About parabolic Kazhdan Lusztig polynomialsBGG category everywhere implies generalized Kazhdan-Lusztig formula?When are parabolic Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials nonzero?Implications of non-negativity of coefficients of arbitrary Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials?Kazhdan-Lusztig Polynomials and Intersection CohomologyPapers/Programs for computing periodic KL polynomials?Recursive formula for inverse Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomialsCombinatorics of $p$-Kazhdan--lusztig polynomialsParabolic Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomial coincide?Examples of non-trivial Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomialsRelationship bewteen Kazhdan-Lusztig Vogan polynomial and Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomial

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

About parabolic Kazhdan Lusztig polynomials


BGG category everywhere implies generalized Kazhdan-Lusztig formula?When are parabolic Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials nonzero?Implications of non-negativity of coefficients of arbitrary Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials?Kazhdan-Lusztig Polynomials and Intersection CohomologyPapers/Programs for computing periodic KL polynomials?Recursive formula for inverse Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomialsCombinatorics of $p$-Kazhdan--lusztig polynomialsParabolic Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomial coincide?Examples of non-trivial Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomialsRelationship bewteen Kazhdan-Lusztig Vogan polynomial and Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomial













4












$begingroup$


There are two types of parabolic Kazhdan Lusztig polynomials, namely, of type -1: $P_x,w^I,-1$ and of type $q$: $P_x,w^I,q$. See Kazhdan–Lusztig and R-Polynomials,
Young’s Lattice, and Dyck Partitions



My question: What is the meaning of $-1$ and $q$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    4












    $begingroup$


    There are two types of parabolic Kazhdan Lusztig polynomials, namely, of type -1: $P_x,w^I,-1$ and of type $q$: $P_x,w^I,q$. See Kazhdan–Lusztig and R-Polynomials,
    Young’s Lattice, and Dyck Partitions



    My question: What is the meaning of $-1$ and $q$?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$


      There are two types of parabolic Kazhdan Lusztig polynomials, namely, of type -1: $P_x,w^I,-1$ and of type $q$: $P_x,w^I,q$. See Kazhdan–Lusztig and R-Polynomials,
      Young’s Lattice, and Dyck Partitions



      My question: What is the meaning of $-1$ and $q$?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      There are two types of parabolic Kazhdan Lusztig polynomials, namely, of type -1: $P_x,w^I,-1$ and of type $q$: $P_x,w^I,q$. See Kazhdan–Lusztig and R-Polynomials,
      Young’s Lattice, and Dyck Partitions



      My question: What is the meaning of $-1$ and $q$?







      rt.representation-theory algebraic-combinatorics kazhdan-lusztig






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 14 at 14:27









      Carlo Beenakker

      78.7k9186289




      78.7k9186289










      asked Mar 14 at 11:44









      James CheungJames Cheung

      42816




      42816




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          6












          $begingroup$

          These polynomials are connected to the canonical basis of the induction from a parabolic subalgebra $H_I$ up to the whole Hecke algebra $H$. The difference is which module is being induced: The $q$-variant induces the trivial module (on which the generators $T_s$ of $H_I$ act as multiplication by $q$) while the $(-1)$ variant induces the sign module (on which the generators act as multiplication by $-1$).






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your detailed explanation.
            $endgroup$
            – James Cheung
            Mar 16 at 13:57


















          3












          $begingroup$

          these are polynomials in $q$ of two types, which satisfy either of the two recursions:
          $$P_v,w^I,q=-P_v,ws^I,q;;textor;;P_v,w^I,-1=qP_v,ws^I,-1,$$
          see for example these lecture notes.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your notes.
            $endgroup$
            – James Cheung
            Mar 16 at 13:57










          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "504"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f325436%2fabout-parabolic-kazhdan-lusztig-polynomials%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          6












          $begingroup$

          These polynomials are connected to the canonical basis of the induction from a parabolic subalgebra $H_I$ up to the whole Hecke algebra $H$. The difference is which module is being induced: The $q$-variant induces the trivial module (on which the generators $T_s$ of $H_I$ act as multiplication by $q$) while the $(-1)$ variant induces the sign module (on which the generators act as multiplication by $-1$).






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your detailed explanation.
            $endgroup$
            – James Cheung
            Mar 16 at 13:57















          6












          $begingroup$

          These polynomials are connected to the canonical basis of the induction from a parabolic subalgebra $H_I$ up to the whole Hecke algebra $H$. The difference is which module is being induced: The $q$-variant induces the trivial module (on which the generators $T_s$ of $H_I$ act as multiplication by $q$) while the $(-1)$ variant induces the sign module (on which the generators act as multiplication by $-1$).






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your detailed explanation.
            $endgroup$
            – James Cheung
            Mar 16 at 13:57













          6












          6








          6





          $begingroup$

          These polynomials are connected to the canonical basis of the induction from a parabolic subalgebra $H_I$ up to the whole Hecke algebra $H$. The difference is which module is being induced: The $q$-variant induces the trivial module (on which the generators $T_s$ of $H_I$ act as multiplication by $q$) while the $(-1)$ variant induces the sign module (on which the generators act as multiplication by $-1$).






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          These polynomials are connected to the canonical basis of the induction from a parabolic subalgebra $H_I$ up to the whole Hecke algebra $H$. The difference is which module is being induced: The $q$-variant induces the trivial module (on which the generators $T_s$ of $H_I$ act as multiplication by $q$) while the $(-1)$ variant induces the sign module (on which the generators act as multiplication by $-1$).







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 14 at 15:12









          Johannes HahnJohannes Hahn

          6,14222446




          6,14222446











          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your detailed explanation.
            $endgroup$
            – James Cheung
            Mar 16 at 13:57
















          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your detailed explanation.
            $endgroup$
            – James Cheung
            Mar 16 at 13:57















          $begingroup$
          Thank you for your detailed explanation.
          $endgroup$
          – James Cheung
          Mar 16 at 13:57




          $begingroup$
          Thank you for your detailed explanation.
          $endgroup$
          – James Cheung
          Mar 16 at 13:57











          3












          $begingroup$

          these are polynomials in $q$ of two types, which satisfy either of the two recursions:
          $$P_v,w^I,q=-P_v,ws^I,q;;textor;;P_v,w^I,-1=qP_v,ws^I,-1,$$
          see for example these lecture notes.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your notes.
            $endgroup$
            – James Cheung
            Mar 16 at 13:57















          3












          $begingroup$

          these are polynomials in $q$ of two types, which satisfy either of the two recursions:
          $$P_v,w^I,q=-P_v,ws^I,q;;textor;;P_v,w^I,-1=qP_v,ws^I,-1,$$
          see for example these lecture notes.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your notes.
            $endgroup$
            – James Cheung
            Mar 16 at 13:57













          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          these are polynomials in $q$ of two types, which satisfy either of the two recursions:
          $$P_v,w^I,q=-P_v,ws^I,q;;textor;;P_v,w^I,-1=qP_v,ws^I,-1,$$
          see for example these lecture notes.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          these are polynomials in $q$ of two types, which satisfy either of the two recursions:
          $$P_v,w^I,q=-P_v,ws^I,q;;textor;;P_v,w^I,-1=qP_v,ws^I,-1,$$
          see for example these lecture notes.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 14 at 14:25









          Carlo BeenakkerCarlo Beenakker

          78.7k9186289




          78.7k9186289











          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your notes.
            $endgroup$
            – James Cheung
            Mar 16 at 13:57
















          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your notes.
            $endgroup$
            – James Cheung
            Mar 16 at 13:57















          $begingroup$
          Thank you for your notes.
          $endgroup$
          – James Cheung
          Mar 16 at 13:57




          $begingroup$
          Thank you for your notes.
          $endgroup$
          – James Cheung
          Mar 16 at 13:57

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f325436%2fabout-parabolic-kazhdan-lusztig-polynomials%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          eq0Vz11h5IS,G,lW2,bLQIe4arWWTR5r58U2m18miopxv4,bXQuou9cQH Fr
          S26HG,TmB3EIQpAev K8ZhyU,A6H2u13BbiB7B w35TDf mdZqX8GIJyOjtJ9mb5TuoQzydInCq4KI L6iQOIyw,nTETpRLKWJM4Vy

          Popular posts from this blog

          Football at the 1986 Brunei Merdeka Games Contents Teams Group stage Knockout stage References Navigation menu"Brunei Merdeka Games 1986".

          Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

          Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee