How to define the density on a subspace of a topological one Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)The topology produced by indexing subsets of a topological space.Density, Irreducible Topological SpaceAlgebraic (Kuratowski axiomatic) proof of a simple topological statementCondition ici=ic on a topological space is equivalent to if each dense set has dense interior in the space.Second category subset vs subspaceTwo definitions of one set being dense in the other$A$ dense in $X$, $O$ open in $X$Tarski's notion of $E$-spaceBasis of topological space and topological subspaceEquivalent definition of irreducible topological subspace.

What is the topology associated with the algebras for the ultrafilter monad?

Amount of permutations on an NxNxN Rubik's Cube

How to install press fit bottom bracket into new frame

How to compare two different files line by line in unix?

Is it possible for SQL statements to execute concurrently within a single session in SQL Server?

Is there hard evidence that the grant peer review system performs significantly better than random?

Why should I vote and accept answers?

Most bit efficient text communication method?

Question about debouncing - delay of state change

Did Deadpool rescue all of the X-Force?

How can I reduce the gap between left and right of cdot with a macro?

What would you call this weird metallic apparatus that allows you to lift people?

If Windows 7 doesn't support WSL, then what does Linux subsystem option mean?

What is "gratricide"?

What is a fractional matching?

As a beginner, should I get a Squier Strat with a SSS config or a HSS?

How does light 'choose' between wave and particle behaviour?

How to write the following sign?

Morning, Afternoon, Night Kanji

Denied boarding although I have proper visa and documentation. To whom should I make a complaint?

Do I really need to have a message in a novel to appeal to readers?

How come Sam didn't become Lord of Horn Hill?

Can the Great Weapon Master feat's damage bonus and accuracy penalty apply to attacks from the Spiritual Weapon spell?

Why wasn't DOSKEY integrated with COMMAND.COM?



How to define the density on a subspace of a topological one



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)The topology produced by indexing subsets of a topological space.Density, Irreducible Topological SpaceAlgebraic (Kuratowski axiomatic) proof of a simple topological statementCondition ici=ic on a topological space is equivalent to if each dense set has dense interior in the space.Second category subset vs subspaceTwo definitions of one set being dense in the other$A$ dense in $X$, $O$ open in $X$Tarski's notion of $E$-spaceBasis of topological space and topological subspaceEquivalent definition of irreducible topological subspace.










0












$begingroup$


Assume $X$ is a topological space and $Asubseteq X$.
Then $A$ is dense in $X$ iff $overlineA=X$.
Now, suppose $Asubseteq Bsubseteq X$.




How can I define the density of $A$ in $B$?




As I understand it, a reasonable way to overcome this difficulty is to require $overlineAcap B=B$ or $overlineAcap B=B$, where we are using the closure operator of $X$.



I guess the second one is more adeguate, but it is only a feeling.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that $Acap B = A$.
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 16:29










  • $begingroup$
    Ah, I feel so stupid... at this point is the first one the actual definition?
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 27 at 16:30







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The second is at least not the one because it would imply that $B$ is closed.
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 16:31











  • $begingroup$
    You are absolutely right once again
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 27 at 16:33






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is correct that $A$ is dense in $B$ if and only if $overline Acap B = B$.
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 16:34















0












$begingroup$


Assume $X$ is a topological space and $Asubseteq X$.
Then $A$ is dense in $X$ iff $overlineA=X$.
Now, suppose $Asubseteq Bsubseteq X$.




How can I define the density of $A$ in $B$?




As I understand it, a reasonable way to overcome this difficulty is to require $overlineAcap B=B$ or $overlineAcap B=B$, where we are using the closure operator of $X$.



I guess the second one is more adeguate, but it is only a feeling.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that $Acap B = A$.
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 16:29










  • $begingroup$
    Ah, I feel so stupid... at this point is the first one the actual definition?
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 27 at 16:30







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The second is at least not the one because it would imply that $B$ is closed.
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 16:31











  • $begingroup$
    You are absolutely right once again
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 27 at 16:33






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is correct that $A$ is dense in $B$ if and only if $overline Acap B = B$.
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 16:34













0












0








0





$begingroup$


Assume $X$ is a topological space and $Asubseteq X$.
Then $A$ is dense in $X$ iff $overlineA=X$.
Now, suppose $Asubseteq Bsubseteq X$.




How can I define the density of $A$ in $B$?




As I understand it, a reasonable way to overcome this difficulty is to require $overlineAcap B=B$ or $overlineAcap B=B$, where we are using the closure operator of $X$.



I guess the second one is more adeguate, but it is only a feeling.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Assume $X$ is a topological space and $Asubseteq X$.
Then $A$ is dense in $X$ iff $overlineA=X$.
Now, suppose $Asubseteq Bsubseteq X$.




How can I define the density of $A$ in $B$?




As I understand it, a reasonable way to overcome this difficulty is to require $overlineAcap B=B$ or $overlineAcap B=B$, where we are using the closure operator of $X$.



I guess the second one is more adeguate, but it is only a feeling.







general-topology






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 27 at 16:29







LBJFS

















asked Mar 27 at 16:25









LBJFSLBJFS

391112




391112







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that $Acap B = A$.
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 16:29










  • $begingroup$
    Ah, I feel so stupid... at this point is the first one the actual definition?
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 27 at 16:30







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The second is at least not the one because it would imply that $B$ is closed.
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 16:31











  • $begingroup$
    You are absolutely right once again
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 27 at 16:33






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is correct that $A$ is dense in $B$ if and only if $overline Acap B = B$.
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 16:34












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that $Acap B = A$.
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 16:29










  • $begingroup$
    Ah, I feel so stupid... at this point is the first one the actual definition?
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 27 at 16:30







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The second is at least not the one because it would imply that $B$ is closed.
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 16:31











  • $begingroup$
    You are absolutely right once again
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 27 at 16:33






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is correct that $A$ is dense in $B$ if and only if $overline Acap B = B$.
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 16:34







1




1




$begingroup$
Note that $Acap B = A$.
$endgroup$
– amsmath
Mar 27 at 16:29




$begingroup$
Note that $Acap B = A$.
$endgroup$
– amsmath
Mar 27 at 16:29












$begingroup$
Ah, I feel so stupid... at this point is the first one the actual definition?
$endgroup$
– LBJFS
Mar 27 at 16:30





$begingroup$
Ah, I feel so stupid... at this point is the first one the actual definition?
$endgroup$
– LBJFS
Mar 27 at 16:30





1




1




$begingroup$
The second is at least not the one because it would imply that $B$ is closed.
$endgroup$
– amsmath
Mar 27 at 16:31





$begingroup$
The second is at least not the one because it would imply that $B$ is closed.
$endgroup$
– amsmath
Mar 27 at 16:31













$begingroup$
You are absolutely right once again
$endgroup$
– LBJFS
Mar 27 at 16:33




$begingroup$
You are absolutely right once again
$endgroup$
– LBJFS
Mar 27 at 16:33




1




1




$begingroup$
It is correct that $A$ is dense in $B$ if and only if $overline Acap B = B$.
$endgroup$
– amsmath
Mar 27 at 16:34




$begingroup$
It is correct that $A$ is dense in $B$ if and only if $overline Acap B = B$.
$endgroup$
– amsmath
Mar 27 at 16:34










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

By definition, $A$ is dense in $B$ if for any $bin B$ and any open $U$ with $bin U$ you can find $ain A$ such that $ain Ucap B$, i.e., $ain Acap U$.



Assume that $overline Acap B = B$ and let $bin B$, $U$ open with $bin U$. Then, since $bin overline A$, there exists $ain Acap U$.



Assume that $A$ is dense in $B$ and let $bin B$. Then for any open $U$ with $bin U$ we find $ain Acap U$. This implies $bin overline A$. Hence, we have $overline Acap B = B$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Ok, you checked the agreement of this definition with the equivalent notions in $X$. Thank you very much.
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 27 at 16:54


















1












$begingroup$

$A$ is dense in $B$ iff $operatornamecl_B(A)=B$ so iff $operatornamecl_X(A) cap B = B$ (by the formula that relates closure in subspaces to that in the large space) iff $B subseteq operatornamecl_X(A)$. So it suffices to check the closure of $A$ in the whole space and check if it contains $B$.



It's intuitive too: $A$ is dense in $B$ iff we can "reach" all points of $B$ by points of $A$ (formalisable by nets, e.g.) and this also can be restated as $B subseteq operatornamecl_X(A)$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Ah, now I see. This is the natural way I was looking for. Thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 27 at 17:51






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    He just restated your statement that $A$ is dense in $B$ iff $overline Acap B = B$. And "this last condition also restates that same fact." I proved in my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 18:15











  • $begingroup$
    I see what you mean, but he stated explicitly why the formula holds: it was sufficient to recall the definition of subspace closure. Maybe it is trivial, but this is why everything works.
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 27 at 18:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You mean "relative closure". But this has to be proved using the relative topology. That's what you have first. And I proved in my answer that the relative closure of $A$ is $overline Acap B$. If you knew that already, your question seems odd.
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 18:35






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @LBJFS I did some time ago; a minor edit.
    $endgroup$
    – Henno Brandsma
    Mar 27 at 22:23











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3164714%2fhow-to-define-the-density-on-a-subspace-of-a-topological-one%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

By definition, $A$ is dense in $B$ if for any $bin B$ and any open $U$ with $bin U$ you can find $ain A$ such that $ain Ucap B$, i.e., $ain Acap U$.



Assume that $overline Acap B = B$ and let $bin B$, $U$ open with $bin U$. Then, since $bin overline A$, there exists $ain Acap U$.



Assume that $A$ is dense in $B$ and let $bin B$. Then for any open $U$ with $bin U$ we find $ain Acap U$. This implies $bin overline A$. Hence, we have $overline Acap B = B$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Ok, you checked the agreement of this definition with the equivalent notions in $X$. Thank you very much.
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 27 at 16:54















1












$begingroup$

By definition, $A$ is dense in $B$ if for any $bin B$ and any open $U$ with $bin U$ you can find $ain A$ such that $ain Ucap B$, i.e., $ain Acap U$.



Assume that $overline Acap B = B$ and let $bin B$, $U$ open with $bin U$. Then, since $bin overline A$, there exists $ain Acap U$.



Assume that $A$ is dense in $B$ and let $bin B$. Then for any open $U$ with $bin U$ we find $ain Acap U$. This implies $bin overline A$. Hence, we have $overline Acap B = B$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Ok, you checked the agreement of this definition with the equivalent notions in $X$. Thank you very much.
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 27 at 16:54













1












1








1





$begingroup$

By definition, $A$ is dense in $B$ if for any $bin B$ and any open $U$ with $bin U$ you can find $ain A$ such that $ain Ucap B$, i.e., $ain Acap U$.



Assume that $overline Acap B = B$ and let $bin B$, $U$ open with $bin U$. Then, since $bin overline A$, there exists $ain Acap U$.



Assume that $A$ is dense in $B$ and let $bin B$. Then for any open $U$ with $bin U$ we find $ain Acap U$. This implies $bin overline A$. Hence, we have $overline Acap B = B$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



By definition, $A$ is dense in $B$ if for any $bin B$ and any open $U$ with $bin U$ you can find $ain A$ such that $ain Ucap B$, i.e., $ain Acap U$.



Assume that $overline Acap B = B$ and let $bin B$, $U$ open with $bin U$. Then, since $bin overline A$, there exists $ain Acap U$.



Assume that $A$ is dense in $B$ and let $bin B$. Then for any open $U$ with $bin U$ we find $ain Acap U$. This implies $bin overline A$. Hence, we have $overline Acap B = B$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Mar 27 at 16:48









amsmathamsmath

3,387421




3,387421











  • $begingroup$
    Ok, you checked the agreement of this definition with the equivalent notions in $X$. Thank you very much.
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 27 at 16:54
















  • $begingroup$
    Ok, you checked the agreement of this definition with the equivalent notions in $X$. Thank you very much.
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 27 at 16:54















$begingroup$
Ok, you checked the agreement of this definition with the equivalent notions in $X$. Thank you very much.
$endgroup$
– LBJFS
Mar 27 at 16:54




$begingroup$
Ok, you checked the agreement of this definition with the equivalent notions in $X$. Thank you very much.
$endgroup$
– LBJFS
Mar 27 at 16:54











1












$begingroup$

$A$ is dense in $B$ iff $operatornamecl_B(A)=B$ so iff $operatornamecl_X(A) cap B = B$ (by the formula that relates closure in subspaces to that in the large space) iff $B subseteq operatornamecl_X(A)$. So it suffices to check the closure of $A$ in the whole space and check if it contains $B$.



It's intuitive too: $A$ is dense in $B$ iff we can "reach" all points of $B$ by points of $A$ (formalisable by nets, e.g.) and this also can be restated as $B subseteq operatornamecl_X(A)$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Ah, now I see. This is the natural way I was looking for. Thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 27 at 17:51






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    He just restated your statement that $A$ is dense in $B$ iff $overline Acap B = B$. And "this last condition also restates that same fact." I proved in my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 18:15











  • $begingroup$
    I see what you mean, but he stated explicitly why the formula holds: it was sufficient to recall the definition of subspace closure. Maybe it is trivial, but this is why everything works.
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 27 at 18:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You mean "relative closure". But this has to be proved using the relative topology. That's what you have first. And I proved in my answer that the relative closure of $A$ is $overline Acap B$. If you knew that already, your question seems odd.
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 18:35






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @LBJFS I did some time ago; a minor edit.
    $endgroup$
    – Henno Brandsma
    Mar 27 at 22:23















1












$begingroup$

$A$ is dense in $B$ iff $operatornamecl_B(A)=B$ so iff $operatornamecl_X(A) cap B = B$ (by the formula that relates closure in subspaces to that in the large space) iff $B subseteq operatornamecl_X(A)$. So it suffices to check the closure of $A$ in the whole space and check if it contains $B$.



It's intuitive too: $A$ is dense in $B$ iff we can "reach" all points of $B$ by points of $A$ (formalisable by nets, e.g.) and this also can be restated as $B subseteq operatornamecl_X(A)$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Ah, now I see. This is the natural way I was looking for. Thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 27 at 17:51






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    He just restated your statement that $A$ is dense in $B$ iff $overline Acap B = B$. And "this last condition also restates that same fact." I proved in my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 18:15











  • $begingroup$
    I see what you mean, but he stated explicitly why the formula holds: it was sufficient to recall the definition of subspace closure. Maybe it is trivial, but this is why everything works.
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 27 at 18:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You mean "relative closure". But this has to be proved using the relative topology. That's what you have first. And I proved in my answer that the relative closure of $A$ is $overline Acap B$. If you knew that already, your question seems odd.
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 18:35






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @LBJFS I did some time ago; a minor edit.
    $endgroup$
    – Henno Brandsma
    Mar 27 at 22:23













1












1








1





$begingroup$

$A$ is dense in $B$ iff $operatornamecl_B(A)=B$ so iff $operatornamecl_X(A) cap B = B$ (by the formula that relates closure in subspaces to that in the large space) iff $B subseteq operatornamecl_X(A)$. So it suffices to check the closure of $A$ in the whole space and check if it contains $B$.



It's intuitive too: $A$ is dense in $B$ iff we can "reach" all points of $B$ by points of $A$ (formalisable by nets, e.g.) and this also can be restated as $B subseteq operatornamecl_X(A)$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



$A$ is dense in $B$ iff $operatornamecl_B(A)=B$ so iff $operatornamecl_X(A) cap B = B$ (by the formula that relates closure in subspaces to that in the large space) iff $B subseteq operatornamecl_X(A)$. So it suffices to check the closure of $A$ in the whole space and check if it contains $B$.



It's intuitive too: $A$ is dense in $B$ iff we can "reach" all points of $B$ by points of $A$ (formalisable by nets, e.g.) and this also can be restated as $B subseteq operatornamecl_X(A)$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Mar 27 at 18:55

























answered Mar 27 at 17:40









Henno BrandsmaHenno Brandsma

117k349127




117k349127











  • $begingroup$
    Ah, now I see. This is the natural way I was looking for. Thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 27 at 17:51






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    He just restated your statement that $A$ is dense in $B$ iff $overline Acap B = B$. And "this last condition also restates that same fact." I proved in my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 18:15











  • $begingroup$
    I see what you mean, but he stated explicitly why the formula holds: it was sufficient to recall the definition of subspace closure. Maybe it is trivial, but this is why everything works.
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 27 at 18:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You mean "relative closure". But this has to be proved using the relative topology. That's what you have first. And I proved in my answer that the relative closure of $A$ is $overline Acap B$. If you knew that already, your question seems odd.
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 18:35






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @LBJFS I did some time ago; a minor edit.
    $endgroup$
    – Henno Brandsma
    Mar 27 at 22:23
















  • $begingroup$
    Ah, now I see. This is the natural way I was looking for. Thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 27 at 17:51






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    He just restated your statement that $A$ is dense in $B$ iff $overline Acap B = B$. And "this last condition also restates that same fact." I proved in my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 18:15











  • $begingroup$
    I see what you mean, but he stated explicitly why the formula holds: it was sufficient to recall the definition of subspace closure. Maybe it is trivial, but this is why everything works.
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 27 at 18:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You mean "relative closure". But this has to be proved using the relative topology. That's what you have first. And I proved in my answer that the relative closure of $A$ is $overline Acap B$. If you knew that already, your question seems odd.
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 27 at 18:35






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @LBJFS I did some time ago; a minor edit.
    $endgroup$
    – Henno Brandsma
    Mar 27 at 22:23















$begingroup$
Ah, now I see. This is the natural way I was looking for. Thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– LBJFS
Mar 27 at 17:51




$begingroup$
Ah, now I see. This is the natural way I was looking for. Thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– LBJFS
Mar 27 at 17:51




1




1




$begingroup$
He just restated your statement that $A$ is dense in $B$ iff $overline Acap B = B$. And "this last condition also restates that same fact." I proved in my answer.
$endgroup$
– amsmath
Mar 27 at 18:15





$begingroup$
He just restated your statement that $A$ is dense in $B$ iff $overline Acap B = B$. And "this last condition also restates that same fact." I proved in my answer.
$endgroup$
– amsmath
Mar 27 at 18:15













$begingroup$
I see what you mean, but he stated explicitly why the formula holds: it was sufficient to recall the definition of subspace closure. Maybe it is trivial, but this is why everything works.
$endgroup$
– LBJFS
Mar 27 at 18:26




$begingroup$
I see what you mean, but he stated explicitly why the formula holds: it was sufficient to recall the definition of subspace closure. Maybe it is trivial, but this is why everything works.
$endgroup$
– LBJFS
Mar 27 at 18:26




1




1




$begingroup$
You mean "relative closure". But this has to be proved using the relative topology. That's what you have first. And I proved in my answer that the relative closure of $A$ is $overline Acap B$. If you knew that already, your question seems odd.
$endgroup$
– amsmath
Mar 27 at 18:35




$begingroup$
You mean "relative closure". But this has to be proved using the relative topology. That's what you have first. And I proved in my answer that the relative closure of $A$ is $overline Acap B$. If you knew that already, your question seems odd.
$endgroup$
– amsmath
Mar 27 at 18:35




1




1




$begingroup$
@LBJFS I did some time ago; a minor edit.
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Mar 27 at 22:23




$begingroup$
@LBJFS I did some time ago; a minor edit.
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Mar 27 at 22:23

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3164714%2fhow-to-define-the-density-on-a-subspace-of-a-topological-one%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye