Automorphisms, order and degree uniquely determine a regular graphThe existence and uniqueness of a strongly regular graph of order 100 and degree 22.Graph isomorphism and existence of nontrivial automorphismsGive an example of 2 non isomorphic regular tournament of the same orderWhy this graph has automorphism group is isomorphic to the cyclic group of order 4?Get degree distribution of a graph from its Adjacency matrixFinding Automorphisms of Irregular graph through Regular Sub-Graphs.Non-regular Expander graph ?!Prove that a regular graph of degree 5 cannot be decomposed into subgraphs, each isomorphic to a path of length sixAutomorphisms of cospectral k-regular graphsDegree of quotient graph of a regular graph

Is it true that good novels will automatically sell themselves on Amazon (and so on) and there is no need for one to waste time promoting?

Why does overlay work only on the first tcolorbox?

Planetary tidal locking causing asymetrical water distribution

Violin - Can double stops be played when the strings are not next to each other?

PTIJ: Who should I vote for? (21st Knesset Edition)

How do I hide Chekhov's Gun?

Does this sum go infinity?

Bacteria contamination inside a thermos bottle

Why does energy conservation give me the wrong answer in this inelastic collision problem?

I got the following comment from a reputed math journal. What does it mean?

How could a scammer know the apps on my phone / iTunes account?

How difficult is it to simply disable/disengage the MCAS on Boeing 737 Max 8 & 9 Aircraft?

Simplify an interface for flexibly applying rules to periods of time

Why is a white electrical wire connected to 2 black wires?

Math equation in non italic font

Have the tides ever turned twice on any open problem?

Equivalents to the present tense

Examples of transfinite towers

Are relativity and doppler effect related?

How to terminate ping <dest> &

New passport but visa is in old (lost) passport

How could an airship be repaired midflight?

Did Ender ever learn that he killed Stilson and/or Bonzo?

What did “the good wine” (τὸν καλὸν οἶνον) mean in John 2:10?



Automorphisms, order and degree uniquely determine a regular graph


The existence and uniqueness of a strongly regular graph of order 100 and degree 22.Graph isomorphism and existence of nontrivial automorphismsGive an example of 2 non isomorphic regular tournament of the same orderWhy this graph has automorphism group is isomorphic to the cyclic group of order 4?Get degree distribution of a graph from its Adjacency matrixFinding Automorphisms of Irregular graph through Regular Sub-Graphs.Non-regular Expander graph ?!Prove that a regular graph of degree 5 cannot be decomposed into subgraphs, each isomorphic to a path of length sixAutomorphisms of cospectral k-regular graphsDegree of quotient graph of a regular graph













1












$begingroup$


Does Automorphism group combined with the order and degree uniquely determine any regular graph? What about any (non-regular) graph?



I think yes, because the automorphism contain within them the adjacency relations, which, I think could be decoded given the order and degree of the graph. Are there any two graphs that have the same automorphism group, order and degree but are not isomorphic? Thanks beforehand.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    Does Automorphism group combined with the order and degree uniquely determine any regular graph? What about any (non-regular) graph?



    I think yes, because the automorphism contain within them the adjacency relations, which, I think could be decoded given the order and degree of the graph. Are there any two graphs that have the same automorphism group, order and degree but are not isomorphic? Thanks beforehand.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Does Automorphism group combined with the order and degree uniquely determine any regular graph? What about any (non-regular) graph?



      I think yes, because the automorphism contain within them the adjacency relations, which, I think could be decoded given the order and degree of the graph. Are there any two graphs that have the same automorphism group, order and degree but are not isomorphic? Thanks beforehand.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Does Automorphism group combined with the order and degree uniquely determine any regular graph? What about any (non-regular) graph?



      I think yes, because the automorphism contain within them the adjacency relations, which, I think could be decoded given the order and degree of the graph. Are there any two graphs that have the same automorphism group, order and degree but are not isomorphic? Thanks beforehand.







      combinatorics graph-theory automorphism-group cayley-graphs






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 12 at 9:25









      vidyarthividyarthi

      3,0341833




      3,0341833




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          Non-regular? No. The two following graphs both have the same list of degrees ($3,2cdot 5, 1cdot 3$) and the same automorphism group (the trivial group):
          $G_1$: Edges A-B, A-C-D, A-E-F-G-H-I.
          $G_2$: Edges A-B, A-C-D-E, A-F-G-H-I.

          In each case, an automorphism must fix the lone vertex of order 3, and send each chain heading away from that vertex to a chain of the same length. Within each groups, the chains have different lengths and must therefore each be fixed. Between the two groups, the list of chain lengths is different.



          Regular? No. The two following groups have the same number of vertices ($19$), the same common degree ($4$), and the same automorphism group (dihedral):



          $G_3$: The vertices are the integers mod $19$. There is an edge between $m$ and $n$ if and only if $m-nin -2,-1,1,2$ mod $19$. The triangles including $0$ are $0,1,2$, $-1,0,1$, and $-2,-1,0$, so edges $(k,k+1)$ are the only ones in two triangles each and can be distinguished from edges $(k,k+2)$.



          $G_4$: The vertices are the integers mod $19$. There is an edge between $m$ and $n$ if and only if $m-nin -3,-1,1,3$ mod $19$. The quadrilaterals including $0$ are $(0,1,2,3)$, $(0,1,4,3)$, $(0,3,2,-1)$, $(0,1,2,-1)$, $(0,1,-2,-3)$, $(0,1,-2,-1)$, $(0,-1,-2,-3)$, and $(0,-1,-4,-3)$. Edges $(k,k+1)$ are in five quadrilaterals each, while edges $(k,k+3)$ are in three quadrilaterals each, so we can distinguish between them.



          In each case, we can distinguish between edges of the type $(k,k+1)$ and the other type present. Each automorphism group must therefore be contained in the automorphism group of the subgraph of just those edges - which is the dihedral group $D_19$. A quick check verifies that everything in that dihedral group is in fact an automorphism of each of these groups, and we're done.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! The last two graphs were circulant graphs, right? So, is there any extra criterion required to uniquely determine the graph along the three parameters I mentioned?
            $endgroup$
            – vidyarthi
            Mar 12 at 10:10










          • $begingroup$
            Probably nothing practical. I just invented these examples off the top of my head. Oh, and there's nothing special about 19 there, other than being big enough. Anything greater than 12 definitely works.
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 12 at 10:14










          • $begingroup$
            But those two last graphs are circulant graphs. Anyways, so is there no criterion except perfect isomorphism to completely determine a graph, I mean is there no extra parameter except isomorphism that can be added to the parameters I gave to make it equivalent to isomorphism?
            $endgroup$
            – vidyarthi
            Mar 12 at 10:18










          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3144864%2fautomorphisms-order-and-degree-uniquely-determine-a-regular-graph%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3












          $begingroup$

          Non-regular? No. The two following graphs both have the same list of degrees ($3,2cdot 5, 1cdot 3$) and the same automorphism group (the trivial group):
          $G_1$: Edges A-B, A-C-D, A-E-F-G-H-I.
          $G_2$: Edges A-B, A-C-D-E, A-F-G-H-I.

          In each case, an automorphism must fix the lone vertex of order 3, and send each chain heading away from that vertex to a chain of the same length. Within each groups, the chains have different lengths and must therefore each be fixed. Between the two groups, the list of chain lengths is different.



          Regular? No. The two following groups have the same number of vertices ($19$), the same common degree ($4$), and the same automorphism group (dihedral):



          $G_3$: The vertices are the integers mod $19$. There is an edge between $m$ and $n$ if and only if $m-nin -2,-1,1,2$ mod $19$. The triangles including $0$ are $0,1,2$, $-1,0,1$, and $-2,-1,0$, so edges $(k,k+1)$ are the only ones in two triangles each and can be distinguished from edges $(k,k+2)$.



          $G_4$: The vertices are the integers mod $19$. There is an edge between $m$ and $n$ if and only if $m-nin -3,-1,1,3$ mod $19$. The quadrilaterals including $0$ are $(0,1,2,3)$, $(0,1,4,3)$, $(0,3,2,-1)$, $(0,1,2,-1)$, $(0,1,-2,-3)$, $(0,1,-2,-1)$, $(0,-1,-2,-3)$, and $(0,-1,-4,-3)$. Edges $(k,k+1)$ are in five quadrilaterals each, while edges $(k,k+3)$ are in three quadrilaterals each, so we can distinguish between them.



          In each case, we can distinguish between edges of the type $(k,k+1)$ and the other type present. Each automorphism group must therefore be contained in the automorphism group of the subgraph of just those edges - which is the dihedral group $D_19$. A quick check verifies that everything in that dihedral group is in fact an automorphism of each of these groups, and we're done.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! The last two graphs were circulant graphs, right? So, is there any extra criterion required to uniquely determine the graph along the three parameters I mentioned?
            $endgroup$
            – vidyarthi
            Mar 12 at 10:10










          • $begingroup$
            Probably nothing practical. I just invented these examples off the top of my head. Oh, and there's nothing special about 19 there, other than being big enough. Anything greater than 12 definitely works.
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 12 at 10:14










          • $begingroup$
            But those two last graphs are circulant graphs. Anyways, so is there no criterion except perfect isomorphism to completely determine a graph, I mean is there no extra parameter except isomorphism that can be added to the parameters I gave to make it equivalent to isomorphism?
            $endgroup$
            – vidyarthi
            Mar 12 at 10:18















          3












          $begingroup$

          Non-regular? No. The two following graphs both have the same list of degrees ($3,2cdot 5, 1cdot 3$) and the same automorphism group (the trivial group):
          $G_1$: Edges A-B, A-C-D, A-E-F-G-H-I.
          $G_2$: Edges A-B, A-C-D-E, A-F-G-H-I.

          In each case, an automorphism must fix the lone vertex of order 3, and send each chain heading away from that vertex to a chain of the same length. Within each groups, the chains have different lengths and must therefore each be fixed. Between the two groups, the list of chain lengths is different.



          Regular? No. The two following groups have the same number of vertices ($19$), the same common degree ($4$), and the same automorphism group (dihedral):



          $G_3$: The vertices are the integers mod $19$. There is an edge between $m$ and $n$ if and only if $m-nin -2,-1,1,2$ mod $19$. The triangles including $0$ are $0,1,2$, $-1,0,1$, and $-2,-1,0$, so edges $(k,k+1)$ are the only ones in two triangles each and can be distinguished from edges $(k,k+2)$.



          $G_4$: The vertices are the integers mod $19$. There is an edge between $m$ and $n$ if and only if $m-nin -3,-1,1,3$ mod $19$. The quadrilaterals including $0$ are $(0,1,2,3)$, $(0,1,4,3)$, $(0,3,2,-1)$, $(0,1,2,-1)$, $(0,1,-2,-3)$, $(0,1,-2,-1)$, $(0,-1,-2,-3)$, and $(0,-1,-4,-3)$. Edges $(k,k+1)$ are in five quadrilaterals each, while edges $(k,k+3)$ are in three quadrilaterals each, so we can distinguish between them.



          In each case, we can distinguish between edges of the type $(k,k+1)$ and the other type present. Each automorphism group must therefore be contained in the automorphism group of the subgraph of just those edges - which is the dihedral group $D_19$. A quick check verifies that everything in that dihedral group is in fact an automorphism of each of these groups, and we're done.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! The last two graphs were circulant graphs, right? So, is there any extra criterion required to uniquely determine the graph along the three parameters I mentioned?
            $endgroup$
            – vidyarthi
            Mar 12 at 10:10










          • $begingroup$
            Probably nothing practical. I just invented these examples off the top of my head. Oh, and there's nothing special about 19 there, other than being big enough. Anything greater than 12 definitely works.
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 12 at 10:14










          • $begingroup$
            But those two last graphs are circulant graphs. Anyways, so is there no criterion except perfect isomorphism to completely determine a graph, I mean is there no extra parameter except isomorphism that can be added to the parameters I gave to make it equivalent to isomorphism?
            $endgroup$
            – vidyarthi
            Mar 12 at 10:18













          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          Non-regular? No. The two following graphs both have the same list of degrees ($3,2cdot 5, 1cdot 3$) and the same automorphism group (the trivial group):
          $G_1$: Edges A-B, A-C-D, A-E-F-G-H-I.
          $G_2$: Edges A-B, A-C-D-E, A-F-G-H-I.

          In each case, an automorphism must fix the lone vertex of order 3, and send each chain heading away from that vertex to a chain of the same length. Within each groups, the chains have different lengths and must therefore each be fixed. Between the two groups, the list of chain lengths is different.



          Regular? No. The two following groups have the same number of vertices ($19$), the same common degree ($4$), and the same automorphism group (dihedral):



          $G_3$: The vertices are the integers mod $19$. There is an edge between $m$ and $n$ if and only if $m-nin -2,-1,1,2$ mod $19$. The triangles including $0$ are $0,1,2$, $-1,0,1$, and $-2,-1,0$, so edges $(k,k+1)$ are the only ones in two triangles each and can be distinguished from edges $(k,k+2)$.



          $G_4$: The vertices are the integers mod $19$. There is an edge between $m$ and $n$ if and only if $m-nin -3,-1,1,3$ mod $19$. The quadrilaterals including $0$ are $(0,1,2,3)$, $(0,1,4,3)$, $(0,3,2,-1)$, $(0,1,2,-1)$, $(0,1,-2,-3)$, $(0,1,-2,-1)$, $(0,-1,-2,-3)$, and $(0,-1,-4,-3)$. Edges $(k,k+1)$ are in five quadrilaterals each, while edges $(k,k+3)$ are in three quadrilaterals each, so we can distinguish between them.



          In each case, we can distinguish between edges of the type $(k,k+1)$ and the other type present. Each automorphism group must therefore be contained in the automorphism group of the subgraph of just those edges - which is the dihedral group $D_19$. A quick check verifies that everything in that dihedral group is in fact an automorphism of each of these groups, and we're done.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Non-regular? No. The two following graphs both have the same list of degrees ($3,2cdot 5, 1cdot 3$) and the same automorphism group (the trivial group):
          $G_1$: Edges A-B, A-C-D, A-E-F-G-H-I.
          $G_2$: Edges A-B, A-C-D-E, A-F-G-H-I.

          In each case, an automorphism must fix the lone vertex of order 3, and send each chain heading away from that vertex to a chain of the same length. Within each groups, the chains have different lengths and must therefore each be fixed. Between the two groups, the list of chain lengths is different.



          Regular? No. The two following groups have the same number of vertices ($19$), the same common degree ($4$), and the same automorphism group (dihedral):



          $G_3$: The vertices are the integers mod $19$. There is an edge between $m$ and $n$ if and only if $m-nin -2,-1,1,2$ mod $19$. The triangles including $0$ are $0,1,2$, $-1,0,1$, and $-2,-1,0$, so edges $(k,k+1)$ are the only ones in two triangles each and can be distinguished from edges $(k,k+2)$.



          $G_4$: The vertices are the integers mod $19$. There is an edge between $m$ and $n$ if and only if $m-nin -3,-1,1,3$ mod $19$. The quadrilaterals including $0$ are $(0,1,2,3)$, $(0,1,4,3)$, $(0,3,2,-1)$, $(0,1,2,-1)$, $(0,1,-2,-3)$, $(0,1,-2,-1)$, $(0,-1,-2,-3)$, and $(0,-1,-4,-3)$. Edges $(k,k+1)$ are in five quadrilaterals each, while edges $(k,k+3)$ are in three quadrilaterals each, so we can distinguish between them.



          In each case, we can distinguish between edges of the type $(k,k+1)$ and the other type present. Each automorphism group must therefore be contained in the automorphism group of the subgraph of just those edges - which is the dihedral group $D_19$. A quick check verifies that everything in that dihedral group is in fact an automorphism of each of these groups, and we're done.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 12 at 10:04









          jmerryjmerry

          14.4k1629




          14.4k1629











          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! The last two graphs were circulant graphs, right? So, is there any extra criterion required to uniquely determine the graph along the three parameters I mentioned?
            $endgroup$
            – vidyarthi
            Mar 12 at 10:10










          • $begingroup$
            Probably nothing practical. I just invented these examples off the top of my head. Oh, and there's nothing special about 19 there, other than being big enough. Anything greater than 12 definitely works.
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 12 at 10:14










          • $begingroup$
            But those two last graphs are circulant graphs. Anyways, so is there no criterion except perfect isomorphism to completely determine a graph, I mean is there no extra parameter except isomorphism that can be added to the parameters I gave to make it equivalent to isomorphism?
            $endgroup$
            – vidyarthi
            Mar 12 at 10:18
















          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! The last two graphs were circulant graphs, right? So, is there any extra criterion required to uniquely determine the graph along the three parameters I mentioned?
            $endgroup$
            – vidyarthi
            Mar 12 at 10:10










          • $begingroup$
            Probably nothing practical. I just invented these examples off the top of my head. Oh, and there's nothing special about 19 there, other than being big enough. Anything greater than 12 definitely works.
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 12 at 10:14










          • $begingroup$
            But those two last graphs are circulant graphs. Anyways, so is there no criterion except perfect isomorphism to completely determine a graph, I mean is there no extra parameter except isomorphism that can be added to the parameters I gave to make it equivalent to isomorphism?
            $endgroup$
            – vidyarthi
            Mar 12 at 10:18















          $begingroup$
          Thanks! The last two graphs were circulant graphs, right? So, is there any extra criterion required to uniquely determine the graph along the three parameters I mentioned?
          $endgroup$
          – vidyarthi
          Mar 12 at 10:10




          $begingroup$
          Thanks! The last two graphs were circulant graphs, right? So, is there any extra criterion required to uniquely determine the graph along the three parameters I mentioned?
          $endgroup$
          – vidyarthi
          Mar 12 at 10:10












          $begingroup$
          Probably nothing practical. I just invented these examples off the top of my head. Oh, and there's nothing special about 19 there, other than being big enough. Anything greater than 12 definitely works.
          $endgroup$
          – jmerry
          Mar 12 at 10:14




          $begingroup$
          Probably nothing practical. I just invented these examples off the top of my head. Oh, and there's nothing special about 19 there, other than being big enough. Anything greater than 12 definitely works.
          $endgroup$
          – jmerry
          Mar 12 at 10:14












          $begingroup$
          But those two last graphs are circulant graphs. Anyways, so is there no criterion except perfect isomorphism to completely determine a graph, I mean is there no extra parameter except isomorphism that can be added to the parameters I gave to make it equivalent to isomorphism?
          $endgroup$
          – vidyarthi
          Mar 12 at 10:18




          $begingroup$
          But those two last graphs are circulant graphs. Anyways, so is there no criterion except perfect isomorphism to completely determine a graph, I mean is there no extra parameter except isomorphism that can be added to the parameters I gave to make it equivalent to isomorphism?
          $endgroup$
          – vidyarthi
          Mar 12 at 10:18

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3144864%2fautomorphisms-order-and-degree-uniquely-determine-a-regular-graph%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

          random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

          Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye