, let $a_n = f_n(a)$ and $b_n = f_n(b)$.
(a) Show that for any $epsilon > 0$, there is $k in mathbbN$ such that
$$|a-a_k| < epsilon, |b-b_k|<epsilon.$$
(b) Show that $f(K)$ is dense in $K$.
(c) Show that $f$ is an isometry
My attempt
(a) I dont have any idea
(b) Given $x in K$, take $x_n = f_n(x)$. By (a), for any $epsilon > 0$, there is $k in mathbbN$ such that $|x - x_k| < epsilon$. The sequence $x_k$ satisfying (a) has a convergent subsequence, since $K$ is compact. But this sequence converges to $x$.
(c) My idea was suppose that $|a - b| > |f(a) - f(b)|$ for some $a,b$ using (b), but I cannot conclude anything.
Can someone help me? Also, I'm not sure about (b). This not seems a hard problem, but I'm stuck on it.
real-analysis metric-spaces compactness
$endgroup$
Let $Ksubset mathbbR^n$ be a compact non-empty set and $f: K to K$ such that $|f(x) - f(y)| geq |x-y|$, for all $x,y in K$. Consider the sequnce $f_n$ given by $f_n = f^n = fcirc cdots circ f$. For $a,b in K$, let $a_n = f_n(a)$ and $b_n = f_n(b)$.
(a) Show that for any $epsilon > 0$, there is $k in mathbbN$ such that
$$|a-a_k| < epsilon, |b-b_k|<epsilon.$$
(b) Show that $f(K)$ is dense in $K$.
(c) Show that $f$ is an isometry
My attempt
(a) I dont have any idea
(b) Given $x in K$, take $x_n = f_n(x)$. By (a), for any $epsilon > 0$, there is $k in mathbbN$ such that $|x - x_k| < epsilon$. The sequence $x_k$ satisfying (a) has a convergent subsequence, since $K$ is compact. But this sequence converges to $x$.
(c) My idea was suppose that $|a - b| > |f(a) - f(b)|$ for some $a,b$ using (b), but I cannot conclude anything.
Can someone help me? Also, I'm not sure about (b). This not seems a hard problem, but I'm stuck on it.
real-analysis metric-spaces compactness
real-analysis metric-spaces compactness
asked Mar 20 at 9:35
Lucas CorrêaLucas Corrêa
1,5561421
1,5561421
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$(a) quad$ Let $varepsilon > 0$. For all $x in K$, denote by $B_x$ the open ball centered in $x$, of radius $varepsilon$. The family of open sets $(B_x times B_y)_x,y in K$ covers $K times K$. Because $K times K$ is compact, there exists a finite family $x_1, ..., x_n$ and $y_1, ..., y_n$ of points of $K$ such that
$$(K times K) subset bigcup_1 leq m leq n (B_x_m times B_y_m) $$
Now consider the $n+1$ points $(a,b)$, $(a_1, b_1)$, ..., $(a_n, b_n)$ of $K times K$. You have $n+1$ points, and $Ktimes K$ is covered by $n$ open sets, so two of these points are in the same open. So there exists $1 leq m leq n$, and $0 leq i < j leq n$ such that $a_i$ and $a_j$ are in $B_x_m$, and $b_i$ and $b_j$ are in $B_y_m$. In particular, $|a_i - a_j| < varepsilon$, and $|b_i - b_j| < varepsilon$. Let $k=j-i$. It is easy to see that, because $f$ is expansive, $|f^i(a)-f^j(a)| geq |a-f^j-i(a)|$, i.e $|a_i-a_j| geq |a-a_k|$. Similarly, $|b_i - b_j| geq |b-b_k|$. So you deduce that
$$|a-a_k| < varepsilon quad textand quad|b-b_k| < varepsilon$$
$(b) quad$ The first question shows that for every $varepsilon > 0$ and $a in K$, there exists $k neq 0$ such that $|a-f^k(a)| < varepsilon$. But $f^k(a)=f(f^k-1(a)) in f(K)$, so you get a point of $f(K)$ at distance less than $varepsilon$ of $a$. This shows that $f(K)$ is dense in $K$.
$(c) quad$ Suppose that there exists $a neq b$ such that $|f(a) - f(b)| > |a-b|$. Let $$varepsilon = frac2$$
By the first question, there exists $k$ such that $|a-a_k| <varepsilon$ and $|b-b_k| < varepsilon$. So you get
$$|a_k-b_k| leq |a-a_k| + |a-b| + |b-b_k| < 2varepsilon + |a-b| = |f(a)-f(b)|$$
This is impossible, because $f$ is expansive so you must have $|f^k(a)-f^k(b)| geq |f(a)-f(b)|$.
This shows that $f$ is an isometry.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $epsilon>0$. Cover $K$ with finitely many open balls of radius $epsilon/2$, as we may, since $K$ is compact. The sequence $(a_n)$ must visit at least one such ball, say $B$, infinitely many times. Therefore there is a subsequence $(a_n_k)$ of $(a_n)$ that lives wholly in $B$. In particular, $|a_n_k - a_n_k+1| < epsilon$ for all $k$, where we also used the triangle inequality. By the expansive property of $f$, and by induction, it follows that $|a - a_n_k - n_k+1| < epsilon$ for all $k$, that is, $(alpha_k) = (a_n_k - n_k+1)$ is a subsequence of $(a_n)$ that lives wholly in the $epsilon$-ball centred on $a$. Taking the corresponding subsequence of $(b_n)$, and applying the same argument using compactness of $K$ and expansiveness of $f$, we may pass to further corresponding subsequences of $(a_n)$ and $(b_n)$ that live wholly in the $epsilon$-balls centred on $a$ and on $b$, respectively. In particular, there is an index $k$ such that $a_k$ and $b_k$ have the property required in part a) of the question.
For part b), let $c in K$. We already showed in part a) that points in the sequence $f^n(c)$ may be found that are arbitrarily close to $c$. It follows that the range of $f$ is dense in $K$, as required.
For part c), let $a, b in K$ and suppose, for a contradiction, that $|f(a) - f(b)| = |a - b| + eta$, where $eta > 0$. Then for all $k$, $|a_k - b_k| geq |a - b| + eta$. By a suitable choice of $epsilon$, and by applying the triangle inequality, we can contradict the assertion in part a). Conclude that $|f(a) - f(b)| = |a - b|$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I didn't see TheSilverDoe's nice answer, until after I'd posted this.
$endgroup$
– Simon
Mar 20 at 13:02
add a comment |
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3155209%2fisometry-and-compactness%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$(a) quad$ Let $varepsilon > 0$. For all $x in K$, denote by $B_x$ the open ball centered in $x$, of radius $varepsilon$. The family of open sets $(B_x times B_y)_x,y in K$ covers $K times K$. Because $K times K$ is compact, there exists a finite family $x_1, ..., x_n$ and $y_1, ..., y_n$ of points of $K$ such that
$$(K times K) subset bigcup_1 leq m leq n (B_x_m times B_y_m) $$
Now consider the $n+1$ points $(a,b)$, $(a_1, b_1)$, ..., $(a_n, b_n)$ of $K times K$. You have $n+1$ points, and $Ktimes K$ is covered by $n$ open sets, so two of these points are in the same open. So there exists $1 leq m leq n$, and $0 leq i < j leq n$ such that $a_i$ and $a_j$ are in $B_x_m$, and $b_i$ and $b_j$ are in $B_y_m$. In particular, $|a_i - a_j| < varepsilon$, and $|b_i - b_j| < varepsilon$. Let $k=j-i$. It is easy to see that, because $f$ is expansive, $|f^i(a)-f^j(a)| geq |a-f^j-i(a)|$, i.e $|a_i-a_j| geq |a-a_k|$. Similarly, $|b_i - b_j| geq |b-b_k|$. So you deduce that
$$|a-a_k| < varepsilon quad textand quad|b-b_k| < varepsilon$$
$(b) quad$ The first question shows that for every $varepsilon > 0$ and $a in K$, there exists $k neq 0$ such that $|a-f^k(a)| < varepsilon$. But $f^k(a)=f(f^k-1(a)) in f(K)$, so you get a point of $f(K)$ at distance less than $varepsilon$ of $a$. This shows that $f(K)$ is dense in $K$.
$(c) quad$ Suppose that there exists $a neq b$ such that $|f(a) - f(b)| > |a-b|$. Let $$varepsilon = frac2$$
By the first question, there exists $k$ such that $|a-a_k| <varepsilon$ and $|b-b_k| < varepsilon$. So you get
$$|a_k-b_k| leq |a-a_k| + |a-b| + |b-b_k| < 2varepsilon + |a-b| = |f(a)-f(b)|$$
This is impossible, because $f$ is expansive so you must have $|f^k(a)-f^k(b)| geq |f(a)-f(b)|$.
This shows that $f$ is an isometry.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$(a) quad$ Let $varepsilon > 0$. For all $x in K$, denote by $B_x$ the open ball centered in $x$, of radius $varepsilon$. The family of open sets $(B_x times B_y)_x,y in K$ covers $K times K$. Because $K times K$ is compact, there exists a finite family $x_1, ..., x_n$ and $y_1, ..., y_n$ of points of $K$ such that
$$(K times K) subset bigcup_1 leq m leq n (B_x_m times B_y_m) $$
Now consider the $n+1$ points $(a,b)$, $(a_1, b_1)$, ..., $(a_n, b_n)$ of $K times K$. You have $n+1$ points, and $Ktimes K$ is covered by $n$ open sets, so two of these points are in the same open. So there exists $1 leq m leq n$, and $0 leq i < j leq n$ such that $a_i$ and $a_j$ are in $B_x_m$, and $b_i$ and $b_j$ are in $B_y_m$. In particular, $|a_i - a_j| < varepsilon$, and $|b_i - b_j| < varepsilon$. Let $k=j-i$. It is easy to see that, because $f$ is expansive, $|f^i(a)-f^j(a)| geq |a-f^j-i(a)|$, i.e $|a_i-a_j| geq |a-a_k|$. Similarly, $|b_i - b_j| geq |b-b_k|$. So you deduce that
$$|a-a_k| < varepsilon quad textand quad|b-b_k| < varepsilon$$
$(b) quad$ The first question shows that for every $varepsilon > 0$ and $a in K$, there exists $k neq 0$ such that $|a-f^k(a)| < varepsilon$. But $f^k(a)=f(f^k-1(a)) in f(K)$, so you get a point of $f(K)$ at distance less than $varepsilon$ of $a$. This shows that $f(K)$ is dense in $K$.
$(c) quad$ Suppose that there exists $a neq b$ such that $|f(a) - f(b)| > |a-b|$. Let $$varepsilon = frac2$$
By the first question, there exists $k$ such that $|a-a_k| <varepsilon$ and $|b-b_k| < varepsilon$. So you get
$$|a_k-b_k| leq |a-a_k| + |a-b| + |b-b_k| < 2varepsilon + |a-b| = |f(a)-f(b)|$$
This is impossible, because $f$ is expansive so you must have $|f^k(a)-f^k(b)| geq |f(a)-f(b)|$.
This shows that $f$ is an isometry.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$(a) quad$ Let $varepsilon > 0$. For all $x in K$, denote by $B_x$ the open ball centered in $x$, of radius $varepsilon$. The family of open sets $(B_x times B_y)_x,y in K$ covers $K times K$. Because $K times K$ is compact, there exists a finite family $x_1, ..., x_n$ and $y_1, ..., y_n$ of points of $K$ such that
$$(K times K) subset bigcup_1 leq m leq n (B_x_m times B_y_m) $$
Now consider the $n+1$ points $(a,b)$, $(a_1, b_1)$, ..., $(a_n, b_n)$ of $K times K$. You have $n+1$ points, and $Ktimes K$ is covered by $n$ open sets, so two of these points are in the same open. So there exists $1 leq m leq n$, and $0 leq i < j leq n$ such that $a_i$ and $a_j$ are in $B_x_m$, and $b_i$ and $b_j$ are in $B_y_m$. In particular, $|a_i - a_j| < varepsilon$, and $|b_i - b_j| < varepsilon$. Let $k=j-i$. It is easy to see that, because $f$ is expansive, $|f^i(a)-f^j(a)| geq |a-f^j-i(a)|$, i.e $|a_i-a_j| geq |a-a_k|$. Similarly, $|b_i - b_j| geq |b-b_k|$. So you deduce that
$$|a-a_k| < varepsilon quad textand quad|b-b_k| < varepsilon$$
$(b) quad$ The first question shows that for every $varepsilon > 0$ and $a in K$, there exists $k neq 0$ such that $|a-f^k(a)| < varepsilon$. But $f^k(a)=f(f^k-1(a)) in f(K)$, so you get a point of $f(K)$ at distance less than $varepsilon$ of $a$. This shows that $f(K)$ is dense in $K$.
$(c) quad$ Suppose that there exists $a neq b$ such that $|f(a) - f(b)| > |a-b|$. Let $$varepsilon = frac2$$
By the first question, there exists $k$ such that $|a-a_k| <varepsilon$ and $|b-b_k| < varepsilon$. So you get
$$|a_k-b_k| leq |a-a_k| + |a-b| + |b-b_k| < 2varepsilon + |a-b| = |f(a)-f(b)|$$
This is impossible, because $f$ is expansive so you must have $|f^k(a)-f^k(b)| geq |f(a)-f(b)|$.
This shows that $f$ is an isometry.
$endgroup$
$(a) quad$ Let $varepsilon > 0$. For all $x in K$, denote by $B_x$ the open ball centered in $x$, of radius $varepsilon$. The family of open sets $(B_x times B_y)_x,y in K$ covers $K times K$. Because $K times K$ is compact, there exists a finite family $x_1, ..., x_n$ and $y_1, ..., y_n$ of points of $K$ such that
$$(K times K) subset bigcup_1 leq m leq n (B_x_m times B_y_m) $$
Now consider the $n+1$ points $(a,b)$, $(a_1, b_1)$, ..., $(a_n, b_n)$ of $K times K$. You have $n+1$ points, and $Ktimes K$ is covered by $n$ open sets, so two of these points are in the same open. So there exists $1 leq m leq n$, and $0 leq i < j leq n$ such that $a_i$ and $a_j$ are in $B_x_m$, and $b_i$ and $b_j$ are in $B_y_m$. In particular, $|a_i - a_j| < varepsilon$, and $|b_i - b_j| < varepsilon$. Let $k=j-i$. It is easy to see that, because $f$ is expansive, $|f^i(a)-f^j(a)| geq |a-f^j-i(a)|$, i.e $|a_i-a_j| geq |a-a_k|$. Similarly, $|b_i - b_j| geq |b-b_k|$. So you deduce that
$$|a-a_k| < varepsilon quad textand quad|b-b_k| < varepsilon$$
$(b) quad$ The first question shows that for every $varepsilon > 0$ and $a in K$, there exists $k neq 0$ such that $|a-f^k(a)| < varepsilon$. But $f^k(a)=f(f^k-1(a)) in f(K)$, so you get a point of $f(K)$ at distance less than $varepsilon$ of $a$. This shows that $f(K)$ is dense in $K$.
$(c) quad$ Suppose that there exists $a neq b$ such that $|f(a) - f(b)| > |a-b|$. Let $$varepsilon = frac2$$
By the first question, there exists $k$ such that $|a-a_k| <varepsilon$ and $|b-b_k| < varepsilon$. So you get
$$|a_k-b_k| leq |a-a_k| + |a-b| + |b-b_k| < 2varepsilon + |a-b| = |f(a)-f(b)|$$
This is impossible, because $f$ is expansive so you must have $|f^k(a)-f^k(b)| geq |f(a)-f(b)|$.
This shows that $f$ is an isometry.
answered Mar 20 at 12:45
TheSilverDoeTheSilverDoe
4,997215
4,997215
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $epsilon>0$. Cover $K$ with finitely many open balls of radius $epsilon/2$, as we may, since $K$ is compact. The sequence $(a_n)$ must visit at least one such ball, say $B$, infinitely many times. Therefore there is a subsequence $(a_n_k)$ of $(a_n)$ that lives wholly in $B$. In particular, $|a_n_k - a_n_k+1| < epsilon$ for all $k$, where we also used the triangle inequality. By the expansive property of $f$, and by induction, it follows that $|a - a_n_k - n_k+1| < epsilon$ for all $k$, that is, $(alpha_k) = (a_n_k - n_k+1)$ is a subsequence of $(a_n)$ that lives wholly in the $epsilon$-ball centred on $a$. Taking the corresponding subsequence of $(b_n)$, and applying the same argument using compactness of $K$ and expansiveness of $f$, we may pass to further corresponding subsequences of $(a_n)$ and $(b_n)$ that live wholly in the $epsilon$-balls centred on $a$ and on $b$, respectively. In particular, there is an index $k$ such that $a_k$ and $b_k$ have the property required in part a) of the question.
For part b), let $c in K$. We already showed in part a) that points in the sequence $f^n(c)$ may be found that are arbitrarily close to $c$. It follows that the range of $f$ is dense in $K$, as required.
For part c), let $a, b in K$ and suppose, for a contradiction, that $|f(a) - f(b)| = |a - b| + eta$, where $eta > 0$. Then for all $k$, $|a_k - b_k| geq |a - b| + eta$. By a suitable choice of $epsilon$, and by applying the triangle inequality, we can contradict the assertion in part a). Conclude that $|f(a) - f(b)| = |a - b|$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I didn't see TheSilverDoe's nice answer, until after I'd posted this.
$endgroup$
– Simon
Mar 20 at 13:02
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $epsilon>0$. Cover $K$ with finitely many open balls of radius $epsilon/2$, as we may, since $K$ is compact. The sequence $(a_n)$ must visit at least one such ball, say $B$, infinitely many times. Therefore there is a subsequence $(a_n_k)$ of $(a_n)$ that lives wholly in $B$. In particular, $|a_n_k - a_n_k+1| < epsilon$ for all $k$, where we also used the triangle inequality. By the expansive property of $f$, and by induction, it follows that $|a - a_n_k - n_k+1| < epsilon$ for all $k$, that is, $(alpha_k) = (a_n_k - n_k+1)$ is a subsequence of $(a_n)$ that lives wholly in the $epsilon$-ball centred on $a$. Taking the corresponding subsequence of $(b_n)$, and applying the same argument using compactness of $K$ and expansiveness of $f$, we may pass to further corresponding subsequences of $(a_n)$ and $(b_n)$ that live wholly in the $epsilon$-balls centred on $a$ and on $b$, respectively. In particular, there is an index $k$ such that $a_k$ and $b_k$ have the property required in part a) of the question.
For part b), let $c in K$. We already showed in part a) that points in the sequence $f^n(c)$ may be found that are arbitrarily close to $c$. It follows that the range of $f$ is dense in $K$, as required.
For part c), let $a, b in K$ and suppose, for a contradiction, that $|f(a) - f(b)| = |a - b| + eta$, where $eta > 0$. Then for all $k$, $|a_k - b_k| geq |a - b| + eta$. By a suitable choice of $epsilon$, and by applying the triangle inequality, we can contradict the assertion in part a). Conclude that $|f(a) - f(b)| = |a - b|$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I didn't see TheSilverDoe's nice answer, until after I'd posted this.
$endgroup$
– Simon
Mar 20 at 13:02
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $epsilon>0$. Cover $K$ with finitely many open balls of radius $epsilon/2$, as we may, since $K$ is compact. The sequence $(a_n)$ must visit at least one such ball, say $B$, infinitely many times. Therefore there is a subsequence $(a_n_k)$ of $(a_n)$ that lives wholly in $B$. In particular, $|a_n_k - a_n_k+1| < epsilon$ for all $k$, where we also used the triangle inequality. By the expansive property of $f$, and by induction, it follows that $|a - a_n_k - n_k+1| < epsilon$ for all $k$, that is, $(alpha_k) = (a_n_k - n_k+1)$ is a subsequence of $(a_n)$ that lives wholly in the $epsilon$-ball centred on $a$. Taking the corresponding subsequence of $(b_n)$, and applying the same argument using compactness of $K$ and expansiveness of $f$, we may pass to further corresponding subsequences of $(a_n)$ and $(b_n)$ that live wholly in the $epsilon$-balls centred on $a$ and on $b$, respectively. In particular, there is an index $k$ such that $a_k$ and $b_k$ have the property required in part a) of the question.
For part b), let $c in K$. We already showed in part a) that points in the sequence $f^n(c)$ may be found that are arbitrarily close to $c$. It follows that the range of $f$ is dense in $K$, as required.
For part c), let $a, b in K$ and suppose, for a contradiction, that $|f(a) - f(b)| = |a - b| + eta$, where $eta > 0$. Then for all $k$, $|a_k - b_k| geq |a - b| + eta$. By a suitable choice of $epsilon$, and by applying the triangle inequality, we can contradict the assertion in part a). Conclude that $|f(a) - f(b)| = |a - b|$.
$endgroup$
Let $epsilon>0$. Cover $K$ with finitely many open balls of radius $epsilon/2$, as we may, since $K$ is compact. The sequence $(a_n)$ must visit at least one such ball, say $B$, infinitely many times. Therefore there is a subsequence $(a_n_k)$ of $(a_n)$ that lives wholly in $B$. In particular, $|a_n_k - a_n_k+1| < epsilon$ for all $k$, where we also used the triangle inequality. By the expansive property of $f$, and by induction, it follows that $|a - a_n_k - n_k+1| < epsilon$ for all $k$, that is, $(alpha_k) = (a_n_k - n_k+1)$ is a subsequence of $(a_n)$ that lives wholly in the $epsilon$-ball centred on $a$. Taking the corresponding subsequence of $(b_n)$, and applying the same argument using compactness of $K$ and expansiveness of $f$, we may pass to further corresponding subsequences of $(a_n)$ and $(b_n)$ that live wholly in the $epsilon$-balls centred on $a$ and on $b$, respectively. In particular, there is an index $k$ such that $a_k$ and $b_k$ have the property required in part a) of the question.
For part b), let $c in K$. We already showed in part a) that points in the sequence $f^n(c)$ may be found that are arbitrarily close to $c$. It follows that the range of $f$ is dense in $K$, as required.
For part c), let $a, b in K$ and suppose, for a contradiction, that $|f(a) - f(b)| = |a - b| + eta$, where $eta > 0$. Then for all $k$, $|a_k - b_k| geq |a - b| + eta$. By a suitable choice of $epsilon$, and by applying the triangle inequality, we can contradict the assertion in part a). Conclude that $|f(a) - f(b)| = |a - b|$.
answered Mar 20 at 12:58
SimonSimon
793513
793513
$begingroup$
I didn't see TheSilverDoe's nice answer, until after I'd posted this.
$endgroup$
– Simon
Mar 20 at 13:02
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I didn't see TheSilverDoe's nice answer, until after I'd posted this.
$endgroup$
– Simon
Mar 20 at 13:02
$begingroup$
I didn't see TheSilverDoe's nice answer, until after I'd posted this.
$endgroup$
– Simon
Mar 20 at 13:02
$begingroup$
I didn't see TheSilverDoe's nice answer, until after I'd posted this.
$endgroup$
– Simon
Mar 20 at 13:02
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3155209%2fisometry-and-compactness%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown