Fdtxjr

Does Parliament need to approve the new Brexit delay to 31 October 2019?

Slither Like a Snake

Match Roman Numerals

Program that generates brainfuck code that outputs given text

How are presidential pardons supposed to be used?

Can withdrawing asylum be illegal?

What information about me do stores get via my credit card?

He got a vote 80% that of Emmanuel Macron’s

Who or what is the being for whom Being is a question for Heidegger?

Why is superheterodyning better than direct conversion?

Didn't get enough time to take a Coding Test - what to do now?

Semisimplicity of the category of coherent sheaves?

Single author papers against my advisor's will?

Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?

Wolves and sheep

Windows 10: How to Lock (not sleep) laptop on lid close?

Make it rain characters

"... to apply for a visa" or "... and applied for a visa"?

Movie about afterlife I think? Large towers with clothing and food?

How long does the line of fire that you can create as an action using the Investiture of Flame spell last?

Python - Fishing Simulator

How to colour the US map with Yellow, Green, Red and Blue to minimize the number of states with the colour of Green

What does the torsion-free condition for a connection mean in terms of its horizontal bundle?

Is there a trick to getting spices to fix to nuts?

Can I have $Q = R = I$ as covariance matrices for a kalman filter?

0

$begingroup$

Assume that we have no noise in our system. We using a low pass filter to filer away some peaks in the measurements.

But our goal is just to estimate the state $X_k$. Can we set the $Q_k$ and $R$ to the identity matrix $I$? Or do we need to compute $Q_k$ and $R$?

We can assume that we have no noise from our process.

We know $A, B, C, X_0, P_0, U_k, Y_k, H$ but not $Z_k, W_k$

control-theory optimal-control linear-control kalman-filter

share|cite|improve this question

edited Mar 25 at 10:37

Daniel Mårtensson

asked Mar 25 at 10:10

Daniel MårtenssonDaniel Mårtensson

993419

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Why do you have to filter out peaks if there is no noise acting on the system?
  $endgroup$
  – Kwin van der Veen
  Mar 25 at 13:10
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @KwinvanderVeen It can be disturbance from the microcontroller. I know that $R$ can be found by $R = cov(Y_k)$ when $Y_k$ is steady state. But how about $Q$?
  $endgroup$
  – Daniel Mårtensson
  Mar 25 at 14:12
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Q is the prior variance ( or sometimes they call it the initial variance ) of the state. If you know everything else, it can be estimated using prediction error decomposition but that's a time-series methodology. ( see Andrew Harvey's blue book ) .I'm not familiar with how they would do it in control field which could be something totally different.
  $endgroup$
  – mark leeds
  Mar 26 at 5:30
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @markleeds it's very difficult to find Q in reality for an unknow process ? Can I then set $Q=0$?
  $endgroup$
  – Daniel Mårtensson
  Mar 26 at 13:24
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Hi: I would think, even in the control field, you should give it a prior ( in bayesian framework ) or estimate it ( classical framework ). Setting it to zero says that the state has no prior variance so, no, I don't think that's the approach to take. Hopefully someone else can chime in. But check out Harvey's blue book because, if everything else is known, it's not that hard to estimate it.
  $endgroup$
  – mark leeds
  Mar 27 at 16:59
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 2 more comments

0

$begingroup$

Assume that we have no noise in our system. We using a low pass filter to filer away some peaks in the measurements.

But our goal is just to estimate the state $X_k$. Can we set the $Q_k$ and $R$ to the identity matrix $I$? Or do we need to compute $Q_k$ and $R$?

We can assume that we have no noise from our process.

We know $A, B, C, X_0, P_0, U_k, Y_k, H$ but not $Z_k, W_k$

control-theory optimal-control linear-control kalman-filter

share|cite|improve this question

edited Mar 25 at 10:37

Daniel Mårtensson

asked Mar 25 at 10:10

Daniel MårtenssonDaniel Mårtensson

993419

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Why do you have to filter out peaks if there is no noise acting on the system?
  $endgroup$
  – Kwin van der Veen
  Mar 25 at 13:10
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @KwinvanderVeen It can be disturbance from the microcontroller. I know that $R$ can be found by $R = cov(Y_k)$ when $Y_k$ is steady state. But how about $Q$?
  $endgroup$
  – Daniel Mårtensson
  Mar 25 at 14:12
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Q is the prior variance ( or sometimes they call it the initial variance ) of the state. If you know everything else, it can be estimated using prediction error decomposition but that's a time-series methodology. ( see Andrew Harvey's blue book ) .I'm not familiar with how they would do it in control field which could be something totally different.
  $endgroup$
  – mark leeds
  Mar 26 at 5:30
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @markleeds it's very difficult to find Q in reality for an unknow process ? Can I then set $Q=0$?
  $endgroup$
  – Daniel Mårtensson
  Mar 26 at 13:24
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Hi: I would think, even in the control field, you should give it a prior ( in bayesian framework ) or estimate it ( classical framework ). Setting it to zero says that the state has no prior variance so, no, I don't think that's the approach to take. Hopefully someone else can chime in. But check out Harvey's blue book because, if everything else is known, it's not that hard to estimate it.
  $endgroup$
  – mark leeds
  Mar 27 at 16:59
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 2 more comments

$begingroup$

Assume that we have no noise in our system. We using a low pass filter to filer away some peaks in the measurements.

But our goal is just to estimate the state $X_k$. Can we set the $Q_k$ and $R$ to the identity matrix $I$? Or do we need to compute $Q_k$ and $R$?

We can assume that we have no noise from our process.

We know $A, B, C, X_0, P_0, U_k, Y_k, H$ but not $Z_k, W_k$

control-theory optimal-control linear-control kalman-filter

share|cite|improve this question

edited Mar 25 at 10:37

Daniel Mårtensson

asked Mar 25 at 10:10

Daniel MårtenssonDaniel Mårtensson

993419

$endgroup$

share|cite|improve this question

edited Mar 25 at 10:37

Daniel Mårtensson

asked Mar 25 at 10:10

Daniel MårtenssonDaniel Mårtensson

993419

share|cite|improve this question

edited Mar 25 at 10:37

Daniel Mårtensson

asked Mar 25 at 10:10

Daniel MårtenssonDaniel Mårtensson

993419

asked Mar 25 at 10:10

Daniel MårtenssonDaniel Mårtensson

993419

asked Mar 25 at 10:10

Daniel MårtenssonDaniel Mårtensson

993419