Octahedrons whose faces are congruent quadrangles The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How would you make a (physical) dodecahedron with edges instead of faces?Uniform Polyhedron with 500 congruent right kite faces!How to find out the circumscribed radius of a snub dodecahedron?Coordinates of a rhombohedronPolyhedra with at least 3 pentagonal facesDividing an octahedron into two congruent regionsWhy semiregular polyhedra existsIrregular analogue of cube and octahedron.Obtuse triangle octahedron packingIsohedron splitting into isohedra

Working through the single responsibility principle (SRP) in Python when calls are expensive

how can a perfect fourth interval be considered either consonant or dissonant?

How are presidential pardons supposed to be used?

How do you keep chess fun when your opponent constantly beats you?

Did God make two great lights or did He make the great light two?

Did the UK government pay "millions and millions of dollars" to try to snag Julian Assange?

Segmentation fault output is suppressed when piping stdin into a function. Why?

Mortgage adviser recommends a longer term than necessary combined with overpayments

What's the point in a preamp?

Hiding Certain Lines on Table

How did passengers keep warm on sail ships?

What are these Gizmos at Izaña Atmospheric Research Center in Spain?

Single author papers against my advisor's will?

Semisimplicity of the category of coherent sheaves?

Is every episode of "Where are my Pants?" identical?

How did the audience guess the pentatonic scale in Bobby McFerrin's presentation?

In horse breeding, what is the female equivalent of putting a horse out "to stud"?

How do I add random spotting to the same face in cycles?

How to pronounce 1ターン?

Does Parliament hold absolute power in the UK?

The variadic template constructor of my class cannot modify my class members, why is that so?

Didn't get enough time to take a Coding Test - what to do now?

"... to apply for a visa" or "... and applied for a visa"?

Can smartphones with the same camera sensor have different image quality?



Octahedrons whose faces are congruent quadrangles



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How would you make a (physical) dodecahedron with edges instead of faces?Uniform Polyhedron with 500 congruent right kite faces!How to find out the circumscribed radius of a snub dodecahedron?Coordinates of a rhombohedronPolyhedra with at least 3 pentagonal facesDividing an octahedron into two congruent regionsWhy semiregular polyhedra existsIrregular analogue of cube and octahedron.Obtuse triangle octahedron packingIsohedron splitting into isohedra










0












$begingroup$



There is a octahedron which the faces are all congruent quadrangles. Let $M$ the set of length of edges of faces of the octahedron.



  1. Prove that $|M| le 3$.


  2. Prove that all faces have two edges with equal length which meets at one point.




My approach. I think I have to solve this problem with the numbers of faces, edges, and points.



There are $frac4 times 82 = 16$ edges and 8 faces, but we don't know the numbers of points.



By Euler theorem, $v-e+f=2$ and $e=16, f=8$. So $v=10$.



So, the degrees of the points is $(5, 3, 3, ..., 3)$ or $(4, 4, 3, 3, ..., 3)$. (Because the degrees are at least 3.)



Now what do we do?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Have you neglected to include in the problem statement that all the faces are quadrilaterals?
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 25 at 9:32






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oh, sorry. I did.
    $endgroup$
    – coding1101
    Mar 25 at 9:33










  • $begingroup$
    For (1) Suppose the side-lengths are $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$, in order, and consider three quadrangles that meet at a vertex of degree three. Show that at least two of the edge-lengths must match. Property (2) follows from the same consideration.
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Mar 25 at 10:38










  • $begingroup$
    Where does this question come from? I note Problem 39 in Steinhaus, One Hundred Problems in Elementary Mathematics: "Is it possible to construct an octahedron whose faces are congruent quadrangles?" A solution is given on pages 101-102. But where did you find this question, please?
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 26 at 3:47










  • $begingroup$
    This problem is from an academy, and I was curious about it.
    $endgroup$
    – coding1101
    Mar 26 at 8:23















0












$begingroup$



There is a octahedron which the faces are all congruent quadrangles. Let $M$ the set of length of edges of faces of the octahedron.



  1. Prove that $|M| le 3$.


  2. Prove that all faces have two edges with equal length which meets at one point.




My approach. I think I have to solve this problem with the numbers of faces, edges, and points.



There are $frac4 times 82 = 16$ edges and 8 faces, but we don't know the numbers of points.



By Euler theorem, $v-e+f=2$ and $e=16, f=8$. So $v=10$.



So, the degrees of the points is $(5, 3, 3, ..., 3)$ or $(4, 4, 3, 3, ..., 3)$. (Because the degrees are at least 3.)



Now what do we do?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Have you neglected to include in the problem statement that all the faces are quadrilaterals?
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 25 at 9:32






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oh, sorry. I did.
    $endgroup$
    – coding1101
    Mar 25 at 9:33










  • $begingroup$
    For (1) Suppose the side-lengths are $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$, in order, and consider three quadrangles that meet at a vertex of degree three. Show that at least two of the edge-lengths must match. Property (2) follows from the same consideration.
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Mar 25 at 10:38










  • $begingroup$
    Where does this question come from? I note Problem 39 in Steinhaus, One Hundred Problems in Elementary Mathematics: "Is it possible to construct an octahedron whose faces are congruent quadrangles?" A solution is given on pages 101-102. But where did you find this question, please?
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 26 at 3:47










  • $begingroup$
    This problem is from an academy, and I was curious about it.
    $endgroup$
    – coding1101
    Mar 26 at 8:23













0












0








0


0



$begingroup$



There is a octahedron which the faces are all congruent quadrangles. Let $M$ the set of length of edges of faces of the octahedron.



  1. Prove that $|M| le 3$.


  2. Prove that all faces have two edges with equal length which meets at one point.




My approach. I think I have to solve this problem with the numbers of faces, edges, and points.



There are $frac4 times 82 = 16$ edges and 8 faces, but we don't know the numbers of points.



By Euler theorem, $v-e+f=2$ and $e=16, f=8$. So $v=10$.



So, the degrees of the points is $(5, 3, 3, ..., 3)$ or $(4, 4, 3, 3, ..., 3)$. (Because the degrees are at least 3.)



Now what do we do?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





There is a octahedron which the faces are all congruent quadrangles. Let $M$ the set of length of edges of faces of the octahedron.



  1. Prove that $|M| le 3$.


  2. Prove that all faces have two edges with equal length which meets at one point.




My approach. I think I have to solve this problem with the numbers of faces, edges, and points.



There are $frac4 times 82 = 16$ edges and 8 faces, but we don't know the numbers of points.



By Euler theorem, $v-e+f=2$ and $e=16, f=8$. So $v=10$.



So, the degrees of the points is $(5, 3, 3, ..., 3)$ or $(4, 4, 3, 3, ..., 3)$. (Because the degrees are at least 3.)



Now what do we do?







solid-geometry






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 25 at 9:53







coding1101

















asked Mar 25 at 9:29









coding1101coding1101

1246




1246











  • $begingroup$
    Have you neglected to include in the problem statement that all the faces are quadrilaterals?
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 25 at 9:32






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oh, sorry. I did.
    $endgroup$
    – coding1101
    Mar 25 at 9:33










  • $begingroup$
    For (1) Suppose the side-lengths are $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$, in order, and consider three quadrangles that meet at a vertex of degree three. Show that at least two of the edge-lengths must match. Property (2) follows from the same consideration.
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Mar 25 at 10:38










  • $begingroup$
    Where does this question come from? I note Problem 39 in Steinhaus, One Hundred Problems in Elementary Mathematics: "Is it possible to construct an octahedron whose faces are congruent quadrangles?" A solution is given on pages 101-102. But where did you find this question, please?
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 26 at 3:47










  • $begingroup$
    This problem is from an academy, and I was curious about it.
    $endgroup$
    – coding1101
    Mar 26 at 8:23
















  • $begingroup$
    Have you neglected to include in the problem statement that all the faces are quadrilaterals?
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 25 at 9:32






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oh, sorry. I did.
    $endgroup$
    – coding1101
    Mar 25 at 9:33










  • $begingroup$
    For (1) Suppose the side-lengths are $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$, in order, and consider three quadrangles that meet at a vertex of degree three. Show that at least two of the edge-lengths must match. Property (2) follows from the same consideration.
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Mar 25 at 10:38










  • $begingroup$
    Where does this question come from? I note Problem 39 in Steinhaus, One Hundred Problems in Elementary Mathematics: "Is it possible to construct an octahedron whose faces are congruent quadrangles?" A solution is given on pages 101-102. But where did you find this question, please?
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 26 at 3:47










  • $begingroup$
    This problem is from an academy, and I was curious about it.
    $endgroup$
    – coding1101
    Mar 26 at 8:23















$begingroup$
Have you neglected to include in the problem statement that all the faces are quadrilaterals?
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Mar 25 at 9:32




$begingroup$
Have you neglected to include in the problem statement that all the faces are quadrilaterals?
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Mar 25 at 9:32




1




1




$begingroup$
Oh, sorry. I did.
$endgroup$
– coding1101
Mar 25 at 9:33




$begingroup$
Oh, sorry. I did.
$endgroup$
– coding1101
Mar 25 at 9:33












$begingroup$
For (1) Suppose the side-lengths are $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$, in order, and consider three quadrangles that meet at a vertex of degree three. Show that at least two of the edge-lengths must match. Property (2) follows from the same consideration.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Mar 25 at 10:38




$begingroup$
For (1) Suppose the side-lengths are $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$, in order, and consider three quadrangles that meet at a vertex of degree three. Show that at least two of the edge-lengths must match. Property (2) follows from the same consideration.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Mar 25 at 10:38












$begingroup$
Where does this question come from? I note Problem 39 in Steinhaus, One Hundred Problems in Elementary Mathematics: "Is it possible to construct an octahedron whose faces are congruent quadrangles?" A solution is given on pages 101-102. But where did you find this question, please?
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Mar 26 at 3:47




$begingroup$
Where does this question come from? I note Problem 39 in Steinhaus, One Hundred Problems in Elementary Mathematics: "Is it possible to construct an octahedron whose faces are congruent quadrangles?" A solution is given on pages 101-102. But where did you find this question, please?
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Mar 26 at 3:47












$begingroup$
This problem is from an academy, and I was curious about it.
$endgroup$
– coding1101
Mar 26 at 8:23




$begingroup$
This problem is from an academy, and I was curious about it.
$endgroup$
– coding1101
Mar 26 at 8:23










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

All right, let's clear up some things about the configuration.



First, any planar graph with all faces quadrilaterals (or even polygons) must be bipartite. How do those parts split? If there are six or more vertices in one of the parts, then, since each of those vertices has degree at least $3$ and each edge has only one of its vertices in the part, that's at least $18$ edges. This contradicts our calculation of $16$ edges, so the two parts must have five vertices each.



Now, count degrees at the vertices in each part. With $16$ total edges over five vertices, that must be four vertices of degree $3$ and one of degree $4$. The same is true of the other part.



Now, this splits into two cases for the configuration. Either the two vertices of degree $4$ are directly connected by an edge, or they're not. Let's see if we can build a planar graph in the former case:



Grid 1



We have several edges left to fill in, but the six faces around the two degree-$4$ vertices give us this much. Number the vertices and label as shown; the vertices of one part are shown in red, and the other part in blue.



Next, what can vertex blue #5 ($U_5$) connect to? It has three edges going to red vertices #2,3,4,5 ($R_2$,$R_3$,$R_4$,$R_5$). In particular, that means it must connect to at least one of $R_2$ or $R_3$. WLOG, that's $R_2$.



Grid 2



Then, there's a quadrilateral with consecutive vertices $U_5$, $R_2$, $U_1$. This must be face $C$, and the fourth vertex is $R_4$. That means it closes with an edge between $U_5$ and $R_4$, our second edge drawn in.



Now, we have some edges in the picture that only have one of their connected faces indicated. First, the triad U2 to R2 to U5 has to be part of a face. It can't be $A$, $B$, or $C$ since those faces have all of their vertices known. It can't be $D$, $E$, or $F$ since those faces have three known vertices each that agree with the list of three we have in at most one place. Therefore, it must be a new face; call it $G$.



Second, the edge from $R_3$ to $U_3$ is part of face $B$. What's its second face? It can't be $A$ or $C$ because those don't have either $R_3$ or $U_3$ as a vertex. It can't be $E$ or $G$ since those have three known vertices and can't include both $R_3$ and $U_3$. It can't be $D$ or $F$ since two faces of the polyhedron can't share adjacent edges. All of the old faces are ruled out, so it has to be a new face $H$.



Third, the edge from $R_4$ to $U_5$ is part of face $C$. What's its second face? Not $A$, $B$, $E$, or $F$ because there aren't enough free vertices. Not $D$ or $G$ because it can't share two adjacent edges with $C$. There are only eight faces, so that leaves us with $H$ as the only option.



Grid 3



How can $R_3$, $U_3$, $R_4$, and $U_5$ be part of the same face $H$? We must have edges from $R_3$ to $U_5$ and $R_4$ to $U_3$.



But that doesn't work. There's no way to connect those edges while remaining planar. Merging vertices $R_1$ and $R_2$ through their connection at $U_2$, that's the equivalent of a $K_3,3$ between $(U_1,U_3,U_5)$ and $(R_3,R_4,R_1,2)$.



This configuration has failed, leaving only one possibility - the two degree-4 vertices aren't connected by an edge, and indeed don't share a face. That configuration works as a polyhedron. A flattened version:



Octagonal caps



I'm maintaining the color choices; the two caps will meet at corresponding colors when we stack them and open it up.



And that's the configuration you'll need to work with in figuring out how many different edge lengths there can be.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    1












    $begingroup$

    Thanks @Blue.



    I solved this problem in a very simple way, thanks to you.



    1) Solved this by contradiction.



    If $|M| ge 4$, the lengths of edges of quadrangles are all different.



    Let the four lengths $a, b, c, d$.



    Then, it seems to be a contradiction because,



    contradiction



    2) It is simmilar from above.



    Let the four lengths $a, b, a, c$.



    Then, it seems to be a contradiction because,



    contradiction






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      I think you have your two diagrams each where the other should be.
      $endgroup$
      – Gerry Myerson
      Mar 26 at 23:40










    • $begingroup$
      Thank you. My mistake.
      $endgroup$
      – coding1101
      Mar 27 at 7:33











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3161559%2foctahedrons-whose-faces-are-congruent-quadrangles%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    All right, let's clear up some things about the configuration.



    First, any planar graph with all faces quadrilaterals (or even polygons) must be bipartite. How do those parts split? If there are six or more vertices in one of the parts, then, since each of those vertices has degree at least $3$ and each edge has only one of its vertices in the part, that's at least $18$ edges. This contradicts our calculation of $16$ edges, so the two parts must have five vertices each.



    Now, count degrees at the vertices in each part. With $16$ total edges over five vertices, that must be four vertices of degree $3$ and one of degree $4$. The same is true of the other part.



    Now, this splits into two cases for the configuration. Either the two vertices of degree $4$ are directly connected by an edge, or they're not. Let's see if we can build a planar graph in the former case:



    Grid 1



    We have several edges left to fill in, but the six faces around the two degree-$4$ vertices give us this much. Number the vertices and label as shown; the vertices of one part are shown in red, and the other part in blue.



    Next, what can vertex blue #5 ($U_5$) connect to? It has three edges going to red vertices #2,3,4,5 ($R_2$,$R_3$,$R_4$,$R_5$). In particular, that means it must connect to at least one of $R_2$ or $R_3$. WLOG, that's $R_2$.



    Grid 2



    Then, there's a quadrilateral with consecutive vertices $U_5$, $R_2$, $U_1$. This must be face $C$, and the fourth vertex is $R_4$. That means it closes with an edge between $U_5$ and $R_4$, our second edge drawn in.



    Now, we have some edges in the picture that only have one of their connected faces indicated. First, the triad U2 to R2 to U5 has to be part of a face. It can't be $A$, $B$, or $C$ since those faces have all of their vertices known. It can't be $D$, $E$, or $F$ since those faces have three known vertices each that agree with the list of three we have in at most one place. Therefore, it must be a new face; call it $G$.



    Second, the edge from $R_3$ to $U_3$ is part of face $B$. What's its second face? It can't be $A$ or $C$ because those don't have either $R_3$ or $U_3$ as a vertex. It can't be $E$ or $G$ since those have three known vertices and can't include both $R_3$ and $U_3$. It can't be $D$ or $F$ since two faces of the polyhedron can't share adjacent edges. All of the old faces are ruled out, so it has to be a new face $H$.



    Third, the edge from $R_4$ to $U_5$ is part of face $C$. What's its second face? Not $A$, $B$, $E$, or $F$ because there aren't enough free vertices. Not $D$ or $G$ because it can't share two adjacent edges with $C$. There are only eight faces, so that leaves us with $H$ as the only option.



    Grid 3



    How can $R_3$, $U_3$, $R_4$, and $U_5$ be part of the same face $H$? We must have edges from $R_3$ to $U_5$ and $R_4$ to $U_3$.



    But that doesn't work. There's no way to connect those edges while remaining planar. Merging vertices $R_1$ and $R_2$ through their connection at $U_2$, that's the equivalent of a $K_3,3$ between $(U_1,U_3,U_5)$ and $(R_3,R_4,R_1,2)$.



    This configuration has failed, leaving only one possibility - the two degree-4 vertices aren't connected by an edge, and indeed don't share a face. That configuration works as a polyhedron. A flattened version:



    Octagonal caps



    I'm maintaining the color choices; the two caps will meet at corresponding colors when we stack them and open it up.



    And that's the configuration you'll need to work with in figuring out how many different edge lengths there can be.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      1












      $begingroup$

      All right, let's clear up some things about the configuration.



      First, any planar graph with all faces quadrilaterals (or even polygons) must be bipartite. How do those parts split? If there are six or more vertices in one of the parts, then, since each of those vertices has degree at least $3$ and each edge has only one of its vertices in the part, that's at least $18$ edges. This contradicts our calculation of $16$ edges, so the two parts must have five vertices each.



      Now, count degrees at the vertices in each part. With $16$ total edges over five vertices, that must be four vertices of degree $3$ and one of degree $4$. The same is true of the other part.



      Now, this splits into two cases for the configuration. Either the two vertices of degree $4$ are directly connected by an edge, or they're not. Let's see if we can build a planar graph in the former case:



      Grid 1



      We have several edges left to fill in, but the six faces around the two degree-$4$ vertices give us this much. Number the vertices and label as shown; the vertices of one part are shown in red, and the other part in blue.



      Next, what can vertex blue #5 ($U_5$) connect to? It has three edges going to red vertices #2,3,4,5 ($R_2$,$R_3$,$R_4$,$R_5$). In particular, that means it must connect to at least one of $R_2$ or $R_3$. WLOG, that's $R_2$.



      Grid 2



      Then, there's a quadrilateral with consecutive vertices $U_5$, $R_2$, $U_1$. This must be face $C$, and the fourth vertex is $R_4$. That means it closes with an edge between $U_5$ and $R_4$, our second edge drawn in.



      Now, we have some edges in the picture that only have one of their connected faces indicated. First, the triad U2 to R2 to U5 has to be part of a face. It can't be $A$, $B$, or $C$ since those faces have all of their vertices known. It can't be $D$, $E$, or $F$ since those faces have three known vertices each that agree with the list of three we have in at most one place. Therefore, it must be a new face; call it $G$.



      Second, the edge from $R_3$ to $U_3$ is part of face $B$. What's its second face? It can't be $A$ or $C$ because those don't have either $R_3$ or $U_3$ as a vertex. It can't be $E$ or $G$ since those have three known vertices and can't include both $R_3$ and $U_3$. It can't be $D$ or $F$ since two faces of the polyhedron can't share adjacent edges. All of the old faces are ruled out, so it has to be a new face $H$.



      Third, the edge from $R_4$ to $U_5$ is part of face $C$. What's its second face? Not $A$, $B$, $E$, or $F$ because there aren't enough free vertices. Not $D$ or $G$ because it can't share two adjacent edges with $C$. There are only eight faces, so that leaves us with $H$ as the only option.



      Grid 3



      How can $R_3$, $U_3$, $R_4$, and $U_5$ be part of the same face $H$? We must have edges from $R_3$ to $U_5$ and $R_4$ to $U_3$.



      But that doesn't work. There's no way to connect those edges while remaining planar. Merging vertices $R_1$ and $R_2$ through their connection at $U_2$, that's the equivalent of a $K_3,3$ between $(U_1,U_3,U_5)$ and $(R_3,R_4,R_1,2)$.



      This configuration has failed, leaving only one possibility - the two degree-4 vertices aren't connected by an edge, and indeed don't share a face. That configuration works as a polyhedron. A flattened version:



      Octagonal caps



      I'm maintaining the color choices; the two caps will meet at corresponding colors when we stack them and open it up.



      And that's the configuration you'll need to work with in figuring out how many different edge lengths there can be.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        All right, let's clear up some things about the configuration.



        First, any planar graph with all faces quadrilaterals (or even polygons) must be bipartite. How do those parts split? If there are six or more vertices in one of the parts, then, since each of those vertices has degree at least $3$ and each edge has only one of its vertices in the part, that's at least $18$ edges. This contradicts our calculation of $16$ edges, so the two parts must have five vertices each.



        Now, count degrees at the vertices in each part. With $16$ total edges over five vertices, that must be four vertices of degree $3$ and one of degree $4$. The same is true of the other part.



        Now, this splits into two cases for the configuration. Either the two vertices of degree $4$ are directly connected by an edge, or they're not. Let's see if we can build a planar graph in the former case:



        Grid 1



        We have several edges left to fill in, but the six faces around the two degree-$4$ vertices give us this much. Number the vertices and label as shown; the vertices of one part are shown in red, and the other part in blue.



        Next, what can vertex blue #5 ($U_5$) connect to? It has three edges going to red vertices #2,3,4,5 ($R_2$,$R_3$,$R_4$,$R_5$). In particular, that means it must connect to at least one of $R_2$ or $R_3$. WLOG, that's $R_2$.



        Grid 2



        Then, there's a quadrilateral with consecutive vertices $U_5$, $R_2$, $U_1$. This must be face $C$, and the fourth vertex is $R_4$. That means it closes with an edge between $U_5$ and $R_4$, our second edge drawn in.



        Now, we have some edges in the picture that only have one of their connected faces indicated. First, the triad U2 to R2 to U5 has to be part of a face. It can't be $A$, $B$, or $C$ since those faces have all of their vertices known. It can't be $D$, $E$, or $F$ since those faces have three known vertices each that agree with the list of three we have in at most one place. Therefore, it must be a new face; call it $G$.



        Second, the edge from $R_3$ to $U_3$ is part of face $B$. What's its second face? It can't be $A$ or $C$ because those don't have either $R_3$ or $U_3$ as a vertex. It can't be $E$ or $G$ since those have three known vertices and can't include both $R_3$ and $U_3$. It can't be $D$ or $F$ since two faces of the polyhedron can't share adjacent edges. All of the old faces are ruled out, so it has to be a new face $H$.



        Third, the edge from $R_4$ to $U_5$ is part of face $C$. What's its second face? Not $A$, $B$, $E$, or $F$ because there aren't enough free vertices. Not $D$ or $G$ because it can't share two adjacent edges with $C$. There are only eight faces, so that leaves us with $H$ as the only option.



        Grid 3



        How can $R_3$, $U_3$, $R_4$, and $U_5$ be part of the same face $H$? We must have edges from $R_3$ to $U_5$ and $R_4$ to $U_3$.



        But that doesn't work. There's no way to connect those edges while remaining planar. Merging vertices $R_1$ and $R_2$ through their connection at $U_2$, that's the equivalent of a $K_3,3$ between $(U_1,U_3,U_5)$ and $(R_3,R_4,R_1,2)$.



        This configuration has failed, leaving only one possibility - the two degree-4 vertices aren't connected by an edge, and indeed don't share a face. That configuration works as a polyhedron. A flattened version:



        Octagonal caps



        I'm maintaining the color choices; the two caps will meet at corresponding colors when we stack them and open it up.



        And that's the configuration you'll need to work with in figuring out how many different edge lengths there can be.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        All right, let's clear up some things about the configuration.



        First, any planar graph with all faces quadrilaterals (or even polygons) must be bipartite. How do those parts split? If there are six or more vertices in one of the parts, then, since each of those vertices has degree at least $3$ and each edge has only one of its vertices in the part, that's at least $18$ edges. This contradicts our calculation of $16$ edges, so the two parts must have five vertices each.



        Now, count degrees at the vertices in each part. With $16$ total edges over five vertices, that must be four vertices of degree $3$ and one of degree $4$. The same is true of the other part.



        Now, this splits into two cases for the configuration. Either the two vertices of degree $4$ are directly connected by an edge, or they're not. Let's see if we can build a planar graph in the former case:



        Grid 1



        We have several edges left to fill in, but the six faces around the two degree-$4$ vertices give us this much. Number the vertices and label as shown; the vertices of one part are shown in red, and the other part in blue.



        Next, what can vertex blue #5 ($U_5$) connect to? It has three edges going to red vertices #2,3,4,5 ($R_2$,$R_3$,$R_4$,$R_5$). In particular, that means it must connect to at least one of $R_2$ or $R_3$. WLOG, that's $R_2$.



        Grid 2



        Then, there's a quadrilateral with consecutive vertices $U_5$, $R_2$, $U_1$. This must be face $C$, and the fourth vertex is $R_4$. That means it closes with an edge between $U_5$ and $R_4$, our second edge drawn in.



        Now, we have some edges in the picture that only have one of their connected faces indicated. First, the triad U2 to R2 to U5 has to be part of a face. It can't be $A$, $B$, or $C$ since those faces have all of their vertices known. It can't be $D$, $E$, or $F$ since those faces have three known vertices each that agree with the list of three we have in at most one place. Therefore, it must be a new face; call it $G$.



        Second, the edge from $R_3$ to $U_3$ is part of face $B$. What's its second face? It can't be $A$ or $C$ because those don't have either $R_3$ or $U_3$ as a vertex. It can't be $E$ or $G$ since those have three known vertices and can't include both $R_3$ and $U_3$. It can't be $D$ or $F$ since two faces of the polyhedron can't share adjacent edges. All of the old faces are ruled out, so it has to be a new face $H$.



        Third, the edge from $R_4$ to $U_5$ is part of face $C$. What's its second face? Not $A$, $B$, $E$, or $F$ because there aren't enough free vertices. Not $D$ or $G$ because it can't share two adjacent edges with $C$. There are only eight faces, so that leaves us with $H$ as the only option.



        Grid 3



        How can $R_3$, $U_3$, $R_4$, and $U_5$ be part of the same face $H$? We must have edges from $R_3$ to $U_5$ and $R_4$ to $U_3$.



        But that doesn't work. There's no way to connect those edges while remaining planar. Merging vertices $R_1$ and $R_2$ through their connection at $U_2$, that's the equivalent of a $K_3,3$ between $(U_1,U_3,U_5)$ and $(R_3,R_4,R_1,2)$.



        This configuration has failed, leaving only one possibility - the two degree-4 vertices aren't connected by an edge, and indeed don't share a face. That configuration works as a polyhedron. A flattened version:



        Octagonal caps



        I'm maintaining the color choices; the two caps will meet at corresponding colors when we stack them and open it up.



        And that's the configuration you'll need to work with in figuring out how many different edge lengths there can be.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Mar 25 at 23:46









        jmerryjmerry

        17.1k11633




        17.1k11633





















            1












            $begingroup$

            Thanks @Blue.



            I solved this problem in a very simple way, thanks to you.



            1) Solved this by contradiction.



            If $|M| ge 4$, the lengths of edges of quadrangles are all different.



            Let the four lengths $a, b, c, d$.



            Then, it seems to be a contradiction because,



            contradiction



            2) It is simmilar from above.



            Let the four lengths $a, b, a, c$.



            Then, it seems to be a contradiction because,



            contradiction






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              I think you have your two diagrams each where the other should be.
              $endgroup$
              – Gerry Myerson
              Mar 26 at 23:40










            • $begingroup$
              Thank you. My mistake.
              $endgroup$
              – coding1101
              Mar 27 at 7:33















            1












            $begingroup$

            Thanks @Blue.



            I solved this problem in a very simple way, thanks to you.



            1) Solved this by contradiction.



            If $|M| ge 4$, the lengths of edges of quadrangles are all different.



            Let the four lengths $a, b, c, d$.



            Then, it seems to be a contradiction because,



            contradiction



            2) It is simmilar from above.



            Let the four lengths $a, b, a, c$.



            Then, it seems to be a contradiction because,



            contradiction






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              I think you have your two diagrams each where the other should be.
              $endgroup$
              – Gerry Myerson
              Mar 26 at 23:40










            • $begingroup$
              Thank you. My mistake.
              $endgroup$
              – coding1101
              Mar 27 at 7:33













            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            Thanks @Blue.



            I solved this problem in a very simple way, thanks to you.



            1) Solved this by contradiction.



            If $|M| ge 4$, the lengths of edges of quadrangles are all different.



            Let the four lengths $a, b, c, d$.



            Then, it seems to be a contradiction because,



            contradiction



            2) It is simmilar from above.



            Let the four lengths $a, b, a, c$.



            Then, it seems to be a contradiction because,



            contradiction






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Thanks @Blue.



            I solved this problem in a very simple way, thanks to you.



            1) Solved this by contradiction.



            If $|M| ge 4$, the lengths of edges of quadrangles are all different.



            Let the four lengths $a, b, c, d$.



            Then, it seems to be a contradiction because,



            contradiction



            2) It is simmilar from above.



            Let the four lengths $a, b, a, c$.



            Then, it seems to be a contradiction because,



            contradiction







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Mar 27 at 7:33

























            answered Mar 26 at 9:44









            coding1101coding1101

            1246




            1246











            • $begingroup$
              I think you have your two diagrams each where the other should be.
              $endgroup$
              – Gerry Myerson
              Mar 26 at 23:40










            • $begingroup$
              Thank you. My mistake.
              $endgroup$
              – coding1101
              Mar 27 at 7:33
















            • $begingroup$
              I think you have your two diagrams each where the other should be.
              $endgroup$
              – Gerry Myerson
              Mar 26 at 23:40










            • $begingroup$
              Thank you. My mistake.
              $endgroup$
              – coding1101
              Mar 27 at 7:33















            $begingroup$
            I think you have your two diagrams each where the other should be.
            $endgroup$
            – Gerry Myerson
            Mar 26 at 23:40




            $begingroup$
            I think you have your two diagrams each where the other should be.
            $endgroup$
            – Gerry Myerson
            Mar 26 at 23:40












            $begingroup$
            Thank you. My mistake.
            $endgroup$
            – coding1101
            Mar 27 at 7:33




            $begingroup$
            Thank you. My mistake.
            $endgroup$
            – coding1101
            Mar 27 at 7:33

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3161559%2foctahedrons-whose-faces-are-congruent-quadrangles%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

            Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee

            Method to test if a number is a perfect power? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Detecting perfect squares faster than by extracting square rooteffective way to get the integer sequence A181392 from oeisA rarely mentioned fact about perfect powersHow many numbers such $n$ are there that $n<100,lfloorsqrtn rfloor mid n$Check perfect squareness by modulo division against multiple basesFor what pair of integers $(a,b)$ is $3^a + 7^b$ a perfect square.Do there exist any positive integers $n$ such that $lfloore^nrfloor$ is a perfect power? What is the probability that one exists?finding perfect power factors of an integerProve that the sequence contains a perfect square for any natural number $m $ in the domain of $f$ .Counting Perfect Powers