Proving $f(x)=|x|$ is onto The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Determining if Function is 1:1 or OntoProving a bijection(injection and surjection) over a functionRigorous proof that surjectivity implies injectivity for finite setsProving continuity on Sobolev space with weak topologyProving or Disproving a function that is onto itself is one to one.How to prove $f(n)=lceilfracn2rceil$ is one-to-one and onto?Onto functions from Power set of Naturals$f(y)geq f(x)rightarrow (y-x)geq0$ in $mathbbR^2_+$ if weakly increasing?Is $f(x) = 3 -frac2x$ injective or surjective?Prove a function is onto if its domain is a Cartesian product

Single author papers against my advisor's will?

Can withdrawing asylum be illegal?

Can undead you have reanimated wait inside a portable hole?

Why does the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) not include telescopes from Africa, Asia or Australia?

Semisimplicity of the category of coherent sheaves?

Relations between two reciprocal partial derivatives?

Typeface like Times New Roman but with "tied" percent sign

The variadic template constructor of my class cannot modify my class members, why is that so?

I could not break this equation. Please help me

Does Parliament hold absolute power in the UK?

What's the point in a preamp?

does high air pressure throw off wheel balance?

High Q peak in frequency response means what in time domain?

Working through the single responsibility principle (SRP) in Python when calls are expensive

How can I protect witches in combat who wear limited clothing?

Is there a writing software that you can sort scenes like slides in PowerPoint?

How did the audience guess the pentatonic scale in Bobby McFerrin's presentation?

Was credit for the black hole image misattributed?

How to pronounce 1ターン?

What do you call a plan that's an alternative plan in case your initial plan fails?

What can I do if neighbor is blocking my solar panels intentionally?

How to delete random line from file using Unix command?

Match Roman Numerals

First use of “packing” as in carrying a gun



Proving $f(x)=|x|$ is onto



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Determining if Function is 1:1 or OntoProving a bijection(injection and surjection) over a functionRigorous proof that surjectivity implies injectivity for finite setsProving continuity on Sobolev space with weak topologyProving or Disproving a function that is onto itself is one to one.How to prove $f(n)=lceilfracn2rceil$ is one-to-one and onto?Onto functions from Power set of Naturals$f(y)geq f(x)rightarrow (y-x)geq0$ in $mathbbR^2_+$ if weakly increasing?Is $f(x) = 3 -frac2x$ injective or surjective?Prove a function is onto if its domain is a Cartesian product










2












$begingroup$


I've been working on proving that this is a onto function:



$f$ : $mathbb R$ $to$ $mathbb R^geq0$ is defined by $f(x)=|x|$



My proof so far: Let $yinmathbb R$.



Rough work: $|x|=y Rightarrow sqrt x^2=y Rightarrow n^2=y^2 Rightarrow pm x=pm y$



Suppose $f(pm y)=|pm y|=y$.



I know that this function is definitely onto given the co-domain of $mathbb R^geq0$, but I feel like my proof is flawed. Am I supposed to individually account for the $-x$ and the $+x$ from $pm x=pm y$ when trying to solve $f(x) = y$?



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Let $ain mathbb R ^geq 0$. Then by definition, $|a|=a$. Therefore, $a$ is in the image of $f:xmapsto |x|$.
    $endgroup$
    – Arrow
    Mar 24 at 15:23






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    You proof is wrong from the beginning. You need to assume y is in the nonnegative reals and show you can find a real x that maps to it.
    $endgroup$
    – symplectomorphic
    Mar 24 at 15:24















2












$begingroup$


I've been working on proving that this is a onto function:



$f$ : $mathbb R$ $to$ $mathbb R^geq0$ is defined by $f(x)=|x|$



My proof so far: Let $yinmathbb R$.



Rough work: $|x|=y Rightarrow sqrt x^2=y Rightarrow n^2=y^2 Rightarrow pm x=pm y$



Suppose $f(pm y)=|pm y|=y$.



I know that this function is definitely onto given the co-domain of $mathbb R^geq0$, but I feel like my proof is flawed. Am I supposed to individually account for the $-x$ and the $+x$ from $pm x=pm y$ when trying to solve $f(x) = y$?



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Let $ain mathbb R ^geq 0$. Then by definition, $|a|=a$. Therefore, $a$ is in the image of $f:xmapsto |x|$.
    $endgroup$
    – Arrow
    Mar 24 at 15:23






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    You proof is wrong from the beginning. You need to assume y is in the nonnegative reals and show you can find a real x that maps to it.
    $endgroup$
    – symplectomorphic
    Mar 24 at 15:24













2












2








2


2



$begingroup$


I've been working on proving that this is a onto function:



$f$ : $mathbb R$ $to$ $mathbb R^geq0$ is defined by $f(x)=|x|$



My proof so far: Let $yinmathbb R$.



Rough work: $|x|=y Rightarrow sqrt x^2=y Rightarrow n^2=y^2 Rightarrow pm x=pm y$



Suppose $f(pm y)=|pm y|=y$.



I know that this function is definitely onto given the co-domain of $mathbb R^geq0$, but I feel like my proof is flawed. Am I supposed to individually account for the $-x$ and the $+x$ from $pm x=pm y$ when trying to solve $f(x) = y$?



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I've been working on proving that this is a onto function:



$f$ : $mathbb R$ $to$ $mathbb R^geq0$ is defined by $f(x)=|x|$



My proof so far: Let $yinmathbb R$.



Rough work: $|x|=y Rightarrow sqrt x^2=y Rightarrow n^2=y^2 Rightarrow pm x=pm y$



Suppose $f(pm y)=|pm y|=y$.



I know that this function is definitely onto given the co-domain of $mathbb R^geq0$, but I feel like my proof is flawed. Am I supposed to individually account for the $-x$ and the $+x$ from $pm x=pm y$ when trying to solve $f(x) = y$?



Thanks!







proof-verification elementary-set-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 25 at 8:00









YuiTo Cheng

2,40641037




2,40641037










asked Mar 24 at 15:21









Nick SabiaNick Sabia

356




356







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Let $ain mathbb R ^geq 0$. Then by definition, $|a|=a$. Therefore, $a$ is in the image of $f:xmapsto |x|$.
    $endgroup$
    – Arrow
    Mar 24 at 15:23






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    You proof is wrong from the beginning. You need to assume y is in the nonnegative reals and show you can find a real x that maps to it.
    $endgroup$
    – symplectomorphic
    Mar 24 at 15:24












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Let $ain mathbb R ^geq 0$. Then by definition, $|a|=a$. Therefore, $a$ is in the image of $f:xmapsto |x|$.
    $endgroup$
    – Arrow
    Mar 24 at 15:23






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    You proof is wrong from the beginning. You need to assume y is in the nonnegative reals and show you can find a real x that maps to it.
    $endgroup$
    – symplectomorphic
    Mar 24 at 15:24







1




1




$begingroup$
Let $ain mathbb R ^geq 0$. Then by definition, $|a|=a$. Therefore, $a$ is in the image of $f:xmapsto |x|$.
$endgroup$
– Arrow
Mar 24 at 15:23




$begingroup$
Let $ain mathbb R ^geq 0$. Then by definition, $|a|=a$. Therefore, $a$ is in the image of $f:xmapsto |x|$.
$endgroup$
– Arrow
Mar 24 at 15:23




6




6




$begingroup$
You proof is wrong from the beginning. You need to assume y is in the nonnegative reals and show you can find a real x that maps to it.
$endgroup$
– symplectomorphic
Mar 24 at 15:24




$begingroup$
You proof is wrong from the beginning. You need to assume y is in the nonnegative reals and show you can find a real x that maps to it.
$endgroup$
– symplectomorphic
Mar 24 at 15:24










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















21












$begingroup$

In order to show that the function is onto (surjective) it is enough to argue that for each $y$ in the codomain there is at least one $x$ in the domain that maps to it.



You seem to be trying to find all of the $x$ such that $f(x)=y$, which is more work than you need to do and creates a rather large detour.



You could just say:




Let $yinmathbb R^ge 0$ be given. Then $f(y)=|y|=y$, so by setting $x=y$ we find an $xinmathbb R$ such that $f(x)=y$. Since $y$ was arbitrary this proves that $f$ is surjective.




(Even this is more verbose than it really needs to be, but in exercises at this elementary level it is good to be explicit about the details, to show that you know what you're doing).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    (+1) Because this is a vey pedagogical answer.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Mar 24 at 15:33


















4












$begingroup$


Am I supposed to individually account for the -x and the +x from ±x=±y when trying to solve f(x)=y?




No.



You are simply supposed to show that for any general arbitrary $y in mathbb R^ge 0$ that there is, at least (you don't have to find them all), one $xin mathbb R$ so that $|x| = y$.



As $|y| = y$ this is very easy. And you are done.



The proof is two lines:



1) Let $y in mathbb R^ge 0$.



2) $f(y) = |y| = y$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    2












    $begingroup$

    You should not start with $yinmathbb R$ but rather with $yinmathbbR^geqslant0$. Then $y=f(y)$. Since this happens for every $yinmathbbR^geqslant 0$, $f$ is onto.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$




















      0












      $begingroup$

      Well, you want to show that $f$ is onto. So take an arbitrary element $yinBbb R_geq 0$ from the image set and find a preimage. Here a preimage is $y$ itself or even $-y$, since $|-y|=y$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$




















        0












        $begingroup$

        More generally, If $B subseteq A$ and $f: A rightarrow B$ is a continuous mapping with $f(b) = b$ for all $b in B$ then $f$ is called a retraction of $A$ onto $B$. It is trivial that any such $f$ is onto since $f(b) = b$ for all $b in B$ immediately implies that all such $b$ are in the range. Note that continuity really plays no role in this. Thinking of $|x|$ as a retraction is perhaps overkill, but shows that the proof that it is onto the nonnegative reals is a special case of a more general (and equally easy to prove) result.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3160658%2fproving-fx-x-is-onto%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes








          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          21












          $begingroup$

          In order to show that the function is onto (surjective) it is enough to argue that for each $y$ in the codomain there is at least one $x$ in the domain that maps to it.



          You seem to be trying to find all of the $x$ such that $f(x)=y$, which is more work than you need to do and creates a rather large detour.



          You could just say:




          Let $yinmathbb R^ge 0$ be given. Then $f(y)=|y|=y$, so by setting $x=y$ we find an $xinmathbb R$ such that $f(x)=y$. Since $y$ was arbitrary this proves that $f$ is surjective.




          (Even this is more verbose than it really needs to be, but in exercises at this elementary level it is good to be explicit about the details, to show that you know what you're doing).






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 2




            $begingroup$
            (+1) Because this is a vey pedagogical answer.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            Mar 24 at 15:33















          21












          $begingroup$

          In order to show that the function is onto (surjective) it is enough to argue that for each $y$ in the codomain there is at least one $x$ in the domain that maps to it.



          You seem to be trying to find all of the $x$ such that $f(x)=y$, which is more work than you need to do and creates a rather large detour.



          You could just say:




          Let $yinmathbb R^ge 0$ be given. Then $f(y)=|y|=y$, so by setting $x=y$ we find an $xinmathbb R$ such that $f(x)=y$. Since $y$ was arbitrary this proves that $f$ is surjective.




          (Even this is more verbose than it really needs to be, but in exercises at this elementary level it is good to be explicit about the details, to show that you know what you're doing).






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 2




            $begingroup$
            (+1) Because this is a vey pedagogical answer.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            Mar 24 at 15:33













          21












          21








          21





          $begingroup$

          In order to show that the function is onto (surjective) it is enough to argue that for each $y$ in the codomain there is at least one $x$ in the domain that maps to it.



          You seem to be trying to find all of the $x$ such that $f(x)=y$, which is more work than you need to do and creates a rather large detour.



          You could just say:




          Let $yinmathbb R^ge 0$ be given. Then $f(y)=|y|=y$, so by setting $x=y$ we find an $xinmathbb R$ such that $f(x)=y$. Since $y$ was arbitrary this proves that $f$ is surjective.




          (Even this is more verbose than it really needs to be, but in exercises at this elementary level it is good to be explicit about the details, to show that you know what you're doing).






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          In order to show that the function is onto (surjective) it is enough to argue that for each $y$ in the codomain there is at least one $x$ in the domain that maps to it.



          You seem to be trying to find all of the $x$ such that $f(x)=y$, which is more work than you need to do and creates a rather large detour.



          You could just say:




          Let $yinmathbb R^ge 0$ be given. Then $f(y)=|y|=y$, so by setting $x=y$ we find an $xinmathbb R$ such that $f(x)=y$. Since $y$ was arbitrary this proves that $f$ is surjective.




          (Even this is more verbose than it really needs to be, but in exercises at this elementary level it is good to be explicit about the details, to show that you know what you're doing).







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 24 at 15:25









          Henning MakholmHenning Makholm

          243k17311555




          243k17311555







          • 2




            $begingroup$
            (+1) Because this is a vey pedagogical answer.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            Mar 24 at 15:33












          • 2




            $begingroup$
            (+1) Because this is a vey pedagogical answer.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            Mar 24 at 15:33







          2




          2




          $begingroup$
          (+1) Because this is a vey pedagogical answer.
          $endgroup$
          – José Carlos Santos
          Mar 24 at 15:33




          $begingroup$
          (+1) Because this is a vey pedagogical answer.
          $endgroup$
          – José Carlos Santos
          Mar 24 at 15:33











          4












          $begingroup$


          Am I supposed to individually account for the -x and the +x from ±x=±y when trying to solve f(x)=y?




          No.



          You are simply supposed to show that for any general arbitrary $y in mathbb R^ge 0$ that there is, at least (you don't have to find them all), one $xin mathbb R$ so that $|x| = y$.



          As $|y| = y$ this is very easy. And you are done.



          The proof is two lines:



          1) Let $y in mathbb R^ge 0$.



          2) $f(y) = |y| = y$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$

















            4












            $begingroup$


            Am I supposed to individually account for the -x and the +x from ±x=±y when trying to solve f(x)=y?




            No.



            You are simply supposed to show that for any general arbitrary $y in mathbb R^ge 0$ that there is, at least (you don't have to find them all), one $xin mathbb R$ so that $|x| = y$.



            As $|y| = y$ this is very easy. And you are done.



            The proof is two lines:



            1) Let $y in mathbb R^ge 0$.



            2) $f(y) = |y| = y$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$















              4












              4








              4





              $begingroup$


              Am I supposed to individually account for the -x and the +x from ±x=±y when trying to solve f(x)=y?




              No.



              You are simply supposed to show that for any general arbitrary $y in mathbb R^ge 0$ that there is, at least (you don't have to find them all), one $xin mathbb R$ so that $|x| = y$.



              As $|y| = y$ this is very easy. And you are done.



              The proof is two lines:



              1) Let $y in mathbb R^ge 0$.



              2) $f(y) = |y| = y$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$




              Am I supposed to individually account for the -x and the +x from ±x=±y when trying to solve f(x)=y?




              No.



              You are simply supposed to show that for any general arbitrary $y in mathbb R^ge 0$ that there is, at least (you don't have to find them all), one $xin mathbb R$ so that $|x| = y$.



              As $|y| = y$ this is very easy. And you are done.



              The proof is two lines:



              1) Let $y in mathbb R^ge 0$.



              2) $f(y) = |y| = y$.







              share|cite|improve this answer












              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered Mar 24 at 16:04









              fleabloodfleablood

              1




              1





















                  2












                  $begingroup$

                  You should not start with $yinmathbb R$ but rather with $yinmathbbR^geqslant0$. Then $y=f(y)$. Since this happens for every $yinmathbbR^geqslant 0$, $f$ is onto.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$

















                    2












                    $begingroup$

                    You should not start with $yinmathbb R$ but rather with $yinmathbbR^geqslant0$. Then $y=f(y)$. Since this happens for every $yinmathbbR^geqslant 0$, $f$ is onto.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$















                      2












                      2








                      2





                      $begingroup$

                      You should not start with $yinmathbb R$ but rather with $yinmathbbR^geqslant0$. Then $y=f(y)$. Since this happens for every $yinmathbbR^geqslant 0$, $f$ is onto.






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$



                      You should not start with $yinmathbb R$ but rather with $yinmathbbR^geqslant0$. Then $y=f(y)$. Since this happens for every $yinmathbbR^geqslant 0$, $f$ is onto.







                      share|cite|improve this answer














                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer








                      edited Mar 24 at 15:41









                      J. W. Tanner

                      4,7721420




                      4,7721420










                      answered Mar 24 at 15:26









                      José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

                      174k23134243




                      174k23134243





















                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          Well, you want to show that $f$ is onto. So take an arbitrary element $yinBbb R_geq 0$ from the image set and find a preimage. Here a preimage is $y$ itself or even $-y$, since $|-y|=y$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$

















                            0












                            $begingroup$

                            Well, you want to show that $f$ is onto. So take an arbitrary element $yinBbb R_geq 0$ from the image set and find a preimage. Here a preimage is $y$ itself or even $-y$, since $|-y|=y$.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$















                              0












                              0








                              0





                              $begingroup$

                              Well, you want to show that $f$ is onto. So take an arbitrary element $yinBbb R_geq 0$ from the image set and find a preimage. Here a preimage is $y$ itself or even $-y$, since $|-y|=y$.






                              share|cite|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$



                              Well, you want to show that $f$ is onto. So take an arbitrary element $yinBbb R_geq 0$ from the image set and find a preimage. Here a preimage is $y$ itself or even $-y$, since $|-y|=y$.







                              share|cite|improve this answer












                              share|cite|improve this answer



                              share|cite|improve this answer










                              answered Mar 24 at 15:24









                              WuestenfuxWuestenfux

                              5,5131513




                              5,5131513





















                                  0












                                  $begingroup$

                                  More generally, If $B subseteq A$ and $f: A rightarrow B$ is a continuous mapping with $f(b) = b$ for all $b in B$ then $f$ is called a retraction of $A$ onto $B$. It is trivial that any such $f$ is onto since $f(b) = b$ for all $b in B$ immediately implies that all such $b$ are in the range. Note that continuity really plays no role in this. Thinking of $|x|$ as a retraction is perhaps overkill, but shows that the proof that it is onto the nonnegative reals is a special case of a more general (and equally easy to prove) result.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$

















                                    0












                                    $begingroup$

                                    More generally, If $B subseteq A$ and $f: A rightarrow B$ is a continuous mapping with $f(b) = b$ for all $b in B$ then $f$ is called a retraction of $A$ onto $B$. It is trivial that any such $f$ is onto since $f(b) = b$ for all $b in B$ immediately implies that all such $b$ are in the range. Note that continuity really plays no role in this. Thinking of $|x|$ as a retraction is perhaps overkill, but shows that the proof that it is onto the nonnegative reals is a special case of a more general (and equally easy to prove) result.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$















                                      0












                                      0








                                      0





                                      $begingroup$

                                      More generally, If $B subseteq A$ and $f: A rightarrow B$ is a continuous mapping with $f(b) = b$ for all $b in B$ then $f$ is called a retraction of $A$ onto $B$. It is trivial that any such $f$ is onto since $f(b) = b$ for all $b in B$ immediately implies that all such $b$ are in the range. Note that continuity really plays no role in this. Thinking of $|x|$ as a retraction is perhaps overkill, but shows that the proof that it is onto the nonnegative reals is a special case of a more general (and equally easy to prove) result.






                                      share|cite|improve this answer









                                      $endgroup$



                                      More generally, If $B subseteq A$ and $f: A rightarrow B$ is a continuous mapping with $f(b) = b$ for all $b in B$ then $f$ is called a retraction of $A$ onto $B$. It is trivial that any such $f$ is onto since $f(b) = b$ for all $b in B$ immediately implies that all such $b$ are in the range. Note that continuity really plays no role in this. Thinking of $|x|$ as a retraction is perhaps overkill, but shows that the proof that it is onto the nonnegative reals is a special case of a more general (and equally easy to prove) result.







                                      share|cite|improve this answer












                                      share|cite|improve this answer



                                      share|cite|improve this answer










                                      answered Mar 24 at 20:31









                                      John ColemanJohn Coleman

                                      4,00311224




                                      4,00311224



























                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded
















































                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid


                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function ()
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3160658%2fproving-fx-x-is-onto%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye

                                          random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

                                          How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer