Proof: Every reflexive $sigma$-sesquilinear form, $sigma ne mathbb1$, is proportional with a hermitian form Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Quadratic forms…Bounding the dimension of a subspace associated with a hermitian form.Sequence of matrices, equivalent conditionsHow can a matrix be Hermitian, unitary, and diagonal all at onceSimultaneously vanishing quadratic formsVector space endomorphisms in $mathbbR[x]$ commuting with $E:fmapsto f+f'$V vectorspace, $sigma, tau$ $ mathbbK$-linear and $sigma, tau: V rightarrow V.$ Proof $sigma circ $ $tau $ $mathbbK$-linearCan we always define a sesquilinear form on a vector space (without any additonal structure)?If $ImA = (ImB)^bot$ then $B^TA = 0$Generalized eigenvalue problem of Hermitian matrix (exist complex eigenvalues)
Generate an RGB colour grid
How were pictures turned from film to a big picture in a picture frame before digital scanning?
Morning, Afternoon, Night Kanji
How to react to hostile behavior from a senior developer?
Would the Life Transference spell be unbalanced if it ignored resistance and immunity?
Most bit efficient text communication method?
What is the difference between globalisation and imperialism?
How does the math work when buying airline miles?
Is there any word for a place full of confusion?
What's the meaning of "fortified infraction restraint"?
Did Deadpool rescue all of the X-Force?
How to compare two different files line by line in unix?
Disembodied hand growing fangs
Time to Settle Down!
Drawing without replacement: why is the order of draw irrelevant?
Is it fair for a professor to grade us on the possession of past papers?
What is "gratricide"?
Trademark violation for app?
Why weren't discrete x86 CPUs ever used in game hardware?
Is a ledger board required if the side of my house is wood?
ArcGIS Pro Python arcpy.CreatePersonalGDB_management
What does it mean that physics no longer uses mechanical models to describe phenomena?
Find 108 by using 3,4,6
Should I use a zero-interest credit card for a large one-time purchase?
Proof: Every reflexive $sigma$-sesquilinear form, $sigma ne mathbb1$, is proportional with a hermitian form
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Quadratic forms…Bounding the dimension of a subspace associated with a hermitian form.Sequence of matrices, equivalent conditionsHow can a matrix be Hermitian, unitary, and diagonal all at onceSimultaneously vanishing quadratic formsVector space endomorphisms in $mathbbR[x]$ commuting with $E:fmapsto f+f'$V vectorspace, $sigma, tau$ $ mathbbK$-linear and $sigma, tau: V rightarrow V.$ Proof $sigma circ $ $tau $ $mathbbK$-linearCan we always define a sesquilinear form on a vector space (without any additonal structure)?If $ImA = (ImB)^bot$ then $B^TA = 0$Generalized eigenvalue problem of Hermitian matrix (exist complex eigenvalues)
$begingroup$
$V$ is a $K$-vector field and $sigma$ a field automorphism of $K$.
(Definition: Two $sigma$-sesquilinear forms $f$ and $f'$ are said to be proportional if there exists an $ell in K^*$ such that $f'(v,w) = ell f(v,w), forall v,w in V$.)
Proof:
Suppose that there exists $v in V$ such that $f(v,v) ne 0$. Then we have $f(u,w)=fracf(v,v)f(v,v)^sigma f(w,u)^sigma$ for all $u,w in V$. Define $f':V times V to K: (x,y) mapsto f(v,v)^sigma f(x,y)$, this a $sigma$-sesquilinear form proportional with $f$. We can easily check that $f'$ is a hermitian form.
This proof is all over the place and results are stated without proper explanation.
"Suppose that there exists $v in V$ such that $f(v,v) ne 0$." We know that if $f$ is a $sigma$-sesquilinear form ($sigma ne 1$) for which $f(u,u)=0, forall u in V$, then $f$ is the null form. We'd like to prove the theorem for non-trivial sesquilinear forms, therefore such a $v$ exists.
Then we have $f(u,w)=fracf(v,v)f(v,v)^sigma f(w,u)^sigma$ for all $u,w in V$. Where does this expression come from? This is what I wrote next to it: $exists g = af Rightarrow a = ka^sigma Rightarrow a=f(x,x).$ I don't understand what this has to do with the derivation of that expression. Any ideas?
We can easily check that $f'$ is a hermitian form. I have to prove that $f(v,w) = f(w,v)^sigma$. Well, $$ f(v,w) = f(v,v)^sigmaf(v,w)$$ and $$ f(w,v)^sigma = f(v,v)^sigma^2f(w,v)= f(v,v)f(w,v) quad (ftext is reflexive)$$ I don't see the equality here. Did I miss something?
The last to paragraphs are the parts of the proof I don't fully understand. Could somebody help me out. Thanks.
linear-algebra
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$V$ is a $K$-vector field and $sigma$ a field automorphism of $K$.
(Definition: Two $sigma$-sesquilinear forms $f$ and $f'$ are said to be proportional if there exists an $ell in K^*$ such that $f'(v,w) = ell f(v,w), forall v,w in V$.)
Proof:
Suppose that there exists $v in V$ such that $f(v,v) ne 0$. Then we have $f(u,w)=fracf(v,v)f(v,v)^sigma f(w,u)^sigma$ for all $u,w in V$. Define $f':V times V to K: (x,y) mapsto f(v,v)^sigma f(x,y)$, this a $sigma$-sesquilinear form proportional with $f$. We can easily check that $f'$ is a hermitian form.
This proof is all over the place and results are stated without proper explanation.
"Suppose that there exists $v in V$ such that $f(v,v) ne 0$." We know that if $f$ is a $sigma$-sesquilinear form ($sigma ne 1$) for which $f(u,u)=0, forall u in V$, then $f$ is the null form. We'd like to prove the theorem for non-trivial sesquilinear forms, therefore such a $v$ exists.
Then we have $f(u,w)=fracf(v,v)f(v,v)^sigma f(w,u)^sigma$ for all $u,w in V$. Where does this expression come from? This is what I wrote next to it: $exists g = af Rightarrow a = ka^sigma Rightarrow a=f(x,x).$ I don't understand what this has to do with the derivation of that expression. Any ideas?
We can easily check that $f'$ is a hermitian form. I have to prove that $f(v,w) = f(w,v)^sigma$. Well, $$ f(v,w) = f(v,v)^sigmaf(v,w)$$ and $$ f(w,v)^sigma = f(v,v)^sigma^2f(w,v)= f(v,v)f(w,v) quad (ftext is reflexive)$$ I don't see the equality here. Did I miss something?
The last to paragraphs are the parts of the proof I don't fully understand. Could somebody help me out. Thanks.
linear-algebra
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$V$ is a $K$-vector field and $sigma$ a field automorphism of $K$.
(Definition: Two $sigma$-sesquilinear forms $f$ and $f'$ are said to be proportional if there exists an $ell in K^*$ such that $f'(v,w) = ell f(v,w), forall v,w in V$.)
Proof:
Suppose that there exists $v in V$ such that $f(v,v) ne 0$. Then we have $f(u,w)=fracf(v,v)f(v,v)^sigma f(w,u)^sigma$ for all $u,w in V$. Define $f':V times V to K: (x,y) mapsto f(v,v)^sigma f(x,y)$, this a $sigma$-sesquilinear form proportional with $f$. We can easily check that $f'$ is a hermitian form.
This proof is all over the place and results are stated without proper explanation.
"Suppose that there exists $v in V$ such that $f(v,v) ne 0$." We know that if $f$ is a $sigma$-sesquilinear form ($sigma ne 1$) for which $f(u,u)=0, forall u in V$, then $f$ is the null form. We'd like to prove the theorem for non-trivial sesquilinear forms, therefore such a $v$ exists.
Then we have $f(u,w)=fracf(v,v)f(v,v)^sigma f(w,u)^sigma$ for all $u,w in V$. Where does this expression come from? This is what I wrote next to it: $exists g = af Rightarrow a = ka^sigma Rightarrow a=f(x,x).$ I don't understand what this has to do with the derivation of that expression. Any ideas?
We can easily check that $f'$ is a hermitian form. I have to prove that $f(v,w) = f(w,v)^sigma$. Well, $$ f(v,w) = f(v,v)^sigmaf(v,w)$$ and $$ f(w,v)^sigma = f(v,v)^sigma^2f(w,v)= f(v,v)f(w,v) quad (ftext is reflexive)$$ I don't see the equality here. Did I miss something?
The last to paragraphs are the parts of the proof I don't fully understand. Could somebody help me out. Thanks.
linear-algebra
$endgroup$
$V$ is a $K$-vector field and $sigma$ a field automorphism of $K$.
(Definition: Two $sigma$-sesquilinear forms $f$ and $f'$ are said to be proportional if there exists an $ell in K^*$ such that $f'(v,w) = ell f(v,w), forall v,w in V$.)
Proof:
Suppose that there exists $v in V$ such that $f(v,v) ne 0$. Then we have $f(u,w)=fracf(v,v)f(v,v)^sigma f(w,u)^sigma$ for all $u,w in V$. Define $f':V times V to K: (x,y) mapsto f(v,v)^sigma f(x,y)$, this a $sigma$-sesquilinear form proportional with $f$. We can easily check that $f'$ is a hermitian form.
This proof is all over the place and results are stated without proper explanation.
"Suppose that there exists $v in V$ such that $f(v,v) ne 0$." We know that if $f$ is a $sigma$-sesquilinear form ($sigma ne 1$) for which $f(u,u)=0, forall u in V$, then $f$ is the null form. We'd like to prove the theorem for non-trivial sesquilinear forms, therefore such a $v$ exists.
Then we have $f(u,w)=fracf(v,v)f(v,v)^sigma f(w,u)^sigma$ for all $u,w in V$. Where does this expression come from? This is what I wrote next to it: $exists g = af Rightarrow a = ka^sigma Rightarrow a=f(x,x).$ I don't understand what this has to do with the derivation of that expression. Any ideas?
We can easily check that $f'$ is a hermitian form. I have to prove that $f(v,w) = f(w,v)^sigma$. Well, $$ f(v,w) = f(v,v)^sigmaf(v,w)$$ and $$ f(w,v)^sigma = f(v,v)^sigma^2f(w,v)= f(v,v)f(w,v) quad (ftext is reflexive)$$ I don't see the equality here. Did I miss something?
The last to paragraphs are the parts of the proof I don't fully understand. Could somebody help me out. Thanks.
linear-algebra
linear-algebra
asked Mar 27 at 16:24
ZacharyZachary
3419
3419
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3164713%2fproof-every-reflexive-sigma-sesquilinear-form-sigma-ne-mathbb1-is-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3164713%2fproof-every-reflexive-sigma-sesquilinear-form-sigma-ne-mathbb1-is-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown