Fdtxjr

Maximum summed subsequences with non-adjacent items

Trademark violation for app?

How to write this math term? with cases it isn't working

How come Sam didn't become Lord of Horn Hill?

SF book about people trapped in a series of worlds they imagine

What was the first language to use conditional keywords?

Hangman Game with C++

Time to Settle Down!

Has negative voting ever been officially implemented in elections, or seriously proposed, or even studied?

What is the appropriate index architecture when forced to implement IsDeleted (soft deletes)?

How does the secondary effect of the Heat Metal spell interact with a creature resistant/immune to fire damage?

Why weren't discrete x86 CPUs ever used in game hardware?

Is grep documentation about ignoring case wrong, since it doesn't ignore case in filenames?

Why should I vote and accept answers?

Why does it sometimes sound good to play a grace note as a lead in to a note in a melody?

What initially awakened the Balrog?

How fail-safe is nr as stop bytes?

Is it a good idea to use CNN to classify 1D signal?

How does the math work when buying airline miles?

Is it fair for a professor to grade us on the possession of past papers?

When a candle burns, why does the top of wick glow if bottom of flame is hottest?

Is there any word for a place full of confusion?

What do you call the main part of a joke?

Denied boarding although I have proper visa and documentation. To whom should I make a complaint?

Why can methods be overriden but attributes can't?

.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;

14

6

I have a class

public class A 
 public String attr ="A attribute";
 public void method() 
 System.out.println(this+" , "+this.attr);
 
 public String toString() 
 return("Object A");
 

and another class that inherits from it

public class B extends A
 public String attr = "B attribute";
 public void method() 
 super.method();
 
 public String toString() 
 return("Object B");
 

Note that the method() of B is simply a wrapper for method() of A.

When I run the following code

B b = new B();
b.method();

I get Object B , A attribute as output which means that, this and this.attr accessed different things. Why is that the case?

Shouldn't System.out.println(this) refer to the toString() method of class A ?

java inheritance this

share|improve this question

edited Mar 28 at 20:00

Ondra K.

1,0691926

asked Mar 27 at 14:44

Noah BishopNoah Bishop

1138

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  A modern IDE will have the possibility to show a warning on the second definition of attr that it 'shadows' a similarly named field of a superclass.
  
  – Mark Jeronimus
  Mar 27 at 15:49
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Noah why did you revert the edited question name? I think the edited title Why can methods be overriden but attributes can't described the content of the question better than the current one. This is important for all other people looking for an answer to their question.
  
  – Ondra K.
  Mar 28 at 12:20
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

14

6

I have a class

public class A 
 public String attr ="A attribute";
 public void method() 
 System.out.println(this+" , "+this.attr);
 
 public String toString() 
 return("Object A");
 

and another class that inherits from it

public class B extends A
 public String attr = "B attribute";
 public void method() 
 super.method();
 
 public String toString() 
 return("Object B");
 

Note that the method() of B is simply a wrapper for method() of A.

When I run the following code

B b = new B();
b.method();

I get Object B , A attribute as output which means that, this and this.attr accessed different things. Why is that the case?

Shouldn't System.out.println(this) refer to the toString() method of class A ?

java inheritance this

share|improve this question

edited Mar 28 at 20:00

Ondra K.

1,0691926

asked Mar 27 at 14:44

Noah BishopNoah Bishop

1138

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  A modern IDE will have the possibility to show a warning on the second definition of attr that it 'shadows' a similarly named field of a superclass.
  
  – Mark Jeronimus
  Mar 27 at 15:49
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Noah why did you revert the edited question name? I think the edited title Why can methods be overriden but attributes can't described the content of the question better than the current one. This is important for all other people looking for an answer to their question.
  
  – Ondra K.
  Mar 28 at 12:20
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

I have a class

public class A 
 public String attr ="A attribute";
 public void method() 
 System.out.println(this+" , "+this.attr);
 
 public String toString() 
 return("Object A");
 

and another class that inherits from it

public class B extends A
 public String attr = "B attribute";
 public void method() 
 super.method();
 
 public String toString() 
 return("Object B");
 

Note that the method() of B is simply a wrapper for method() of A.

When I run the following code

B b = new B();
b.method();

I get Object B , A attribute as output which means that, this and this.attr accessed different things. Why is that the case?

Shouldn't System.out.println(this) refer to the toString() method of class A ?

java inheritance this

share|improve this question

edited Mar 28 at 20:00

Ondra K.

1,0691926

asked Mar 27 at 14:44

Noah BishopNoah Bishop

1138

public class A 
 public String attr ="A attribute";
 public void method() 
 System.out.println(this+" , "+this.attr);
 
 public String toString() 
 return("Object A");
 

public class B extends A
 public String attr = "B attribute";
 public void method() 
 super.method();
 
 public String toString() 
 return("Object B");
 

B b = new B();
b.method();

share|improve this question

edited Mar 28 at 20:00

Ondra K.

1,0691926

asked Mar 27 at 14:44

Noah BishopNoah Bishop

1138

share|improve this question

edited Mar 28 at 20:00

Ondra K.

1,0691926

asked Mar 27 at 14:44

Noah BishopNoah Bishop

1138

edited Mar 28 at 20:00

Ondra K.

1,0691926

edited Mar 28 at 20:00

Ondra K.

1,0691926

asked Mar 27 at 14:44

Noah BishopNoah Bishop

1138

asked Mar 27 at 14:44

Noah BishopNoah Bishop

1138

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

14

By declaring a method with a same name as parent class, you override it, that is, replace the original behaviour. But if you declare a field with a same name, you effectively hide it, making it inaccessible from that subclass, but only by super.field. See oracle docs on variable hiding, as well as using the keyword super. Note that it is not recommended to use variable hiding, as it creates exactly the kind of confusion you're experiencing.

By calling super.method(), printing this results in calling the toString method, which was in fact overridden - so that's the reason why it prints "Object B", as you've called the method on an instance of B. But the this in this.attr actually refers to the parent object, as you're calling the method from the parent class (by super.method()).

share|improve this answer

edited Mar 27 at 15:15

answered Mar 27 at 14:49

Ondra K.Ondra K.

1,0691926

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55380016%2fwhy-can-methods-be-overriden-but-attributes-cant%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

14

By declaring a method with a same name as parent class, you override it, that is, replace the original behaviour. But if you declare a field with a same name, you effectively hide it, making it inaccessible from that subclass, but only by super.field. See oracle docs on variable hiding, as well as using the keyword super. Note that it is not recommended to use variable hiding, as it creates exactly the kind of confusion you're experiencing.

By calling super.method(), printing this results in calling the toString method, which was in fact overridden - so that's the reason why it prints "Object B", as you've called the method on an instance of B. But the this in this.attr actually refers to the parent object, as you're calling the method from the parent class (by super.method()).

share|improve this answer

edited Mar 27 at 15:15

answered Mar 27 at 14:49

Ondra K.Ondra K.

1,0691926

add a comment | 

14

By declaring a method with a same name as parent class, you override it, that is, replace the original behaviour. But if you declare a field with a same name, you effectively hide it, making it inaccessible from that subclass, but only by super.field. See oracle docs on variable hiding, as well as using the keyword super. Note that it is not recommended to use variable hiding, as it creates exactly the kind of confusion you're experiencing.

By calling super.method(), printing this results in calling the toString method, which was in fact overridden - so that's the reason why it prints "Object B", as you've called the method on an instance of B. But the this in this.attr actually refers to the parent object, as you're calling the method from the parent class (by super.method()).

share|improve this answer

edited Mar 27 at 15:15

answered Mar 27 at 14:49

Ondra K.Ondra K.

1,0691926

add a comment | 

By declaring a method with a same name as parent class, you override it, that is, replace the original behaviour. But if you declare a field with a same name, you effectively hide it, making it inaccessible from that subclass, but only by super.field. See oracle docs on variable hiding, as well as using the keyword super. Note that it is not recommended to use variable hiding, as it creates exactly the kind of confusion you're experiencing.

By calling super.method(), printing this results in calling the toString method, which was in fact overridden - so that's the reason why it prints "Object B", as you've called the method on an instance of B. But the this in this.attr actually refers to the parent object, as you're calling the method from the parent class (by super.method()).

share|improve this answer

edited Mar 27 at 15:15

answered Mar 27 at 14:49

Ondra K.Ondra K.

1,0691926

share|improve this answer

edited Mar 27 at 15:15

answered Mar 27 at 14:49

Ondra K.Ondra K.

1,0691926

answered Mar 27 at 14:49

Ondra K.Ondra K.

1,0691926

answered Mar 27 at 14:49

Ondra K.Ondra K.

1,0691926