About parabolic Kazhdan Lusztig polynomialsBGG category everywhere implies generalized Kazhdan-Lusztig formula?When are parabolic Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials nonzero?Implications of non-negativity of coefficients of arbitrary Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials?Kazhdan-Lusztig Polynomials and Intersection CohomologyPapers/Programs for computing periodic KL polynomials?Recursive formula for inverse Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomialsCombinatorics of $p$-Kazhdan--lusztig polynomialsParabolic Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomial coincide?Examples of non-trivial Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomialsRelationship bewteen Kazhdan-Lusztig Vogan polynomial and Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomial

About parabolic Kazhdan Lusztig polynomials


BGG category everywhere implies generalized Kazhdan-Lusztig formula?When are parabolic Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials nonzero?Implications of non-negativity of coefficients of arbitrary Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials?Kazhdan-Lusztig Polynomials and Intersection CohomologyPapers/Programs for computing periodic KL polynomials?Recursive formula for inverse Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomialsCombinatorics of $p$-Kazhdan--lusztig polynomialsParabolic Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomial coincide?Examples of non-trivial Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomialsRelationship bewteen Kazhdan-Lusztig Vogan polynomial and Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomial













4












$begingroup$


There are two types of parabolic Kazhdan Lusztig polynomials, namely, of type -1: $P_x,w^I,-1$ and of type $q$: $P_x,w^I,q$. See Kazhdan–Lusztig and R-Polynomials,
Young’s Lattice, and Dyck Partitions



My question: What is the meaning of $-1$ and $q$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    4












    $begingroup$


    There are two types of parabolic Kazhdan Lusztig polynomials, namely, of type -1: $P_x,w^I,-1$ and of type $q$: $P_x,w^I,q$. See Kazhdan–Lusztig and R-Polynomials,
    Young’s Lattice, and Dyck Partitions



    My question: What is the meaning of $-1$ and $q$?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$


      There are two types of parabolic Kazhdan Lusztig polynomials, namely, of type -1: $P_x,w^I,-1$ and of type $q$: $P_x,w^I,q$. See Kazhdan–Lusztig and R-Polynomials,
      Young’s Lattice, and Dyck Partitions



      My question: What is the meaning of $-1$ and $q$?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      There are two types of parabolic Kazhdan Lusztig polynomials, namely, of type -1: $P_x,w^I,-1$ and of type $q$: $P_x,w^I,q$. See Kazhdan–Lusztig and R-Polynomials,
      Young’s Lattice, and Dyck Partitions



      My question: What is the meaning of $-1$ and $q$?







      rt.representation-theory algebraic-combinatorics kazhdan-lusztig






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 14 at 14:27









      Carlo Beenakker

      78.7k9186289




      78.7k9186289










      asked Mar 14 at 11:44









      James CheungJames Cheung

      42816




      42816




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          6












          $begingroup$

          These polynomials are connected to the canonical basis of the induction from a parabolic subalgebra $H_I$ up to the whole Hecke algebra $H$. The difference is which module is being induced: The $q$-variant induces the trivial module (on which the generators $T_s$ of $H_I$ act as multiplication by $q$) while the $(-1)$ variant induces the sign module (on which the generators act as multiplication by $-1$).






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your detailed explanation.
            $endgroup$
            – James Cheung
            Mar 16 at 13:57


















          3












          $begingroup$

          these are polynomials in $q$ of two types, which satisfy either of the two recursions:
          $$P_v,w^I,q=-P_v,ws^I,q;;textor;;P_v,w^I,-1=qP_v,ws^I,-1,$$
          see for example these lecture notes.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your notes.
            $endgroup$
            – James Cheung
            Mar 16 at 13:57










          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "504"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f325436%2fabout-parabolic-kazhdan-lusztig-polynomials%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          6












          $begingroup$

          These polynomials are connected to the canonical basis of the induction from a parabolic subalgebra $H_I$ up to the whole Hecke algebra $H$. The difference is which module is being induced: The $q$-variant induces the trivial module (on which the generators $T_s$ of $H_I$ act as multiplication by $q$) while the $(-1)$ variant induces the sign module (on which the generators act as multiplication by $-1$).






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your detailed explanation.
            $endgroup$
            – James Cheung
            Mar 16 at 13:57















          6












          $begingroup$

          These polynomials are connected to the canonical basis of the induction from a parabolic subalgebra $H_I$ up to the whole Hecke algebra $H$. The difference is which module is being induced: The $q$-variant induces the trivial module (on which the generators $T_s$ of $H_I$ act as multiplication by $q$) while the $(-1)$ variant induces the sign module (on which the generators act as multiplication by $-1$).






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your detailed explanation.
            $endgroup$
            – James Cheung
            Mar 16 at 13:57













          6












          6








          6





          $begingroup$

          These polynomials are connected to the canonical basis of the induction from a parabolic subalgebra $H_I$ up to the whole Hecke algebra $H$. The difference is which module is being induced: The $q$-variant induces the trivial module (on which the generators $T_s$ of $H_I$ act as multiplication by $q$) while the $(-1)$ variant induces the sign module (on which the generators act as multiplication by $-1$).






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          These polynomials are connected to the canonical basis of the induction from a parabolic subalgebra $H_I$ up to the whole Hecke algebra $H$. The difference is which module is being induced: The $q$-variant induces the trivial module (on which the generators $T_s$ of $H_I$ act as multiplication by $q$) while the $(-1)$ variant induces the sign module (on which the generators act as multiplication by $-1$).







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 14 at 15:12









          Johannes HahnJohannes Hahn

          6,14222446




          6,14222446











          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your detailed explanation.
            $endgroup$
            – James Cheung
            Mar 16 at 13:57
















          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your detailed explanation.
            $endgroup$
            – James Cheung
            Mar 16 at 13:57















          $begingroup$
          Thank you for your detailed explanation.
          $endgroup$
          – James Cheung
          Mar 16 at 13:57




          $begingroup$
          Thank you for your detailed explanation.
          $endgroup$
          – James Cheung
          Mar 16 at 13:57











          3












          $begingroup$

          these are polynomials in $q$ of two types, which satisfy either of the two recursions:
          $$P_v,w^I,q=-P_v,ws^I,q;;textor;;P_v,w^I,-1=qP_v,ws^I,-1,$$
          see for example these lecture notes.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your notes.
            $endgroup$
            – James Cheung
            Mar 16 at 13:57















          3












          $begingroup$

          these are polynomials in $q$ of two types, which satisfy either of the two recursions:
          $$P_v,w^I,q=-P_v,ws^I,q;;textor;;P_v,w^I,-1=qP_v,ws^I,-1,$$
          see for example these lecture notes.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your notes.
            $endgroup$
            – James Cheung
            Mar 16 at 13:57













          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          these are polynomials in $q$ of two types, which satisfy either of the two recursions:
          $$P_v,w^I,q=-P_v,ws^I,q;;textor;;P_v,w^I,-1=qP_v,ws^I,-1,$$
          see for example these lecture notes.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          these are polynomials in $q$ of two types, which satisfy either of the two recursions:
          $$P_v,w^I,q=-P_v,ws^I,q;;textor;;P_v,w^I,-1=qP_v,ws^I,-1,$$
          see for example these lecture notes.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 14 at 14:25









          Carlo BeenakkerCarlo Beenakker

          78.7k9186289




          78.7k9186289











          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your notes.
            $endgroup$
            – James Cheung
            Mar 16 at 13:57
















          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your notes.
            $endgroup$
            – James Cheung
            Mar 16 at 13:57















          $begingroup$
          Thank you for your notes.
          $endgroup$
          – James Cheung
          Mar 16 at 13:57




          $begingroup$
          Thank you for your notes.
          $endgroup$
          – James Cheung
          Mar 16 at 13:57

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f325436%2fabout-parabolic-kazhdan-lusztig-polynomials%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Moe incest case Sentencing See also References Navigation menu"'Australian Josef Fritzl' fathered four children by daughter""Small town recoils in horror at 'Australian Fritzl' incest case""Victorian rape allegations echo Fritzl case - Just In (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)""Incest father jailed for 22 years""'Australian Fritzl' sentenced to 22 years in prison for abusing daughter for three decades""RSJ v The Queen"

          John Burke, 9th Earl of Clanricarde References Navigation menuA General and heraldic dictionary of the peerage and baronetage of the British EmpireLeigh Rayment's Peerage Pages

          Football at the 1986 Brunei Merdeka Games Contents Teams Group stage Knockout stage References Navigation menu"Brunei Merdeka Games 1986".