Solution for a functional equation Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Is it possible to have $f(x)f(y) = g(x)+g(y)$?Uniqueness of solution of functional equationUniqueness of solution for a functional equationWhat's the solution of the functional equation?What's the solution of the functional equationSolution of functional equationFunctional equation extended solutionUnderstanding of solution for a functional equation.Solution of particular functional equationExistence of solution for a functional equationfunctional equation in renormalization group theory

Morning, Afternoon, Night Kanji

What is the font for "b" letter?

As a beginner, should I get a Squier Strat with a SSS config or a HSS?

Question about debouncing - delay of state change

Performance gap between vector<bool> and array

If Windows 7 doesn't support WSL, then what does Linux subsystem option mean?

Why is Nikon 1.4g better when Nikon 1.8g is sharper?

What is a fractional matching?

Dating a Former Employee

Is it possible for SQL statements to execute concurrently within a single session in SQL Server?

Did Deadpool rescue all of the X-Force?

Sum letters are not two different

Why wasn't DOSKEY integrated with COMMAND.COM?

What is the appropriate index architecture when forced to implement IsDeleted (soft deletes)?

Generate an RGB colour grid

Maximum summed subsequences with non-adjacent items

Can the Great Weapon Master feat's damage bonus and accuracy penalty apply to attacks from the Spiritual Weapon spell?

Central Vacuuming: Is it worth it, and how does it compare to normal vacuuming?

How does the math work when buying airline miles?

How do I find out the mythology and history of my Fortress?

What does it mean that physics no longer uses mechanical models to describe phenomena?

Is there any word for a place full of confusion?

Do wooden building fires get hotter than 600°C?

What is this clumpy 20-30cm high yellow-flowered plant?



Solution for a functional equation



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Is it possible to have $f(x)f(y) = g(x)+g(y)$?Uniqueness of solution of functional equationUniqueness of solution for a functional equationWhat's the solution of the functional equation?What's the solution of the functional equationSolution of functional equationFunctional equation extended solutionUnderstanding of solution for a functional equation.Solution of particular functional equationExistence of solution for a functional equationfunctional equation in renormalization group theory










1












$begingroup$


I'm searching for a solution to the following functional equation:



$$f(u)f(u+lambda)=prod_i=1^Lrho(u-u_i)rho(u_i-u)+prod_i=1^Lrho(u+lambda-u_i)rho(u_i-u-lambda)$$



where $f$ is the unknown function, $rho(u)=sin(u-lambda)/sin(lambda)$, $lambda=pi/4$ and there are $L$ arbitrary real parameters $u_i_i=1^L$ where $L$ is an even number.



This equation comes from a $TQ$-equation for a solvable lattice model. If necessary, I can give more information but the equation itself is independent from its physical origin. I hope someone can help.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    I'm searching for a solution to the following functional equation:



    $$f(u)f(u+lambda)=prod_i=1^Lrho(u-u_i)rho(u_i-u)+prod_i=1^Lrho(u+lambda-u_i)rho(u_i-u-lambda)$$



    where $f$ is the unknown function, $rho(u)=sin(u-lambda)/sin(lambda)$, $lambda=pi/4$ and there are $L$ arbitrary real parameters $u_i_i=1^L$ where $L$ is an even number.



    This equation comes from a $TQ$-equation for a solvable lattice model. If necessary, I can give more information but the equation itself is independent from its physical origin. I hope someone can help.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I'm searching for a solution to the following functional equation:



      $$f(u)f(u+lambda)=prod_i=1^Lrho(u-u_i)rho(u_i-u)+prod_i=1^Lrho(u+lambda-u_i)rho(u_i-u-lambda)$$



      where $f$ is the unknown function, $rho(u)=sin(u-lambda)/sin(lambda)$, $lambda=pi/4$ and there are $L$ arbitrary real parameters $u_i_i=1^L$ where $L$ is an even number.



      This equation comes from a $TQ$-equation for a solvable lattice model. If necessary, I can give more information but the equation itself is independent from its physical origin. I hope someone can help.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I'm searching for a solution to the following functional equation:



      $$f(u)f(u+lambda)=prod_i=1^Lrho(u-u_i)rho(u_i-u)+prod_i=1^Lrho(u+lambda-u_i)rho(u_i-u-lambda)$$



      where $f$ is the unknown function, $rho(u)=sin(u-lambda)/sin(lambda)$, $lambda=pi/4$ and there are $L$ arbitrary real parameters $u_i_i=1^L$ where $L$ is an even number.



      This equation comes from a $TQ$-equation for a solvable lattice model. If necessary, I can give more information but the equation itself is independent from its physical origin. I hope someone can help.







      analysis functional-equations






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 27 at 16:16









      TheoPhysicaeTheoPhysicae

      355




      355




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          This is not a complete solution, but just presenting a few ideas.



          Let's work on $rho$ first:
          beginalign*
          rho(u)&=fracsin(u-lambda)sin(lambda)\
          &=fracsin(u)cos(lambda)-cos(u)sin(lambda)sin(lambda)\
          &=sin(u)-cos(u),
          endalign*

          since $lambda=pi/4$ and $sin(pi/4)=cos(pi/4).$



          Next, we look at what happens when we have $rho(u)cdotrho(-u).$ We have
          beginalign*
          rho(u)cdotrho(-u)&=[sin(u)-cos(u)][-sin(u)-cos(u)] \
          &=-sin^2(u)-sin(u)cos(u)+sin(u)cos(u)+cos^2(u)\
          &=cos^2(u)-sin^2(u)\
          &=cos(2u).
          endalign*



          From this, we gather that
          beginalign*f(u),f(u+lambda)&=prod_i=1^Lrho(u-u_i),rho(u_i-u)+prod_i=1^Lrho(u+lambda-u_i),rho(u_i-u-lambda)\
          &=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u-lambda)) \
          &=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u)-pi/2),;textor \
          f(u),f(u+pi/4)&=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lsin(2(u_i-u)).
          endalign*

          From this, we can at least see that if $u=u_i$ for any $1le ile L,$ then the second product drops out and you get
          $$f(u_i),f(u_i+pi/4)=prod_beginarraycj=1\ jnot=iendarray^Lcos(2(u_j-u)).$$
          Conversely, if $u_i-u=(2k+1)pi/4$ for some $kinmathbbZ,$ then the first product series drops out and you only get the second one.



          Finally, it's always worthwhile plugging in $u=0$ to arrive at
          $$f(0),f(pi/4)=prod_i=1^Lcos(2u_i)+prod_i=1^Lsin(2u_i).$$



          The RHS of
          $$f(u),f(u+pi/4)=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lsin(2(u_i-u))$$
          is $pi$ periodic, and hence the LHS is as well.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer. Maybe I should have added some more information. I know in addition, that $f(u)$ is a Laurant-Polynomial of degree $L$ in $z=e^i u$. This can be used to get quadratic equations for the coefficients by evaluation the equation at $u_i$ as you mentioned. This is however not efficient when $L$ becomes large and I was hoping to find something like a closed form, non-linear integral equation or anything else which is fast also for large $L$.
            $endgroup$
            – TheoPhysicae
            Mar 28 at 12:17










          • $begingroup$
            Hmm. Well, the RHS of my general simplification there is $pi$ periodic, and therefore the LHS must be $pi$ periodic, so $z=e^iu$ would make sense. I'm not sure I know how to proceed further, though. If you differentiated both sides w.r.t. $u,$ the RHS would be the negative of what you started out as. That might allow you to continue. I'll try to add that to my solution.
            $endgroup$
            – Adrian Keister
            Mar 28 at 14:52










          • $begingroup$
            Actually, differentiating the RHS is more complicated than I made out, so that's not going to give you a nice DE.
            $endgroup$
            – Adrian Keister
            Mar 28 at 15:04











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3164706%2fsolution-for-a-functional-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          This is not a complete solution, but just presenting a few ideas.



          Let's work on $rho$ first:
          beginalign*
          rho(u)&=fracsin(u-lambda)sin(lambda)\
          &=fracsin(u)cos(lambda)-cos(u)sin(lambda)sin(lambda)\
          &=sin(u)-cos(u),
          endalign*

          since $lambda=pi/4$ and $sin(pi/4)=cos(pi/4).$



          Next, we look at what happens when we have $rho(u)cdotrho(-u).$ We have
          beginalign*
          rho(u)cdotrho(-u)&=[sin(u)-cos(u)][-sin(u)-cos(u)] \
          &=-sin^2(u)-sin(u)cos(u)+sin(u)cos(u)+cos^2(u)\
          &=cos^2(u)-sin^2(u)\
          &=cos(2u).
          endalign*



          From this, we gather that
          beginalign*f(u),f(u+lambda)&=prod_i=1^Lrho(u-u_i),rho(u_i-u)+prod_i=1^Lrho(u+lambda-u_i),rho(u_i-u-lambda)\
          &=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u-lambda)) \
          &=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u)-pi/2),;textor \
          f(u),f(u+pi/4)&=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lsin(2(u_i-u)).
          endalign*

          From this, we can at least see that if $u=u_i$ for any $1le ile L,$ then the second product drops out and you get
          $$f(u_i),f(u_i+pi/4)=prod_beginarraycj=1\ jnot=iendarray^Lcos(2(u_j-u)).$$
          Conversely, if $u_i-u=(2k+1)pi/4$ for some $kinmathbbZ,$ then the first product series drops out and you only get the second one.



          Finally, it's always worthwhile plugging in $u=0$ to arrive at
          $$f(0),f(pi/4)=prod_i=1^Lcos(2u_i)+prod_i=1^Lsin(2u_i).$$



          The RHS of
          $$f(u),f(u+pi/4)=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lsin(2(u_i-u))$$
          is $pi$ periodic, and hence the LHS is as well.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer. Maybe I should have added some more information. I know in addition, that $f(u)$ is a Laurant-Polynomial of degree $L$ in $z=e^i u$. This can be used to get quadratic equations for the coefficients by evaluation the equation at $u_i$ as you mentioned. This is however not efficient when $L$ becomes large and I was hoping to find something like a closed form, non-linear integral equation or anything else which is fast also for large $L$.
            $endgroup$
            – TheoPhysicae
            Mar 28 at 12:17










          • $begingroup$
            Hmm. Well, the RHS of my general simplification there is $pi$ periodic, and therefore the LHS must be $pi$ periodic, so $z=e^iu$ would make sense. I'm not sure I know how to proceed further, though. If you differentiated both sides w.r.t. $u,$ the RHS would be the negative of what you started out as. That might allow you to continue. I'll try to add that to my solution.
            $endgroup$
            – Adrian Keister
            Mar 28 at 14:52










          • $begingroup$
            Actually, differentiating the RHS is more complicated than I made out, so that's not going to give you a nice DE.
            $endgroup$
            – Adrian Keister
            Mar 28 at 15:04















          1












          $begingroup$

          This is not a complete solution, but just presenting a few ideas.



          Let's work on $rho$ first:
          beginalign*
          rho(u)&=fracsin(u-lambda)sin(lambda)\
          &=fracsin(u)cos(lambda)-cos(u)sin(lambda)sin(lambda)\
          &=sin(u)-cos(u),
          endalign*

          since $lambda=pi/4$ and $sin(pi/4)=cos(pi/4).$



          Next, we look at what happens when we have $rho(u)cdotrho(-u).$ We have
          beginalign*
          rho(u)cdotrho(-u)&=[sin(u)-cos(u)][-sin(u)-cos(u)] \
          &=-sin^2(u)-sin(u)cos(u)+sin(u)cos(u)+cos^2(u)\
          &=cos^2(u)-sin^2(u)\
          &=cos(2u).
          endalign*



          From this, we gather that
          beginalign*f(u),f(u+lambda)&=prod_i=1^Lrho(u-u_i),rho(u_i-u)+prod_i=1^Lrho(u+lambda-u_i),rho(u_i-u-lambda)\
          &=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u-lambda)) \
          &=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u)-pi/2),;textor \
          f(u),f(u+pi/4)&=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lsin(2(u_i-u)).
          endalign*

          From this, we can at least see that if $u=u_i$ for any $1le ile L,$ then the second product drops out and you get
          $$f(u_i),f(u_i+pi/4)=prod_beginarraycj=1\ jnot=iendarray^Lcos(2(u_j-u)).$$
          Conversely, if $u_i-u=(2k+1)pi/4$ for some $kinmathbbZ,$ then the first product series drops out and you only get the second one.



          Finally, it's always worthwhile plugging in $u=0$ to arrive at
          $$f(0),f(pi/4)=prod_i=1^Lcos(2u_i)+prod_i=1^Lsin(2u_i).$$



          The RHS of
          $$f(u),f(u+pi/4)=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lsin(2(u_i-u))$$
          is $pi$ periodic, and hence the LHS is as well.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer. Maybe I should have added some more information. I know in addition, that $f(u)$ is a Laurant-Polynomial of degree $L$ in $z=e^i u$. This can be used to get quadratic equations for the coefficients by evaluation the equation at $u_i$ as you mentioned. This is however not efficient when $L$ becomes large and I was hoping to find something like a closed form, non-linear integral equation or anything else which is fast also for large $L$.
            $endgroup$
            – TheoPhysicae
            Mar 28 at 12:17










          • $begingroup$
            Hmm. Well, the RHS of my general simplification there is $pi$ periodic, and therefore the LHS must be $pi$ periodic, so $z=e^iu$ would make sense. I'm not sure I know how to proceed further, though. If you differentiated both sides w.r.t. $u,$ the RHS would be the negative of what you started out as. That might allow you to continue. I'll try to add that to my solution.
            $endgroup$
            – Adrian Keister
            Mar 28 at 14:52










          • $begingroup$
            Actually, differentiating the RHS is more complicated than I made out, so that's not going to give you a nice DE.
            $endgroup$
            – Adrian Keister
            Mar 28 at 15:04













          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          This is not a complete solution, but just presenting a few ideas.



          Let's work on $rho$ first:
          beginalign*
          rho(u)&=fracsin(u-lambda)sin(lambda)\
          &=fracsin(u)cos(lambda)-cos(u)sin(lambda)sin(lambda)\
          &=sin(u)-cos(u),
          endalign*

          since $lambda=pi/4$ and $sin(pi/4)=cos(pi/4).$



          Next, we look at what happens when we have $rho(u)cdotrho(-u).$ We have
          beginalign*
          rho(u)cdotrho(-u)&=[sin(u)-cos(u)][-sin(u)-cos(u)] \
          &=-sin^2(u)-sin(u)cos(u)+sin(u)cos(u)+cos^2(u)\
          &=cos^2(u)-sin^2(u)\
          &=cos(2u).
          endalign*



          From this, we gather that
          beginalign*f(u),f(u+lambda)&=prod_i=1^Lrho(u-u_i),rho(u_i-u)+prod_i=1^Lrho(u+lambda-u_i),rho(u_i-u-lambda)\
          &=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u-lambda)) \
          &=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u)-pi/2),;textor \
          f(u),f(u+pi/4)&=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lsin(2(u_i-u)).
          endalign*

          From this, we can at least see that if $u=u_i$ for any $1le ile L,$ then the second product drops out and you get
          $$f(u_i),f(u_i+pi/4)=prod_beginarraycj=1\ jnot=iendarray^Lcos(2(u_j-u)).$$
          Conversely, if $u_i-u=(2k+1)pi/4$ for some $kinmathbbZ,$ then the first product series drops out and you only get the second one.



          Finally, it's always worthwhile plugging in $u=0$ to arrive at
          $$f(0),f(pi/4)=prod_i=1^Lcos(2u_i)+prod_i=1^Lsin(2u_i).$$



          The RHS of
          $$f(u),f(u+pi/4)=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lsin(2(u_i-u))$$
          is $pi$ periodic, and hence the LHS is as well.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          This is not a complete solution, but just presenting a few ideas.



          Let's work on $rho$ first:
          beginalign*
          rho(u)&=fracsin(u-lambda)sin(lambda)\
          &=fracsin(u)cos(lambda)-cos(u)sin(lambda)sin(lambda)\
          &=sin(u)-cos(u),
          endalign*

          since $lambda=pi/4$ and $sin(pi/4)=cos(pi/4).$



          Next, we look at what happens when we have $rho(u)cdotrho(-u).$ We have
          beginalign*
          rho(u)cdotrho(-u)&=[sin(u)-cos(u)][-sin(u)-cos(u)] \
          &=-sin^2(u)-sin(u)cos(u)+sin(u)cos(u)+cos^2(u)\
          &=cos^2(u)-sin^2(u)\
          &=cos(2u).
          endalign*



          From this, we gather that
          beginalign*f(u),f(u+lambda)&=prod_i=1^Lrho(u-u_i),rho(u_i-u)+prod_i=1^Lrho(u+lambda-u_i),rho(u_i-u-lambda)\
          &=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u-lambda)) \
          &=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u)-pi/2),;textor \
          f(u),f(u+pi/4)&=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lsin(2(u_i-u)).
          endalign*

          From this, we can at least see that if $u=u_i$ for any $1le ile L,$ then the second product drops out and you get
          $$f(u_i),f(u_i+pi/4)=prod_beginarraycj=1\ jnot=iendarray^Lcos(2(u_j-u)).$$
          Conversely, if $u_i-u=(2k+1)pi/4$ for some $kinmathbbZ,$ then the first product series drops out and you only get the second one.



          Finally, it's always worthwhile plugging in $u=0$ to arrive at
          $$f(0),f(pi/4)=prod_i=1^Lcos(2u_i)+prod_i=1^Lsin(2u_i).$$



          The RHS of
          $$f(u),f(u+pi/4)=prod_i=1^Lcos(2(u_i-u))+prod_i=1^Lsin(2(u_i-u))$$
          is $pi$ periodic, and hence the LHS is as well.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Mar 28 at 15:04

























          answered Mar 27 at 16:54









          Adrian KeisterAdrian Keister

          5,28272033




          5,28272033











          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer. Maybe I should have added some more information. I know in addition, that $f(u)$ is a Laurant-Polynomial of degree $L$ in $z=e^i u$. This can be used to get quadratic equations for the coefficients by evaluation the equation at $u_i$ as you mentioned. This is however not efficient when $L$ becomes large and I was hoping to find something like a closed form, non-linear integral equation or anything else which is fast also for large $L$.
            $endgroup$
            – TheoPhysicae
            Mar 28 at 12:17










          • $begingroup$
            Hmm. Well, the RHS of my general simplification there is $pi$ periodic, and therefore the LHS must be $pi$ periodic, so $z=e^iu$ would make sense. I'm not sure I know how to proceed further, though. If you differentiated both sides w.r.t. $u,$ the RHS would be the negative of what you started out as. That might allow you to continue. I'll try to add that to my solution.
            $endgroup$
            – Adrian Keister
            Mar 28 at 14:52










          • $begingroup$
            Actually, differentiating the RHS is more complicated than I made out, so that's not going to give you a nice DE.
            $endgroup$
            – Adrian Keister
            Mar 28 at 15:04
















          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer. Maybe I should have added some more information. I know in addition, that $f(u)$ is a Laurant-Polynomial of degree $L$ in $z=e^i u$. This can be used to get quadratic equations for the coefficients by evaluation the equation at $u_i$ as you mentioned. This is however not efficient when $L$ becomes large and I was hoping to find something like a closed form, non-linear integral equation or anything else which is fast also for large $L$.
            $endgroup$
            – TheoPhysicae
            Mar 28 at 12:17










          • $begingroup$
            Hmm. Well, the RHS of my general simplification there is $pi$ periodic, and therefore the LHS must be $pi$ periodic, so $z=e^iu$ would make sense. I'm not sure I know how to proceed further, though. If you differentiated both sides w.r.t. $u,$ the RHS would be the negative of what you started out as. That might allow you to continue. I'll try to add that to my solution.
            $endgroup$
            – Adrian Keister
            Mar 28 at 14:52










          • $begingroup$
            Actually, differentiating the RHS is more complicated than I made out, so that's not going to give you a nice DE.
            $endgroup$
            – Adrian Keister
            Mar 28 at 15:04















          $begingroup$
          Thank you for your answer. Maybe I should have added some more information. I know in addition, that $f(u)$ is a Laurant-Polynomial of degree $L$ in $z=e^i u$. This can be used to get quadratic equations for the coefficients by evaluation the equation at $u_i$ as you mentioned. This is however not efficient when $L$ becomes large and I was hoping to find something like a closed form, non-linear integral equation or anything else which is fast also for large $L$.
          $endgroup$
          – TheoPhysicae
          Mar 28 at 12:17




          $begingroup$
          Thank you for your answer. Maybe I should have added some more information. I know in addition, that $f(u)$ is a Laurant-Polynomial of degree $L$ in $z=e^i u$. This can be used to get quadratic equations for the coefficients by evaluation the equation at $u_i$ as you mentioned. This is however not efficient when $L$ becomes large and I was hoping to find something like a closed form, non-linear integral equation or anything else which is fast also for large $L$.
          $endgroup$
          – TheoPhysicae
          Mar 28 at 12:17












          $begingroup$
          Hmm. Well, the RHS of my general simplification there is $pi$ periodic, and therefore the LHS must be $pi$ periodic, so $z=e^iu$ would make sense. I'm not sure I know how to proceed further, though. If you differentiated both sides w.r.t. $u,$ the RHS would be the negative of what you started out as. That might allow you to continue. I'll try to add that to my solution.
          $endgroup$
          – Adrian Keister
          Mar 28 at 14:52




          $begingroup$
          Hmm. Well, the RHS of my general simplification there is $pi$ periodic, and therefore the LHS must be $pi$ periodic, so $z=e^iu$ would make sense. I'm not sure I know how to proceed further, though. If you differentiated both sides w.r.t. $u,$ the RHS would be the negative of what you started out as. That might allow you to continue. I'll try to add that to my solution.
          $endgroup$
          – Adrian Keister
          Mar 28 at 14:52












          $begingroup$
          Actually, differentiating the RHS is more complicated than I made out, so that's not going to give you a nice DE.
          $endgroup$
          – Adrian Keister
          Mar 28 at 15:04




          $begingroup$
          Actually, differentiating the RHS is more complicated than I made out, so that's not going to give you a nice DE.
          $endgroup$
          – Adrian Keister
          Mar 28 at 15:04

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3164706%2fsolution-for-a-functional-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Moe incest case Sentencing See also References Navigation menu"'Australian Josef Fritzl' fathered four children by daughter""Small town recoils in horror at 'Australian Fritzl' incest case""Victorian rape allegations echo Fritzl case - Just In (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)""Incest father jailed for 22 years""'Australian Fritzl' sentenced to 22 years in prison for abusing daughter for three decades""RSJ v The Queen"

          John Burke, 9th Earl of Clanricarde References Navigation menuA General and heraldic dictionary of the peerage and baronetage of the British EmpireLeigh Rayment's Peerage Pages

          Sum infinite sum for a complex variable not in the integers The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Convergence of the infinite product $prod_n = 1^infty fracz - alpha_nz - beta_n$Suppose $sum_k=-infty^inftya_kz^k$ and $sum_-infty^inftyb_kz^k$ converge to $1/sin(pi z)$. Find $b_k-a_k$.Laurent series of $ 1over (z - i) $Laurent series for $z^2 e^1/z$ at $z = infty$Write $sumlimits_n=0^infty e^-xn^3$ in the form $sumlimits_n=-infty^infty a_nx^n$Help needed on laurent series for a complex functionShow that $sum_-infty^infty (-1)^nexp(nz-frac12(n+frac12)^2omega)$ converges and is entireΑn entire function as an infinite sum of entire functionsClassify singularities in the extended complex planeFinding the laurent series around z = 0