Vector Field Exponential MapReasoning about Lie theory and the Exponential MapLie Group Multiplication in CoordinatesQuestion about SO(3) and “infinitesimal generators”Why is the Lie derivative linear in the vector field?Does the exponential map respect module actions?Induced Lie Algebra Representation, Left invariant vector fields and more…Lie algebra of projective linear group and one-parameter transformationsSecond-order term of Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formulaExponential of the product between $x$ the derivative operator of $x$ acting in a $f(x)$Can the formula for the derivative of the exponential map (in a Lie group) be derived without using the power series formula?

How to convince somebody that he is fit for something else, but not this job?

Pre-mixing cryogenic fuels and using only one fuel tank

Has any country ever had 2 former presidents in jail simultaneously?

Why does this expression simplify as such?

Short story about a deaf man, who cuts people tongues

Has the laser at Magurele, Romania reached a tenth of the Sun's power?

Why should universal income be universal?

Why Shazam when there is already Superman?

C++ copy constructor called at return

Is this part of the description of the Archfey warlock's Misty Escape feature redundant?

How could a planet have erratic days?

Does Doodling or Improvising on the Piano Have Any Benefits?

Mimic lecturing on blackboard, facing audience

Is it allowed to activate the ability of multiple planeswalkers in a single turn?

What does "Scientists rise up against statistical significance" mean? (Comment in Nature)

Does the reader need to like the PoV character?

What is the highest possible scrabble score for placing a single tile

Make a Bowl of Alphabet Soup

Giving feedback to someone without sounding prejudiced

Why do Radio Buttons not fill the entire outer circle?

Will number of steps recorded on FitBit/any fitness tracker add up distance in PokemonGo?

What are some good ways to treat frozen vegetables such that they behave like fresh vegetables when stir frying them?

Why is so much work done on numerical verification of the Riemann Hypothesis?

A Trivial Diagnosis



Vector Field Exponential Map


Reasoning about Lie theory and the Exponential MapLie Group Multiplication in CoordinatesQuestion about SO(3) and “infinitesimal generators”Why is the Lie derivative linear in the vector field?Does the exponential map respect module actions?Induced Lie Algebra Representation, Left invariant vector fields and more…Lie algebra of projective linear group and one-parameter transformationsSecond-order term of Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formulaExponential of the product between $x$ the derivative operator of $x$ acting in a $f(x)$Can the formula for the derivative of the exponential map (in a Lie group) be derived without using the power series formula?













1












$begingroup$


I've got $bf v = x^2partial_x$, and I'm trying to find $exp(varepsilonbf v)$, but I'm having some trouble.



If I define $bf v^n+1 = bf vbf v^n$ then I get a different outcome to $bf v^n+1 = bf v^nbf v$.



For example:



$$bf v^2 = bf vv = (x^2partial_x)(x^2partial_x) = x^2(partial_xx^2)partial_x =
x^2(2x)partial_x = 2x^3partial_x$$



$$bf v^3 = bf vbf v^2 =(x^2partial_x)(2x^3partial_x)=x^2(partial_x2x^3)partial_x = x^2(6x^2)partial_x = 6x^4partial_x$$
$$bf v^3 = bf v^2bf v = (2x^3partial_x)(x^2partial_x) = 2x^3(partial_xx^2)partial_x = 2x^3(2x)partial_x = 4x^4partial_x$$



Using $bf v^n+1 = bf vbf v^n$ gives
$$exp(varepsilon bf v)x = fracx1-varepsilon x$$



While using $bf v^n+1 = bf v^nbf v$ gives
$$exp(varepsilon bf v)x = fracx2(1+mathrm e^2varepsilon x)$$



In both cases, when $varepsilon =0$, we get just $x$, i.e. the identity element. Also, in both cases, we get
$$lim_varepsilon to 0 fracmathrm dmathrm dvarepsilon exp(varepsilon bf v)x = bf v$$



The same $bf v in mathfrak g$ can't possible generate two different flows, can it?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Doesn't it seem odd to you that you are not getting iterates (i.e. nested compositions) of $partial_x$? For instance, if $mathbfv = partial_x$, what should $mathbfv^2$ be?
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Towers
    Mar 14 at 17:37










  • $begingroup$
    If $bf v = partial_x$ then I would say $bf v^2 = (1partial_x)(1partial_x) = 1(partial_x 1)partial_x=0$. Similarly $bf v^n =0$ for all $n ge 2$, meaning that $exp(varepsilon bf v)x= (1+varepsilon partial_x)x=x+varepsilon$, which is the correct flow.
    $endgroup$
    – Fly by Night
    Mar 14 at 18:16











  • $begingroup$
    And yet, "the derivative with respect to $x$ of the derivative with respect to $x$" is not the zero operator (without projection to first order operators). If $mathbfv = partial_x$, $mathbfv^2 = partial_x^2$, the second derivative with respect to $x$. (... which projects onto the zero vector on the subspace of first order differentials.) But in short, in your expression "$1(partial_x 1) partial_x$", you have made an error: the first $partial_x$ acts on the rest of the expression; you should have "$1 partial_x (1 partial_x) = 1 (1 partial_x^2 + 0 partial_x)$".
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Towers
    Mar 15 at 14:03
















1












$begingroup$


I've got $bf v = x^2partial_x$, and I'm trying to find $exp(varepsilonbf v)$, but I'm having some trouble.



If I define $bf v^n+1 = bf vbf v^n$ then I get a different outcome to $bf v^n+1 = bf v^nbf v$.



For example:



$$bf v^2 = bf vv = (x^2partial_x)(x^2partial_x) = x^2(partial_xx^2)partial_x =
x^2(2x)partial_x = 2x^3partial_x$$



$$bf v^3 = bf vbf v^2 =(x^2partial_x)(2x^3partial_x)=x^2(partial_x2x^3)partial_x = x^2(6x^2)partial_x = 6x^4partial_x$$
$$bf v^3 = bf v^2bf v = (2x^3partial_x)(x^2partial_x) = 2x^3(partial_xx^2)partial_x = 2x^3(2x)partial_x = 4x^4partial_x$$



Using $bf v^n+1 = bf vbf v^n$ gives
$$exp(varepsilon bf v)x = fracx1-varepsilon x$$



While using $bf v^n+1 = bf v^nbf v$ gives
$$exp(varepsilon bf v)x = fracx2(1+mathrm e^2varepsilon x)$$



In both cases, when $varepsilon =0$, we get just $x$, i.e. the identity element. Also, in both cases, we get
$$lim_varepsilon to 0 fracmathrm dmathrm dvarepsilon exp(varepsilon bf v)x = bf v$$



The same $bf v in mathfrak g$ can't possible generate two different flows, can it?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Doesn't it seem odd to you that you are not getting iterates (i.e. nested compositions) of $partial_x$? For instance, if $mathbfv = partial_x$, what should $mathbfv^2$ be?
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Towers
    Mar 14 at 17:37










  • $begingroup$
    If $bf v = partial_x$ then I would say $bf v^2 = (1partial_x)(1partial_x) = 1(partial_x 1)partial_x=0$. Similarly $bf v^n =0$ for all $n ge 2$, meaning that $exp(varepsilon bf v)x= (1+varepsilon partial_x)x=x+varepsilon$, which is the correct flow.
    $endgroup$
    – Fly by Night
    Mar 14 at 18:16











  • $begingroup$
    And yet, "the derivative with respect to $x$ of the derivative with respect to $x$" is not the zero operator (without projection to first order operators). If $mathbfv = partial_x$, $mathbfv^2 = partial_x^2$, the second derivative with respect to $x$. (... which projects onto the zero vector on the subspace of first order differentials.) But in short, in your expression "$1(partial_x 1) partial_x$", you have made an error: the first $partial_x$ acts on the rest of the expression; you should have "$1 partial_x (1 partial_x) = 1 (1 partial_x^2 + 0 partial_x)$".
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Towers
    Mar 15 at 14:03














1












1








1





$begingroup$


I've got $bf v = x^2partial_x$, and I'm trying to find $exp(varepsilonbf v)$, but I'm having some trouble.



If I define $bf v^n+1 = bf vbf v^n$ then I get a different outcome to $bf v^n+1 = bf v^nbf v$.



For example:



$$bf v^2 = bf vv = (x^2partial_x)(x^2partial_x) = x^2(partial_xx^2)partial_x =
x^2(2x)partial_x = 2x^3partial_x$$



$$bf v^3 = bf vbf v^2 =(x^2partial_x)(2x^3partial_x)=x^2(partial_x2x^3)partial_x = x^2(6x^2)partial_x = 6x^4partial_x$$
$$bf v^3 = bf v^2bf v = (2x^3partial_x)(x^2partial_x) = 2x^3(partial_xx^2)partial_x = 2x^3(2x)partial_x = 4x^4partial_x$$



Using $bf v^n+1 = bf vbf v^n$ gives
$$exp(varepsilon bf v)x = fracx1-varepsilon x$$



While using $bf v^n+1 = bf v^nbf v$ gives
$$exp(varepsilon bf v)x = fracx2(1+mathrm e^2varepsilon x)$$



In both cases, when $varepsilon =0$, we get just $x$, i.e. the identity element. Also, in both cases, we get
$$lim_varepsilon to 0 fracmathrm dmathrm dvarepsilon exp(varepsilon bf v)x = bf v$$



The same $bf v in mathfrak g$ can't possible generate two different flows, can it?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I've got $bf v = x^2partial_x$, and I'm trying to find $exp(varepsilonbf v)$, but I'm having some trouble.



If I define $bf v^n+1 = bf vbf v^n$ then I get a different outcome to $bf v^n+1 = bf v^nbf v$.



For example:



$$bf v^2 = bf vv = (x^2partial_x)(x^2partial_x) = x^2(partial_xx^2)partial_x =
x^2(2x)partial_x = 2x^3partial_x$$



$$bf v^3 = bf vbf v^2 =(x^2partial_x)(2x^3partial_x)=x^2(partial_x2x^3)partial_x = x^2(6x^2)partial_x = 6x^4partial_x$$
$$bf v^3 = bf v^2bf v = (2x^3partial_x)(x^2partial_x) = 2x^3(partial_xx^2)partial_x = 2x^3(2x)partial_x = 4x^4partial_x$$



Using $bf v^n+1 = bf vbf v^n$ gives
$$exp(varepsilon bf v)x = fracx1-varepsilon x$$



While using $bf v^n+1 = bf v^nbf v$ gives
$$exp(varepsilon bf v)x = fracx2(1+mathrm e^2varepsilon x)$$



In both cases, when $varepsilon =0$, we get just $x$, i.e. the identity element. Also, in both cases, we get
$$lim_varepsilon to 0 fracmathrm dmathrm dvarepsilon exp(varepsilon bf v)x = bf v$$



The same $bf v in mathfrak g$ can't possible generate two different flows, can it?







lie-groups lie-algebras vector-fields






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Mar 14 at 17:20









Fly by NightFly by Night

26.1k32978




26.1k32978











  • $begingroup$
    Doesn't it seem odd to you that you are not getting iterates (i.e. nested compositions) of $partial_x$? For instance, if $mathbfv = partial_x$, what should $mathbfv^2$ be?
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Towers
    Mar 14 at 17:37










  • $begingroup$
    If $bf v = partial_x$ then I would say $bf v^2 = (1partial_x)(1partial_x) = 1(partial_x 1)partial_x=0$. Similarly $bf v^n =0$ for all $n ge 2$, meaning that $exp(varepsilon bf v)x= (1+varepsilon partial_x)x=x+varepsilon$, which is the correct flow.
    $endgroup$
    – Fly by Night
    Mar 14 at 18:16











  • $begingroup$
    And yet, "the derivative with respect to $x$ of the derivative with respect to $x$" is not the zero operator (without projection to first order operators). If $mathbfv = partial_x$, $mathbfv^2 = partial_x^2$, the second derivative with respect to $x$. (... which projects onto the zero vector on the subspace of first order differentials.) But in short, in your expression "$1(partial_x 1) partial_x$", you have made an error: the first $partial_x$ acts on the rest of the expression; you should have "$1 partial_x (1 partial_x) = 1 (1 partial_x^2 + 0 partial_x)$".
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Towers
    Mar 15 at 14:03

















  • $begingroup$
    Doesn't it seem odd to you that you are not getting iterates (i.e. nested compositions) of $partial_x$? For instance, if $mathbfv = partial_x$, what should $mathbfv^2$ be?
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Towers
    Mar 14 at 17:37










  • $begingroup$
    If $bf v = partial_x$ then I would say $bf v^2 = (1partial_x)(1partial_x) = 1(partial_x 1)partial_x=0$. Similarly $bf v^n =0$ for all $n ge 2$, meaning that $exp(varepsilon bf v)x= (1+varepsilon partial_x)x=x+varepsilon$, which is the correct flow.
    $endgroup$
    – Fly by Night
    Mar 14 at 18:16











  • $begingroup$
    And yet, "the derivative with respect to $x$ of the derivative with respect to $x$" is not the zero operator (without projection to first order operators). If $mathbfv = partial_x$, $mathbfv^2 = partial_x^2$, the second derivative with respect to $x$. (... which projects onto the zero vector on the subspace of first order differentials.) But in short, in your expression "$1(partial_x 1) partial_x$", you have made an error: the first $partial_x$ acts on the rest of the expression; you should have "$1 partial_x (1 partial_x) = 1 (1 partial_x^2 + 0 partial_x)$".
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Towers
    Mar 15 at 14:03
















$begingroup$
Doesn't it seem odd to you that you are not getting iterates (i.e. nested compositions) of $partial_x$? For instance, if $mathbfv = partial_x$, what should $mathbfv^2$ be?
$endgroup$
– Eric Towers
Mar 14 at 17:37




$begingroup$
Doesn't it seem odd to you that you are not getting iterates (i.e. nested compositions) of $partial_x$? For instance, if $mathbfv = partial_x$, what should $mathbfv^2$ be?
$endgroup$
– Eric Towers
Mar 14 at 17:37












$begingroup$
If $bf v = partial_x$ then I would say $bf v^2 = (1partial_x)(1partial_x) = 1(partial_x 1)partial_x=0$. Similarly $bf v^n =0$ for all $n ge 2$, meaning that $exp(varepsilon bf v)x= (1+varepsilon partial_x)x=x+varepsilon$, which is the correct flow.
$endgroup$
– Fly by Night
Mar 14 at 18:16





$begingroup$
If $bf v = partial_x$ then I would say $bf v^2 = (1partial_x)(1partial_x) = 1(partial_x 1)partial_x=0$. Similarly $bf v^n =0$ for all $n ge 2$, meaning that $exp(varepsilon bf v)x= (1+varepsilon partial_x)x=x+varepsilon$, which is the correct flow.
$endgroup$
– Fly by Night
Mar 14 at 18:16













$begingroup$
And yet, "the derivative with respect to $x$ of the derivative with respect to $x$" is not the zero operator (without projection to first order operators). If $mathbfv = partial_x$, $mathbfv^2 = partial_x^2$, the second derivative with respect to $x$. (... which projects onto the zero vector on the subspace of first order differentials.) But in short, in your expression "$1(partial_x 1) partial_x$", you have made an error: the first $partial_x$ acts on the rest of the expression; you should have "$1 partial_x (1 partial_x) = 1 (1 partial_x^2 + 0 partial_x)$".
$endgroup$
– Eric Towers
Mar 15 at 14:03





$begingroup$
And yet, "the derivative with respect to $x$ of the derivative with respect to $x$" is not the zero operator (without projection to first order operators). If $mathbfv = partial_x$, $mathbfv^2 = partial_x^2$, the second derivative with respect to $x$. (... which projects onto the zero vector on the subspace of first order differentials.) But in short, in your expression "$1(partial_x 1) partial_x$", you have made an error: the first $partial_x$ acts on the rest of the expression; you should have "$1 partial_x (1 partial_x) = 1 (1 partial_x^2 + 0 partial_x)$".
$endgroup$
– Eric Towers
Mar 15 at 14:03











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

If you apply the product rule carefully, you don't get two different answers. In your example, beginalign*
mathbfv(f(x)) &= (x^2 partial_x)(f(x)) \
&= x^2 f'(x) text, and \
mathbfv^2(f(x)) &= (x^2 partial_x)left( (x^2 partial_x)(f(x)) right) \
&= (x^2 partial_x)left( x^2 f'(x) right) \
&= x^2(2x f'(x) + x^2 f''(x) ) text, or \
mathbfv^2(f(x)) &= left((x^2 partial_x) (x^2 partial_x) right) (f(x)) \
&= (x^2(2x partial_x + x^2 partial_x^2))(f(x)) \
&= x^2(2x f'(x) + x^2 f''(x) )
endalign*

so we see $mathbfv^2 = 2x^3 partial_x + x^4 partial_x^2$. Similarly, $mathbfv^3 = 6 x^4 partial_x + 6 x^5 partial_x^2 + x^6 partial_x^3$.



(Of course, if we're linearizing, we project onto the first term in both of those.)






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the reply. Am I right to think that $bf v$ is best understood by its action on a function, i.e. $bf v(f)$, and so "multiplying on the right" doesn't make sense. $bf v[bf v(f)]$ is fine, while $[bf v(f)]bf v$ doesn't make sense because it's not a function. Hence $bf v^n+1 = bf vbf v^n$ is the only way to go?
    $endgroup$
    – Fly by Night
    Mar 14 at 18:22











  • $begingroup$
    @FlybyNight : $[mathbfv(f)]mathbfv$ is an operator as much as $x^2 partial_x$ is since $mathbfv(f)$ is some function and the $mathbfv$ on the right still has an open slot to consume a function. Note that I showed both $mathbfv(mathbfv(f))$ and $(mathbfv(mathbfv))(f)$ above, so both "wrap another $mathbfv$ on the left" ($mathbfv (mathbfv^n(f))$) and "let $mathbfv^n$ act on $mathbfv(f)$" ($mathbfv^n (mathbfv(f))$), arriving at the same result both ways.
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Towers
    Mar 15 at 13:57











  • $begingroup$
    But $bf v(f)bf v$ isn't a function, while $bf vv(f)$ is. That's what I meant.
    $endgroup$
    – Fly by Night
    Mar 16 at 18:22


















1












$begingroup$

You are looking at the simplest Lie advective flow in perturbation theory (as applied in physics: QFT) and the workhorse example in the 19th century book of Georg Sheffer cited.



v generates a shift operator, and it pays to define suitable canonical coordinates,
$$
y=-1/x, qquad Longrightarrow qquad x^2 partial_x=partial_y ,
$$

so that you are shifting y by $epsilon$,
$$
e^epsilon partial_y ~~f(y)= f(y+epsilon),
$$

which reads
$$
e^epsilon x^2partial_x ~~g(x)= gleft(frac-1y+epsilonright )=gleft (fracx1-epsilon xright ),
$$

a standard formula in the RG advection of QFT.



Your difficulties are traceable to your refusal to perform your Heaviside calculus manipulations of functions of differential operators with a "test-function" f(x) on the right, which keeps track of the proper chain rule action of noncommuting derivative operators.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    0












    $begingroup$

    The action of a vector field as a derivation on the space of functions means that it only makes sense to multiply on the left because $bf v(f)$ is a function and so $bf v[bf v(f)]$ is also a function, while $[bf v(f)]bf v$ is a function times a vector field, i.e. a vector field.



    The differential operator $bf v = x^2partial_x$ is best understood as differentiate with respect to $x$, and then multiply by $x^2$.



    Applied to $x$, we get $x mapsto 1 mapsto x^2$, meaning $bf v(x) = x^2$.



    Applied to $x^2$, we get $x^2 mapsto 2x mapsto 2x^3$, meaning $bf v^2(x) = 2x^3$.



    Applied to $2x^3$, we get $2x^3 mapsto 6x^2 mapsto 6x^4$, meaning $bf v^3(x) = 6x^4$.



    In general, $bf v^n(x) = n!x^n+1$, and so for all $|varepsilon x|<1$
    begineqnarray*
    sum_n ge 0 fracvarepsilon^nn!bf v^n(x) &=& sum_n ge 0 fracvarepsilon^nn!n!x^n+1 \ \
    &=& xsum_n ge 0 (varepsilon x)^n \ \
    &=& fracx1-varepsilon x
    endeqnarray*






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3148273%2fvector-field-exponential-map%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1












      $begingroup$

      If you apply the product rule carefully, you don't get two different answers. In your example, beginalign*
      mathbfv(f(x)) &= (x^2 partial_x)(f(x)) \
      &= x^2 f'(x) text, and \
      mathbfv^2(f(x)) &= (x^2 partial_x)left( (x^2 partial_x)(f(x)) right) \
      &= (x^2 partial_x)left( x^2 f'(x) right) \
      &= x^2(2x f'(x) + x^2 f''(x) ) text, or \
      mathbfv^2(f(x)) &= left((x^2 partial_x) (x^2 partial_x) right) (f(x)) \
      &= (x^2(2x partial_x + x^2 partial_x^2))(f(x)) \
      &= x^2(2x f'(x) + x^2 f''(x) )
      endalign*

      so we see $mathbfv^2 = 2x^3 partial_x + x^4 partial_x^2$. Similarly, $mathbfv^3 = 6 x^4 partial_x + 6 x^5 partial_x^2 + x^6 partial_x^3$.



      (Of course, if we're linearizing, we project onto the first term in both of those.)






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        Thanks for the reply. Am I right to think that $bf v$ is best understood by its action on a function, i.e. $bf v(f)$, and so "multiplying on the right" doesn't make sense. $bf v[bf v(f)]$ is fine, while $[bf v(f)]bf v$ doesn't make sense because it's not a function. Hence $bf v^n+1 = bf vbf v^n$ is the only way to go?
        $endgroup$
        – Fly by Night
        Mar 14 at 18:22











      • $begingroup$
        @FlybyNight : $[mathbfv(f)]mathbfv$ is an operator as much as $x^2 partial_x$ is since $mathbfv(f)$ is some function and the $mathbfv$ on the right still has an open slot to consume a function. Note that I showed both $mathbfv(mathbfv(f))$ and $(mathbfv(mathbfv))(f)$ above, so both "wrap another $mathbfv$ on the left" ($mathbfv (mathbfv^n(f))$) and "let $mathbfv^n$ act on $mathbfv(f)$" ($mathbfv^n (mathbfv(f))$), arriving at the same result both ways.
        $endgroup$
        – Eric Towers
        Mar 15 at 13:57











      • $begingroup$
        But $bf v(f)bf v$ isn't a function, while $bf vv(f)$ is. That's what I meant.
        $endgroup$
        – Fly by Night
        Mar 16 at 18:22















      1












      $begingroup$

      If you apply the product rule carefully, you don't get two different answers. In your example, beginalign*
      mathbfv(f(x)) &= (x^2 partial_x)(f(x)) \
      &= x^2 f'(x) text, and \
      mathbfv^2(f(x)) &= (x^2 partial_x)left( (x^2 partial_x)(f(x)) right) \
      &= (x^2 partial_x)left( x^2 f'(x) right) \
      &= x^2(2x f'(x) + x^2 f''(x) ) text, or \
      mathbfv^2(f(x)) &= left((x^2 partial_x) (x^2 partial_x) right) (f(x)) \
      &= (x^2(2x partial_x + x^2 partial_x^2))(f(x)) \
      &= x^2(2x f'(x) + x^2 f''(x) )
      endalign*

      so we see $mathbfv^2 = 2x^3 partial_x + x^4 partial_x^2$. Similarly, $mathbfv^3 = 6 x^4 partial_x + 6 x^5 partial_x^2 + x^6 partial_x^3$.



      (Of course, if we're linearizing, we project onto the first term in both of those.)






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        Thanks for the reply. Am I right to think that $bf v$ is best understood by its action on a function, i.e. $bf v(f)$, and so "multiplying on the right" doesn't make sense. $bf v[bf v(f)]$ is fine, while $[bf v(f)]bf v$ doesn't make sense because it's not a function. Hence $bf v^n+1 = bf vbf v^n$ is the only way to go?
        $endgroup$
        – Fly by Night
        Mar 14 at 18:22











      • $begingroup$
        @FlybyNight : $[mathbfv(f)]mathbfv$ is an operator as much as $x^2 partial_x$ is since $mathbfv(f)$ is some function and the $mathbfv$ on the right still has an open slot to consume a function. Note that I showed both $mathbfv(mathbfv(f))$ and $(mathbfv(mathbfv))(f)$ above, so both "wrap another $mathbfv$ on the left" ($mathbfv (mathbfv^n(f))$) and "let $mathbfv^n$ act on $mathbfv(f)$" ($mathbfv^n (mathbfv(f))$), arriving at the same result both ways.
        $endgroup$
        – Eric Towers
        Mar 15 at 13:57











      • $begingroup$
        But $bf v(f)bf v$ isn't a function, while $bf vv(f)$ is. That's what I meant.
        $endgroup$
        – Fly by Night
        Mar 16 at 18:22













      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$

      If you apply the product rule carefully, you don't get two different answers. In your example, beginalign*
      mathbfv(f(x)) &= (x^2 partial_x)(f(x)) \
      &= x^2 f'(x) text, and \
      mathbfv^2(f(x)) &= (x^2 partial_x)left( (x^2 partial_x)(f(x)) right) \
      &= (x^2 partial_x)left( x^2 f'(x) right) \
      &= x^2(2x f'(x) + x^2 f''(x) ) text, or \
      mathbfv^2(f(x)) &= left((x^2 partial_x) (x^2 partial_x) right) (f(x)) \
      &= (x^2(2x partial_x + x^2 partial_x^2))(f(x)) \
      &= x^2(2x f'(x) + x^2 f''(x) )
      endalign*

      so we see $mathbfv^2 = 2x^3 partial_x + x^4 partial_x^2$. Similarly, $mathbfv^3 = 6 x^4 partial_x + 6 x^5 partial_x^2 + x^6 partial_x^3$.



      (Of course, if we're linearizing, we project onto the first term in both of those.)






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



      If you apply the product rule carefully, you don't get two different answers. In your example, beginalign*
      mathbfv(f(x)) &= (x^2 partial_x)(f(x)) \
      &= x^2 f'(x) text, and \
      mathbfv^2(f(x)) &= (x^2 partial_x)left( (x^2 partial_x)(f(x)) right) \
      &= (x^2 partial_x)left( x^2 f'(x) right) \
      &= x^2(2x f'(x) + x^2 f''(x) ) text, or \
      mathbfv^2(f(x)) &= left((x^2 partial_x) (x^2 partial_x) right) (f(x)) \
      &= (x^2(2x partial_x + x^2 partial_x^2))(f(x)) \
      &= x^2(2x f'(x) + x^2 f''(x) )
      endalign*

      so we see $mathbfv^2 = 2x^3 partial_x + x^4 partial_x^2$. Similarly, $mathbfv^3 = 6 x^4 partial_x + 6 x^5 partial_x^2 + x^6 partial_x^3$.



      (Of course, if we're linearizing, we project onto the first term in both of those.)







      share|cite|improve this answer












      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer










      answered Mar 14 at 17:56









      Eric TowersEric Towers

      32.9k22370




      32.9k22370











      • $begingroup$
        Thanks for the reply. Am I right to think that $bf v$ is best understood by its action on a function, i.e. $bf v(f)$, and so "multiplying on the right" doesn't make sense. $bf v[bf v(f)]$ is fine, while $[bf v(f)]bf v$ doesn't make sense because it's not a function. Hence $bf v^n+1 = bf vbf v^n$ is the only way to go?
        $endgroup$
        – Fly by Night
        Mar 14 at 18:22











      • $begingroup$
        @FlybyNight : $[mathbfv(f)]mathbfv$ is an operator as much as $x^2 partial_x$ is since $mathbfv(f)$ is some function and the $mathbfv$ on the right still has an open slot to consume a function. Note that I showed both $mathbfv(mathbfv(f))$ and $(mathbfv(mathbfv))(f)$ above, so both "wrap another $mathbfv$ on the left" ($mathbfv (mathbfv^n(f))$) and "let $mathbfv^n$ act on $mathbfv(f)$" ($mathbfv^n (mathbfv(f))$), arriving at the same result both ways.
        $endgroup$
        – Eric Towers
        Mar 15 at 13:57











      • $begingroup$
        But $bf v(f)bf v$ isn't a function, while $bf vv(f)$ is. That's what I meant.
        $endgroup$
        – Fly by Night
        Mar 16 at 18:22
















      • $begingroup$
        Thanks for the reply. Am I right to think that $bf v$ is best understood by its action on a function, i.e. $bf v(f)$, and so "multiplying on the right" doesn't make sense. $bf v[bf v(f)]$ is fine, while $[bf v(f)]bf v$ doesn't make sense because it's not a function. Hence $bf v^n+1 = bf vbf v^n$ is the only way to go?
        $endgroup$
        – Fly by Night
        Mar 14 at 18:22











      • $begingroup$
        @FlybyNight : $[mathbfv(f)]mathbfv$ is an operator as much as $x^2 partial_x$ is since $mathbfv(f)$ is some function and the $mathbfv$ on the right still has an open slot to consume a function. Note that I showed both $mathbfv(mathbfv(f))$ and $(mathbfv(mathbfv))(f)$ above, so both "wrap another $mathbfv$ on the left" ($mathbfv (mathbfv^n(f))$) and "let $mathbfv^n$ act on $mathbfv(f)$" ($mathbfv^n (mathbfv(f))$), arriving at the same result both ways.
        $endgroup$
        – Eric Towers
        Mar 15 at 13:57











      • $begingroup$
        But $bf v(f)bf v$ isn't a function, while $bf vv(f)$ is. That's what I meant.
        $endgroup$
        – Fly by Night
        Mar 16 at 18:22















      $begingroup$
      Thanks for the reply. Am I right to think that $bf v$ is best understood by its action on a function, i.e. $bf v(f)$, and so "multiplying on the right" doesn't make sense. $bf v[bf v(f)]$ is fine, while $[bf v(f)]bf v$ doesn't make sense because it's not a function. Hence $bf v^n+1 = bf vbf v^n$ is the only way to go?
      $endgroup$
      – Fly by Night
      Mar 14 at 18:22





      $begingroup$
      Thanks for the reply. Am I right to think that $bf v$ is best understood by its action on a function, i.e. $bf v(f)$, and so "multiplying on the right" doesn't make sense. $bf v[bf v(f)]$ is fine, while $[bf v(f)]bf v$ doesn't make sense because it's not a function. Hence $bf v^n+1 = bf vbf v^n$ is the only way to go?
      $endgroup$
      – Fly by Night
      Mar 14 at 18:22













      $begingroup$
      @FlybyNight : $[mathbfv(f)]mathbfv$ is an operator as much as $x^2 partial_x$ is since $mathbfv(f)$ is some function and the $mathbfv$ on the right still has an open slot to consume a function. Note that I showed both $mathbfv(mathbfv(f))$ and $(mathbfv(mathbfv))(f)$ above, so both "wrap another $mathbfv$ on the left" ($mathbfv (mathbfv^n(f))$) and "let $mathbfv^n$ act on $mathbfv(f)$" ($mathbfv^n (mathbfv(f))$), arriving at the same result both ways.
      $endgroup$
      – Eric Towers
      Mar 15 at 13:57





      $begingroup$
      @FlybyNight : $[mathbfv(f)]mathbfv$ is an operator as much as $x^2 partial_x$ is since $mathbfv(f)$ is some function and the $mathbfv$ on the right still has an open slot to consume a function. Note that I showed both $mathbfv(mathbfv(f))$ and $(mathbfv(mathbfv))(f)$ above, so both "wrap another $mathbfv$ on the left" ($mathbfv (mathbfv^n(f))$) and "let $mathbfv^n$ act on $mathbfv(f)$" ($mathbfv^n (mathbfv(f))$), arriving at the same result both ways.
      $endgroup$
      – Eric Towers
      Mar 15 at 13:57













      $begingroup$
      But $bf v(f)bf v$ isn't a function, while $bf vv(f)$ is. That's what I meant.
      $endgroup$
      – Fly by Night
      Mar 16 at 18:22




      $begingroup$
      But $bf v(f)bf v$ isn't a function, while $bf vv(f)$ is. That's what I meant.
      $endgroup$
      – Fly by Night
      Mar 16 at 18:22











      1












      $begingroup$

      You are looking at the simplest Lie advective flow in perturbation theory (as applied in physics: QFT) and the workhorse example in the 19th century book of Georg Sheffer cited.



      v generates a shift operator, and it pays to define suitable canonical coordinates,
      $$
      y=-1/x, qquad Longrightarrow qquad x^2 partial_x=partial_y ,
      $$

      so that you are shifting y by $epsilon$,
      $$
      e^epsilon partial_y ~~f(y)= f(y+epsilon),
      $$

      which reads
      $$
      e^epsilon x^2partial_x ~~g(x)= gleft(frac-1y+epsilonright )=gleft (fracx1-epsilon xright ),
      $$

      a standard formula in the RG advection of QFT.



      Your difficulties are traceable to your refusal to perform your Heaviside calculus manipulations of functions of differential operators with a "test-function" f(x) on the right, which keeps track of the proper chain rule action of noncommuting derivative operators.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$

















        1












        $begingroup$

        You are looking at the simplest Lie advective flow in perturbation theory (as applied in physics: QFT) and the workhorse example in the 19th century book of Georg Sheffer cited.



        v generates a shift operator, and it pays to define suitable canonical coordinates,
        $$
        y=-1/x, qquad Longrightarrow qquad x^2 partial_x=partial_y ,
        $$

        so that you are shifting y by $epsilon$,
        $$
        e^epsilon partial_y ~~f(y)= f(y+epsilon),
        $$

        which reads
        $$
        e^epsilon x^2partial_x ~~g(x)= gleft(frac-1y+epsilonright )=gleft (fracx1-epsilon xright ),
        $$

        a standard formula in the RG advection of QFT.



        Your difficulties are traceable to your refusal to perform your Heaviside calculus manipulations of functions of differential operators with a "test-function" f(x) on the right, which keeps track of the proper chain rule action of noncommuting derivative operators.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          You are looking at the simplest Lie advective flow in perturbation theory (as applied in physics: QFT) and the workhorse example in the 19th century book of Georg Sheffer cited.



          v generates a shift operator, and it pays to define suitable canonical coordinates,
          $$
          y=-1/x, qquad Longrightarrow qquad x^2 partial_x=partial_y ,
          $$

          so that you are shifting y by $epsilon$,
          $$
          e^epsilon partial_y ~~f(y)= f(y+epsilon),
          $$

          which reads
          $$
          e^epsilon x^2partial_x ~~g(x)= gleft(frac-1y+epsilonright )=gleft (fracx1-epsilon xright ),
          $$

          a standard formula in the RG advection of QFT.



          Your difficulties are traceable to your refusal to perform your Heaviside calculus manipulations of functions of differential operators with a "test-function" f(x) on the right, which keeps track of the proper chain rule action of noncommuting derivative operators.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          You are looking at the simplest Lie advective flow in perturbation theory (as applied in physics: QFT) and the workhorse example in the 19th century book of Georg Sheffer cited.



          v generates a shift operator, and it pays to define suitable canonical coordinates,
          $$
          y=-1/x, qquad Longrightarrow qquad x^2 partial_x=partial_y ,
          $$

          so that you are shifting y by $epsilon$,
          $$
          e^epsilon partial_y ~~f(y)= f(y+epsilon),
          $$

          which reads
          $$
          e^epsilon x^2partial_x ~~g(x)= gleft(frac-1y+epsilonright )=gleft (fracx1-epsilon xright ),
          $$

          a standard formula in the RG advection of QFT.



          Your difficulties are traceable to your refusal to perform your Heaviside calculus manipulations of functions of differential operators with a "test-function" f(x) on the right, which keeps track of the proper chain rule action of noncommuting derivative operators.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Mar 16 at 2:51

























          answered Mar 15 at 16:59









          Cosmas ZachosCosmas Zachos

          1,810522




          1,810522





















              0












              $begingroup$

              The action of a vector field as a derivation on the space of functions means that it only makes sense to multiply on the left because $bf v(f)$ is a function and so $bf v[bf v(f)]$ is also a function, while $[bf v(f)]bf v$ is a function times a vector field, i.e. a vector field.



              The differential operator $bf v = x^2partial_x$ is best understood as differentiate with respect to $x$, and then multiply by $x^2$.



              Applied to $x$, we get $x mapsto 1 mapsto x^2$, meaning $bf v(x) = x^2$.



              Applied to $x^2$, we get $x^2 mapsto 2x mapsto 2x^3$, meaning $bf v^2(x) = 2x^3$.



              Applied to $2x^3$, we get $2x^3 mapsto 6x^2 mapsto 6x^4$, meaning $bf v^3(x) = 6x^4$.



              In general, $bf v^n(x) = n!x^n+1$, and so for all $|varepsilon x|<1$
              begineqnarray*
              sum_n ge 0 fracvarepsilon^nn!bf v^n(x) &=& sum_n ge 0 fracvarepsilon^nn!n!x^n+1 \ \
              &=& xsum_n ge 0 (varepsilon x)^n \ \
              &=& fracx1-varepsilon x
              endeqnarray*






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$

















                0












                $begingroup$

                The action of a vector field as a derivation on the space of functions means that it only makes sense to multiply on the left because $bf v(f)$ is a function and so $bf v[bf v(f)]$ is also a function, while $[bf v(f)]bf v$ is a function times a vector field, i.e. a vector field.



                The differential operator $bf v = x^2partial_x$ is best understood as differentiate with respect to $x$, and then multiply by $x^2$.



                Applied to $x$, we get $x mapsto 1 mapsto x^2$, meaning $bf v(x) = x^2$.



                Applied to $x^2$, we get $x^2 mapsto 2x mapsto 2x^3$, meaning $bf v^2(x) = 2x^3$.



                Applied to $2x^3$, we get $2x^3 mapsto 6x^2 mapsto 6x^4$, meaning $bf v^3(x) = 6x^4$.



                In general, $bf v^n(x) = n!x^n+1$, and so for all $|varepsilon x|<1$
                begineqnarray*
                sum_n ge 0 fracvarepsilon^nn!bf v^n(x) &=& sum_n ge 0 fracvarepsilon^nn!n!x^n+1 \ \
                &=& xsum_n ge 0 (varepsilon x)^n \ \
                &=& fracx1-varepsilon x
                endeqnarray*






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  The action of a vector field as a derivation on the space of functions means that it only makes sense to multiply on the left because $bf v(f)$ is a function and so $bf v[bf v(f)]$ is also a function, while $[bf v(f)]bf v$ is a function times a vector field, i.e. a vector field.



                  The differential operator $bf v = x^2partial_x$ is best understood as differentiate with respect to $x$, and then multiply by $x^2$.



                  Applied to $x$, we get $x mapsto 1 mapsto x^2$, meaning $bf v(x) = x^2$.



                  Applied to $x^2$, we get $x^2 mapsto 2x mapsto 2x^3$, meaning $bf v^2(x) = 2x^3$.



                  Applied to $2x^3$, we get $2x^3 mapsto 6x^2 mapsto 6x^4$, meaning $bf v^3(x) = 6x^4$.



                  In general, $bf v^n(x) = n!x^n+1$, and so for all $|varepsilon x|<1$
                  begineqnarray*
                  sum_n ge 0 fracvarepsilon^nn!bf v^n(x) &=& sum_n ge 0 fracvarepsilon^nn!n!x^n+1 \ \
                  &=& xsum_n ge 0 (varepsilon x)^n \ \
                  &=& fracx1-varepsilon x
                  endeqnarray*






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  The action of a vector field as a derivation on the space of functions means that it only makes sense to multiply on the left because $bf v(f)$ is a function and so $bf v[bf v(f)]$ is also a function, while $[bf v(f)]bf v$ is a function times a vector field, i.e. a vector field.



                  The differential operator $bf v = x^2partial_x$ is best understood as differentiate with respect to $x$, and then multiply by $x^2$.



                  Applied to $x$, we get $x mapsto 1 mapsto x^2$, meaning $bf v(x) = x^2$.



                  Applied to $x^2$, we get $x^2 mapsto 2x mapsto 2x^3$, meaning $bf v^2(x) = 2x^3$.



                  Applied to $2x^3$, we get $2x^3 mapsto 6x^2 mapsto 6x^4$, meaning $bf v^3(x) = 6x^4$.



                  In general, $bf v^n(x) = n!x^n+1$, and so for all $|varepsilon x|<1$
                  begineqnarray*
                  sum_n ge 0 fracvarepsilon^nn!bf v^n(x) &=& sum_n ge 0 fracvarepsilon^nn!n!x^n+1 \ \
                  &=& xsum_n ge 0 (varepsilon x)^n \ \
                  &=& fracx1-varepsilon x
                  endeqnarray*







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Mar 17 at 1:40

























                  answered Mar 16 at 19:05









                  Fly by NightFly by Night

                  26.1k32978




                  26.1k32978



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3148273%2fvector-field-exponential-map%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

                      random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

                      Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye