What does it mean : the finite dimensional distribution determine the random process?Does the distribution of a process on $mathbbR^[0,infty)$ uniquely define it?definition of stochastic process on countable spaceEqual distribution only for finite dimensional distributionsRecurrence of random walks in terms of the mean of each step.Finite dimensional distribution of a stochastic processDoes a Levy process have the property $mathbbE_x(X_t|mathcalG)=mathbbE(X_t+x|mathcalG)$?For a given sequence of random variables $R_n$, what does the stochastic order relations $o_p(R_n)$ and $O_p(R_n)$ mean intuitively?Pointwise convergence in limit of conditional probabilities implies almost sure convergence?What does the weak convergence of stochastic intensity tell us about the point process?Definition of a Markov process: What does $mathbb P_xX_uin Bmid mathcal F_t=p(u-t,X_t,Gamma)$ mean?

Python if-else code style for reduced code for rounding floats

How to make healing in an exploration game interesting

Official degrees of earth’s rotation per day

Is it good practice to use Linear Least-Squares with SMA?

Is a party consisting of only a bard, a cleric, and a warlock functional long-term?

What is a ^ b and (a & b) << 1?

Why do passenger jet manufacturers design their planes with stall prevention systems?

Why is the President allowed to veto a cancellation of emergency powers?

Does multi-classing into Fighter give you heavy armor?

Fastest way to pop N items from a large dict

How to explain that I do not want to visit a country due to personal safety concern?

Non-trivial topology where only open sets are closed

If I am holding an item before I cast Blink, will it move with me through the Ethereal Plane?

Employee lack of ownership

How could an airship be repaired midflight?

World War I as a war of liberals against authoritarians?

Bach's Toccata and Fugue in D minor breaks the "no parallel octaves" rule?

Recruiter wants very extensive technical details about all of my previous work

Is there a hypothetical scenario that would make Earth uninhabitable for humans, but not for (the majority of) other animals?

What does 高層ビルに何車線もの道路。mean?

How to deal with taxi scam when on vacation?

What is "focus distance lower/upper" and how is it different from depth of field?

What are substitutions for coconut in curry?

If I can solve Sudoku, can I solve the Travelling Salesman Problem (TSP)? If so, how?



What does it mean : the finite dimensional distribution determine the random process?


Does the distribution of a process on $mathbbR^[0,infty)$ uniquely define it?definition of stochastic process on countable spaceEqual distribution only for finite dimensional distributionsRecurrence of random walks in terms of the mean of each step.Finite dimensional distribution of a stochastic processDoes a Levy process have the property $mathbbE_x(X_t|mathcalG)=mathbbE(X_t+x|mathcalG)$?For a given sequence of random variables $R_n$, what does the stochastic order relations $o_p(R_n)$ and $O_p(R_n)$ mean intuitively?Pointwise convergence in limit of conditional probabilities implies almost sure convergence?What does the weak convergence of stochastic intensity tell us about the point process?Definition of a Markov process: What does $mathbb P_xX_uin Bmid mathcal F_t=p(u-t,X_t,Gamma)$ mean?













2












$begingroup$


In the book Random perturbation of dynamical system of Fredlin and Wantzell (2nd edition) page 17, it's written :



Let $(Omega ,mathcal F,mathbb P)$ a probability space and $(xi_t)_tin T$ a stochastic process with state space $(X,mathcal B )$. If $T$ is countable, then the finite dimensional distributions determine the random process to the degree of uniqueness usual in probability. If $T$ is an interval, we can have two process (one continuous and ond discontinuous) with the same finite dimensional distribution.




I'm not sure if I completly understand this... does it mean (in the countable case), that if for all $Bin mathcal B$, $$mathbb PX_nin B=mathbb PY_nin B$$
for all $ninmathbb N$, then $X_n=Y_n$ a.s. ?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Pierre is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    In the book Random perturbation of dynamical system of Fredlin and Wantzell (2nd edition) page 17, it's written :



    Let $(Omega ,mathcal F,mathbb P)$ a probability space and $(xi_t)_tin T$ a stochastic process with state space $(X,mathcal B )$. If $T$ is countable, then the finite dimensional distributions determine the random process to the degree of uniqueness usual in probability. If $T$ is an interval, we can have two process (one continuous and ond discontinuous) with the same finite dimensional distribution.




    I'm not sure if I completly understand this... does it mean (in the countable case), that if for all $Bin mathcal B$, $$mathbb PX_nin B=mathbb PY_nin B$$
    for all $ninmathbb N$, then $X_n=Y_n$ a.s. ?










    share|cite|improve this question









    New contributor




    Pierre is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      In the book Random perturbation of dynamical system of Fredlin and Wantzell (2nd edition) page 17, it's written :



      Let $(Omega ,mathcal F,mathbb P)$ a probability space and $(xi_t)_tin T$ a stochastic process with state space $(X,mathcal B )$. If $T$ is countable, then the finite dimensional distributions determine the random process to the degree of uniqueness usual in probability. If $T$ is an interval, we can have two process (one continuous and ond discontinuous) with the same finite dimensional distribution.




      I'm not sure if I completly understand this... does it mean (in the countable case), that if for all $Bin mathcal B$, $$mathbb PX_nin B=mathbb PY_nin B$$
      for all $ninmathbb N$, then $X_n=Y_n$ a.s. ?










      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      Pierre is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      In the book Random perturbation of dynamical system of Fredlin and Wantzell (2nd edition) page 17, it's written :



      Let $(Omega ,mathcal F,mathbb P)$ a probability space and $(xi_t)_tin T$ a stochastic process with state space $(X,mathcal B )$. If $T$ is countable, then the finite dimensional distributions determine the random process to the degree of uniqueness usual in probability. If $T$ is an interval, we can have two process (one continuous and ond discontinuous) with the same finite dimensional distribution.




      I'm not sure if I completly understand this... does it mean (in the countable case), that if for all $Bin mathcal B$, $$mathbb PX_nin B=mathbb PY_nin B$$
      for all $ninmathbb N$, then $X_n=Y_n$ a.s. ?







      probability






      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      Pierre is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      Pierre is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 12 at 10:32







      Pierre













      New contributor




      Pierre is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked Mar 12 at 10:04









      PierrePierre

      5610




      5610




      New contributor




      Pierre is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Pierre is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Pierre is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          No.



          It means that if two stochastic processes $xi^1$ and $xi^2$ are such that
          $$
          forall t_1,cdots,t_nin T,forall A_1,cdots,A_ninmathcal B,mathbb P(xi^1_t_1in A_1,cdots,xi^1_t_nin A_n)=mathbb P(xi^2_t_1in A_1,cdots,xi^2_t_nin A_n),
          $$

          then $xi^1$ and $xi^2$ have the same distribution, that is to say
          $$
          forall Ainmathcal B^otimes T,mathbb P((xi^1_t)_tinmathbb Rin A)=mathbb P((xi^2_t)_tinmathbb Rin A).
          $$



          The short way of saying this is that if two processes $xi^1$ and $xi^2$ have the same finite dimensional distributions, then they have the same distribution. In the general case, you cannot deduce the almost sure equality between the two processes.



          Let us now illustrate the last sentence. Let $T=[0,1]$, $U$ be a random variable uniformly distributed on $[0,1]$ and $xi^1$ and $xi^2$ be defined for all $tin T$ by $xi^1_t=0$ and $xi^2_t=1_U=t$ (that is $1$ if $U=t$ and $0$ otherwise). Then for all $tin [0,T]$, $xi^1_t=xi^2_t$ a.s. (since $mathbb P(U=t)=0$) so we easily deduce that $xi^1$ and $xi^2$ have equal finite dimensional distributions and therefore equal distributions. However, $xi^1$ is clearly continuous and $xi^2$ discontinuous.






          share|cite|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Will is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer, but my question was rather for $T=mathbb N$ (or $1,...,n$). The statement looks stronger. (I know that for the case $T=[0,1]$ is not true that the process are a.s. equal when they have same distribution)
            $endgroup$
            – Pierre
            Mar 12 at 11:33











          • $begingroup$
            Everything I said (except the last paragraph of course) is valid for $T$ countable. If $T=mathbb N$ or $1,cdots,n$ you can deduce the equality of the distributions but not the equality a.s.
            $endgroup$
            – Will
            Mar 12 at 12:08










          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );






          Pierre is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3144894%2fwhat-does-it-mean-the-finite-dimensional-distribution-determine-the-random-pro%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          No.



          It means that if two stochastic processes $xi^1$ and $xi^2$ are such that
          $$
          forall t_1,cdots,t_nin T,forall A_1,cdots,A_ninmathcal B,mathbb P(xi^1_t_1in A_1,cdots,xi^1_t_nin A_n)=mathbb P(xi^2_t_1in A_1,cdots,xi^2_t_nin A_n),
          $$

          then $xi^1$ and $xi^2$ have the same distribution, that is to say
          $$
          forall Ainmathcal B^otimes T,mathbb P((xi^1_t)_tinmathbb Rin A)=mathbb P((xi^2_t)_tinmathbb Rin A).
          $$



          The short way of saying this is that if two processes $xi^1$ and $xi^2$ have the same finite dimensional distributions, then they have the same distribution. In the general case, you cannot deduce the almost sure equality between the two processes.



          Let us now illustrate the last sentence. Let $T=[0,1]$, $U$ be a random variable uniformly distributed on $[0,1]$ and $xi^1$ and $xi^2$ be defined for all $tin T$ by $xi^1_t=0$ and $xi^2_t=1_U=t$ (that is $1$ if $U=t$ and $0$ otherwise). Then for all $tin [0,T]$, $xi^1_t=xi^2_t$ a.s. (since $mathbb P(U=t)=0$) so we easily deduce that $xi^1$ and $xi^2$ have equal finite dimensional distributions and therefore equal distributions. However, $xi^1$ is clearly continuous and $xi^2$ discontinuous.






          share|cite|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Will is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer, but my question was rather for $T=mathbb N$ (or $1,...,n$). The statement looks stronger. (I know that for the case $T=[0,1]$ is not true that the process are a.s. equal when they have same distribution)
            $endgroup$
            – Pierre
            Mar 12 at 11:33











          • $begingroup$
            Everything I said (except the last paragraph of course) is valid for $T$ countable. If $T=mathbb N$ or $1,cdots,n$ you can deduce the equality of the distributions but not the equality a.s.
            $endgroup$
            – Will
            Mar 12 at 12:08















          1












          $begingroup$

          No.



          It means that if two stochastic processes $xi^1$ and $xi^2$ are such that
          $$
          forall t_1,cdots,t_nin T,forall A_1,cdots,A_ninmathcal B,mathbb P(xi^1_t_1in A_1,cdots,xi^1_t_nin A_n)=mathbb P(xi^2_t_1in A_1,cdots,xi^2_t_nin A_n),
          $$

          then $xi^1$ and $xi^2$ have the same distribution, that is to say
          $$
          forall Ainmathcal B^otimes T,mathbb P((xi^1_t)_tinmathbb Rin A)=mathbb P((xi^2_t)_tinmathbb Rin A).
          $$



          The short way of saying this is that if two processes $xi^1$ and $xi^2$ have the same finite dimensional distributions, then they have the same distribution. In the general case, you cannot deduce the almost sure equality between the two processes.



          Let us now illustrate the last sentence. Let $T=[0,1]$, $U$ be a random variable uniformly distributed on $[0,1]$ and $xi^1$ and $xi^2$ be defined for all $tin T$ by $xi^1_t=0$ and $xi^2_t=1_U=t$ (that is $1$ if $U=t$ and $0$ otherwise). Then for all $tin [0,T]$, $xi^1_t=xi^2_t$ a.s. (since $mathbb P(U=t)=0$) so we easily deduce that $xi^1$ and $xi^2$ have equal finite dimensional distributions and therefore equal distributions. However, $xi^1$ is clearly continuous and $xi^2$ discontinuous.






          share|cite|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Will is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer, but my question was rather for $T=mathbb N$ (or $1,...,n$). The statement looks stronger. (I know that for the case $T=[0,1]$ is not true that the process are a.s. equal when they have same distribution)
            $endgroup$
            – Pierre
            Mar 12 at 11:33











          • $begingroup$
            Everything I said (except the last paragraph of course) is valid for $T$ countable. If $T=mathbb N$ or $1,cdots,n$ you can deduce the equality of the distributions but not the equality a.s.
            $endgroup$
            – Will
            Mar 12 at 12:08













          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          No.



          It means that if two stochastic processes $xi^1$ and $xi^2$ are such that
          $$
          forall t_1,cdots,t_nin T,forall A_1,cdots,A_ninmathcal B,mathbb P(xi^1_t_1in A_1,cdots,xi^1_t_nin A_n)=mathbb P(xi^2_t_1in A_1,cdots,xi^2_t_nin A_n),
          $$

          then $xi^1$ and $xi^2$ have the same distribution, that is to say
          $$
          forall Ainmathcal B^otimes T,mathbb P((xi^1_t)_tinmathbb Rin A)=mathbb P((xi^2_t)_tinmathbb Rin A).
          $$



          The short way of saying this is that if two processes $xi^1$ and $xi^2$ have the same finite dimensional distributions, then they have the same distribution. In the general case, you cannot deduce the almost sure equality between the two processes.



          Let us now illustrate the last sentence. Let $T=[0,1]$, $U$ be a random variable uniformly distributed on $[0,1]$ and $xi^1$ and $xi^2$ be defined for all $tin T$ by $xi^1_t=0$ and $xi^2_t=1_U=t$ (that is $1$ if $U=t$ and $0$ otherwise). Then for all $tin [0,T]$, $xi^1_t=xi^2_t$ a.s. (since $mathbb P(U=t)=0$) so we easily deduce that $xi^1$ and $xi^2$ have equal finite dimensional distributions and therefore equal distributions. However, $xi^1$ is clearly continuous and $xi^2$ discontinuous.






          share|cite|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Will is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$



          No.



          It means that if two stochastic processes $xi^1$ and $xi^2$ are such that
          $$
          forall t_1,cdots,t_nin T,forall A_1,cdots,A_ninmathcal B,mathbb P(xi^1_t_1in A_1,cdots,xi^1_t_nin A_n)=mathbb P(xi^2_t_1in A_1,cdots,xi^2_t_nin A_n),
          $$

          then $xi^1$ and $xi^2$ have the same distribution, that is to say
          $$
          forall Ainmathcal B^otimes T,mathbb P((xi^1_t)_tinmathbb Rin A)=mathbb P((xi^2_t)_tinmathbb Rin A).
          $$



          The short way of saying this is that if two processes $xi^1$ and $xi^2$ have the same finite dimensional distributions, then they have the same distribution. In the general case, you cannot deduce the almost sure equality between the two processes.



          Let us now illustrate the last sentence. Let $T=[0,1]$, $U$ be a random variable uniformly distributed on $[0,1]$ and $xi^1$ and $xi^2$ be defined for all $tin T$ by $xi^1_t=0$ and $xi^2_t=1_U=t$ (that is $1$ if $U=t$ and $0$ otherwise). Then for all $tin [0,T]$, $xi^1_t=xi^2_t$ a.s. (since $mathbb P(U=t)=0$) so we easily deduce that $xi^1$ and $xi^2$ have equal finite dimensional distributions and therefore equal distributions. However, $xi^1$ is clearly continuous and $xi^2$ discontinuous.







          share|cite|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Will is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer






          New contributor




          Will is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          answered Mar 12 at 11:10









          WillWill

          1663




          1663




          New contributor




          Will is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          New contributor





          Will is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          Will is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.











          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer, but my question was rather for $T=mathbb N$ (or $1,...,n$). The statement looks stronger. (I know that for the case $T=[0,1]$ is not true that the process are a.s. equal when they have same distribution)
            $endgroup$
            – Pierre
            Mar 12 at 11:33











          • $begingroup$
            Everything I said (except the last paragraph of course) is valid for $T$ countable. If $T=mathbb N$ or $1,cdots,n$ you can deduce the equality of the distributions but not the equality a.s.
            $endgroup$
            – Will
            Mar 12 at 12:08
















          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer, but my question was rather for $T=mathbb N$ (or $1,...,n$). The statement looks stronger. (I know that for the case $T=[0,1]$ is not true that the process are a.s. equal when they have same distribution)
            $endgroup$
            – Pierre
            Mar 12 at 11:33











          • $begingroup$
            Everything I said (except the last paragraph of course) is valid for $T$ countable. If $T=mathbb N$ or $1,cdots,n$ you can deduce the equality of the distributions but not the equality a.s.
            $endgroup$
            – Will
            Mar 12 at 12:08















          $begingroup$
          Thank you for your answer, but my question was rather for $T=mathbb N$ (or $1,...,n$). The statement looks stronger. (I know that for the case $T=[0,1]$ is not true that the process are a.s. equal when they have same distribution)
          $endgroup$
          – Pierre
          Mar 12 at 11:33





          $begingroup$
          Thank you for your answer, but my question was rather for $T=mathbb N$ (or $1,...,n$). The statement looks stronger. (I know that for the case $T=[0,1]$ is not true that the process are a.s. equal when they have same distribution)
          $endgroup$
          – Pierre
          Mar 12 at 11:33













          $begingroup$
          Everything I said (except the last paragraph of course) is valid for $T$ countable. If $T=mathbb N$ or $1,cdots,n$ you can deduce the equality of the distributions but not the equality a.s.
          $endgroup$
          – Will
          Mar 12 at 12:08




          $begingroup$
          Everything I said (except the last paragraph of course) is valid for $T$ countable. If $T=mathbb N$ or $1,cdots,n$ you can deduce the equality of the distributions but not the equality a.s.
          $endgroup$
          – Will
          Mar 12 at 12:08










          Pierre is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          Pierre is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          Pierre is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











          Pierre is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3144894%2fwhat-does-it-mean-the-finite-dimensional-distribution-determine-the-random-pro%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

          random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

          Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye