Is $X+Y$ regularly varying at zero if $X$ and $Y$ are and are independent?If the fields $F_alpha^0$ are independent, then so are the B.F.'s $F_alpha$.Extended stochastic exponentialConditions on distributions to obey a certain inequalityConvergence in Distribution and Exponential FunctionVariance estimation for uncorrelated variablesHow to prove axiomatically whether a function is a cumulative distribution function?Condition of Existence of Asymptotic DistributionRelation between total variation and covarianceFor multivariate probability distributions, what are “medians” and “percentiles”?Is there a connection between regularly varying tail with exponent $alpha$ and the tail function itself?
Recruiter wants very extensive technical details about all of my previous work
Relationship between sampajanna definitions in SN 47.2 and SN 47.35
Fastest way to pop N items from a large dict
Custom alignment for GeoMarkers
Encrypting then Base64 Encoding
What is the significance behind "40 days" that often appears in the Bible?
Is there a symmetric-key algorithm which we can use for creating a signature?
Professor being mistaken for a grad student
Python if-else code style for reduced code for rounding floats
Do the common programs (for example: "ls", "cat") in Linux and BSD come from the same source code?
Simplify an interface for flexibly applying rules to periods of time
Book: Young man exiled to a penal colony, helps to lead revolution
World War I as a war of liberals against authoritarians?
Is there a hypothetical scenario that would make Earth uninhabitable for humans, but not for (the majority of) other animals?
What options are left, if Britain cannot decide?
Why does a Star of David appear at a rally with Francisco Franco?
Happy pi day, everyone!
Is honey really a supersaturated solution? Does heating to un-crystalize redissolve it or melt it?
ERC721: How to get the owned tokens of an address
As a new Ubuntu desktop 18.04 LTS user, do I need to use ufw for a firewall or is iptables sufficient?
Is it normal that my co-workers at a fitness company criticize my food choices?
Why is a white electrical wire connected to 2 black wires?
Is a party consisting of only a bard, a cleric, and a warlock functional long-term?
How are passwords stolen from companies if they only store hashes?
Is $X+Y$ regularly varying at zero if $X$ and $Y$ are and are independent?
If the fields $F_alpha^0$ are independent, then so are the B.F.'s $F_alpha$.Extended stochastic exponentialConditions on distributions to obey a certain inequalityConvergence in Distribution and Exponential FunctionVariance estimation for uncorrelated variablesHow to prove axiomatically whether a function is a cumulative distribution function?Condition of Existence of Asymptotic DistributionRelation between total variation and covarianceFor multivariate probability distributions, what are “medians” and “percentiles”?Is there a connection between regularly varying tail with exponent $alpha$ and the tail function itself?
$begingroup$
Imagine it holds that
$$limlimits_t to 0F(tx)/F(t)=x^alpha,$$
where $F$ is the cdf of $X$ respectively $Y$ and $alpha>0$. Does it then also hold that
$$limlimits_t to 0F_X+Y(tx)/F_X+Y(t)=x^beta,$$
for some $beta>0$?
It is a well known fact that this is true if $X$ and $Y$ are regularly varying at infinity(Then X+Y is regularly varying at infinity as well with the same $alpha$), however it is not possible to easily adapt this result to this problem
probability-theory probability-distributions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Imagine it holds that
$$limlimits_t to 0F(tx)/F(t)=x^alpha,$$
where $F$ is the cdf of $X$ respectively $Y$ and $alpha>0$. Does it then also hold that
$$limlimits_t to 0F_X+Y(tx)/F_X+Y(t)=x^beta,$$
for some $beta>0$?
It is a well known fact that this is true if $X$ and $Y$ are regularly varying at infinity(Then X+Y is regularly varying at infinity as well with the same $alpha$), however it is not possible to easily adapt this result to this problem
probability-theory probability-distributions
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I could not prove it, but it holds for simple distributions like the exponential distribution at least, so you might be right.
$endgroup$
– Martin
Mar 12 at 20:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Imagine it holds that
$$limlimits_t to 0F(tx)/F(t)=x^alpha,$$
where $F$ is the cdf of $X$ respectively $Y$ and $alpha>0$. Does it then also hold that
$$limlimits_t to 0F_X+Y(tx)/F_X+Y(t)=x^beta,$$
for some $beta>0$?
It is a well known fact that this is true if $X$ and $Y$ are regularly varying at infinity(Then X+Y is regularly varying at infinity as well with the same $alpha$), however it is not possible to easily adapt this result to this problem
probability-theory probability-distributions
$endgroup$
Imagine it holds that
$$limlimits_t to 0F(tx)/F(t)=x^alpha,$$
where $F$ is the cdf of $X$ respectively $Y$ and $alpha>0$. Does it then also hold that
$$limlimits_t to 0F_X+Y(tx)/F_X+Y(t)=x^beta,$$
for some $beta>0$?
It is a well known fact that this is true if $X$ and $Y$ are regularly varying at infinity(Then X+Y is regularly varying at infinity as well with the same $alpha$), however it is not possible to easily adapt this result to this problem
probability-theory probability-distributions
probability-theory probability-distributions
edited Mar 13 at 21:06
Cettt
1,890622
1,890622
asked Mar 12 at 11:10
user299124
$begingroup$
I could not prove it, but it holds for simple distributions like the exponential distribution at least, so you might be right.
$endgroup$
– Martin
Mar 12 at 20:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I could not prove it, but it holds for simple distributions like the exponential distribution at least, so you might be right.
$endgroup$
– Martin
Mar 12 at 20:50
$begingroup$
I could not prove it, but it holds for simple distributions like the exponential distribution at least, so you might be right.
$endgroup$
– Martin
Mar 12 at 20:50
$begingroup$
I could not prove it, but it holds for simple distributions like the exponential distribution at least, so you might be right.
$endgroup$
– Martin
Mar 12 at 20:50
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes, there is a result at zero, however, it is very different from the one at infinity you mentioned. Namely, the indices add up:
If $X_i$, $i=1,2$, are independent with cdfs $F_X_i$, which are regulatly varying at zero with indices $alpha_i$, $i=1,2$, then $F_X_1 +X_2$ is regularly varying at zero of index $alpha_1+alpha_2$.
Proof follows from the corresponding Tauberian theorem (see e.g. Bingham, Goldie, Teugels, Theorem 1.7.1'):
A non-decreasing function $Ucolon (0,infty)to (0,infty)$, whose Laplace-Stieltjes transform $hat U(s) = int_0^infty e^-st dU(s)$ is finite for large $s$, is regularly varying at zero of index $rhoge 0$ iff $hat U(s)$ is regularly varying on infinity of index $-rho$.
That said, $hat F_X_i$ are regularly varying at infinity with indices $-alpha_i$, $i=1,2$, so $hat F_X_1+X_2 = hat F_X_1hat F_X_2$ is regularly varying at infinity of index $-alpha_1-alpha_2$. Hence, $F_X_1+X_2$ is regularly varying at zero of index $alpha_1+alpha_2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3144959%2fis-xy-regularly-varying-at-zero-if-x-and-y-are-and-are-independent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes, there is a result at zero, however, it is very different from the one at infinity you mentioned. Namely, the indices add up:
If $X_i$, $i=1,2$, are independent with cdfs $F_X_i$, which are regulatly varying at zero with indices $alpha_i$, $i=1,2$, then $F_X_1 +X_2$ is regularly varying at zero of index $alpha_1+alpha_2$.
Proof follows from the corresponding Tauberian theorem (see e.g. Bingham, Goldie, Teugels, Theorem 1.7.1'):
A non-decreasing function $Ucolon (0,infty)to (0,infty)$, whose Laplace-Stieltjes transform $hat U(s) = int_0^infty e^-st dU(s)$ is finite for large $s$, is regularly varying at zero of index $rhoge 0$ iff $hat U(s)$ is regularly varying on infinity of index $-rho$.
That said, $hat F_X_i$ are regularly varying at infinity with indices $-alpha_i$, $i=1,2$, so $hat F_X_1+X_2 = hat F_X_1hat F_X_2$ is regularly varying at infinity of index $-alpha_1-alpha_2$. Hence, $F_X_1+X_2$ is regularly varying at zero of index $alpha_1+alpha_2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, there is a result at zero, however, it is very different from the one at infinity you mentioned. Namely, the indices add up:
If $X_i$, $i=1,2$, are independent with cdfs $F_X_i$, which are regulatly varying at zero with indices $alpha_i$, $i=1,2$, then $F_X_1 +X_2$ is regularly varying at zero of index $alpha_1+alpha_2$.
Proof follows from the corresponding Tauberian theorem (see e.g. Bingham, Goldie, Teugels, Theorem 1.7.1'):
A non-decreasing function $Ucolon (0,infty)to (0,infty)$, whose Laplace-Stieltjes transform $hat U(s) = int_0^infty e^-st dU(s)$ is finite for large $s$, is regularly varying at zero of index $rhoge 0$ iff $hat U(s)$ is regularly varying on infinity of index $-rho$.
That said, $hat F_X_i$ are regularly varying at infinity with indices $-alpha_i$, $i=1,2$, so $hat F_X_1+X_2 = hat F_X_1hat F_X_2$ is regularly varying at infinity of index $-alpha_1-alpha_2$. Hence, $F_X_1+X_2$ is regularly varying at zero of index $alpha_1+alpha_2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, there is a result at zero, however, it is very different from the one at infinity you mentioned. Namely, the indices add up:
If $X_i$, $i=1,2$, are independent with cdfs $F_X_i$, which are regulatly varying at zero with indices $alpha_i$, $i=1,2$, then $F_X_1 +X_2$ is regularly varying at zero of index $alpha_1+alpha_2$.
Proof follows from the corresponding Tauberian theorem (see e.g. Bingham, Goldie, Teugels, Theorem 1.7.1'):
A non-decreasing function $Ucolon (0,infty)to (0,infty)$, whose Laplace-Stieltjes transform $hat U(s) = int_0^infty e^-st dU(s)$ is finite for large $s$, is regularly varying at zero of index $rhoge 0$ iff $hat U(s)$ is regularly varying on infinity of index $-rho$.
That said, $hat F_X_i$ are regularly varying at infinity with indices $-alpha_i$, $i=1,2$, so $hat F_X_1+X_2 = hat F_X_1hat F_X_2$ is regularly varying at infinity of index $-alpha_1-alpha_2$. Hence, $F_X_1+X_2$ is regularly varying at zero of index $alpha_1+alpha_2$.
$endgroup$
Yes, there is a result at zero, however, it is very different from the one at infinity you mentioned. Namely, the indices add up:
If $X_i$, $i=1,2$, are independent with cdfs $F_X_i$, which are regulatly varying at zero with indices $alpha_i$, $i=1,2$, then $F_X_1 +X_2$ is regularly varying at zero of index $alpha_1+alpha_2$.
Proof follows from the corresponding Tauberian theorem (see e.g. Bingham, Goldie, Teugels, Theorem 1.7.1'):
A non-decreasing function $Ucolon (0,infty)to (0,infty)$, whose Laplace-Stieltjes transform $hat U(s) = int_0^infty e^-st dU(s)$ is finite for large $s$, is regularly varying at zero of index $rhoge 0$ iff $hat U(s)$ is regularly varying on infinity of index $-rho$.
That said, $hat F_X_i$ are regularly varying at infinity with indices $-alpha_i$, $i=1,2$, so $hat F_X_1+X_2 = hat F_X_1hat F_X_2$ is regularly varying at infinity of index $-alpha_1-alpha_2$. Hence, $F_X_1+X_2$ is regularly varying at zero of index $alpha_1+alpha_2$.
answered Mar 13 at 10:20
zhorasterzhoraster
15.9k21853
15.9k21853
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3144959%2fis-xy-regularly-varying-at-zero-if-x-and-y-are-and-are-independent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
I could not prove it, but it holds for simple distributions like the exponential distribution at least, so you might be right.
$endgroup$
– Martin
Mar 12 at 20:50