Number multiplied by itself does not give a square numberAre square numbers also known as rectangular numbers, too?I call them squares. They called them arrays. What do they mean?When is $8x^2-4$ a square number?A property regarding complete/perfect squares.If the square of a natural number is odd then this number is odd.Can a multi-perfect number be a perfect square?What is the series of numbers, where each number is a triangular, square, and hexagonal number?Why is there a pattern to the last digits of square numbers?Is mean squared error equivalent to mean squared absolute errorThree-Digit Square Containing Numbers 1-9

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

The Digit Triangles

Why should universal income be universal?

Strong empirical falsification of quantum mechanics based on vacuum energy density?

Will number of steps recorded on FitBit/any fitness tracker add up distance in PokemonGo?

Is this toilet slogan correct usage of the English language?

What is the difference between lands and mana?

Short story about a deaf man, who cuts people tongues

How to explain what's wrong with this application of the chain rule?

What does Apple's new App Store requirement mean

Biological Blimps: Propulsion

How much theory knowledge is actually used while playing?

Can you use Vicious Mockery to win an argument or gain favours?

How would you translate "more" for use as an interface button?

Why is it that I can sometimes guess the next note?

Fantasy comedy romance novel, set in medieval times, involving a siege, a nun, and enchanted pickles

Taxes on Dividends in a Roth IRA

What features enable the Su-25 Frogfoot to operate with such a wide variety of fuels?

How to convince somebody that he is fit for something else, but not this job?

Why is the "ls" command showing permissions of files in a FAT32 partition?

Creating two special characters

How to get directions in deep space?

How can ping know if my host is down

Is there any evidence that Cleopatra and Caesarion considered fleeing to India to escape the Romans?

Were Persian-Median kings illiterate?



Number multiplied by itself does not give a square number


Are square numbers also known as rectangular numbers, too?I call them squares. They called them arrays. What do they mean?When is $8x^2-4$ a square number?A property regarding complete/perfect squares.If the square of a natural number is odd then this number is odd.Can a multi-perfect number be a perfect square?What is the series of numbers, where each number is a triangular, square, and hexagonal number?Why is there a pattern to the last digits of square numbers?Is mean squared error equivalent to mean squared absolute errorThree-Digit Square Containing Numbers 1-9













1












$begingroup$


The answer to this is probably very simple but while working on a question I was surprised to discover than a number multiplied by itself does not give the same answer as the same number squared (in the case of negative numbers).



Examples:



$-1^2 = -1$



If I now multiply this number by itself $-1 * -1$ I get $1$



$-4^2 = -16$



$-4 * -4 = 16$



The same goes for all the other negative numbers I tried.



What changes when squaring a number and how do I understand what is going on? When I multiply a positive number by itself I get a square number, why does this not work with negative numbers?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    It's just operator precedence. $-x^2$ does not mean $(-x)^2$, it means $-(x^2)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Mar 14 at 16:49










  • $begingroup$
    What you've done above is not squaring a number. It is true (depending on how you interpret order of operations) that $-1^2=-1$. But what you are actually asking about is $(-1)^2$ which is exactly $1$. By definition, $x^2$ is the same thing as $xcdot x$.
    $endgroup$
    – Nick Peterson
    Mar 14 at 16:50










  • $begingroup$
    @NickPeterson So it's actually (-1)1^2
    $endgroup$
    – Simon
    Mar 14 at 16:55










  • $begingroup$
    @Robert Israel thank you I understand now
    $endgroup$
    – Simon
    Mar 14 at 16:56















1












$begingroup$


The answer to this is probably very simple but while working on a question I was surprised to discover than a number multiplied by itself does not give the same answer as the same number squared (in the case of negative numbers).



Examples:



$-1^2 = -1$



If I now multiply this number by itself $-1 * -1$ I get $1$



$-4^2 = -16$



$-4 * -4 = 16$



The same goes for all the other negative numbers I tried.



What changes when squaring a number and how do I understand what is going on? When I multiply a positive number by itself I get a square number, why does this not work with negative numbers?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    It's just operator precedence. $-x^2$ does not mean $(-x)^2$, it means $-(x^2)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Mar 14 at 16:49










  • $begingroup$
    What you've done above is not squaring a number. It is true (depending on how you interpret order of operations) that $-1^2=-1$. But what you are actually asking about is $(-1)^2$ which is exactly $1$. By definition, $x^2$ is the same thing as $xcdot x$.
    $endgroup$
    – Nick Peterson
    Mar 14 at 16:50










  • $begingroup$
    @NickPeterson So it's actually (-1)1^2
    $endgroup$
    – Simon
    Mar 14 at 16:55










  • $begingroup$
    @Robert Israel thank you I understand now
    $endgroup$
    – Simon
    Mar 14 at 16:56













1












1








1





$begingroup$


The answer to this is probably very simple but while working on a question I was surprised to discover than a number multiplied by itself does not give the same answer as the same number squared (in the case of negative numbers).



Examples:



$-1^2 = -1$



If I now multiply this number by itself $-1 * -1$ I get $1$



$-4^2 = -16$



$-4 * -4 = 16$



The same goes for all the other negative numbers I tried.



What changes when squaring a number and how do I understand what is going on? When I multiply a positive number by itself I get a square number, why does this not work with negative numbers?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




The answer to this is probably very simple but while working on a question I was surprised to discover than a number multiplied by itself does not give the same answer as the same number squared (in the case of negative numbers).



Examples:



$-1^2 = -1$



If I now multiply this number by itself $-1 * -1$ I get $1$



$-4^2 = -16$



$-4 * -4 = 16$



The same goes for all the other negative numbers I tried.



What changes when squaring a number and how do I understand what is going on? When I multiply a positive number by itself I get a square number, why does this not work with negative numbers?







square-numbers






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Mar 14 at 16:47









SimonSimon

1104




1104







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    It's just operator precedence. $-x^2$ does not mean $(-x)^2$, it means $-(x^2)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Mar 14 at 16:49










  • $begingroup$
    What you've done above is not squaring a number. It is true (depending on how you interpret order of operations) that $-1^2=-1$. But what you are actually asking about is $(-1)^2$ which is exactly $1$. By definition, $x^2$ is the same thing as $xcdot x$.
    $endgroup$
    – Nick Peterson
    Mar 14 at 16:50










  • $begingroup$
    @NickPeterson So it's actually (-1)1^2
    $endgroup$
    – Simon
    Mar 14 at 16:55










  • $begingroup$
    @Robert Israel thank you I understand now
    $endgroup$
    – Simon
    Mar 14 at 16:56












  • 4




    $begingroup$
    It's just operator precedence. $-x^2$ does not mean $(-x)^2$, it means $-(x^2)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Mar 14 at 16:49










  • $begingroup$
    What you've done above is not squaring a number. It is true (depending on how you interpret order of operations) that $-1^2=-1$. But what you are actually asking about is $(-1)^2$ which is exactly $1$. By definition, $x^2$ is the same thing as $xcdot x$.
    $endgroup$
    – Nick Peterson
    Mar 14 at 16:50










  • $begingroup$
    @NickPeterson So it's actually (-1)1^2
    $endgroup$
    – Simon
    Mar 14 at 16:55










  • $begingroup$
    @Robert Israel thank you I understand now
    $endgroup$
    – Simon
    Mar 14 at 16:56







4




4




$begingroup$
It's just operator precedence. $-x^2$ does not mean $(-x)^2$, it means $-(x^2)$.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Mar 14 at 16:49




$begingroup$
It's just operator precedence. $-x^2$ does not mean $(-x)^2$, it means $-(x^2)$.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Mar 14 at 16:49












$begingroup$
What you've done above is not squaring a number. It is true (depending on how you interpret order of operations) that $-1^2=-1$. But what you are actually asking about is $(-1)^2$ which is exactly $1$. By definition, $x^2$ is the same thing as $xcdot x$.
$endgroup$
– Nick Peterson
Mar 14 at 16:50




$begingroup$
What you've done above is not squaring a number. It is true (depending on how you interpret order of operations) that $-1^2=-1$. But what you are actually asking about is $(-1)^2$ which is exactly $1$. By definition, $x^2$ is the same thing as $xcdot x$.
$endgroup$
– Nick Peterson
Mar 14 at 16:50












$begingroup$
@NickPeterson So it's actually (-1)1^2
$endgroup$
– Simon
Mar 14 at 16:55




$begingroup$
@NickPeterson So it's actually (-1)1^2
$endgroup$
– Simon
Mar 14 at 16:55












$begingroup$
@Robert Israel thank you I understand now
$endgroup$
– Simon
Mar 14 at 16:56




$begingroup$
@Robert Israel thank you I understand now
$endgroup$
– Simon
Mar 14 at 16:56










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Note that the square of $-1$ is $$ (-1)^2 = (-1)times (-1) = 1 ne -1 .$$ You've mixed up operator precedence by putting $$ -(1)^2 = - (1) times (1) = - 1 . $$



In general $-(x)^2$ is $- (xcdot x)$, because exponentiation has a higher operator precedence than negation. You can read more about the order of operations here.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I see I understand now. I'll accept your answer. Thank you, it was as obvious as I expected
    $endgroup$
    – Simon
    Mar 14 at 16:59










Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3148233%2fnumber-multiplied-by-itself-does-not-give-a-square-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

Note that the square of $-1$ is $$ (-1)^2 = (-1)times (-1) = 1 ne -1 .$$ You've mixed up operator precedence by putting $$ -(1)^2 = - (1) times (1) = - 1 . $$



In general $-(x)^2$ is $- (xcdot x)$, because exponentiation has a higher operator precedence than negation. You can read more about the order of operations here.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I see I understand now. I'll accept your answer. Thank you, it was as obvious as I expected
    $endgroup$
    – Simon
    Mar 14 at 16:59















1












$begingroup$

Note that the square of $-1$ is $$ (-1)^2 = (-1)times (-1) = 1 ne -1 .$$ You've mixed up operator precedence by putting $$ -(1)^2 = - (1) times (1) = - 1 . $$



In general $-(x)^2$ is $- (xcdot x)$, because exponentiation has a higher operator precedence than negation. You can read more about the order of operations here.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I see I understand now. I'll accept your answer. Thank you, it was as obvious as I expected
    $endgroup$
    – Simon
    Mar 14 at 16:59













1












1








1





$begingroup$

Note that the square of $-1$ is $$ (-1)^2 = (-1)times (-1) = 1 ne -1 .$$ You've mixed up operator precedence by putting $$ -(1)^2 = - (1) times (1) = - 1 . $$



In general $-(x)^2$ is $- (xcdot x)$, because exponentiation has a higher operator precedence than negation. You can read more about the order of operations here.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Note that the square of $-1$ is $$ (-1)^2 = (-1)times (-1) = 1 ne -1 .$$ You've mixed up operator precedence by putting $$ -(1)^2 = - (1) times (1) = - 1 . $$



In general $-(x)^2$ is $- (xcdot x)$, because exponentiation has a higher operator precedence than negation. You can read more about the order of operations here.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Mar 14 at 16:53









Dando18Dando18

4,73241235




4,73241235











  • $begingroup$
    I see I understand now. I'll accept your answer. Thank you, it was as obvious as I expected
    $endgroup$
    – Simon
    Mar 14 at 16:59
















  • $begingroup$
    I see I understand now. I'll accept your answer. Thank you, it was as obvious as I expected
    $endgroup$
    – Simon
    Mar 14 at 16:59















$begingroup$
I see I understand now. I'll accept your answer. Thank you, it was as obvious as I expected
$endgroup$
– Simon
Mar 14 at 16:59




$begingroup$
I see I understand now. I'll accept your answer. Thank you, it was as obvious as I expected
$endgroup$
– Simon
Mar 14 at 16:59

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3148233%2fnumber-multiplied-by-itself-does-not-give-a-square-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







XI,c zk J,BkxcbuNNQMp w,W 7 to5Z,Kll,H wcVB83PFQE8qZftLPkCIUPkG4kNAy58 qflTekmY1NOey VA0JBG,ln,o0KeSat9eMtGNyc04l
m1y6mHGi

Popular posts from this blog

Football at the 1986 Brunei Merdeka Games Contents Teams Group stage Knockout stage References Navigation menu"Brunei Merdeka Games 1986".

Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee