Is $X+Y$ regularly varying at zero if $X$ and $Y$ are and are independent?If the fields $F_alpha^0$ are independent, then so are the B.F.'s $F_alpha$.Extended stochastic exponentialConditions on distributions to obey a certain inequalityConvergence in Distribution and Exponential FunctionVariance estimation for uncorrelated variablesHow to prove axiomatically whether a function is a cumulative distribution function?Condition of Existence of Asymptotic DistributionRelation between total variation and covarianceFor multivariate probability distributions, what are “medians” and “percentiles”?Is there a connection between regularly varying tail with exponent $alpha$ and the tail function itself?

Recruiter wants very extensive technical details about all of my previous work

Relationship between sampajanna definitions in SN 47.2 and SN 47.35

Fastest way to pop N items from a large dict

Custom alignment for GeoMarkers

Encrypting then Base64 Encoding

What is the significance behind "40 days" that often appears in the Bible?

Is there a symmetric-key algorithm which we can use for creating a signature?

Professor being mistaken for a grad student

Python if-else code style for reduced code for rounding floats

Do the common programs (for example: "ls", "cat") in Linux and BSD come from the same source code?

Simplify an interface for flexibly applying rules to periods of time

Book: Young man exiled to a penal colony, helps to lead revolution

World War I as a war of liberals against authoritarians?

Is there a hypothetical scenario that would make Earth uninhabitable for humans, but not for (the majority of) other animals?

What options are left, if Britain cannot decide?

Why does a Star of David appear at a rally with Francisco Franco?

Happy pi day, everyone!

Is honey really a supersaturated solution? Does heating to un-crystalize redissolve it or melt it?

ERC721: How to get the owned tokens of an address

As a new Ubuntu desktop 18.04 LTS user, do I need to use ufw for a firewall or is iptables sufficient?

Is it normal that my co-workers at a fitness company criticize my food choices?

Why is a white electrical wire connected to 2 black wires?

Is a party consisting of only a bard, a cleric, and a warlock functional long-term?

How are passwords stolen from companies if they only store hashes?



Is $X+Y$ regularly varying at zero if $X$ and $Y$ are and are independent?


If the fields $F_alpha^0$ are independent, then so are the B.F.'s $F_alpha$.Extended stochastic exponentialConditions on distributions to obey a certain inequalityConvergence in Distribution and Exponential FunctionVariance estimation for uncorrelated variablesHow to prove axiomatically whether a function is a cumulative distribution function?Condition of Existence of Asymptotic DistributionRelation between total variation and covarianceFor multivariate probability distributions, what are “medians” and “percentiles”?Is there a connection between regularly varying tail with exponent $alpha$ and the tail function itself?













3












$begingroup$


Imagine it holds that



$$limlimits_t to 0F(tx)/F(t)=x^alpha,$$



where $F$ is the cdf of $X$ respectively $Y$ and $alpha>0$. Does it then also hold that



$$limlimits_t to 0F_X+Y(tx)/F_X+Y(t)=x^beta,$$



for some $beta>0$?



It is a well known fact that this is true if $X$ and $Y$ are regularly varying at infinity(Then X+Y is regularly varying at infinity as well with the same $alpha$), however it is not possible to easily adapt this result to this problem










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    I could not prove it, but it holds for simple distributions like the exponential distribution at least, so you might be right.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin
    Mar 12 at 20:50
















3












$begingroup$


Imagine it holds that



$$limlimits_t to 0F(tx)/F(t)=x^alpha,$$



where $F$ is the cdf of $X$ respectively $Y$ and $alpha>0$. Does it then also hold that



$$limlimits_t to 0F_X+Y(tx)/F_X+Y(t)=x^beta,$$



for some $beta>0$?



It is a well known fact that this is true if $X$ and $Y$ are regularly varying at infinity(Then X+Y is regularly varying at infinity as well with the same $alpha$), however it is not possible to easily adapt this result to this problem










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    I could not prove it, but it holds for simple distributions like the exponential distribution at least, so you might be right.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin
    Mar 12 at 20:50














3












3








3


1



$begingroup$


Imagine it holds that



$$limlimits_t to 0F(tx)/F(t)=x^alpha,$$



where $F$ is the cdf of $X$ respectively $Y$ and $alpha>0$. Does it then also hold that



$$limlimits_t to 0F_X+Y(tx)/F_X+Y(t)=x^beta,$$



for some $beta>0$?



It is a well known fact that this is true if $X$ and $Y$ are regularly varying at infinity(Then X+Y is regularly varying at infinity as well with the same $alpha$), however it is not possible to easily adapt this result to this problem










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Imagine it holds that



$$limlimits_t to 0F(tx)/F(t)=x^alpha,$$



where $F$ is the cdf of $X$ respectively $Y$ and $alpha>0$. Does it then also hold that



$$limlimits_t to 0F_X+Y(tx)/F_X+Y(t)=x^beta,$$



for some $beta>0$?



It is a well known fact that this is true if $X$ and $Y$ are regularly varying at infinity(Then X+Y is regularly varying at infinity as well with the same $alpha$), however it is not possible to easily adapt this result to this problem







probability-theory probability-distributions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 13 at 21:06









Cettt

1,890622




1,890622










asked Mar 12 at 11:10







user299124


















  • $begingroup$
    I could not prove it, but it holds for simple distributions like the exponential distribution at least, so you might be right.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin
    Mar 12 at 20:50

















  • $begingroup$
    I could not prove it, but it holds for simple distributions like the exponential distribution at least, so you might be right.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin
    Mar 12 at 20:50
















$begingroup$
I could not prove it, but it holds for simple distributions like the exponential distribution at least, so you might be right.
$endgroup$
– Martin
Mar 12 at 20:50





$begingroup$
I could not prove it, but it holds for simple distributions like the exponential distribution at least, so you might be right.
$endgroup$
– Martin
Mar 12 at 20:50











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Yes, there is a result at zero, however, it is very different from the one at infinity you mentioned. Namely, the indices add up:




If $X_i$, $i=1,2$, are independent with cdfs $F_X_i$, which are regulatly varying at zero with indices $alpha_i$, $i=1,2$, then $F_X_1 +X_2$ is regularly varying at zero of index $alpha_1+alpha_2$.




Proof follows from the corresponding Tauberian theorem (see e.g. Bingham, Goldie, Teugels, Theorem 1.7.1'):




A non-decreasing function $Ucolon (0,infty)to (0,infty)$, whose Laplace-Stieltjes transform $hat U(s) = int_0^infty e^-st dU(s)$ is finite for large $s$, is regularly varying at zero of index $rhoge 0$ iff $hat U(s)$ is regularly varying on infinity of index $-rho$.




That said, $hat F_X_i$ are regularly varying at infinity with indices $-alpha_i$, $i=1,2$, so $hat F_X_1+X_2 = hat F_X_1hat F_X_2$ is regularly varying at infinity of index $-alpha_1-alpha_2$. Hence, $F_X_1+X_2$ is regularly varying at zero of index $alpha_1+alpha_2$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3144959%2fis-xy-regularly-varying-at-zero-if-x-and-y-are-and-are-independent%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown
























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    Yes, there is a result at zero, however, it is very different from the one at infinity you mentioned. Namely, the indices add up:




    If $X_i$, $i=1,2$, are independent with cdfs $F_X_i$, which are regulatly varying at zero with indices $alpha_i$, $i=1,2$, then $F_X_1 +X_2$ is regularly varying at zero of index $alpha_1+alpha_2$.




    Proof follows from the corresponding Tauberian theorem (see e.g. Bingham, Goldie, Teugels, Theorem 1.7.1'):




    A non-decreasing function $Ucolon (0,infty)to (0,infty)$, whose Laplace-Stieltjes transform $hat U(s) = int_0^infty e^-st dU(s)$ is finite for large $s$, is regularly varying at zero of index $rhoge 0$ iff $hat U(s)$ is regularly varying on infinity of index $-rho$.




    That said, $hat F_X_i$ are regularly varying at infinity with indices $-alpha_i$, $i=1,2$, so $hat F_X_1+X_2 = hat F_X_1hat F_X_2$ is regularly varying at infinity of index $-alpha_1-alpha_2$. Hence, $F_X_1+X_2$ is regularly varying at zero of index $alpha_1+alpha_2$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      0












      $begingroup$

      Yes, there is a result at zero, however, it is very different from the one at infinity you mentioned. Namely, the indices add up:




      If $X_i$, $i=1,2$, are independent with cdfs $F_X_i$, which are regulatly varying at zero with indices $alpha_i$, $i=1,2$, then $F_X_1 +X_2$ is regularly varying at zero of index $alpha_1+alpha_2$.




      Proof follows from the corresponding Tauberian theorem (see e.g. Bingham, Goldie, Teugels, Theorem 1.7.1'):




      A non-decreasing function $Ucolon (0,infty)to (0,infty)$, whose Laplace-Stieltjes transform $hat U(s) = int_0^infty e^-st dU(s)$ is finite for large $s$, is regularly varying at zero of index $rhoge 0$ iff $hat U(s)$ is regularly varying on infinity of index $-rho$.




      That said, $hat F_X_i$ are regularly varying at infinity with indices $-alpha_i$, $i=1,2$, so $hat F_X_1+X_2 = hat F_X_1hat F_X_2$ is regularly varying at infinity of index $-alpha_1-alpha_2$. Hence, $F_X_1+X_2$ is regularly varying at zero of index $alpha_1+alpha_2$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Yes, there is a result at zero, however, it is very different from the one at infinity you mentioned. Namely, the indices add up:




        If $X_i$, $i=1,2$, are independent with cdfs $F_X_i$, which are regulatly varying at zero with indices $alpha_i$, $i=1,2$, then $F_X_1 +X_2$ is regularly varying at zero of index $alpha_1+alpha_2$.




        Proof follows from the corresponding Tauberian theorem (see e.g. Bingham, Goldie, Teugels, Theorem 1.7.1'):




        A non-decreasing function $Ucolon (0,infty)to (0,infty)$, whose Laplace-Stieltjes transform $hat U(s) = int_0^infty e^-st dU(s)$ is finite for large $s$, is regularly varying at zero of index $rhoge 0$ iff $hat U(s)$ is regularly varying on infinity of index $-rho$.




        That said, $hat F_X_i$ are regularly varying at infinity with indices $-alpha_i$, $i=1,2$, so $hat F_X_1+X_2 = hat F_X_1hat F_X_2$ is regularly varying at infinity of index $-alpha_1-alpha_2$. Hence, $F_X_1+X_2$ is regularly varying at zero of index $alpha_1+alpha_2$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Yes, there is a result at zero, however, it is very different from the one at infinity you mentioned. Namely, the indices add up:




        If $X_i$, $i=1,2$, are independent with cdfs $F_X_i$, which are regulatly varying at zero with indices $alpha_i$, $i=1,2$, then $F_X_1 +X_2$ is regularly varying at zero of index $alpha_1+alpha_2$.




        Proof follows from the corresponding Tauberian theorem (see e.g. Bingham, Goldie, Teugels, Theorem 1.7.1'):




        A non-decreasing function $Ucolon (0,infty)to (0,infty)$, whose Laplace-Stieltjes transform $hat U(s) = int_0^infty e^-st dU(s)$ is finite for large $s$, is regularly varying at zero of index $rhoge 0$ iff $hat U(s)$ is regularly varying on infinity of index $-rho$.




        That said, $hat F_X_i$ are regularly varying at infinity with indices $-alpha_i$, $i=1,2$, so $hat F_X_1+X_2 = hat F_X_1hat F_X_2$ is regularly varying at infinity of index $-alpha_1-alpha_2$. Hence, $F_X_1+X_2$ is regularly varying at zero of index $alpha_1+alpha_2$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Mar 13 at 10:20









        zhorasterzhoraster

        15.9k21853




        15.9k21853



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3144959%2fis-xy-regularly-varying-at-zero-if-x-and-y-are-and-are-independent%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

            random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

            Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye