Octahedrons whose faces are congruent quadrangles The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How would you make a (physical) dodecahedron with edges instead of faces?Uniform Polyhedron with 500 congruent right kite faces!How to find out the circumscribed radius of a snub dodecahedron?Coordinates of a rhombohedronPolyhedra with at least 3 pentagonal facesDividing an octahedron into two congruent regionsWhy semiregular polyhedra existsIrregular analogue of cube and octahedron.Obtuse triangle octahedron packingIsohedron splitting into isohedra

Did the UK government pay "millions and millions of dollars" to try to snag Julian Assange?

Typeface like Times New Roman but with "tied" percent sign

Do warforged have souls?

How should I replace vector<uint8_t>::const_iterator in an API?

How is simplicity better than precision and clarity in prose?

How are presidential pardons supposed to be used?

Why is superheterodyning better than direct conversion?

Is there a writing software that you can sort scenes like slides in PowerPoint?

Why can't wing-mounted spoilers be used to steepen approaches?

Can a 1st-level character have an ability score above 18?

Cooking pasta in a water boiler

When did F become S in typeography, and why?

how can a perfect fourth interval be considered either consonant or dissonant?

Relations between two reciprocal partial derivatives?

In horse breeding, what is the female equivalent of putting a horse out "to stud"?

How to delete random line from file using Unix command?

Keeping a retro style to sci-fi spaceships?

How do I add random spotting to the same face in cycles?

The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 1397BC53640DB551

Finding the path in a graph from A to B then back to A with a minimum of shared edges

How can I protect witches in combat who wear limited clothing?

Is it ethical to upload a automatically generated paper to a non peer-reviewed site as part of a larger research?

What information about me do stores get via my credit card?

Difference between "generating set" and free product?



Octahedrons whose faces are congruent quadrangles



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How would you make a (physical) dodecahedron with edges instead of faces?Uniform Polyhedron with 500 congruent right kite faces!How to find out the circumscribed radius of a snub dodecahedron?Coordinates of a rhombohedronPolyhedra with at least 3 pentagonal facesDividing an octahedron into two congruent regionsWhy semiregular polyhedra existsIrregular analogue of cube and octahedron.Obtuse triangle octahedron packingIsohedron splitting into isohedra










0












$begingroup$



There is a octahedron which the faces are all congruent quadrangles. Let $M$ the set of length of edges of faces of the octahedron.



  1. Prove that $|M| le 3$.


  2. Prove that all faces have two edges with equal length which meets at one point.




My approach. I think I have to solve this problem with the numbers of faces, edges, and points.



There are $frac4 times 82 = 16$ edges and 8 faces, but we don't know the numbers of points.



By Euler theorem, $v-e+f=2$ and $e=16, f=8$. So $v=10$.



So, the degrees of the points is $(5, 3, 3, ..., 3)$ or $(4, 4, 3, 3, ..., 3)$. (Because the degrees are at least 3.)



Now what do we do?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Have you neglected to include in the problem statement that all the faces are quadrilaterals?
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 25 at 9:32






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oh, sorry. I did.
    $endgroup$
    – coding1101
    Mar 25 at 9:33










  • $begingroup$
    For (1) Suppose the side-lengths are $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$, in order, and consider three quadrangles that meet at a vertex of degree three. Show that at least two of the edge-lengths must match. Property (2) follows from the same consideration.
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Mar 25 at 10:38










  • $begingroup$
    Where does this question come from? I note Problem 39 in Steinhaus, One Hundred Problems in Elementary Mathematics: "Is it possible to construct an octahedron whose faces are congruent quadrangles?" A solution is given on pages 101-102. But where did you find this question, please?
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 26 at 3:47










  • $begingroup$
    This problem is from an academy, and I was curious about it.
    $endgroup$
    – coding1101
    Mar 26 at 8:23















0












$begingroup$



There is a octahedron which the faces are all congruent quadrangles. Let $M$ the set of length of edges of faces of the octahedron.



  1. Prove that $|M| le 3$.


  2. Prove that all faces have two edges with equal length which meets at one point.




My approach. I think I have to solve this problem with the numbers of faces, edges, and points.



There are $frac4 times 82 = 16$ edges and 8 faces, but we don't know the numbers of points.



By Euler theorem, $v-e+f=2$ and $e=16, f=8$. So $v=10$.



So, the degrees of the points is $(5, 3, 3, ..., 3)$ or $(4, 4, 3, 3, ..., 3)$. (Because the degrees are at least 3.)



Now what do we do?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Have you neglected to include in the problem statement that all the faces are quadrilaterals?
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 25 at 9:32






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oh, sorry. I did.
    $endgroup$
    – coding1101
    Mar 25 at 9:33










  • $begingroup$
    For (1) Suppose the side-lengths are $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$, in order, and consider three quadrangles that meet at a vertex of degree three. Show that at least two of the edge-lengths must match. Property (2) follows from the same consideration.
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Mar 25 at 10:38










  • $begingroup$
    Where does this question come from? I note Problem 39 in Steinhaus, One Hundred Problems in Elementary Mathematics: "Is it possible to construct an octahedron whose faces are congruent quadrangles?" A solution is given on pages 101-102. But where did you find this question, please?
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 26 at 3:47










  • $begingroup$
    This problem is from an academy, and I was curious about it.
    $endgroup$
    – coding1101
    Mar 26 at 8:23













0












0








0


0



$begingroup$



There is a octahedron which the faces are all congruent quadrangles. Let $M$ the set of length of edges of faces of the octahedron.



  1. Prove that $|M| le 3$.


  2. Prove that all faces have two edges with equal length which meets at one point.




My approach. I think I have to solve this problem with the numbers of faces, edges, and points.



There are $frac4 times 82 = 16$ edges and 8 faces, but we don't know the numbers of points.



By Euler theorem, $v-e+f=2$ and $e=16, f=8$. So $v=10$.



So, the degrees of the points is $(5, 3, 3, ..., 3)$ or $(4, 4, 3, 3, ..., 3)$. (Because the degrees are at least 3.)



Now what do we do?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





There is a octahedron which the faces are all congruent quadrangles. Let $M$ the set of length of edges of faces of the octahedron.



  1. Prove that $|M| le 3$.


  2. Prove that all faces have two edges with equal length which meets at one point.




My approach. I think I have to solve this problem with the numbers of faces, edges, and points.



There are $frac4 times 82 = 16$ edges and 8 faces, but we don't know the numbers of points.



By Euler theorem, $v-e+f=2$ and $e=16, f=8$. So $v=10$.



So, the degrees of the points is $(5, 3, 3, ..., 3)$ or $(4, 4, 3, 3, ..., 3)$. (Because the degrees are at least 3.)



Now what do we do?







solid-geometry






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 25 at 9:53







coding1101

















asked Mar 25 at 9:29









coding1101coding1101

1246




1246











  • $begingroup$
    Have you neglected to include in the problem statement that all the faces are quadrilaterals?
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 25 at 9:32






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oh, sorry. I did.
    $endgroup$
    – coding1101
    Mar 25 at 9:33










  • $begingroup$
    For (1) Suppose the side-lengths are $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$, in order, and consider three quadrangles that meet at a vertex of degree three. Show that at least two of the edge-lengths must match. Property (2) follows from the same consideration.
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Mar 25 at 10:38










  • $begingroup$
    Where does this question come from? I note Problem 39 in Steinhaus, One Hundred Problems in Elementary Mathematics: "Is it possible to construct an octahedron whose faces are congruent quadrangles?" A solution is given on pages 101-102. But where did you find this question, please?
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 26 at 3:47










  • $begingroup$
    This problem is from an academy, and I was curious about it.
    $endgroup$
    – coding1101
    Mar 26 at 8:23
















  • $begingroup$
    Have you neglected to include in the problem statement that all the faces are quadrilaterals?
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 25 at 9:32






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oh, sorry. I did.
    $endgroup$
    – coding1101
    Mar 25 at 9:33










  • $begingroup$
    For (1) Suppose the side-lengths are $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$, in order, and consider three quadrangles that meet at a vertex of degree three. Show that at least two of the edge-lengths must match. Property (2) follows from the same consideration.
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Mar 25 at 10:38










  • $begingroup$
    Where does this question come from? I note Problem 39 in Steinhaus, One Hundred Problems in Elementary Mathematics: "Is it possible to construct an octahedron whose faces are congruent quadrangles?" A solution is given on pages 101-102. But where did you find this question, please?
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 26 at 3:47










  • $begingroup$
    This problem is from an academy, and I was curious about it.
    $endgroup$
    – coding1101
    Mar 26 at 8:23















$begingroup$
Have you neglected to include in the problem statement that all the faces are quadrilaterals?
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Mar 25 at 9:32




$begingroup$
Have you neglected to include in the problem statement that all the faces are quadrilaterals?
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Mar 25 at 9:32




1




1




$begingroup$
Oh, sorry. I did.
$endgroup$
– coding1101
Mar 25 at 9:33




$begingroup$
Oh, sorry. I did.
$endgroup$
– coding1101
Mar 25 at 9:33












$begingroup$
For (1) Suppose the side-lengths are $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$, in order, and consider three quadrangles that meet at a vertex of degree three. Show that at least two of the edge-lengths must match. Property (2) follows from the same consideration.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Mar 25 at 10:38




$begingroup$
For (1) Suppose the side-lengths are $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$, in order, and consider three quadrangles that meet at a vertex of degree three. Show that at least two of the edge-lengths must match. Property (2) follows from the same consideration.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Mar 25 at 10:38












$begingroup$
Where does this question come from? I note Problem 39 in Steinhaus, One Hundred Problems in Elementary Mathematics: "Is it possible to construct an octahedron whose faces are congruent quadrangles?" A solution is given on pages 101-102. But where did you find this question, please?
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Mar 26 at 3:47




$begingroup$
Where does this question come from? I note Problem 39 in Steinhaus, One Hundred Problems in Elementary Mathematics: "Is it possible to construct an octahedron whose faces are congruent quadrangles?" A solution is given on pages 101-102. But where did you find this question, please?
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Mar 26 at 3:47












$begingroup$
This problem is from an academy, and I was curious about it.
$endgroup$
– coding1101
Mar 26 at 8:23




$begingroup$
This problem is from an academy, and I was curious about it.
$endgroup$
– coding1101
Mar 26 at 8:23










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

All right, let's clear up some things about the configuration.



First, any planar graph with all faces quadrilaterals (or even polygons) must be bipartite. How do those parts split? If there are six or more vertices in one of the parts, then, since each of those vertices has degree at least $3$ and each edge has only one of its vertices in the part, that's at least $18$ edges. This contradicts our calculation of $16$ edges, so the two parts must have five vertices each.



Now, count degrees at the vertices in each part. With $16$ total edges over five vertices, that must be four vertices of degree $3$ and one of degree $4$. The same is true of the other part.



Now, this splits into two cases for the configuration. Either the two vertices of degree $4$ are directly connected by an edge, or they're not. Let's see if we can build a planar graph in the former case:



Grid 1



We have several edges left to fill in, but the six faces around the two degree-$4$ vertices give us this much. Number the vertices and label as shown; the vertices of one part are shown in red, and the other part in blue.



Next, what can vertex blue #5 ($U_5$) connect to? It has three edges going to red vertices #2,3,4,5 ($R_2$,$R_3$,$R_4$,$R_5$). In particular, that means it must connect to at least one of $R_2$ or $R_3$. WLOG, that's $R_2$.



Grid 2



Then, there's a quadrilateral with consecutive vertices $U_5$, $R_2$, $U_1$. This must be face $C$, and the fourth vertex is $R_4$. That means it closes with an edge between $U_5$ and $R_4$, our second edge drawn in.



Now, we have some edges in the picture that only have one of their connected faces indicated. First, the triad U2 to R2 to U5 has to be part of a face. It can't be $A$, $B$, or $C$ since those faces have all of their vertices known. It can't be $D$, $E$, or $F$ since those faces have three known vertices each that agree with the list of three we have in at most one place. Therefore, it must be a new face; call it $G$.



Second, the edge from $R_3$ to $U_3$ is part of face $B$. What's its second face? It can't be $A$ or $C$ because those don't have either $R_3$ or $U_3$ as a vertex. It can't be $E$ or $G$ since those have three known vertices and can't include both $R_3$ and $U_3$. It can't be $D$ or $F$ since two faces of the polyhedron can't share adjacent edges. All of the old faces are ruled out, so it has to be a new face $H$.



Third, the edge from $R_4$ to $U_5$ is part of face $C$. What's its second face? Not $A$, $B$, $E$, or $F$ because there aren't enough free vertices. Not $D$ or $G$ because it can't share two adjacent edges with $C$. There are only eight faces, so that leaves us with $H$ as the only option.



Grid 3



How can $R_3$, $U_3$, $R_4$, and $U_5$ be part of the same face $H$? We must have edges from $R_3$ to $U_5$ and $R_4$ to $U_3$.



But that doesn't work. There's no way to connect those edges while remaining planar. Merging vertices $R_1$ and $R_2$ through their connection at $U_2$, that's the equivalent of a $K_3,3$ between $(U_1,U_3,U_5)$ and $(R_3,R_4,R_1,2)$.



This configuration has failed, leaving only one possibility - the two degree-4 vertices aren't connected by an edge, and indeed don't share a face. That configuration works as a polyhedron. A flattened version:



Octagonal caps



I'm maintaining the color choices; the two caps will meet at corresponding colors when we stack them and open it up.



And that's the configuration you'll need to work with in figuring out how many different edge lengths there can be.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    1












    $begingroup$

    Thanks @Blue.



    I solved this problem in a very simple way, thanks to you.



    1) Solved this by contradiction.



    If $|M| ge 4$, the lengths of edges of quadrangles are all different.



    Let the four lengths $a, b, c, d$.



    Then, it seems to be a contradiction because,



    contradiction



    2) It is simmilar from above.



    Let the four lengths $a, b, a, c$.



    Then, it seems to be a contradiction because,



    contradiction






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      I think you have your two diagrams each where the other should be.
      $endgroup$
      – Gerry Myerson
      Mar 26 at 23:40










    • $begingroup$
      Thank you. My mistake.
      $endgroup$
      – coding1101
      Mar 27 at 7:33











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3161559%2foctahedrons-whose-faces-are-congruent-quadrangles%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    All right, let's clear up some things about the configuration.



    First, any planar graph with all faces quadrilaterals (or even polygons) must be bipartite. How do those parts split? If there are six or more vertices in one of the parts, then, since each of those vertices has degree at least $3$ and each edge has only one of its vertices in the part, that's at least $18$ edges. This contradicts our calculation of $16$ edges, so the two parts must have five vertices each.



    Now, count degrees at the vertices in each part. With $16$ total edges over five vertices, that must be four vertices of degree $3$ and one of degree $4$. The same is true of the other part.



    Now, this splits into two cases for the configuration. Either the two vertices of degree $4$ are directly connected by an edge, or they're not. Let's see if we can build a planar graph in the former case:



    Grid 1



    We have several edges left to fill in, but the six faces around the two degree-$4$ vertices give us this much. Number the vertices and label as shown; the vertices of one part are shown in red, and the other part in blue.



    Next, what can vertex blue #5 ($U_5$) connect to? It has three edges going to red vertices #2,3,4,5 ($R_2$,$R_3$,$R_4$,$R_5$). In particular, that means it must connect to at least one of $R_2$ or $R_3$. WLOG, that's $R_2$.



    Grid 2



    Then, there's a quadrilateral with consecutive vertices $U_5$, $R_2$, $U_1$. This must be face $C$, and the fourth vertex is $R_4$. That means it closes with an edge between $U_5$ and $R_4$, our second edge drawn in.



    Now, we have some edges in the picture that only have one of their connected faces indicated. First, the triad U2 to R2 to U5 has to be part of a face. It can't be $A$, $B$, or $C$ since those faces have all of their vertices known. It can't be $D$, $E$, or $F$ since those faces have three known vertices each that agree with the list of three we have in at most one place. Therefore, it must be a new face; call it $G$.



    Second, the edge from $R_3$ to $U_3$ is part of face $B$. What's its second face? It can't be $A$ or $C$ because those don't have either $R_3$ or $U_3$ as a vertex. It can't be $E$ or $G$ since those have three known vertices and can't include both $R_3$ and $U_3$. It can't be $D$ or $F$ since two faces of the polyhedron can't share adjacent edges. All of the old faces are ruled out, so it has to be a new face $H$.



    Third, the edge from $R_4$ to $U_5$ is part of face $C$. What's its second face? Not $A$, $B$, $E$, or $F$ because there aren't enough free vertices. Not $D$ or $G$ because it can't share two adjacent edges with $C$. There are only eight faces, so that leaves us with $H$ as the only option.



    Grid 3



    How can $R_3$, $U_3$, $R_4$, and $U_5$ be part of the same face $H$? We must have edges from $R_3$ to $U_5$ and $R_4$ to $U_3$.



    But that doesn't work. There's no way to connect those edges while remaining planar. Merging vertices $R_1$ and $R_2$ through their connection at $U_2$, that's the equivalent of a $K_3,3$ between $(U_1,U_3,U_5)$ and $(R_3,R_4,R_1,2)$.



    This configuration has failed, leaving only one possibility - the two degree-4 vertices aren't connected by an edge, and indeed don't share a face. That configuration works as a polyhedron. A flattened version:



    Octagonal caps



    I'm maintaining the color choices; the two caps will meet at corresponding colors when we stack them and open it up.



    And that's the configuration you'll need to work with in figuring out how many different edge lengths there can be.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      1












      $begingroup$

      All right, let's clear up some things about the configuration.



      First, any planar graph with all faces quadrilaterals (or even polygons) must be bipartite. How do those parts split? If there are six or more vertices in one of the parts, then, since each of those vertices has degree at least $3$ and each edge has only one of its vertices in the part, that's at least $18$ edges. This contradicts our calculation of $16$ edges, so the two parts must have five vertices each.



      Now, count degrees at the vertices in each part. With $16$ total edges over five vertices, that must be four vertices of degree $3$ and one of degree $4$. The same is true of the other part.



      Now, this splits into two cases for the configuration. Either the two vertices of degree $4$ are directly connected by an edge, or they're not. Let's see if we can build a planar graph in the former case:



      Grid 1



      We have several edges left to fill in, but the six faces around the two degree-$4$ vertices give us this much. Number the vertices and label as shown; the vertices of one part are shown in red, and the other part in blue.



      Next, what can vertex blue #5 ($U_5$) connect to? It has three edges going to red vertices #2,3,4,5 ($R_2$,$R_3$,$R_4$,$R_5$). In particular, that means it must connect to at least one of $R_2$ or $R_3$. WLOG, that's $R_2$.



      Grid 2



      Then, there's a quadrilateral with consecutive vertices $U_5$, $R_2$, $U_1$. This must be face $C$, and the fourth vertex is $R_4$. That means it closes with an edge between $U_5$ and $R_4$, our second edge drawn in.



      Now, we have some edges in the picture that only have one of their connected faces indicated. First, the triad U2 to R2 to U5 has to be part of a face. It can't be $A$, $B$, or $C$ since those faces have all of their vertices known. It can't be $D$, $E$, or $F$ since those faces have three known vertices each that agree with the list of three we have in at most one place. Therefore, it must be a new face; call it $G$.



      Second, the edge from $R_3$ to $U_3$ is part of face $B$. What's its second face? It can't be $A$ or $C$ because those don't have either $R_3$ or $U_3$ as a vertex. It can't be $E$ or $G$ since those have three known vertices and can't include both $R_3$ and $U_3$. It can't be $D$ or $F$ since two faces of the polyhedron can't share adjacent edges. All of the old faces are ruled out, so it has to be a new face $H$.



      Third, the edge from $R_4$ to $U_5$ is part of face $C$. What's its second face? Not $A$, $B$, $E$, or $F$ because there aren't enough free vertices. Not $D$ or $G$ because it can't share two adjacent edges with $C$. There are only eight faces, so that leaves us with $H$ as the only option.



      Grid 3



      How can $R_3$, $U_3$, $R_4$, and $U_5$ be part of the same face $H$? We must have edges from $R_3$ to $U_5$ and $R_4$ to $U_3$.



      But that doesn't work. There's no way to connect those edges while remaining planar. Merging vertices $R_1$ and $R_2$ through their connection at $U_2$, that's the equivalent of a $K_3,3$ between $(U_1,U_3,U_5)$ and $(R_3,R_4,R_1,2)$.



      This configuration has failed, leaving only one possibility - the two degree-4 vertices aren't connected by an edge, and indeed don't share a face. That configuration works as a polyhedron. A flattened version:



      Octagonal caps



      I'm maintaining the color choices; the two caps will meet at corresponding colors when we stack them and open it up.



      And that's the configuration you'll need to work with in figuring out how many different edge lengths there can be.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        All right, let's clear up some things about the configuration.



        First, any planar graph with all faces quadrilaterals (or even polygons) must be bipartite. How do those parts split? If there are six or more vertices in one of the parts, then, since each of those vertices has degree at least $3$ and each edge has only one of its vertices in the part, that's at least $18$ edges. This contradicts our calculation of $16$ edges, so the two parts must have five vertices each.



        Now, count degrees at the vertices in each part. With $16$ total edges over five vertices, that must be four vertices of degree $3$ and one of degree $4$. The same is true of the other part.



        Now, this splits into two cases for the configuration. Either the two vertices of degree $4$ are directly connected by an edge, or they're not. Let's see if we can build a planar graph in the former case:



        Grid 1



        We have several edges left to fill in, but the six faces around the two degree-$4$ vertices give us this much. Number the vertices and label as shown; the vertices of one part are shown in red, and the other part in blue.



        Next, what can vertex blue #5 ($U_5$) connect to? It has three edges going to red vertices #2,3,4,5 ($R_2$,$R_3$,$R_4$,$R_5$). In particular, that means it must connect to at least one of $R_2$ or $R_3$. WLOG, that's $R_2$.



        Grid 2



        Then, there's a quadrilateral with consecutive vertices $U_5$, $R_2$, $U_1$. This must be face $C$, and the fourth vertex is $R_4$. That means it closes with an edge between $U_5$ and $R_4$, our second edge drawn in.



        Now, we have some edges in the picture that only have one of their connected faces indicated. First, the triad U2 to R2 to U5 has to be part of a face. It can't be $A$, $B$, or $C$ since those faces have all of their vertices known. It can't be $D$, $E$, or $F$ since those faces have three known vertices each that agree with the list of three we have in at most one place. Therefore, it must be a new face; call it $G$.



        Second, the edge from $R_3$ to $U_3$ is part of face $B$. What's its second face? It can't be $A$ or $C$ because those don't have either $R_3$ or $U_3$ as a vertex. It can't be $E$ or $G$ since those have three known vertices and can't include both $R_3$ and $U_3$. It can't be $D$ or $F$ since two faces of the polyhedron can't share adjacent edges. All of the old faces are ruled out, so it has to be a new face $H$.



        Third, the edge from $R_4$ to $U_5$ is part of face $C$. What's its second face? Not $A$, $B$, $E$, or $F$ because there aren't enough free vertices. Not $D$ or $G$ because it can't share two adjacent edges with $C$. There are only eight faces, so that leaves us with $H$ as the only option.



        Grid 3



        How can $R_3$, $U_3$, $R_4$, and $U_5$ be part of the same face $H$? We must have edges from $R_3$ to $U_5$ and $R_4$ to $U_3$.



        But that doesn't work. There's no way to connect those edges while remaining planar. Merging vertices $R_1$ and $R_2$ through their connection at $U_2$, that's the equivalent of a $K_3,3$ between $(U_1,U_3,U_5)$ and $(R_3,R_4,R_1,2)$.



        This configuration has failed, leaving only one possibility - the two degree-4 vertices aren't connected by an edge, and indeed don't share a face. That configuration works as a polyhedron. A flattened version:



        Octagonal caps



        I'm maintaining the color choices; the two caps will meet at corresponding colors when we stack them and open it up.



        And that's the configuration you'll need to work with in figuring out how many different edge lengths there can be.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        All right, let's clear up some things about the configuration.



        First, any planar graph with all faces quadrilaterals (or even polygons) must be bipartite. How do those parts split? If there are six or more vertices in one of the parts, then, since each of those vertices has degree at least $3$ and each edge has only one of its vertices in the part, that's at least $18$ edges. This contradicts our calculation of $16$ edges, so the two parts must have five vertices each.



        Now, count degrees at the vertices in each part. With $16$ total edges over five vertices, that must be four vertices of degree $3$ and one of degree $4$. The same is true of the other part.



        Now, this splits into two cases for the configuration. Either the two vertices of degree $4$ are directly connected by an edge, or they're not. Let's see if we can build a planar graph in the former case:



        Grid 1



        We have several edges left to fill in, but the six faces around the two degree-$4$ vertices give us this much. Number the vertices and label as shown; the vertices of one part are shown in red, and the other part in blue.



        Next, what can vertex blue #5 ($U_5$) connect to? It has three edges going to red vertices #2,3,4,5 ($R_2$,$R_3$,$R_4$,$R_5$). In particular, that means it must connect to at least one of $R_2$ or $R_3$. WLOG, that's $R_2$.



        Grid 2



        Then, there's a quadrilateral with consecutive vertices $U_5$, $R_2$, $U_1$. This must be face $C$, and the fourth vertex is $R_4$. That means it closes with an edge between $U_5$ and $R_4$, our second edge drawn in.



        Now, we have some edges in the picture that only have one of their connected faces indicated. First, the triad U2 to R2 to U5 has to be part of a face. It can't be $A$, $B$, or $C$ since those faces have all of their vertices known. It can't be $D$, $E$, or $F$ since those faces have three known vertices each that agree with the list of three we have in at most one place. Therefore, it must be a new face; call it $G$.



        Second, the edge from $R_3$ to $U_3$ is part of face $B$. What's its second face? It can't be $A$ or $C$ because those don't have either $R_3$ or $U_3$ as a vertex. It can't be $E$ or $G$ since those have three known vertices and can't include both $R_3$ and $U_3$. It can't be $D$ or $F$ since two faces of the polyhedron can't share adjacent edges. All of the old faces are ruled out, so it has to be a new face $H$.



        Third, the edge from $R_4$ to $U_5$ is part of face $C$. What's its second face? Not $A$, $B$, $E$, or $F$ because there aren't enough free vertices. Not $D$ or $G$ because it can't share two adjacent edges with $C$. There are only eight faces, so that leaves us with $H$ as the only option.



        Grid 3



        How can $R_3$, $U_3$, $R_4$, and $U_5$ be part of the same face $H$? We must have edges from $R_3$ to $U_5$ and $R_4$ to $U_3$.



        But that doesn't work. There's no way to connect those edges while remaining planar. Merging vertices $R_1$ and $R_2$ through their connection at $U_2$, that's the equivalent of a $K_3,3$ between $(U_1,U_3,U_5)$ and $(R_3,R_4,R_1,2)$.



        This configuration has failed, leaving only one possibility - the two degree-4 vertices aren't connected by an edge, and indeed don't share a face. That configuration works as a polyhedron. A flattened version:



        Octagonal caps



        I'm maintaining the color choices; the two caps will meet at corresponding colors when we stack them and open it up.



        And that's the configuration you'll need to work with in figuring out how many different edge lengths there can be.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Mar 25 at 23:46









        jmerryjmerry

        17.1k11633




        17.1k11633





















            1












            $begingroup$

            Thanks @Blue.



            I solved this problem in a very simple way, thanks to you.



            1) Solved this by contradiction.



            If $|M| ge 4$, the lengths of edges of quadrangles are all different.



            Let the four lengths $a, b, c, d$.



            Then, it seems to be a contradiction because,



            contradiction



            2) It is simmilar from above.



            Let the four lengths $a, b, a, c$.



            Then, it seems to be a contradiction because,



            contradiction






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              I think you have your two diagrams each where the other should be.
              $endgroup$
              – Gerry Myerson
              Mar 26 at 23:40










            • $begingroup$
              Thank you. My mistake.
              $endgroup$
              – coding1101
              Mar 27 at 7:33















            1












            $begingroup$

            Thanks @Blue.



            I solved this problem in a very simple way, thanks to you.



            1) Solved this by contradiction.



            If $|M| ge 4$, the lengths of edges of quadrangles are all different.



            Let the four lengths $a, b, c, d$.



            Then, it seems to be a contradiction because,



            contradiction



            2) It is simmilar from above.



            Let the four lengths $a, b, a, c$.



            Then, it seems to be a contradiction because,



            contradiction






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              I think you have your two diagrams each where the other should be.
              $endgroup$
              – Gerry Myerson
              Mar 26 at 23:40










            • $begingroup$
              Thank you. My mistake.
              $endgroup$
              – coding1101
              Mar 27 at 7:33













            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            Thanks @Blue.



            I solved this problem in a very simple way, thanks to you.



            1) Solved this by contradiction.



            If $|M| ge 4$, the lengths of edges of quadrangles are all different.



            Let the four lengths $a, b, c, d$.



            Then, it seems to be a contradiction because,



            contradiction



            2) It is simmilar from above.



            Let the four lengths $a, b, a, c$.



            Then, it seems to be a contradiction because,



            contradiction






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Thanks @Blue.



            I solved this problem in a very simple way, thanks to you.



            1) Solved this by contradiction.



            If $|M| ge 4$, the lengths of edges of quadrangles are all different.



            Let the four lengths $a, b, c, d$.



            Then, it seems to be a contradiction because,



            contradiction



            2) It is simmilar from above.



            Let the four lengths $a, b, a, c$.



            Then, it seems to be a contradiction because,



            contradiction







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Mar 27 at 7:33

























            answered Mar 26 at 9:44









            coding1101coding1101

            1246




            1246











            • $begingroup$
              I think you have your two diagrams each where the other should be.
              $endgroup$
              – Gerry Myerson
              Mar 26 at 23:40










            • $begingroup$
              Thank you. My mistake.
              $endgroup$
              – coding1101
              Mar 27 at 7:33
















            • $begingroup$
              I think you have your two diagrams each where the other should be.
              $endgroup$
              – Gerry Myerson
              Mar 26 at 23:40










            • $begingroup$
              Thank you. My mistake.
              $endgroup$
              – coding1101
              Mar 27 at 7:33















            $begingroup$
            I think you have your two diagrams each where the other should be.
            $endgroup$
            – Gerry Myerson
            Mar 26 at 23:40




            $begingroup$
            I think you have your two diagrams each where the other should be.
            $endgroup$
            – Gerry Myerson
            Mar 26 at 23:40












            $begingroup$
            Thank you. My mistake.
            $endgroup$
            – coding1101
            Mar 27 at 7:33




            $begingroup$
            Thank you. My mistake.
            $endgroup$
            – coding1101
            Mar 27 at 7:33

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3161559%2foctahedrons-whose-faces-are-congruent-quadrangles%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

            random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

            Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye