If a linear function is nonnegative on a subspace, then the function is zero The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Finding nonnegative solutions to an underdetermined linear systemIs calling a linear-equation a linear-function, misnomer or completely wrong?Geometric interpretation of First order conditionFirst order condition in constrained optimization: Alternative characterization via normal conesEquivalent characterizations of the dual norm on finite dimensional vector spacesWidth of an ellipsoidDoes entry-wise non-negativity imply positive semidefiniteness?Every affine set can be expressed as the solution set of a system of linear equationswhat are some direct definitions of convexity for multivariable functions?How to show two different definitions of $alpha$-strongly convex are equivalent?

Why does the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) not include telescopes from Africa, Asia or Australia?

How did the audience guess the pentatonic scale in Bobby McFerrin's presentation?

Python - Fishing Simulator

The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 1397BC53640DB551

First use of “packing” as in carrying a gun

Derivation tree not rendering

He got a vote 80% that of Emmanuel Macron’s

What's the point in a preamp?

Problems with Ubuntu mount /tmp

Can withdrawing asylum be illegal?

What are these Gizmos at Izaña Atmospheric Research Center in Spain?

When did F become S in typeography, and why?

system() function string length limit

How to copy the contents of all files with a certain name into a new file?

how can a perfect fourth interval be considered either consonant or dissonant?

Make it rain characters

Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?

Scientific Reports - Significant Figures

How did passengers keep warm on sail ships?

Segmentation fault output is suppressed when piping stdin into a function. Why?

Can undead you have reanimated wait inside a portable hole?

Can smartphones with the same camera sensor have different image quality?

Can the DM override racial traits?

Wolves and sheep



If a linear function is nonnegative on a subspace, then the function is zero



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Finding nonnegative solutions to an underdetermined linear systemIs calling a linear-equation a linear-function, misnomer or completely wrong?Geometric interpretation of First order conditionFirst order condition in constrained optimization: Alternative characterization via normal conesEquivalent characterizations of the dual norm on finite dimensional vector spacesWidth of an ellipsoidDoes entry-wise non-negativity imply positive semidefiniteness?Every affine set can be expressed as the solution set of a system of linear equationswhat are some direct definitions of convexity for multivariable functions?How to show two different definitions of $alpha$-strongly convex are equivalent?










0












$begingroup$


Edit: Consider this solved. I used the wrong definition of linear function. I originally used the polynomial definition, $f(x) = acdot x + b$, not the linear map definition $f(alpha x) = alpha f(x), f(x + y) = f(x) + f(y)$.



This claim comes from "Convex Optimization" by Boyd and Vandenberghe of recharacterizing a convex optimization problem that has only equality constraints (Section 4.2).



Claim: If a linear function is nonnegative on a subspace then it must be zero on the subspace.



Context: It seems as if this is a general statement, but I've had surprising difficulty trying to prove it in general. The specific problem used is:



Minimize $f_0(x)$
subject to $Ax = b$ where $x in mathbbR^n$ and $A$ is some $n times n$ matrix



This claim is applied toward the function $nabla f_0(x)^T v = nabla f_0(x) cdot v geq 0$ which is a nonnegative linear function over $v in Nullspace(A) = N(A)$



Work so far: Let $f(x) = a cdot x + b$ be some nonnegative linear function over some subspace $S$. $0 in S rightarrow b geq 0$. Suppose there exists $x_0 in S$ such that $a cdot x_0 + b > 0$. By definition of the subspace, $-x_0 in S$ such that $-a cdot x + b geq 0 rightarrow b geq a cdot x_0 rightarrow 2b geq a cdot x_0 + b > 0$.



By the last relation, if $b = 0$, then contradiction occurs so $b > 0$. At this point, I get the gut feeling I'm doing something wrong.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    You’re using the wrong definition of linear function: in this context $f$ is linear provided that $f(alpha v)=alpha f(v)$ for each scalar $alpha$ and vector $v$. Thus, if $f(v)$ were positive for some $v$ in the subspace, $f(-v)=-f(v)$ would be negative.
    $endgroup$
    – Brian M. Scott
    Jan 9 '17 at 23:26











  • $begingroup$
    Kill me. I facepalmed so hard. Thank you for pointing that out. The claim works out without much work. I'm used to referring that version as a "linear map" over linear function.
    $endgroup$
    – user64878
    Jan 9 '17 at 23:30
















0












$begingroup$


Edit: Consider this solved. I used the wrong definition of linear function. I originally used the polynomial definition, $f(x) = acdot x + b$, not the linear map definition $f(alpha x) = alpha f(x), f(x + y) = f(x) + f(y)$.



This claim comes from "Convex Optimization" by Boyd and Vandenberghe of recharacterizing a convex optimization problem that has only equality constraints (Section 4.2).



Claim: If a linear function is nonnegative on a subspace then it must be zero on the subspace.



Context: It seems as if this is a general statement, but I've had surprising difficulty trying to prove it in general. The specific problem used is:



Minimize $f_0(x)$
subject to $Ax = b$ where $x in mathbbR^n$ and $A$ is some $n times n$ matrix



This claim is applied toward the function $nabla f_0(x)^T v = nabla f_0(x) cdot v geq 0$ which is a nonnegative linear function over $v in Nullspace(A) = N(A)$



Work so far: Let $f(x) = a cdot x + b$ be some nonnegative linear function over some subspace $S$. $0 in S rightarrow b geq 0$. Suppose there exists $x_0 in S$ such that $a cdot x_0 + b > 0$. By definition of the subspace, $-x_0 in S$ such that $-a cdot x + b geq 0 rightarrow b geq a cdot x_0 rightarrow 2b geq a cdot x_0 + b > 0$.



By the last relation, if $b = 0$, then contradiction occurs so $b > 0$. At this point, I get the gut feeling I'm doing something wrong.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    You’re using the wrong definition of linear function: in this context $f$ is linear provided that $f(alpha v)=alpha f(v)$ for each scalar $alpha$ and vector $v$. Thus, if $f(v)$ were positive for some $v$ in the subspace, $f(-v)=-f(v)$ would be negative.
    $endgroup$
    – Brian M. Scott
    Jan 9 '17 at 23:26











  • $begingroup$
    Kill me. I facepalmed so hard. Thank you for pointing that out. The claim works out without much work. I'm used to referring that version as a "linear map" over linear function.
    $endgroup$
    – user64878
    Jan 9 '17 at 23:30














0












0








0


1



$begingroup$


Edit: Consider this solved. I used the wrong definition of linear function. I originally used the polynomial definition, $f(x) = acdot x + b$, not the linear map definition $f(alpha x) = alpha f(x), f(x + y) = f(x) + f(y)$.



This claim comes from "Convex Optimization" by Boyd and Vandenberghe of recharacterizing a convex optimization problem that has only equality constraints (Section 4.2).



Claim: If a linear function is nonnegative on a subspace then it must be zero on the subspace.



Context: It seems as if this is a general statement, but I've had surprising difficulty trying to prove it in general. The specific problem used is:



Minimize $f_0(x)$
subject to $Ax = b$ where $x in mathbbR^n$ and $A$ is some $n times n$ matrix



This claim is applied toward the function $nabla f_0(x)^T v = nabla f_0(x) cdot v geq 0$ which is a nonnegative linear function over $v in Nullspace(A) = N(A)$



Work so far: Let $f(x) = a cdot x + b$ be some nonnegative linear function over some subspace $S$. $0 in S rightarrow b geq 0$. Suppose there exists $x_0 in S$ such that $a cdot x_0 + b > 0$. By definition of the subspace, $-x_0 in S$ such that $-a cdot x + b geq 0 rightarrow b geq a cdot x_0 rightarrow 2b geq a cdot x_0 + b > 0$.



By the last relation, if $b = 0$, then contradiction occurs so $b > 0$. At this point, I get the gut feeling I'm doing something wrong.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Edit: Consider this solved. I used the wrong definition of linear function. I originally used the polynomial definition, $f(x) = acdot x + b$, not the linear map definition $f(alpha x) = alpha f(x), f(x + y) = f(x) + f(y)$.



This claim comes from "Convex Optimization" by Boyd and Vandenberghe of recharacterizing a convex optimization problem that has only equality constraints (Section 4.2).



Claim: If a linear function is nonnegative on a subspace then it must be zero on the subspace.



Context: It seems as if this is a general statement, but I've had surprising difficulty trying to prove it in general. The specific problem used is:



Minimize $f_0(x)$
subject to $Ax = b$ where $x in mathbbR^n$ and $A$ is some $n times n$ matrix



This claim is applied toward the function $nabla f_0(x)^T v = nabla f_0(x) cdot v geq 0$ which is a nonnegative linear function over $v in Nullspace(A) = N(A)$



Work so far: Let $f(x) = a cdot x + b$ be some nonnegative linear function over some subspace $S$. $0 in S rightarrow b geq 0$. Suppose there exists $x_0 in S$ such that $a cdot x_0 + b > 0$. By definition of the subspace, $-x_0 in S$ such that $-a cdot x + b geq 0 rightarrow b geq a cdot x_0 rightarrow 2b geq a cdot x_0 + b > 0$.



By the last relation, if $b = 0$, then contradiction occurs so $b > 0$. At this point, I get the gut feeling I'm doing something wrong.







linear-algebra






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 9 '17 at 23:32

























asked Jan 9 '17 at 23:24







user64878














  • 3




    $begingroup$
    You’re using the wrong definition of linear function: in this context $f$ is linear provided that $f(alpha v)=alpha f(v)$ for each scalar $alpha$ and vector $v$. Thus, if $f(v)$ were positive for some $v$ in the subspace, $f(-v)=-f(v)$ would be negative.
    $endgroup$
    – Brian M. Scott
    Jan 9 '17 at 23:26











  • $begingroup$
    Kill me. I facepalmed so hard. Thank you for pointing that out. The claim works out without much work. I'm used to referring that version as a "linear map" over linear function.
    $endgroup$
    – user64878
    Jan 9 '17 at 23:30













  • 3




    $begingroup$
    You’re using the wrong definition of linear function: in this context $f$ is linear provided that $f(alpha v)=alpha f(v)$ for each scalar $alpha$ and vector $v$. Thus, if $f(v)$ were positive for some $v$ in the subspace, $f(-v)=-f(v)$ would be negative.
    $endgroup$
    – Brian M. Scott
    Jan 9 '17 at 23:26











  • $begingroup$
    Kill me. I facepalmed so hard. Thank you for pointing that out. The claim works out without much work. I'm used to referring that version as a "linear map" over linear function.
    $endgroup$
    – user64878
    Jan 9 '17 at 23:30








3




3




$begingroup$
You’re using the wrong definition of linear function: in this context $f$ is linear provided that $f(alpha v)=alpha f(v)$ for each scalar $alpha$ and vector $v$. Thus, if $f(v)$ were positive for some $v$ in the subspace, $f(-v)=-f(v)$ would be negative.
$endgroup$
– Brian M. Scott
Jan 9 '17 at 23:26





$begingroup$
You’re using the wrong definition of linear function: in this context $f$ is linear provided that $f(alpha v)=alpha f(v)$ for each scalar $alpha$ and vector $v$. Thus, if $f(v)$ were positive for some $v$ in the subspace, $f(-v)=-f(v)$ would be negative.
$endgroup$
– Brian M. Scott
Jan 9 '17 at 23:26













$begingroup$
Kill me. I facepalmed so hard. Thank you for pointing that out. The claim works out without much work. I'm used to referring that version as a "linear map" over linear function.
$endgroup$
– user64878
Jan 9 '17 at 23:30





$begingroup$
Kill me. I facepalmed so hard. Thank you for pointing that out. The claim works out without much work. I'm used to referring that version as a "linear map" over linear function.
$endgroup$
– user64878
Jan 9 '17 at 23:30











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Say $f(x)$ is a linear function on a subspace $mathbbS$, then
$$
forall xin mathbbS, f(x)geq 0,
$$

And
$$
-xin mathbbS, f(-x)geq 0 Longrightarrow f(-x)=-f(x)geq0,Longrightarrow f(x)leq 0
$$



Hence, $f(x)=0$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2091064%2fif-a-linear-function-is-nonnegative-on-a-subspace-then-the-function-is-zero%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown
























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Say $f(x)$ is a linear function on a subspace $mathbbS$, then
    $$
    forall xin mathbbS, f(x)geq 0,
    $$

    And
    $$
    -xin mathbbS, f(-x)geq 0 Longrightarrow f(-x)=-f(x)geq0,Longrightarrow f(x)leq 0
    $$



    Hence, $f(x)=0$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      1












      $begingroup$

      Say $f(x)$ is a linear function on a subspace $mathbbS$, then
      $$
      forall xin mathbbS, f(x)geq 0,
      $$

      And
      $$
      -xin mathbbS, f(-x)geq 0 Longrightarrow f(-x)=-f(x)geq0,Longrightarrow f(x)leq 0
      $$



      Hence, $f(x)=0$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Say $f(x)$ is a linear function on a subspace $mathbbS$, then
        $$
        forall xin mathbbS, f(x)geq 0,
        $$

        And
        $$
        -xin mathbbS, f(-x)geq 0 Longrightarrow f(-x)=-f(x)geq0,Longrightarrow f(x)leq 0
        $$



        Hence, $f(x)=0$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Say $f(x)$ is a linear function on a subspace $mathbbS$, then
        $$
        forall xin mathbbS, f(x)geq 0,
        $$

        And
        $$
        -xin mathbbS, f(-x)geq 0 Longrightarrow f(-x)=-f(x)geq0,Longrightarrow f(x)leq 0
        $$



        Hence, $f(x)=0$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Mar 25 at 8:23









        ZhiyuZhiyu

        111




        111



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2091064%2fif-a-linear-function-is-nonnegative-on-a-subspace-then-the-function-is-zero%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

            random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

            Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye